Printer Friendly

Little engine that does: Ion propulsion no longer sci-fi dream. (Technology Update).

Ion propulsion, a futuristic technology that for decades catapulted spacecraft through the pages of science fiction novels, is now a reality.

An ion engine, just 12" in diameter, is the main propulsion source for Deep Space 1 (DS1)--a 20th Century spacecraft now off on its primary mission to validate technologies for 21st century spacecraft.

An ion propulsion system converts power from the spacecraft power system into the kinetic energy of an ionized gas jet. That jet, as it exits the spacecraft, propels it in the opposite direction. The system, or any electric propulsion system, consists of four major components: a computer for controlling and monitoring system performance; solar concentrator arrays; a power processing unit for converting power from the solar arrays to the correct voltages for the engine; and the thruster, or engine, itself.

The fuel used in DS1's ion engine is xenon, a chemically inert, colorless, odorless and tasteless gas. The xenon fuel fills a chamber ringed with magnets. When the ion engine is running, electrons emitted from a cathode strike atoms of xenon, knocking away one of the electrons orbiting an atom's nucleus and making it into an ion. The magnets' magnetic field controls the flow of electrons and, by increasing the electrons' residence time in the chamber, increases the efficiency of the ionization.

At the rear of the chamber is a pair of metal grids that are charged with 1280 volts of electric potential. The force of this electric field exerts a strong "electrostatic" pull on the xenon ions--much like the way that bits of lint are pulled to a pocket comb that has been given a static electric charge by rubbing it on wool. The xenon ions shoot past the grids at speeds of more than 88,000 miles per hour (146,000 kilometers per hour), continuing right out the back of the engine and into space. These exiting ions produce the thrust that propels the spacecraft. A second electron-emitting cathode, downstream of the grids, neutralizes the positive charge of the ion beam to keep the spacecraft neutral with respect to its environment.

At full throttle, the ion engine consumes about 2,300 watts of electrical power and puts out 0.02 pound (90 millinewtons) of thrust. This is comparable to the force exerted by a single sheet of paper resting on the palm of a hand. Typical chemical on-board propulsion systems, on the other hand, produce far greater thrust 100 to 500 pounds--450 to 2250 newtons--but for far shorter times. A chemically propelled spacecraft gets its big boost and then coasts at constant speed until the next boost. But an ion engine can produce its small thrust continually and thereby provide near constant acceleration and, so, shorter travel times.

Fuel efficiency

Ion propulsion is also 10 times more fuel efficient than chemical on-board propulsion systems. This greater efficiency means less propellant is needed for a mission. In turn, the spacecraft can be smaller and lighter, and the launch costs lower.

Deep Space 1 carries 178 pounds (81 kilograms) of xenon propellant, which is capable of fueling engine operation at one-half throttle for over 20 months. Ion propulsion will increase the speed of DS1 by 7,900 miles per hour (12,700 kilometers per hour) over the course of the mission.

Electric propulsion technology, which includes ion engines, has been studied at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland (at that time the NASA Lewis Research Center) since the 1950s. Ion propulsion technology development at Glenn began when Dr. Harold Kaufman, now retired from NASA, designed and built the first broad-beam electron-bombardment ion engine in 1959. It used mercury as fuel, but is otherwise similar to the engine flying today on DS1. The laboratory tests of variations of the original ion engine were promising enough for Glenn to begin suborbital flight tests in the early 1960s. By 1964, an ion engine launched on the Space Electric Rocket Test I (SERT I) operated for all of its planned 31 minutes before returning to Earth.

In 1970, two modified ion engines were launched on SERT II; one operated for nearly three months and the other for more than five. Both engines suffered grid shorts, believed to have been be caused by debris from thruster grid wear, before the planned end of the mission. After an attitude control maneuver cleared its grid of the short in 1974, one of the engines was started and was operated on and off for six more years.

The information learned from these genuine space success stories was used to refine and improve the technology that today flies on communications satellites and, of course, on DS1.

Lessons learned

Early ion engines used mercury or cesium instead of xenon as propellants. (Glenn researchers had worked on cesium ion engine technology in the mid-1950's.) But both proved to be difficult to work with. In the 1970s, NASA managers decided that if ion propulsion research was to continue, it would have to he environmentally clean and less hazardous. Glenn researchers soon turned to xenon as a cleaner, simpler fuel for ion engines, with many of the same characteristics as mercury.

In the early 1990s, NASA identified improved electric propulsion as an enabling technology for future deep space missions. In 1996, the prototype engine built at Glenn endured 8,000 hours of operation in a JPL vacuum chamber that simulates conditions of outer space. The results of the prototyping were used to define the design of flight hardware that was built for DS1 by Hughes Electron Dynamics Division and Spectrum Astro Inc.

One of the challenges was developing the compact, lightweight power processing unit that converts power from the solar arrays into the voltages needed by the engine. NSTAR team contractor, Hughes designed a 2,500 watt power processor that weighs a little over 33 pounds (15 kilograms) and has an efficiency of 93 percent.

Deep Space 1

The first spacecraft in NASA's New Millennium Program of missions to flight-test new technologies, DS1 blasted into space in October 1998 aboard a Delta II launch vehicle. Now on its own and headed toward a July 1999 flyby of asteroid 1992 KD, 12 new technologies aboard the spacecraft are being tested for use on future space science missions. Among those 12 is DS1's main propulsion source, the Glenn-designed NSTAR ion engine.

The next New Millennium Program mission to use Glenn ion engine technology will be Space Technology 4/Champollion, which will rendezvous (match orbits) with the periodic Comet Tempel 1. Three NSTAR ion engines (with minor modifications) will provide the primary propulsion for the spacecraft. The planned launch date is in 2003.

For more information, visit NASA Glenn's Deep Space 1 web site: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/PAO/dsl.htm
COPYRIGHT 2001 Nelson Publishing
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Comment:Little engine that does: Ion propulsion no longer sci-fi dream. (Technology Update).
Publication:Tooling & Production
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2001
Words:1122
Previous Article:EU with '2020 vision': here's the aeronautics strategy across the pond. (Import Export).
Next Article:Quality beyond question: keys to a successful grinding operation are more than accuracy and robustness. (Manufacturing Update).
Topics:


Related Articles
French Company Sees the Benefits of Plasma Propulsion.
FCC Commissioner demands media reform.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters