Printer Friendly

Long-term effects of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a 5-year qualitative follow-up.

Introduction

Ayahuasca is a botanical hallucinogenic preparation traditionally used by indigenous populations of Northwestern Amazonian countries for ritual and therapeutic purposes (1), and also as a sacrament and therapeutic tool by Brazilian syncretic religions such as the Santo Daime, Barquinha and Uniao do Vegetal (2-3). It is usually prepared by the prolonged concoction of the bark of the vine Banisteriopsis caapi together with the leaves of the shrub Psychotria viridis. The vine is rich in [beta]-carboline alkaloids such as harmine, tetrahydroharmine (THH), and harmaline, and P. viridis contains N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT). The [beta]-carbolines act as reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A, and DMT act as a [5-HT.sub.1A/2A/2C] agonist (4). DMT by itself is not orally active due to degradation by peripheral MAO-A, but MAO-A inhibition by the [beta]-carbolines renders DMT active by allowing it to reach the brain (4-6). The neural basis of the effects of ayahuasca seem to involve modulation of frontal and midline brain structures, such as the default mode network (DMN) (5-9).

Preclinical, observational, and experimental studies suggest that ayahuasca and its alkaloids have anxiolytic, antidepressive, and antiaddictive effects (2,3,10-14), and studies with healthy volunteers ((2-8)) and psychiatric patients (10,11) show that it is well tolerated. Previous observational studies assessing the mental health of members of Brazilian ayahuasca churches described the potential effects of regular ayahuasca use on anxiety, depression and dependence symptoms (2,14). Moreover, the first double-blind, controlled study showing that a single ayahuasca dose induced significant reductions on panic-like and depressive symptoms was conducted among Santo Daime members (3).

We recently reported that administration of a single oral dose of ayahuasca (dose: 2.2 mL/kg; alkaloid content in the sample: 0.8 mg/mL DMT, 0.21 mg/mL harmine, no harmaline was detected, and THH was not analyzed due to a lack of analytical requirements) in an open-label trial to 17 patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) was associated with significant decreases in depression symptoms assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from 80 minutes to day 21 (10,11). Average baseline score in the HAM-D scale was 19.24 (SD = 5.52), and at day 21 the average score was 7.56 (SD = 4.7). We recently replicated these results in a parallel arm, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with 35 patients with treatment-resistant MDD15. Compared to placebo, HAM-D scores at day 7 were significantly lower in patients treated with ayahuasca (Cohen's d = 0.98), and MADRS scores were significantly reduced in the ayahuasca group at days 1, 2 and 7.

After the publication of the open-label study (10,11); we were interested in interviewing the volunteers after a long-time period to ask if the experiment had any long-lasting effects on them. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first long-term follow-up of a clinical sample that participated in an ayahuasca trial.

Methods

An experienced psychiatrist that was closely involved with the volunteers during the study (RFS) tried to contact the volunteers by telephone. At least three attempts, in three different times of the day, were made to try to contact the volunteers. The contacted volunteers were then asked the following questions by a telephone interview:

#1. Do you classify your experience with ayahuasca as negative, neutral, or positive?

#2. Did the experience bring any significant changes (positive or negative) to your life in general?

#3. Did the experience bring any significant changes (positive or negative) to your daily life?

#4. Did the experience bring any significant changes (positive or negative) to your relationship with other people (friends, family, or in your work)?

#5. Did the experience bring any significant changes (positive or negative) to your spirituality/religiosity or in your way to see the world and nature?

#6. Did the experience bring any significant changes (positive or negative) in the way you perceive music or art in general?

#7. After the experiment, did you have desire to drink ayahuasca again?

#8. After the experience, have you used ayahuasca? If yes, how many times? Briefly describe the experience.

#9. How did your symptoms evolved since the experience? They improved, got worse, or remained stable?

#10. Have you changed your medications after the experience? Did you stop taking your medications, returned to the same medications, or increased the dose or number of medications?

#11. Did you observe any kind of changes in your behavior or symptoms during or after the experience that you believe is important to mention?

#12. Would you classify the experience among the 10 most important experiences of your life? In which position, from 1 to 10?

#13. If you passed for a difficult and challenging experience during the study, do you think it was positive anyway?

#14. Did you observe something negative or positive during the experience that you think is important to mention?

Questions #1 to #13 could be answered as positive (+), negative (-), or neutral/stable (=). Question #14 could be answered more freely.

Results

The results of the interview are described in Table 1.

Of the 17 patients that participated in the study, we could contact only eight (seven women; mean age 39.87 years; range 28-54). The other nine patients could not be contacted after several attempts. All the non-participant subjects were not able to be located, thus, there were no subjects that refused to participate in the study.

The contacted patients had a mean baseline HAM-D score of 20.37 (range 17-24) and a mean baseline MADRS score of 27.12 (range 21-32). Means HAM-D and MADRS scores on D21 were 6.75 (range 2-15) and 8.75 (range 1-19), respectively. Patients have participated in the experiment from October 2010 (patient #1) to January 2013 (patient #8), and the follow-up interviews were conducted from January to May 2017. Therefore, patients were interviewed after a mean of56.37 months (range 49-76), or 4.7 years.

As can be observed in Table 1, although volunteers had difficult experiences, most of them reported that participation on the study was positive and had a positive impact on their general and daily lives, and that they would like to experiment ayahuasca again (although none did). Furthermore, six patients reported that the experience was among the 10 most important experiences of their lives, with four patients reporting that the experience was among the five most important experiences of their lives.

However, four patients reported neutral effects or that their symptoms remained stable, nine reported that their medications were unchanged (one reported that the medication was changed, and none have stopped the medication), and almost all patients that reported positive effects also noted that they were short-lived. Furthermore, only three patients reported improvements in their relationships with friends, family, or at work, and only one described a positive effect of the experiment on music and art perception and on spirituality/religiosity or in the way one sees the world and nature. Negative effects included mostly nausea and vomiting.

Discussion

Previous observational studies in members of the Brazilian ayahuasca churches reported the potential effects of ayahuasca on anxiety and mood regulation (3,14). Moreover, a controlled study in members of these groups also reported anxiolytic and antidepressive effects (3), which were corroborated in recent open-label and controlled studies with depressed patients (10,11,15). In the present work, the first long-term follow-up of those depressed volunteers (11), we found that ayahuasca was well tolerated and associated with antidepressive effects.

The main limitations of this follow-up are the long time that passed since the experimental session was conducted and that not all volunteers were contacted. The first limitation could have increased the chances of recollection bias in the sample, and the second makes it impossible to know if the other volunteers had the same kind of responses, thus limiting the extrapolation of the results for the whole sample. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study long-term follow-up of depressed patients that have ingested ayahuasca.

Even considering the above-cited limitations, our results suggest that ayahuasca was well tolerated by these patients and that the reductions in depressive symptoms attributed to ayahuasca intake were limited to a few weeks. Moreover, most patients that participated in the interview believed that the experience was among the most important of their lives, even 4-7 years later. This last observation could be related to the fact the patients had been suffering with their depressive symptoms for a long time, and a significant (although limited in time) improvement in their symptoms could have a great significance for them.

The results and limitations of this qualitative study suggest that future studies involving administration of ayahuasca should try to perform follow-ups after shorter periods of time to try to observe any effects that could appear a few months of the experiments and to try to avoid losing contact with the volunteers, so that a clearer image of the results can be achieved. Furthermore, the present results and the data from our open-label and controlled studies suggest that ayahuasca holds some promise as a viable treatment for refractory depression. Nevertheless, future studies designed to further explore the antidepressive and anxiolytic effects of ayahuasca should be performed with more volunteers, different doses and also with repeated dosing for longer periods of time.

Declaration of conflicting interests and source of funding

This research was conducted at the Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil. This work was funded by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (Fapesp; process 15/02848-2). RGS is Fellow of the Brazilian National Post-Doctorate Program (PNPD/CAPES) and member of the ICEERS Advisory Board. ICEERS is a non-profit organization that promotes the scientific research of plant hallucinogens such as ayahuasca and ibogaine. For the remaining authors, none were declared. Sponsors had no role in study design, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. All authors had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

References

(1.) Schultes RE, Hofmann A, Tsch CR. Plants of the Gods: their sacred, healing, and hallucinogenic powers. Rochester, VT: Healing Arts Press; 1992.

(2.) Grob CS, McKenna DJ, Callaway JC, Brito GS, Neves ES, Oberlaender G, et al. Human psychopharmacology of hoasca, a plant hallucinogen used in ritual context in Brazil. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996;184(2):86-94.

(3.) Santos RG, Landeira-Fernandez J, Strassman RJ, Motta V, Cruz AP. Effects of ayahuasca on psychometric measures of anxiety, paniclike and hopelessness in Santo Daime members. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;112(3):507-13.

(4.) Riba J, Valle M, Urbano G, Yritia M, Morte A, Barbanoj MJ. Human pharmacology of ayahuasca: subjective and cardiovascular effects, monoamine metabolite excretion, and pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;306(1):73-83.

(5.) de Araujo DB, Ribeiro S, Cecchi GA, Carvalho FM, Sanchez TA, Pinto JP, et al. Seeing with the eyes shut: neural basis of enhanced imagery following Ayahuasca ingestion. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(11):2550-60.

(6.) Riba J, McIlhenny EH, Bouso JC, Barker SA. Metabolism and urinary disposition of N,N-dimethyltryptamine after oral and smoked administration: a comparative study. Drug Test Anal. 2015;7(5):401-6.

(7.) Riba J, Romero S, Grasa E, Mena E, Carrio I, Barbanoj MJ. Increased frontal and paralimbic activation following ayahuasca, the pan-Amazonian inebriant. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;186(1):93-8.

(8.) Palhano-Fontes F, Andrade KC, Tofoli LF, Santos AC, Crippa JA, Hallak JE, et al. The psychedelic state induced by ayahuasca modulates the activity and connectivity of the default mode network. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118143.

(9.) Dos Santos RG, Osorio FL, Crippa JAS, Hallak JEC. Classical hallucinogens and neuroimaging: A systematic review of human studies: Hallucinogens and neuroimaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:715-28.

(10.) Osorio Fde L, Sanches RF, Macedo LR, Santos RG, Maia-de-Oliveira JP, Wichert-Ana L, et al. Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a preliminary report. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2015;37(1):13-20.

(11.) Sanches RF, de Lima Osorio F, Dos Santos RG, Macedo LR, Maia-deOliveira JP, Wichert-Ana L, et al. Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a SPECT study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016;36(1):77-81.

(12.) Dos Santos RG, Osorio FL, Crippa JA, Hallak JE. Antidepressive and anxiolytic effects of ayahuasca: a systematic literature review of animal and human studies. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2016;38(1):65-72.

(13.) Nunes AA, Dos Santos RG, Osorio FL, Sanches RF, Crippa JA, Hallak JE. Effects of ayahuasca and its alkaloids on drug dependence: a systematic literature review of quantitative studies in animals and humans. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2016;48(3):195-205.

(14.) Dos Santos RG, Balthazar FM, Bouso JC, Hallak JE. The current state of research on ayahuasca: A systematic review of human studies assessing psychiatric symptoms, neuropsychological functioning, and neuroimaging. J Psychopharmacol. 2016;30(12):123047.

(15.) Palhano-Fontes F, Barreto D, Onias H, Andrade KC, Novaes M, Pessoa J, et al. Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. bioRxiv 103531; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/103531.

Rafael G. dos Santos [1,2,3], Rafael Faria Sanches [1,2], Flavia de Lima Osorio [1,2], Jaime F. C. Hallak [1,2]

[1] Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.

[2] National Institute of Science and Technology--Translational Medicine, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.

[3] ICEERS Foundation (International Center for Ethnobotanical Education, Research and Services), Barcelona, Spain.

Received: 10/21/2017--Accepted: 2/6/2018

DOI: 10.1590/0101-60830000000149

Address for correspondence: Rafael G. dos Santos. Departamento de Neurociencias e Ciencias do Comportamento, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto da Universidade de Sao Paulo. Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 3 andar-14048-900-Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil. Telephone: +55 (16) 3602-2703. E-mail: banisteria@gmail.com
Table 1. Depressive symptoms assessed with the Hamilton
Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Asberg
Depression Rating Scale MADRS) and results from the
follow-up questions

            Age at the       Time        HAM-D /     HAM-D /
            time of the    since the      MADRS       MADRS
            experiment    experiment    (baseline)    (D1)
                           (months)

Patient 1       31            76         20 / 27     14 / 12
Patient 2       36            67         20 / 32     9 / 17
Patient 3       38            52         20 / 32      3 / 1
Patient 4       46            55         17 / 21     10 / 12
Patient 5       39            51         20 / 28     17 / 20
Patient 6       54            51         19 / 23      6 / 3
Patient 7       28            50         23 / 25      5 / 7
Patient 8       47            49         24 / 29     13 / 17

            HAM-D /   HAM-D /    HAM-D /   #1    #2   #3   #4   #5
             MADRS     MADRS      MADRS
             (D7)      (D14)      (D21)

Patient 1    3 / 6     3 / 3      2 /1
Patient 2   11 / 7     4 / 2      2 / 3     +    +    +    +    +
Patient 3   7 / 11     2 / 2      4 / 2     =    =    +    +    =
Patient 4   8 / 15    10 / 151   13 / 15   =/-   +    =    =    =
Patient 5   18 / 22   15 / 18    15 / 19    +    +    +    =    =
Patient 6   10 / 9    16 / 14     5 / 8     +    +    +    =    =
Patient 7    5 / 5     6 / 6      5 / 5     =    +    =    +    =
Patient 8   20 / 23   16 / 19    10 / 17    +

            #6   #7   #8   #9   #10   #11    #12    #13

Patient 1        -    -    =     =     x      -      =
Patient 2   +    +    -    +     t     +    + (6)    +
Patient 3   =    -    -    +     =     +    + (4)    +
Patient 4   =    -    -    =     =    +/=     -      +
Patient 5   =    +    -    +     =     =    + (8)    +
Patient 6   =    -    -    =     =     =    + (5)    +
Patient 7   =    -    -    =     =     =    + (3)    +
Patient 8        +    -    +     =     =    + (4)    +

Ayahuasca intake for these eight patients occurred between
October 2010 and January 2013. Interviews were conducted between
January and May 2017.

+: positive, -: negative, =: neutral/stable; t: changed medication;
x: do not remember.

The numbers in parenthesis on question #12 are the position
from 1 to 10 reported by those volunteers that had a positive
answer to that question.

(1) Missing data: mean of D7 and D21.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Universidade de Sao Paulo, Facultade de Medicina
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Brief report
Author:Santos, Rafael G. dos; Sanches, Rafael Faria; Osorio, Flavia de Lima; Hallak, Jaime F.C.
Publication:Archives of Clinical Psychiatry
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:2602
Previous Article:The delusional dimension of anorexia nervosa: phenomenological, neurobiological and clinical perspectives.
Next Article:Hypochondriasis as a distinct phenomenological presentation of complicated grief.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters