Lobbying for flexibility in tax-exempt financing: GFOA and the Public Finance Network are working to introduce a bill in Congress that will ease some of the restrictions on the use of tax-exempt municipal bonds.
As noted in the August installment of the Federal Focus (and in Christopher Hoene and Michael Pagano's article in this issue), the intense pressures on the federal budget are having a negative impact on essential programs at the state and local levels. While GFOA and the other local and state government organizations that comprise the Public Finance Network continue to push for additional funding through the federal appropriations process, the group is also looking for legislative remedies to the fiscal challenges facing state and local governments.
One way the federal government could greatly assist state and local governments, universities, non-profit health care facilities, public power entities, and housing authorities to allow for greater flexibility in the use of tax-exempt bonds. Many of the laws pertaining to the issuance of tax-exempt bonds have not been updated since the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988. So while the fiscal needs of state and local governments have evolved through the years, the laws governing public finance are effectively stuck in place, circa 1986.
The members of the Public Finance Network have been lobbying for changes to these laws almost since their inception. Topping the list of changes the PFN would like to see included in a public finance bill to be introduced in Congress are the following:
Relax federal arbitrage rules. Two areas in particular require remedy. First, the small issuer exemption should be raised from $5 million to $25 million. Second, extending the spend-down exception from two years to three years is a simple, sensible approach to this perennial problem faced by issuers of all types of tax-exempt bonds. In addition, the National Association of Bond Lawyers has proposed a number of other helpful technical changes that it has brought to the attention of Congress and the Department of the Treasury. (3)
Increase the deduction threshold for bank-qualified bonds from $10 million to $25 million. Prior to 1986, banks were permitted to deduct all or a major portion of the costs they incurred to invest in municipal bonds. The 1986 Tax Reform Act eliminated this deduction except for certain "small issuers." This exception permits banks to deduct 80 percent of the costs of purchasing and carrying the bonds of municipalities that issue less than $10 million annually. However, this exemption is largely meaningless for many small issuers, since inflationary pressures have pushed their capital needs beyond $10 million (accounting for the rate of inflation, $10 million in 1986 equals $16.8 million today). In order to qualify for the exemption and remain attractive to institutional investors, small issuers are often forced to defer needed projects until a subsequent calendar year. The Independent Community Bankers of America supports this proposal.
Allow an additional advance refunding. Since 1986, governments have been permitted to advance refund tax-exempt bonds once over the lifetime of the debt. However, with interest rates still hovering around historically low levels and governments looking to free up resources any way they can, another advance refunding would be very beneficial. Earlier this year, Senators Gordon Smith and Jon Corzine introduced legislation authorizing an additional advance refunding. (4) The bill now has 26 cosponsors. Still, the Joint Committee on Taxation has concluded that the bill is too expensive, estimating that it would cost the federal government $13 billion over 10 years. GFOA is working closely with The Bond Market Association to overcome this concern.
Expand the use of public-private partnerships. While we are keen to the problems associated with these partnerships, existing tax laws and the prohibitions on private use create inefficiencies and higher costs, making many economic development projects financially unfeasible. The Department of the Treasury is reviewing this section of the tax code as part of its 2003-2004 work plan. (5) GFOA is working closely with the National League of Cities to make certain that the revised guidance provides more flexible allocation rules to facilitate private participation in public projects.
Other issues that may be addressed in the legislation include the following: provisions in the alternative minimum tax laws that adversely affect the municipal securities market; proper infrastructure and transportation financing mechanisms and programs; flexible use and full funding of state revolving loan programs; and preservation of the right of public power entities to issue debt and to influence the restructuring of the electrical utility industry, pending possible changes in the upcoming energy bill.
Many of these items were addressed in a 1989 report by the Anthony Commission on Public Finance, "Preserving the Federal-State-Local Partnership: The Role of Tax-Exempt Financing." (6) Then-Congressman Beryl Anthony asked leaders in the public finance industry to conduct research and develop recommendations to address the concerns of state and local government officials with regard to the intrusive laws regulating tax-exempt financing. Despite the 1992 election of President Clinton, who was a member of the Anthony Commission, most of these recommendations have not seen the light of day, nor have they been endorsed by presidents or congressional majorities of either political party.
More than $357 billion of long-term municipal debt was issued in 2002, an all-time record. (7) If the first six months of 2003 are any indication, the market will break the record again this year. Clearly, governments are refinancing old debt and issuing new debt as never before in order to pay for essential infrastructure and services. GFOA and tire Public Finance Network are doing what we can to help by lobbying Congress for greater flexibility in the use of tax-exempt municipal bonds. Hopefully, these efforts will soon bear fruit and provide needed relief for state and local governments.
Links to the following references can be found at www.gfoa.org/flc/
(1) Richard Kogan, "Deficit Picture Even Grimmer Than New CBO Projections Suggest." Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. August 26, 2003 (www.cbpp.org).
(2.) Congress of the United States--Congressional Budget Office. "The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update," August 2003 (www.cbo.org).
(3.) National Association of Bond Lawyers, "NABL Tax Simplification Recommendations to the Department of the Treasury on Tax-Exempt Bonds," June 14, 2002 (www.nabl.org).
(4.) U.S. Senate Bill. S. 271 (www.thomas.gov).
(5.) U.S. Department of the Treasury Priority Guidance Plan: 2003-2004 (www.treasury.gov).
(6.) Anthony Commission on Public Finance, "Preserving the Federal-State-Local Partnership: The Role of Tax-Exempt Financing," October 1989.
(7.) Susanne Walker, "2002 Marks High Point of Issuance," The Bond Buyer. January 2, 2003 (www.bondbuyer.com).
SUSAN GAFFNEY is director of GFOA's Federal Liaison Center in Washington, D.C.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Federal Focus|
|Publication:||Government Finance Review|
|Date:||Oct 1, 2003|
|Previous Article:||Aligning strategy with finance: by linking long-term financial planning with strategic planning, governments can increase the likelihood that annual...|
|Next Article:||Single audit changes: the recently revised version of OMB Circular A-133 increased the single audit threshold to $500,000 from $300,000 and the...|