Printer Friendly

Lymph Drainage of Posttraumatic Edema of Lower Limbs.

1. Introduction

Traumatic injuries can affect all systems. Traumatic injuries of the musculoskeletal system are classified as direct or indirect, ranging from grazing, abrasions, lacerations, ruptures, crushing, and avulsions to complex tissue failure and fractures of various types. Etiological factors are diverse and include automobile accidents, sports accidents, explosions, burns, and injuries by firearms or sharp instruments, among others [1].

Mechanical injuries of soft or bony parts are usually followed by chronic edema, both at the site of the trauma and distally to it. This complication affects almost all patients with fractures of the lower limbs, whether they are submitted to surgery or not. The so-called "posttraumatic edema" may originate from lymphatic obstruction, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), or hyperactivity of growth factors and cytokines at the trauma site [2].

Erysipelas is an infectious cutaneous process caused by a bacterium that spreads through lymphatic vessels. The port of entry may be a skin injury due to trauma, ulcers, or, more commonly, interdigital mycosis, popularly known as "athlete's foot" [3]. The affected area presents erythema, edema, hyperthermia, and pain, and as systemic symptomatology, the patient may present with chills, high fever, asthenia, headache, nausea, and vomiting. Erysipelas is considered an important complication in both edema and trauma cases [3,4].

Edema of the limb favors erysipelas infections due to insufficient venous and lymphatic circulation, while erysipelas becomes an aggravating factor for lymphedema as a consequence of relapsing outbreaks [5].

One of the ways of treating posttraumatic lymphedema is lymph drainage, and in recent years, new techniques of manual and mechanical lymph drainage have been developed by Godoy and Godoy [6,7].

In relation to the technique, Godoy and Godoy developed a new technique to stimulate the lymphatic system which was recently named manual lymphatic therapy (MLT), the therapy using linear movements which manually displace the lymph along the anatomic path of the lymphatic vessels. The Godoy and Godoy technique was developed based on the normal anatomy and on physiology and pathophysiological processes and adapted for each type of lymphedema. MLT obeys the concepts of the hydrodynamic principles needed to drain collectors [6]. Mechanical lymph drainage has the potential to drain both the superficial and deep lymphatic chains and uses an electromechanical device, RAGodoy[R], that performs continuous passive flexion and extension of the ankle [8,9].

The present study was aimed at evaluating the use of mechanical and manual lymphatic therapy as a treatment for lymphedema due to orthopedic surgery that became painful after an episode of erysipelas.

2. Case Report

A 70-year-old male patient suffered direct trauma resulting in a compound fracture of the tibia and fibula of the left leg. He was treated with an external fixator for four months followed by plaster cast immobilization for three weeks. After removal of the cast, he presented edema and was referred for physiotherapy where he performed five sessions of manual lymph drainage and six sessions of hydrotherapy without resolving the condition. The patient presented with fever and paresthesia of the left leg. A physical examination identified interdigital mycosis between the toes of the left foot, and the medical diagnosis was erysipelas.

After treating erysipelas, the patient presented hypersensitivity, pain, and worsening of the edema. The patient was referred for clinical treatment. The method proposed included manual lymph drainage (Godoy and Godoy technique) [6,7], the technique using linear movements which manually displace the lymph along the anatomic path of the lymphatic vessels. The Godoy and Godoy technique was developed based on the normal anatomy and on physiology and pathophysiological processes and adapted for each type of lymphedema and obeys the concepts of the hydrodynamic principles needed to drain collectors, and a mechanical lymph drainage (RAGodoy device), an apparatus that performs plantar flexion and dorsiflexion exercises, was utilized to dynamically evaluate venous pressure variations during passive exercising, for two hours per day for ten consecutive days [8,9]. Water displacement volumetry was used to quantify the leg size reduction. Before starting treatment, the difference between the edematous leg and the contralateral limb was 567 mL.

After the first session, the patient had less hypersensitivity with the pain improving. Treatment reduced the affected leg by about 497 mL, that is, 87% of the excess volume. Moreover, there was a reduction of 129 mL of the normal leg volume. The initial (pretreatment) and final (after ten treatment sessions) volumes of both legs are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of FAMERP (#20445-11/05/2012).

3. Discussion

The present study reports the case of a patient who suffered a compound fracture, with edema and erysipelas developing as complicating factors. The choice of treatment was manual lymph drainage (Godoy and Godoy method) [6,7] and mechanical lymph drainage (RAGodoy), a method developed for the treatment of edema due to impairment of the lymphatic system [8, 9].

Mechanical lymph drainage was chosen because there is involvement of both the superficial and deep lymphatic systems after trauma, and the RAGodoy equipment performs lymph drainage of both systems [8,9].

Studies have shown that 10.5% of patients with edema due to traumatic injuries presented lymphatic lesions confirmed by lymphoscintigraphy examination, 23.6% presented edema as a consequence of deep venous thrombosis, and 65.9% of patients presented edema related to inflammations. The increase in lymphatic flow in the latter cases can be explained by changes in capillary permeability due to the inflammatory process [2].

The use of RAGodoy during postsurgical hospitalization may be useful as an auxiliary therapy to prevent cases of DVT, as it passively performs flexion and extension movements of the ankle, promoting the activation of the calf muscle pump [8,9]. The use of this device when DVT already exists is contraindicated.

Erysipelas, pain, and increased sensitivity are not exclusion criteria for the use of the equipment to treat lymphedema; in the current case, the patient benefited from improved pain and decreased hypersensitivity.

The association of mechanical lymphatic therapy with manual lymphatic therapy is important as manual lymph drainage can help reduce edema at the trauma site more specifically than mechanical lymph drainage.

4. Conclusion

Mechanical lymph drainage (RAGodoy) associated with manual lymph drainage was effective to reduce edema and pain in lymphedema resulting from a traumatic injury and aggravated by erysipelas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


[1] S. Montmany, S. Navarro, P. Rebasa, J. Hermoso, J. M. Hidalgo, and G. Canovas, "A prospective study on the incidence of missed injuries in trauma patients," Cirugia Espanola, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 32-36, 2008.

[2] G. Szczesny, W. L. Olszewski, and J. Deszczynski, "Post-traumatic lymphatic and venous drainage changes in persistent edema of lower extremities," Chirurgia Narzadow Ruchu i Ortopedia Polska, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 315-325, 2000.

[3] J. M. Pereira de Godoy, L. M. Azoubel, and F. Guerreiro Godoy Mde, "Erysipelas and lymphangitis in patients undergoing lymphedema treatment after breast-cancer therapy," Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 63-65, 2009.

[4] J. M. P. Godoy and H. S. Silva, "Prevalence of cellulitis and erysipelas in post-mastectomy patients after breast cancer," Archives of Medical Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 249-251, 2007.

[5] R. J. Damstra, M. A. van Steensel, J. H. Boomsma, P. Nelemans, and J. C. J. M. Veraart, "Erysipelas as a sign of subclinical primary lymphoedema: a prospective quantitative scintigraphic study of 40 patients with unilateral erysipelas of the leg," British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 1210-1215, 2008.

[6] J. M. P. de Godoy and F. de Fatima Guerreiro de Godoy, "Godoy & Godoy technique in the treatment of lymphedema for under-privileged populations," International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 68-71, 2010.

[7] J. M. De Godoy, K. R. Santana, and F. Godoy Mde, "Lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of manual lymphatic therapy: the Godoy & Godoy technique," Phlebology: Journal of Venous Disease, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 39-44, 2015.

[8] J. M. de Godoy and F. Godoy Mde, "Development and evaluation of a new apparatus for lymph drainage: preliminary results," Lymphology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 62-64, 2004.

[9] J. M. P. de Godoy, F. de Faatima Guerreiro de Godoy, F. Batigaalia, and M. I. G. Xavier, "Dynamic evaluation of the venous pressure during passive plantar flexion and dorsiflexion exercises with the RAGodoy[R] apparatus," IJPMR, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 6-7, 2008.

Ana Carolina Pereira de Godoy, (1) Rodrigo Ocampos Troitino, (2) Maria de Fatima Guerreiro Godoy [ID], (3) and Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy [ID] (4)

(1) Department of Santa Casa de Sao Paulo and Research Group of Clinica Godoy, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

(2) ABC Medicine School, Santo Andre and Research Group of Clinica Godoy, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

(3) Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP) and Research Group of Clinica Godoy, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

(4) Cardiovascular Surgery Department, The Medicine School in Sao Jose do Rio Preto (FAMERP) and CNPq (National Council for Research and Development), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy;

Received 2 September 2017; Revised 19 November 2017; Accepted 14 December 2017; Published 5 March 2018

Academic Editor: Christian W. Muller

Caption: Figure 1: Leg volumes before and after treatment.
Table 1: Volumetric values (in mL) at the start (pretreatment) and end
of treatment (after 2 hours daily for 10 days).

            Initial volume    Final volume    Difference
                 (mL)             (mL)           (mL)

Left leg         3316             2819            497
Right leg        2749             2626            123
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Case Report
Author:de Godoy, Ana Carolina Pereira; Troitino, Rodrigo Ocampos; Godoy, Maria de Fatima Guerreiro; de Godo
Publication:Case Reports in Orthopedics
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Multiple Tophaceous Gout of Hand with Extensor Tendon Rupture.
Next Article:Traumatic Obturator Hip Dislocation with Marginal Femoral Head Fracture in a 15-Year-Old Adolescent: A High-Energy Trauma--A Case Report and a Review...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters