Printer Friendly

Loan-to-own: Predatory or practical?

Byline: David Jones

From the January issue: The collapse of the commercial real estate market in New York has sparked a phenomenon that is being widely debated in legal and financial circles: Is loan-to-own an act of bad faith or simply a smart business move? Lenders are increasingly willing to foreclose on defaulted loans for office towers, malls and multifamily high-rises. But some developers are crying foul over what they say are "pretextual" defaults, created by a lender to help third-party investors snap up distressed assets on the cheap. These battles -- which center on whether lenders are unfairly colluding with third-party investors on loan sales -- have begun to play out in the courts, including two of the most high-profile cases, involving 3 Columbus Circle and 510 Madison Avenue. [more]
COPYRIGHT 2011 Korangy Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Jones, David
Publication:The Real Deal
Date:Jan 11, 2011
Words:129
Previous Article:Bedbug complaints up 7 percent in NYC.
Next Article:Manhattan leasing hits four-year high.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters