Printer Friendly

Lindell v. Casperson.

U.S. District Court

RETALIATION

Lindell v. Casperson, 360 F.Supp.2d 932 (W.D.Wis. 2005). An inmate brought an action against correctional officials and employees alleging violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants in part, and denied it in part. The court held that summary judgment was precluded by a genuine issue of material fact on the inmate's claim of retaliatory conduct against him for his complaint that an officer was sexually harassing him. (Waupun Correctional Institution, and Wisconsin Secure Program Facility)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:cases of retaliation
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3WI
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:105
Previous Article:Lashley v. Wakefield.
Next Article:Rhodes v. Robinson.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: RETALIATION.
U.S. Appeals Court: RETALIATION.
Mitchell v. Horn.
Searches.
Lindell v. Casperson.
McElroy v. Lopac.
Lindell v. Casperson.
Lindell v. Casperson.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters