Printer Friendly

Linking quantum physics and classical chaos.

Linking quantum physics and classical chaos

The equations expressing Newton's laws of motion provide a remarkably successful means for describing the movements of objects ranging from stars and planets to baseballs and dust particles. In the last 10 years, researchers have come to realize that even very simple physical systems governed by these equations can exhibit complicated, unpredictable behavior, now termed chaos.

The situation is somewhat different in the microscopic world of atoms. There, Newton's laws no longer hold sway, and the laws of quantum mechanics, as expressed in the Schrodinger equation, govern the behavior of atoms and electrons. Unlike planets in orbit around a star, electrons can't follow orbits drawn as well-defined curves in space, and they gain and lose energy only in well-defined quantities. In this realm, chaos as seen in classical systems appears absent.

To help answer the question of what happens to chaotic patterns of particle behavior when moving from the classical to the quantum world, several groups of researchers have now formulated mathematical models that attempt to bridge the gap between these two realms. Da Hsuan Feng of Drexel University in Philadelphia and his colleagues describe one such model in the Sept. 15 PHYSICAL REVIEW A. Their theory demonstrates that the introduction of quantum effects can wipe out the chaos seen in classical physics, the researchers say.

Feng and his collaborators approached the problem of reconciling the different mathematical formulations of quantum and classical mechanics by searching for a "deeper" mathematical structure underlying both theories. They discovered a geometric intermediary that seems to encompass key aspects of both classical and quantum mechanics, supplying a framework within which to study systematically the way classical behavior emerges from quantum dynamics.

The resulting equations provide a classical-like picture of a physical system that would normally require a quantum description. By changing the value of a specific parameter in the equations, the researchers can show how the gradual introduction of quantum effects suppresses chaotic behavior. Eventually, that parameter reaches a value at which quantum physics takes over completely and chaos disappears.

"For me, this opens up some questions about the foundations of quantum mechanics," Feng says. "Quantum mechanics has been so successful that we sometimes forget its connection to the macroscopic world. I think this whole question [of the correspondence between the classical and quantum worlds] is beginning to come back to haunt us."

Ronald F. Fox of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta and his colleagues have taken a different tack. They looked at the behavior of a special, hypothetical physical system that could be treated either as a purely classical problem -- in which case it would display chaos -- or as a quantum problem. By comparing how the system's quantum version varies depending on whether the corresponding classical version shows chaotic behavior, the researchers hoped to identify characteristics of the quantum system that could be tied to chaotic behavior in the classical system.

"We found that there is such a property," Fox says.

In a quantum system, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle determines how precisely two variables -- such as position and momentum -- can be defined simultaneously. At the same time, a given variable has a certain probability distribution representing the range of values it may have. When the corresponding classical system is chaotic, Fox and his collaborators find that this probability distribution, initially as narrow as the uncertainty principle allows, becomes extremely broad, growing exponentially as the system evolves. "For a classical object, one normally thinks of these quantum fluctuations [expressed by the probability distribution] as very, very small and ignorable," Fox says. "We argue that when the dynamics is chaotic, these quantum fluctuations grow very large."

Because of their mathematical complexity, many theoretical problems remain unsolved at both the classical and quantum levels. "Understanding the mathematics of classical nonlinear dynamics is very, very hard," says Roderick V. Jensen of Yale University in New Haven, Conn. "What seems clear is that understanding the classical physics better will allow us to understand the quantum mechanics better."

Meanwhile, experimentalists keep uncovering surprises in the behavior of electrons and atoms under extreme conditions. "Lots of new physical phenomena have been exposed," Jensen says. "In some cases, the quantum behavior can look very much like classical chaos. In other cases, quantum systems have behavior that is completely different from classical chaos but which nevertheless reflects some aspects of the underlying classical mechanics."

Jensen adds, "As a theorist, I am continually amazed at how imaginative nature is compared to the combined efforts of all the theorists actively working in this field."
COPYRIGHT 1990 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Peterson, Ivars
Publication:Science News
Date:Oct 6, 1990
Words:758
Previous Article:Rare find: a teething dinosaur embryo.
Next Article:Fish hint at temperate biodiversity threat.
Topics:


Related Articles
Photon, photon, who's got the photon?
Going Bohr's way in physics.
As God's dice fall; was Einstein wrong and Bohr right? Experiment goes against the EPR paradox.
Quanta at large: 101 things to do with Schrodinger's cat.
Taking quantum leaps one at a time.
Back to the quantum future: evading chaos to make quantum predictions.
Ripples in space: electrons make waves.
Cavities of chaos: sorting out quantum chaos in the microwave lab.
Quantum mechanics gets real.
Physics rule of thumb gets thumbs down.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters