Printer Friendly

Liquid Crystals as Phase Change Materials for Thermal Stabilization.

1. Introduction

In order to achieve and maintain an optimum ambient temperature, one must regulate heat flow using different heating or cooling systems, which are usually large energy consumers. Recently, several studies [1-5] focused on the development of innovative materials to passively reduce temperature fluctuations. Phase change materials (PCMs) are suitable candidates, as they undergo a phase change during which they exchange latent heat with the surroundings.

The main function of PCMs is saving excess heat that is accumulated at higher temperature conditions and releasing it at a lower temperature. Therefore, the efficiency of a system using PCMs is strongly correlated with phase change temperature. For example, if one wants to decrease room temperature oscillation, it would be optimal to have a PCM with phase change around the desired room temperature. If the room temperature exceeds the temperature of the PCM composite and reaches the phase change temperature, the PCM undergoes a phase change. During the phase change, the PCM accumulates the excess heat in form of latent heat. The opposite happens as the temperature lowers towards the phase change temperature and the latent heat is released to the surroundings.

In this paper, we focus on analyzing possible mechanisms to tune the phase change temperature in order to obtain optimal thermal stabilization. We used a nematic liquid crystal (LC) system as an experimental testing ground. LCs are experimentally suitable due to their liquid character, softness, large susceptibility to relatively weak external perturbations, and optical anisotropy [6,7]. We considered thermotropic LC in which, by decreasing the temperature from the isotropic (I) phase, the nematic (N) phase is obtained via first-order continuous symmetry breaking phase transition [8-10]. In the uniaxial bulk NLC phase, rod-like molecules exhibit long-range orientational ordering commonly presented by the nematic director [??]. Fluctuations about [??] describe the uniaxial order parameter S. Note that [absolute value of [??]] = and states [+ or -][??] are equivalent due to the so-called head-to-tail invariance. At the mesoscopic scale, we described nematic orientational ordering by the nematic tensor order parameter Q [11]. Our main goal was to identify different mechanisms to control and manipulate the phase change temperature. In general, the presence of nanoparticles (NPs), external electric fields, and other perturbations gives rise to elastic distortions [12-16] that can result in the temperature shift of the phase transition.

First we introduce a numerical model to analyze thermal stabilization using PCMs. The model is based on the heat source approach and finite difference method. Next, we present a theoretical Landau-de Gennes model to examine the impact of the external electric field and NPs on the phase change temperature of NLC system. We present and discuss results in Section 3. In the final section, we conclude our findings.

2. Modeling

2.1. Thermal Stabilization with PCM. In this section, we describe the use of PCMs for the improvement of thermal stabilization. We considered one-dimensional heat transfer through the planar surface of a two-layered composite (Figure 1) with one layer integrating homogeneously distributed PCMs. Our numerical model is based on the heat source approach [17-20], in which latent heat is modeled as an additional heat source. In terms of enthalpy (h), the transient heat transfer equation in one dimension is expressed as

[rho][partial derivative]h/[partial derivative]t = [lambda][partial derivative][T.sup.2]/[partial derivative][x.sup.2], (1)

where [rho] is density and [lambda] thermal conductivity of each layer.

Assuming high porosity of the composite layer, the expansion of PCMs during the phase transition does not change the total volume. Additionally, we considered different physical properties of the solid (s) and liquid (l) phase of PCMs.

In order to simplify their numerical simulations, other studies [17,19, 20] determined the temperature range where phase transition occurs. In this study, we assumed that phase transition is instant at one specific critical temperature [T.sub.c]. We introduced the factor r that equals zero when the PCM is in the solid phase (T < [T.sub.c]) and one when the PCM is in the liquid phase (T > [T.sub.c]).

Using a model of effective physical quantities [18] we defined the effective specific heat capacity ([c.sub.e]), thermal conductivity ([[lambda].sub.e]), and density ([[rho].sub.e]) as follows:

[c.sub.e] = [alpha] ([c.sup.(l).sub.PCM]r + [c.sup.(s).sub.PCM] (1 - r)) + (1 - [alpha]) [c.sub.A], (2a)

[[lambda].sub.e] = [alpha]([lambda].sup.(l).sub.PCM]r + [[lambda].sup.(s).sub.PCM] (1 - r)) + (1 - [alpha]) [[lambda].sub.A], (2b)

[[rho].sub.e] = (1 - [alpha])[[rho].sub.A] + [alpha] ([rho].sup.(l).sub.PCM]r + [[rho].sup.(s).sub.PCM] (1 - r)), (2c)

where [alpha] represents the relative amount of PCM integrated in the composite layer and subscripts A and B correspond to two different layers of studied composite (see Figure 1).

We derived the heat transfer equation for the composite incorporating PCMs in terms of the enthalpy [h.sub.e] = [c.sub.e]T + [alpha]r[Q.sub.L] as follows:

[[rho].sub.e][c.sub.e] [partial derivative]T/[partial derivative]t + [[rho].sub.e][alpha][Q.sub.L] [partial derivative]r/[partial derivative]t = [[lambda].sub.e][partial derivative][T.sup.2]/[partial derivative][partial derivative][x.sup.2], (3)

where [Q.sub.L] is the latent heat of the integrated PCM. For numerical simulations, we used the finite difference method.

2.2. Phase Change Temperature Shift. Next, we theoretically analyzed possible mechanisms to tune the phase change temperature. We considered the NLC rectangular cell, where lateral confinement walls impose strong homogeneous tangential anchoring (Figure 2). The characteristic confinement size R is assumed to be larger than the cell thickness h.

Using the nematic tensor order parameter [6], we described LC orientational ordering as follows:

Q = [3.summation over (i=1)][s.sub.i][[??].sub.i] [cross product] [[??].sub.i], (4)

where [[??].sub.i] are eigenvectors, [s.sub.i] are eigenvalues of Q, and the symbol [cross product] represents tensor product. In case of uniaxial ordering, it holds as follows [12]:

Q = S([??] [cross product] [??] - 1/3 I), (5)

where I is the identity matrix.

Next, we expressed the free energy density as a sum of the condensation nematic term [f.sub.n], elastic term [f.sub.e], external field term [f.sub.f], and surface term [f.sub.s] [12, 13]:

[f.sub.n] = [A.sub.0](T - [T.sub.*])/2 Tr[Q.sup.2] - B/3 Tr[Q.sup.3] + C/4 [(Tr[Q.sup.2]).sup.2], (6a)

[f.sub.e] = L/2 [[absolute value of [nabla]Q].sup.2], (6b)

[f.sub.f] = [[epsilon].sub.0][DELTA][epsilon]/2[??] x Q [??], (6c)

[f.sub.s] = w/2 Tr (Q - [Q.sub.s]), (6d)

where [A.sub.0], B, C are material-dependent constants and [T.sub.*] is the isotropic supercooling temperature. The elastic term evaluates deviations from a spatially homogeneous orientational ordering in terms of the elastic constant L. The external field term describes the contribution of an external electric field [??], where [DELTA][epsilon]e stands for the electric field anisotropy constant and [[epsilon].sub.0] represents the electrical permittivity constant. Since we imposed homogeneous tangential anchoring at the lateral surfaces with the anchoring strength w, [Q.sub.s] describes the degree of orientational ordering enforced by the confining surface.

The I-N phase change temperature is determined by material-dependent constants:

[T.sub.IN] = [T.sub.*] + [B.sup.2]/(4[A.sub.0]C). (7)

Next, assuming uniaxial ordering described by (5), we imposed a distortion to orientational ordering on a characteristic length scale R. On average, it holds as follows (see (6b)) [21, 22]:

[[bar.f].sub.e] ~ L/2 [S.sup.2]/[R.sup.2], (8)

where the overbar ([bar.***]) indicates spatial averaging.

Then, we expressed the average contributions of the condensation nematic term and elastic term to the average free energy density [bar.f] as follows [23-25]:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (9)


[T.sup.eff.sub.*] = [T.sub.*] - 3/2 L/[A.sub.0][R.sup.2]. (10)

Considering L, [A.sub.0], and [T.sub.*] are material-dependent coefficients, one could vary the effective phase change temperature of the NLC system by varying the typical distortion length R. We obtained the phase change temperature shift [DELTA]T = [T.sub.IN] - [T.sub.IN](R) expressed as follows (see (7)) [26, 27]:

[DELTA][T.sub.IN](R) = -3/2 L/[A.sub.0]R.sup.2]. (11)

Since the temperature shift is connected to R, we focused on imposing different distortions that can be described by a linear deformation imposed characteristic length R.

Below, we present two experimentally attainable possibilities influencing the phase change temperature of NLC: the presence of an external electric field and NPs. Since the presence of NPs and the external electric field could induce biaxiality, we introduce the degree of biaxiality as follows [28]:

[[beta].sup.2] = 1 - 6 [(Tr[Q.sup.3]).sup.2]/(Tr[Q.sup.2]).sup.3], (12)

which is zero for uniaxial states and one when the state exhibits a maximum degree of biaxiality.

For further convenience, we introduce three characteristic lengths: the external field coherence length [[xi].sub.f] = [square root of LS/([[epsilon].sub.0][DELTA][epsilon][E.sup.2]), the surface anchoring length [d.sub.e] = L/w, and the bare biaxial order parameter correlation length [[xi].sub.b] = [square root of LC/B]. In addition, we introduce parametrization and scaling as described in the following [12]:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (13)

where [q.sub.1], [q.sub.2], and [q.sub.3] are x and y functions and [[??].sub.3] = [[??].sub.z] is an eigenvector of Q.

In this scaling, we define the scaled temperature as t = (T - [T.sub.*])/([T.sub.**] - [T.sub.*]). Here, the superheating temperature of the nematic phase is [T.sub.**] = [T.sub.*] + [B.sup.2]/24[A.sub.0]C. For numerical convenience we introduce [tau] = 1 + [square root of 1 - t]. With this in mind, we express the equilibrium uniaxial order parameter as [S.sub.eq] = [S.sub.**][tau] where [S.sub.**] = B/4C = [S.sub.eq]([T.sub.**]).

Finally, we obtain bulk Euler-Lagrange equations for variation parameters [q.sub.1], [q.sub.2], and [q.sub.3] by minimization of the free energy density [29]:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (14a)

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (14b)

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (14c)

where [A.sub.[perpendicular to]] = [[partial derivative].sup.2]/[[partial derivative]x.sup.2] + [[partial derivative].sup.2]/[[partial derivative]y.sup.2]. Euler-Lagrange equations are solved using the standard relaxation method numerically.

3. Results and Discussion

In this section, we first analyze the numerical results of a one-dimensional heat transfer through composite wall with a focus on varying the phase change temperature. In our simulations, the composite wall (labeled GPCM) consisted of two layers: 20,0 cm thick panel at the outside and 3,0 CM thick gypsum wallboard with PCMs at the inside. The latter is also true in real building constructions, as the purpose of PCM is to stabilize the interior temperature. The outside temperature fluctuated according to typical day/night temperatures in the summertime (from 15[degrees]C to 35[degrees]C) and the room temperature ([]) was set to a constant value, in our case to 21[degrees]C. We examined cases for three different phase change temperatures ([T.sub.c]) of PCM and obtained different scenarios for the optimal thermal stabilization depending on the initial temperature ([T.sub.i]) of the system.

Figure 3 depicts the incoming heat flux ([]) time dependency for three different cases. First, we set the initial temperature of the composite wall to the average value of the outside temperature ([T.sub.i] > []). It is evident that the presence of PCMs affects qin as soon as the phase change temperature [T.sub.c] is reached. At this point, [q.sub.n] is close to zero, or zero for [T.sub.c] = [] (black solid curve), until the latent heat storage capacity becomes full. By varying the phase change temperature, we show that the time period of a steady incoming heat flux is the longest when [T.sub.c] is slightly above the room temperature (red dotted curve). On the other hand, in order to maintain the constant room temperature in this case, the incoming heat flux should be compensated using different cooling devices. The zero incoming heat flux is reachable only by setting the phase change temperature equal to the room temperature. Negative values of [], for the case when [T.sub.c] < [] (blue dashed curve), correspond to a decrease of a room temperature below the desired value. Next, we analyzed cases for [T.sub.i] < [] (Figure 3(b)) and [T.sub.i] = [] (Figure 3(c)). Figures 3(b) and 3(c) confirm that the incoming heat flux can be entirely or partly stored in the form of the latent heat at the [T.sub.c]. It is also evident that temperature oscillations in all three cases are reduced noticeably, especially for [T.sub.c] = [] and [T.sub.c] > []. The numerical obtained results show that thermal stabilization could be more efficient by using a small variation of the phase change temperature. Nevertheless, it is evident that the incoming heat flux fluctuates the most for the composite with no PCMs (black dotted curve).

To better understand the efficiency of PCM composites, we numerically analyzed thermal stabilization for three different composites used in real-life applications. Figure 4 shows a comparison of an alternative composite GPCM (black solid curve) with composites labeled BS1 (blue dashed curve) and BS2 (red dotted curve). BS1 and BS2 both consist of classic building materials: brick wall of thickness 50,0 cm for BS1 and 20,0 cm for BS2 and 3,0 cm thick insulation layer of Styrofoam placed at the outside of a wall. We simulated typical outside temperature fluctuations for the summertime, as described above. In this case the phase change temperature of GPCM is set to the room temperature. It is noticeable that thicker wall of BS1 lowers temperature oscillations, in comparison with BS2. This is expected due to larger thermal capacity. Furthermore, it is also evident that the alternative composite GPCM, of equal thickness as BS2, improves thermal stability even more. The incoming heat flux after 48 hours of simulations is close to 0% for GPCM and around 5% for BS1. Therefore, we can conclude that both systems BS1 and GPCM optimize the thermal stability, but by using alternative composites with PCMs construction walls can be approximately 2 times thinner.

Note that in all simulations we considered temperature oscillations between 15[degrees]C and 35[degrees]C for total time of 48 hours. In order to obtain more realistic results, additional simulations using different temperature ranges and longer simulation time are welcomed. According to our numerical outcomes (Figures 3 and 4), we assume similar thermal stabilization, with the main difference in the direction of the heat flow, when simulating low temperatures. In this case, we expect that the lowest temperature oscillations would be obtained for [T.sub.c] = [] and [T.sub.c] < []. Since even small variation in [T.sub.c] affects the thermal stability, it is reasonable to explore possible mechanisms to develop PCM composites with tuneable phase change temperature.

We analyzed the impact of external electric fields and NPs on the phase change temperature [T.sub.c] of NLC. We considered square-shaped NP that enforces strong tangential boundary conditions at its surface in the presence and absence of an external electric field. In our study, we set the lateral confinement size R below 1 micron, comparable to [[xi].sub.b] Figure 5 demonstrates typical nematic configurations in the absence and presence of an external electric field. Figure 5(a) depicts the diagonal structure, which is stable for cases when R [much greater than] [[xi].sub.b] and E = 0. At the corners of the cell, opposing conditions give rise to defects. In the center of each defect, a negative uniaxial order along [[??].sub.z] is established and is surrounded by a rim of a maximal degree of biaxiality. By increasing the external electric field strength, we obtained qualitatively different configurations for R/[xi].sub.f] = 10 (Figure 5(b)) and for R/[xi].sub.f] = 100 (Figure 5(c)). In the latter case, the external electric field triggered a surface order-reconstruction type of structural transition. Therefore, by application of strong enough external field, one obtains the qualitatively different configuration of NLC, which would affect the phase transition temperature according to (11).

Next, we studied the impact of square-shaped NP in the absence of an external electric field (Figure 6). We placed NP at four different positions of the NLC cell: (i) at the center, (ii) at the bottom boundary, (iii) at the left boundary, and (iv) at the left bottom edge. The NP acts as a source of elastic distortions that result in locally induced biaxiality.

We obtained an equal configuration (but rotated) for two positions of NP: close to the left boundary and close to the bottom boundary (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)). This shows that the presence of NPs in an NLC cell affects the typical distortion length R. Regarding (10) and (11), we conclude that NPs affect effective phase change temperatures. Note that in general several NPs could be introduced which increases complexity and richness of phenomena.

Additionally, we studied the combined impact of NPs and external electric fields. The external electric field broke the symmetry of the system (see Figure 7) and enabled an order-reconstruction type transition at the bottom plate.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we numerically assessed the impact of PCMs on thermal stabilization. Numerical simulations based on the heat source method confirm that PCMs integrated in the composite material reduced temperature oscillations and therefore improved thermal stabilization. We focused on different cases by varying the phase change temperature around room temperature and showed that the efficiency of the thermal stabilization depends on both the phase change temperature and the desired room temperature. Therefore, it is reasonable to develop tuneable PCM composites. Our main goal was to find and analyze possible mechanisms to control and manipulate phase change temperature. We considered NLC cells as PCMs, as they are commonly used in theoretical and experimental testing.

In our theoretical section, we showed that phase change temperature can be shifted by varying the typical distortion length R. We then examined the impact of external electric fields and NPs on the NLC configuration and consequently on the phase change temperature. We demonstrated that we could shift the phase change temperature by changing the external electric field in the absence of NPs. When an external electric field is absent, an NP can also effectively change the typical characteristic length of the NLC system.

LCs can be used as PCMs to improve thermal stabilization. Furthermore, one can even tune the phase change temperature with relatively simple mechanisms. One of the main disadvantages of using LCs for thermal stabilization is relatively high cost, corresponding to the relatively small amount of latent heat. Nevertheless, LCs have potential for future applications as PCMs, especially in the space industry.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


[1] D. Zhou, C. Y. Zhao, and Y. Tian, "Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials (PCMs) in building applications," Applied Energy, vol. 92, pp. 593-605, 2012.

[2] V. V Tyagi and D. Buddhi, "PCM thermal storage in buildings: a state of art," Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1146-1166, 2007.

[3] D. Li, L. Yang, and J. Lam, "Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications--A review," Energy, vol. 51, pp. 1-10, 2013.

[4] N. Bhikhoo, A. Hashemi, and H. Cruickshank, "Improving thermal comfort of low-income housing in Thailand through passive design strategies," Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 8, article no. 1440, 2017.

[5] M. Casini, Smart Buildings: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology to Improve Energy-Efficiency and Environmental Performance, Woodhead Publishing (Elsevier), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.

[6] M. Kleman and O. D. Lavrentovich, Soft Matter Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2002.

[7] H. de J Wim, Liquid crystal elastomers: Materials and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2012.

[8] V. Popa-Nita, "Statics and kinetics at the nematic-isotropic interface in porous media," The European Physical Journal B, vol. 12, no. 83, 1999.

[9] D. E. Feldman, "Quasi-long-range order in nematics confined in random porous media," Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 4886-4889, 2000.

[10] A. Aharony and E. Pytte, "Infinite susceptibility phase in random uniaxial anisotropy magnets," Physical Review Letters, vol. 45, no. 19, pp. 1583-1586, 1980.

[11] N. J. Mottram and C. Newton, "Introduction to Q-tensor theory," Research Report no. 10, University of Strathclyde Mathematics, Glasgow, UK, 2004.

[12] S. Kralj and A. Majumdar, "Order reconstruction patterns in nematic liquid crystal wells," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 470, no. 2169, 2014.

[13] M. AmbroZic, S. Kralj, and E. G. Virga, "Defect-enhanced nematic surface order reconstruction," Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 75, no. 3, Article ID 031708, 2007.

[14] N. Schopohl and T. J. Sluckin, "Defect core structure in nematic liquid crystals," Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 2582-2584, 1987.

[15] N. D. Mermin, "The topological theory of defects in ordered media," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 591-648, 1979.

[16] S. Kralj, Z. Bradac, and V. Popa-Nita, "The influence of nanoparticles on the phase and structural ordering for nematic liquid crystals," Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 20, no. 24, Article ID 244112, 2008.

[17] Y. Dutil, D. R. Rouse, N. B. Salah, S. Lassue, and L. Zalewski, "A review on phase-change materials: Mathematical modeling and simulations," Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 112-130, 2011.

[18] A. M. Borreguero, M. Luz Sanchez, J. L. Valverde, M. Carmona, and J. F. Rodriguez, "Thermal testing and numerical simulation of gypsum wallboards incorporated with different PCMs content," Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 930-937, 2011.

[19] S. N. AL-Saadi and Z. Zhai, "Modelling phase change materials embedded in building enclosure: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 21, pp. 659-673, 2013.

[20] A. Guiavarch, D. Bruneau, and B. Peuportier, "Evaluation of thermal effect of pcm wallboards by coupling simplified phase change model with design tool," Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 12-29, 2014.

[21] G. Cordoyiannis, A. Zidansek, G. Lahajnar et al., "Influence of confinement in controlled-pore glass on the layer spacing of smectic- A liquid crystals," Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 79, no. 5, Article ID 051703, 2009.

[22] Z. Bradac, S. Kralj, and S. Zumer, "Early stage domain coarsening of the isotropic-nematic phase transition," The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 135, no. 2, p. 024506, 2011.

[23] V. Popa-Nita and S. Kralj, "Liquid crystal-carbon nanotubes mixtures," The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 132, no. 2, Article ID 024902, 2010.

[24] R. Repnik, A. Ranjkesh, V. Simonka, M. Ambrozic, Z. Bradac, and S. Kralj, "Symmetry breaking in nematic liquid crystals: Analogy with cosmology and magnetism," Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 25, no. 40, Article ID 404201, 2013.

[25] A. Ranjkesh, M. Ambrozic, S. Kralj, and T. J. Sluckin, "Computational studies of history dependence in nematic liquid crystals in random environments," Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 89, no. 2, Article ID 022504, 2014.

[26] S. Kralj, G. Cordoyiannis, A. Zidansek et al., "Presmectic wetting and supercritical-like phase behavior of octyl-cyanobiphenyl liquid crystal confined to controlled-pore glass matrices," The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 127, no. 15, Article ID 154905, 2007.

[27] V. Popa-Nita and S. Kralj, "Random anisotropy nematic model: Nematic-non-nematic mixture," Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 041705, 2006.

[28] M. Ambrozic, F. Bisi, and E. G. Virga, "Director reorientation and order reconstruction: competing mechanisms in a nematic cell," Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 193-218, 2008.

[29] M. Slavinec, E. Klemencic, M. Ambrozic, and M. Krasna, "Impact of nanoparticles on nematic ordering in square wells," Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 2015, Article ID 532745, 11 pages, 2015.

Eva Klemencic (iD) (1) and Mitja Slavinec (iD) (1, 2)

(1) Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

(2) Academic Scientific Union of Pomurje (PAZU), Murska Sobota, Slovenia

Correspondence should be addressed to Mitja Slavinec;

Received 19 February 2018; Accepted 12 April 2018; Published 15 May 2018

Academic Editor: Charles Rosenblatt

Caption: Figure 1: Schematic representation of two layers, one integrating PCMs.

Caption: Figure 2: NLC cell of thickness h along the z-Cartesian coordinate with conflicting strong homogeneous tangential anchoring.

Caption: Figure 3: The time dependency of the incoming heat flux (relative units) for three values of phase change temperature [T.sub.c] = [] (black solid curve), [T.sub.c] > [] (red dotted curve), and [T.sub.c] < [] (blue dashed curve). For comparison, the composite without PCM (black dotted curve) is included. Initial temperature is set to (a) [T.sub.i] > [], (b) [T.sub.i] < [], and (c) [T.sub.i] = [].

Caption: Figure 4: The time dependency of the incoming heat flux (relative units) for three real-life composites BS1 (blue dashed curve), BS2 (red dotted curve), and GPCM (black solid curve).

Caption: Figure 5: The degree of biaxiality [[beta].sup.2] in the absence of NPs for R/[xi].sub.b]= 7. Uniaxial state is presented in black; a maximum degree of biaxiality is presented in white. The diagonal structure is formed (a) in the absence of an external electric field, (b) for R/[xi].sub.f] = 10, and (c) for R/[xi].sub.f] = 100.

Caption: Figure 6: Absence of external electric field, R/[xi].sub.b] = 7. Qualitatively different configurations are obtained for NP placed at the (a) center, (b) bottom boundary, (c) left boundary, and (d) left bottom edge. The color scheme is the same as in Figure 5.

Caption: Figure 7: Configurations for combined impact of the external electric field R/[xi].sub.f] = 50 and four different positions of NPs (a) at the center, (b) bottom boundary, (c) left boundary, and (d) left bottom edge, for R/[xi].sub.b] = 7. The color scheme is the same as in Figure 5.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Klemencic, Eva; Slavinec, Mitja
Publication:Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Acoustic Signatures of the Phases and Phase Transitions in the Blume Capel Model with Random Crystal Field.
Next Article:Absence of the Rashba Splitting of Au(111) Surface Bands.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |