Printer Friendly

Lost voices: Vergil, 'Aeneid' 12.718-19.

pavidi cessere magistri,

stat pecus omne metu mutum, mussantque iuvencae

quis nemori imperitet, quem tota armenta sequantur;

Vergil, Aen. 12.717-19

Here, in the middle of the well-known simile that depicts Aeneas and Turnus as bulls fighting for territory and a herd (12.715-22), Vergil registers the reactions of the onlookers. Commentators and lexicographers disagree about what the heifers are doing, interpreting 'mussant' in different ways. Servius (followed by Conington-Nettleship) glosses the verb as 'dubitant'. By contrast, Heyne offers the paraphrase 'anxii expectant', responding to the theme of fear in the two preceding cola: cf. 'pavidi' and 'metu'. Forbiger's explanatory 'tacite expectant' stresses rather the note of silence introduced by 'stat pecus omne metu mutum'. Lewis and Short (s.v., II) and Georges (s.v., II2) concur with Forbiger when they translate 'mussant' 'expect in silence' and 'stumm harren'. Other authorities, however, underscore the verb's onomatopoeic sense. Julius Caesar Scaliger, for example, observes of Vergil's usage: 'sane verbum factitium, neque absonum a boum voce'.(1) Accordingly, some older commentators interpret 'mussant' as a restrained form of 'mugiunt'.(2) More recently, the OLD (s.v., 3a) and TLL (s.v., II2b [8.2.1709.26-32]) cite Aen. 12.718 under the definitions 'mutter in indecision' and 'mussantem (i.e. murmurantem) dubitare'. Although there is general agreement that 'mussant' (followed by indirect deliberative questions) connotes uncertainty, there still remains the problem of whether it indicates silence, faint lowing, or muttering. The purpose of this note is to call attention to an unrecognized etymological wordplay in line 718 ('stat pecus omne metu mutum, mussantque invencae') which helps explain what the heifers are doing and why there are varying interpretations of 'mussant'.

In line 718 the soundplay of 'metu mutum, mussantque iuvencae' has received notice, but the etymological connection between the similar sounding 'mutum' and 'mussant' has not. While caution is advised against reading too much into simple paronomasia, there are other reasons to believe that Vergil is etymologizing. First, the parallelism of 'stat pecus omne metu mutum' and 'mussantque iuvencae' (identified by Henry as theme and variation) encourages the reader to see an etymological link between 'mutum' and 'mussant'.(3) Second, the juxtaposition of similar sounding words is a typical feature of figura etymologica and etymologizing in Roman poetry.(4) Finally, confirmation of the etymological intent of Vergil's wordplay may be found in Varro's De Lingua Latina:

apud Ennium (fr. trag. 393 R) 'vocibus concide [dagger] facimus et obrutus.' mussare dictum quod muti non amplius quam MU dicunt; a quo idem (sc. Ennius) dicit id quod minimum est (inc. 10 V): 'neque, ut aiunt,

[GREEK TEXT OMITTED] facere audent.' (Varro, De Lingua Latina 7.101 G-S)

Here Varro clarifies the meaning of an Ennian example of musso, unfortunately lost to textual corruption.(5) He does so by relating musso to the adjective mutus and deriving both onomatopoeically from mu, the sound of muttering in both Greek and Latin (OLD s.v.; LSJ s.v.

[GREEK TEXT OMITTED] Given the influence of Varro's etymologies on Roman poets, it is likely that Vergil's aim in the wordplay between 'mutum' and 'mussant' is to advertise the origin and meaning of the rare Ennian verb, for which he shows a special liking (cf. Geo. 4.188; Aen. 11.345; 11.454; 12.657).(6)

The question remains whether Vergil points to the derivation of mutus and musso from the sound mu or simply suggests that musso comes from mutus.(7) The subject of the simile itself furnishes evidence that the etymological wordplay brings out the onomatopoeic origin of both words. Although there is little explicit evidence that Latin speakers regarded the interjection mu as proper to bulls and cows,(8) Vergil's usage of mugio and mugitus indicates that he considers the syllable mu to be signally bovine. This is particularly the case when he describes the sound of a herd stung by the asilus ('gadfly') at Geo. 3.150: 'furit mugitibus aether'. Ross argues that here Vergil 'recognizes' the etymology of

[GREEK TEXT OMITTED] ('gadfly') from

[GREEK TEXT OMITTED] ('mooing') which Apollonius suggests when comparing Heracles to a bull pricked by a gadfly (Arg. 1.1265-9).(9) Furthermore, the two (related) bull-similes of Aeneid 12 begin and end respectively with emphasis upon the sound of mooing: 'mugitus veluti cum prima in proelia taurus / terrificos ciet' (103-4); 'gemitu nemus omne remugit' (722). Therefore, the assonance and alliteration of 'stat pecus omne metu mutum, mussantque iuvencae' could both be imitative of the sound that cattle make and call attention to the syllable mu from which 'mutum' and 'mussant' are to be derived.

If Vergil alludes to the Varronian etymology of musso, what bearing does it have on the meaning of 'mussant iuvencae'? Without considering the onomatopoeic origins of 'mutum' and 'mussant', one may interpret 'metu mutum' as 'silent with fear' and hence 'mussant' as 'expect silently'. For, were the whole herd silent, how could the heifers 'moo quietly' or 'mutter'? However, if 'metu mutum' refers to speechlessness (thus OLD s.v. 'mutus', 4), then it is conceivable for 'mussant' to denote the minimal, inarticulate sound that results from, or betrays, the suppression of utterance. While this sense of musso is not indistinguishable from being mutus, the two are semantically close, as Servius observes ad Aen. 11.345: 'et proprie mussare est obmurmurare et muto esse vicinum'. Vergil's etymologizing in line 718 calls attention to a semantic overlap between musso and mutus: i.e. 'saying no more than mu'. This loss of voice may in turn be interpreted either as silence or as some form of murmured sound. The critical disagreement about the precise meaning of 'mussant' ('expect silently', 'faintly low', or 'mutter') therefore represents different, though not necessarily incompatible, aspects of the same phenomenon.(10) Vergil's etymological wordplay helps the reader to understand not only the source for these various possible meanings of 'mussant' but also the point of the theme and variation in line 718.

One further issue needs to be addressed. Varro shows that mutus and musso are derived from mu--the minimal sound that humans make.(11) Vergil innovates upon Varro by recasting the etymology of mutus and musso within a bovine context. To be sure, animals are mutus because they cannot speak (OLD s.v., la), but the phrase 'metu mutum' implies a temporary loss of speech and thus a personification of the herd.(12) This personification continues in the phrase 'mussantque iuvencae' which manifestly echoes 12.657: 'mussat rex ipse Latinus'. Ross observes that when the 'mumblings of the consternated cows' are compared with Latinus 'the comic is dangerously close to the surface'.(13) Yet Vergil does not descend into the mock-heroic. The appropriateness of his use of musso in the animal sphere deserves special attention.

As Varro demonstrates, musso is an onomatopoeic verb. Such verbs fall into three categories depending upon whether they represent sounds made by men, animals, or things.(14) Poets have a fondness for transferring verbs reflective of animal sound to humans. Varro deals specifically with this category of 'verba ab animalium vocibus tralata in homines' in De Lingua Latina (7.103-4).(15) No doubt aware of such grammatical discussion, Vergil reverses the 'regular' transference of animal sounds to humans when he applies musso to heifers. In the Georgics, he performs the same reversal with reference to the humming of bees (4.188): 'fit sonitus, mussantque oras et limina circum'. The 'murmuring' of the bees provides a precedent for the voices of the heifers. But, in the case of the heifers, there is an additional twist. Vergil shows that the phrase 'mussant iuvencae' is uncannily appropriate because the onomatopoeic origin of the verb is a sound both human and bovine. Vergil's etymologizing thus intimates a common ground between man and animal. This association suits well the context of the simile in which Vergil humanizes the rival bulls to bring out the animal nature of Turnus and Aeneas.(16)

STEPHEN M. WHEELER Penn State University

(1)Julius Caesar Scaliger, Poetices Libri Septem, facs. repr. of 1561 Lyon ed. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1964), p. 192.

(2)T. Farnebus, P. Virgilii Maronis Opera (Amsterdam, 1650), ad loc.: 'tacite et intra se mugiunt'; C. Ruaeus, P. Virgilii Maronis Opera, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1682), ad loc.: 'timide et quasi tacite mugiunt; videturque ipso vocabulo vox iuvencarum expressa'; T. Cooke, Publii Virgilii Bucolica Georgica et Aeneis (London and Dublin, 1742), ad loc.: 'iuvencae mugientes expectant'.

(3)Cf. Verg. Aen. 3.540: 'bello armantur equi, bellum haec armenta minantur'. For parallelism as an environment for etymologizing in Vergil, see G. J. M. Bartelink, Etymologisering bij Vergilius, Mededelingen der Kon. Neder. Akad. van Wetenschappen 28.3 (Amsterdam, 1965), pp. 94-5.

(4)Cf. e.g. Verg. Aen. 6.160: 'multa inter sese vario sermone serebat'. For remarks on Vergil's etymologizing of words in 'each other's vicinity', see Bartelink, op. cit. (n. 3), p. 92; on the 'direct collocation' of etymologically related words in Lucretius, see J. M. Snyder, Puns and Poetry in Lucretius' 'De Rerum Natura' (Amsterdam, 1980), pp. 76-84 and 90; discussion of presenting evidence for an etymology by 'close proximity' can be found in F. Cairns, Tibullus: A Hellenistic Poet in Rome (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 92-3.

(5)It is unclear which sense of musso (taceo or murmuro) Ennius uses and Varro clarifies. In their apparatus, Goetz-Schoell print L. Muller's emendation 'faci<to> musset obrutus' for the corrupt text, taking the Ennian example to mean taceo. Alternatively, in the Loeb edition, Kent accepts L. Spengler's emendation 'fac <si> mus<s>et obrutum', and translates musso as 'make a sound'. Both meanings of the verb are attested in Ennius by Festus ex Paul. p. 131.9-11 L: 'mussare murmurare. Ennius (Ann. 168 Sk): "in occulto mussabat". vulgo vero pro tacere dicitur, ut idem Ennius (Ann. 435 Sk): "non decet mussare bonos".' For a discussion of Ennian usage, see Skutsch on Ann. 168, 327, and 435.

(6)On the influence of Varro on Vergil's etymologizing, see Bartelink, op. cit. (n. 3), pp. 21-5 and 111-12; O. S. Due, 'Zur Etymologisierung in der Aeneis', in O. S. Due, et al. (edd.), Classica et Medaevalia Francisco Blatt Septuagenario Dedicata (Copenhagen, 1973), p. 276; N. Horsfall, 'Varrone', in Enciclopedia Virgiliana (Rome, 1985) p. 448. Notably, Vergil does not derive musso from a Greek source as does the Augustan grammarian Clodius Tuscus: 'mussare est ex Graeco, conprimere oculos: Graeci

[GREEK TEXT OMITTED] dicunt' (ap. Servius Auctus ad Aen. 12.657). Ancient etymologies of musso are conveniently found in R. Maltby, A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies (Leeds, 1991), p. 400; cf. also Ernout-Meillet, s.v.

(7)Cf. Donatus on Ter. Ad. 207: 'mussitare ... proprie dissimulandi tacere est, vel a muto vel ab M, quae <est> littera nimium pressae vocis ac paene nullius adeo, ut sola omnium, cum inter vocales inciderit, atteratur atque subsidat. hinc Vergilius (Aen. 12.657) "mussat rex ipse Latinus".'

(8)Cf. CGL 5.33.22 + 23 (= 5.86.2 and 5.119.5): 'mu adhuc in consuetudine est: unde mugire dicimus'.

(9)D. O. Ross, Jr. Virgil's Elements: Physics and Poetry in the 'Georgics' (Princeton, 1987), pp. 158-63.

(10)On ambiguity of meaning in Vergil's use of language, see W. F. Jackson Knight, Roman Virgil (London, 1944) pp. 203-4.

(11)For examples of mu in colloquial speech, see Otto, Sprichworter, s.v. 'mu. mut. muttire'.

(12)Cf. Lucr. 1.92: 'muta metu terram genibus summissa (sc. Iphianassa) petebat'. The personification of the herd in line 718 may be explained as a 'trespass' of the narrative context upon the simile, since the herd corresponds to the armies watching Aeneas and Turnus. For the phenomenon of 'trespass', see R. O. A. M. Lyne, Words and the Poet (Oxford, 1989), pp. 92-8.

(13)Ross, op. cit. (n. 9), p. 158.

(14)E. Wolfflin, 'Die Etymologien der lateinischen Grammatiker', ALL 8 (1892), 432.

(15)R. Schroter, Studien zur varronischen Etymologie, Akad. der Wiss. und der Lit. 12 (Mainz, 1959), pp. 852-3, argues that Varro relies on an already established grammatical inquiry into this type of transference of onomatopoeic words by poets. This would support the idea that Vergil was playing with established grammatical categories.

(16)Cf. Verg. Geo. 3.219-40. On the much discussed parallelism between animals and humans in the Georgics and similar passages in the Aeneid, see W. Liebeschuetz, 'Beast and Man in the Third Book of Virgil's Georgics', G&R 12 (1965), 64-72; M. C. J. Putnam, Virgil's Poem of the Earth: Studies in the 'Georgics' (Princeton, 1979), pp. 192-4; W. W. Briggs, Jr. Narrative and Simile from the 'Georgics' in the 'Aeneid' (Leiden, 1980), pp. 31-2, and 92-6; Ross, op. cit. (n. 9), pp. 149 and 159-63.
COPYRIGHT 1993 Cambridge University Press
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wheeler, Stephen M.
Publication:The Classical Quarterly
Date:Jul 1, 1993
Previous Article:The shield of Argive Abas at 'Aeneid' 3.286.
Next Article:A Roman Hecale: Ovid 'Fasti' 3.661-74.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters