Printer Friendly

Limnology of a lateral lagoon system connected to a Neotropical reservoir (Rosana reservoir, Sao Paulo/Parana, Brazil)/Limnologia de um sistema de lagoas laterais conectadas a um reservatorio Neotropical (reservatorio de Rosana, Estado de Sao Paulo/Parana, Brasil).


The presence of lateral habitats associated with large rivers and reservoirs has a major influence on the whole system, due to their high productivity, prominent role in the nutrient dynamics and maintenance of trophic resources and regional biodiversity (NEIFF, 2001). These attributes are directly related to the fact that these environments are zones of intense interactions (ecotones) with terrestrial ecosystems, receiving significant inputs of organic detritus, which change seasonally due to the phenological cycles of the marginal vegetation, and supporting complex biological communities (DOMITROVIC, 2002; JOSE DE PAGGI; PAGGI, 2008; MITSCH, 1996; WARD et al., 1999; NAIMAN et al., 1988).

Lateral compartments in large Brazilian reservoirs, such as lagoons and river mouths, favors the development of large stands of aquatic macrophytes. These plants can absorb and store nutrients available in the water column during periods of biomass increase. However, during periods of senescence, the intense decomposition process promotes the return of the nutrients to the water column (BARBIERI; ESTEVES, 1991; POMPEO; HENRY, 1998; THOMAZ et al., 2006). Lateral lagoons can also minimize the reservoirs aging process. These adjacent systems act as sediment traps (or filters), with the retention of soil particles transported along the basin (HENRY, 2009). Therefore, the preservation of these environments contributes to the maintenance of water quality and biotic resources in reservoir ecosystems.

Hydropower generation from dammed rivers is the main electrical energy source in Brazil and studies considering the effects of reservoirs structure and functioning on limnological compartmentalization have been performed (HENRY; MARICATTO, 1996; NOGUEIRA et al., 1999, 2012; PAGIORO; THOMAZ, 2002; SOARES et al., 2008). The emphasis is given on longitudinal changes and there is still a lack of information about the role of the lateral dimension, especially the effects of lagoons, river mouths and other adjacent habitats.

The focus of this work is to reinforce the evidences that lateral lagoons of the Rosana Reservoir are distinct limnological environments, which add structural and functional complexity to the reservoir channel and contribute to support diverse biotic communities, as previously demonstrated for fish (FERRAREZE; NOGUEIRA, 2011a), zooplankton (FERRAREZE; NOGUEIRA, 2011b) and phytoplankton (FERRAREZE; NOGUEIRA, 2013). The results of the investigation can subsidize the improvement of the management capacity of the reservoir, especially in terms of conservation and multiple uses.

Material and methods

Study area

The study was conducted in the upper stretch (tail zone) of the Rosana reservoir (State of Sao Paulo/State of Parana, Brazil), which is located in the low Paranapanema river, 25 km from the confluence with the Parana river (Figure 1).

This is the last in a cascade of eleven reservoirs constructed along the river for hydropower generation. Additional information on the limnology of this series of reservoir is provided by Nogueira et al. (2008, 2010, 2012), Naliato et al. (2009) and Perbiche-Neves et al. (2011).

The dam is located at 22[degrees] 36'S e 52[degrees] 52'W, the reservoir area is 276 [km.sup.2], corresponding to a drainage basin of 11,000 [km.sup.2], it is relatively shallow (max. depth of 30 m) and the water retention time is about 21 days.

The regional climate can be characterized by a dry season during autumn and winter, gradual return of rainfall in spring and intensive rainfall in summer. Another remarkable regional characteristic is the presence of a significant large conservation area of Atlantic Rain Forest, the State Park of Morro do Diabo (33,845 ha), adjacent to the right margin of Rosana Reservoir.

After the dam construction, the studied lagoons remain connected permanently to the river-reservoir, despite the wide variation of connection of each individual lagoon (mouth) with the main channel (Table 1).

Sampling and analyses

The fieldwork was carried out during the dry (September/2004, May and August/2005) and rainy (November/2004 and January, March/2005) periods. Data were simultaneously (on the same day) collected at five sampling sites: four lateral lagoons, named lagoons A,B, C and D and one site in the main channel of the Rosana Reservoir--Paranapanema River. Lagoons A, B and D are located in the right margin and lagoon C in the left margin of the reservoir. Table 1 lists the coordinates of the sampling sites, denomination of the sites in an upstream [right arrow] downstream sequence, dominant macrophytes as well as the lagoons area and their connectivity area with the reservoir channel--mean values of the lagoons opening (aperture) considering the different sampling periods.

Daily rainfall data along the studied period were provided by the meteorological station of the State Park of Morro do Diabo, located in municipality of Teodoro Sampaio, Sao Paulo State, Brazil.

In the central zone (limnetic zone) of each lagoon and in the reservoir channel, it was determined vertical profiles (measurements at every 0.5m from the surface to the bottom) of temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity and pH, using a daily calibrated Horiba probe (U-22). The transparency was estimated through the readings of the Secchi disk (30 cm in diameter) (WETZEL; LIKENS, 1991). Due to the reduced depth of the lagoons (between 1.5 and 4.5m), and relatively shallowness (maximum of 9m) and predominance of high turbulence at the reservoir channel sampling site, samples for analysis of turbidity, chlorophyll a, nutrients (total and dissolved) and suspended solids were obtained only under the water surface (ca. 1.0 m depth).

Turbidity was measured using a MSTecnopon digital equipment (0 to 1000 NTU; accurate to 2 NTU). To determine chlorophyll a concentration, it was filtered (vacuum system) a volume of 500 mL, followed by cold acetone (90%) extraction, manual maceration of the filters (Millipore AP40; pore size of 0.7 [micro]m) and posterior spectrophotometer reading and calculation (GOLTERMAN et al., 1978, modified by WETZEL; LIKENS, 1991). Total nitrogen (MACKRETH et al., 1978) and phosphorus (STRICKLAND; PARSONS, 1960) were measured in unfiltered samples, after physical and chemical digestion (VALDERRAMA, 1981).

Dissolved nutrients were obtained using filtered samples (Millipore AP40). Ammonium was determined by Koroleff (1976) method; nitrite and silicate by Golterman et al. (1978); nitrate by Mackreth et al. (1978) and total (after digestion), inorganic and organic (difference between total and inorganic) phosphate by Strickland and Parsons (1960). Suspended solids (total particulate solids) were determined by gravimetry (COLE, 1979), using samples of 500 mL and Millipore AP40 filters previously dried (1 hour at 450[degrees]C) and weighed. Back to laboratory, the filters were dried (24h at 65[degrees]C) and weighed again.

Results are presented as mean values and respective standard deviations, in order to facilitate comparisons between sampling sites (spatial dimension) as well as to provide the magnitude of the temporal (seasonal) variation.

In order to detect similarities between sampling sites it was run a cluster analysis using Pearson-r correlation (Statistic 5.0; STATSOFT, 2001). A principal components analysis (PCA) was also applied, maintaining the discrimination between the sampling periods, with data previously standardized (log x+1, except pH). For both multivariate analyses, it was used the mean values for variables measured along vertical profiles. From PCA analysis, resulting loading and score plots were derived. The differences between the bouquets were tested by Monte Carlo permutation test using redundancy data analysis (PCord 4.1 for Windows; MCCUNE; MEFFORD, 1999).

Finally, the differences between the mean values of the analyzed variables, spatial (reservoir channel versus lagoons) and temporal (dry versus rainy periods), was verified through a Two-way ANOVA (Factor 1: sites; Factor 2: periods). When differences were detected, the Tukey test was used to determine the level of significance. The differences were considered significant for values of p < 0.05. Previously, data normality and homoscedasticity was checked by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. For temporal comparisons, data were pooled into two sets, representing the rainy (September, November and January samplings) (spring-summer) and dry (March, May and August samplings) (autumn-winter) periods. These tests were performed using StatisticaTM 6.0 (STATSOFT, 2001).


During the study period the cumulative annual rainfall was 1,207 mm, with the typical regional pattern of seasonality, maximum rainfall in January (summer), 370 mm, and minimum in August (winter), 12 mm (Figure 2).

Mean values for the water column of pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, conductivity, transparency (Secchi Disc) and turbidity are presented in Table 2. In general, pH values were higher in the lagoons than in the reservoir channel (p = 0.003). Seasonally, the values were slightly acidic during the rainy period and basic during the dry period (p = 0.001). The dissolved oxygen concentrations were higher in the reservoir channel than in the lagoons (p < 0.001). Higher values were observed during the dry period (autumn/winter), due to the positive influence of lower temperatures. Transparency (Secchi disk) was higher in the lagoons than in the reservoir channel (p = 0.03) and the opposite was found for turbidity, higher in the reservoir channel (p < 0.001). Due to the input of allochthonous material, the rainy period exhibited lower transparency (p < 0.001) and a higher turbidity (p < 0.001). The water temperature was higher in the lateral lagoons compared to the reservoir channel (p = 0.02). Seasonally, lower values were verified during the dry period (p < 0.001). Conductivity values were higher in the lateral lagoons, especially due to the influence of lagoons C (P03) and D (P05), compared to the reservoir channel (P04) (p = 0.04). Temporally, lower values were observed during the dry period (p = 0.03).

In general, the chlorophyll a values were relatively low, with mean values inferior to 4 [micro]g [L.sup.-1] (Figure 3a). Among the sampling sites, values were higher in the lateral lagoons, especially in lagoons A (P01) and D (P05), than in the reservoir channel (P04) (p = 0.01). For all sites, the values in the dry season were lower than in the rainy season (p < 0.001). The suspended solids concentration was higher in the reservoir channel compared with lateral lagoons (p = 0.01) (Figure 3b). Higher variability was also observed in the river, as indicated by the standard deviation range. Seasonally, higher values of suspended solids were observed in the rainy period (p < 0.001).

Total nitrogen (Figure 4a) and total phosphorus (Figure 4b) exhibited a similar trend of variation. Among the sampling sites, higher values of total nitrogen and total phosphorus were observed in the reservoir channel (p = 0.02 and p = 0.3, respectively). Seasonally, the concentrations of these nutrients were higher in the rainy period (p < 0.001).

Nitrate values were higher in the reservoir channel than in the lateral lagoons (p = 0.03) (Figure 5a). Seasonally, the values were higher in the dry period (p < 0.001). For nitrite, there was an opposite trend, with higher values in the lateral lagoons (p = 0.04) and in the rainy season (p < 0.001) (Figure 5b). High values of ammonium were registered in the reservoir channel (p = 0.04) (Figure 5c). Seasonally, the dry period showed lower values of this nutrient (p < 0.001).

Total dissolved phosphate (Figure 6a), and its inorganic (Figure 6b) and organic (Figure 6c) fractions, exhibited an increase during the rainy period (p < 0.001). The reservoir channel showed higher values of these nutrients compared with lagoons (p < 0.001).

The concentration of silicate was higher in the reservoir channel than in the lagoons (p = 0.01) (Figure 7). However, the seasonal variation was different from the other dissolved nutrients. This nutrient showed a higher concentration during the dry period (p < 0.001).

Limnological differences between the sampling sites were evidenced by the similarity analysis (Figure 8). The reservoir channel (P4) was the most distinct sampling site, contrasting with the lagoons. This analysis also showed that the P3, with the highest mouth area to the reservoir channel, exhibited a higher similarity with the reservoir channel sampling site as well as more distinct limnological features in relation to the other lagoons.

The PCA (Figure 9; Table 3) explained 84% of data variability (p = 0.01), considering the first two ordination axes (axis 1 = 73%, axis 2 = 11%). This analysis clearly evidenced the seasonal influence on the sampling sites (p < 0.0001). On the positive side of the axis 1 were located the sites sampled in September 2004, May and August 2005, associated with high pH values, high concentration of dissolved oxygen and high transparency (r > 0.4).

On the negative side of the axis, were located most sampling sites of November 2004 and January and March 2005, associated with high turbidity, high concentration of suspended solids (r > 0.4). On the positive side of the axis 2 were located the sites sampled in March, May and August 2005, associated with higher concentration of ammonium (r > 0.4), while on the negative side were located the sites of September and November 2004 and January 2005, with high concentrations of total phosphorus, total dissolved phosphate, dissolved inorganic phosphate and dissolved silicate (r > 0.4). Seasonal changes (increase of rainfall and increase of nutrients carried into the system) constituted the major environmental force influencing the variability of limnological conditions. Spatially, the discrimination between the reservoir channel and lagoons was evidenced in the most contrasting periods--late dry season (September) and, especially, in the peak of the rainfall period, January. In this last occasion the reservoir channel was clearly associated with higher nutrient concentrations and high turbidity (negative side of the axis 1).


The variability of limnological variables, especially nutrient concentrations, in the lateral lagoons of Rosana Reservoir was lower than the observed in the river/reservoir channel. This is probably related to the fact that lateral environments are less affected by 'pulses' of changes produced by intense rainfall, seasonally or during isolated (storm) events.

The reservoir exhibited higher concentrations of nutrients and lower values of transparency and temperature compared with the lagoons. The conditions in the reservoir channel are directly influenced by the input of the main tributary rivers, whose mouths are located upstream (ca. 13 km). High loads of allochthonous material flow into the superior region of the reservoir, especially from the rivers Pirapo (coming from Parana State) and Pirapozinho (from Sao Paulo State), mainly during the rainy period. These inflows correspond to the main nutrient source for the Rosana Reservoir (FERRAREZE et al., 2006). During storm events the rivers inflow change immediately the limnological conditions of the upstream zone of the reservoir.

Despite the high abundance of aquatic macrophytes in the lateral lagoons, nutrients originated from the decomposition of the plants seem to have a secondary role in the biogeochemical cycles of the studied environment. Probably because in that region there is no typical and seasonal decaying period, and the plants are found all over the year (field observations).

In undammed rivers, the seasonal flood pulses promote a strong homogenization between the main River and lateral areas during the overflow period. The increase of the connectivity between the lateral lagoons and the main river can potentiate the flow of organisms and mineral material (STRIPARI; HENRY, 2002; THOMAZ et al., 2007; WARD, 1989; WARD et al., 1999). Lateral lagoons can receive inorganic nutrients from the river and export organic material (JUNK et al., 1989). Local and regional variability of the limnological factors is reduced by the increase of water levels, when there is a dominance of fluvial conditions (AGOSTINHO et al., 2000; THOMAZ et al., 2006). Nevertheless, the results obtained in the present study do not confirm this hypothesis, as the segregation between the different sampling sites was higher during summer (rainy season) compared to the winter (dry season) (PCA analysis). This is probably because the studied system is strongly influenced by the reservoir cascade located upstream, which attenuates the summer pulse effect (NOGUEIRA et al., 2008, 2010).

The increase of the water level in Rosana Reservoir does not follow, necessarily, the regional precipitation cycle, due to the dam operational control. This is a run-off-the river reservoir with short water retention time (NOGUEIRA et al., 2012). Thus, the increase of flow with rain events may not be strong enough to cause the homogenization between the reservoir channel and lateral environments. Some studies demonstrate that the influence of regional processes is significant only when the pulse generates a water level increase above 3.2 m (THOMAZ et al., 1997; VERISSIMO, 1994). Therefore, in regulated river stretches with moderate level variation the pulse effect would not be so influent and local processes (local precipitation, resuspension of sediments, nutrient cycles and decomposition of aquatic macrophytes) would be the main factors influencing the limnological functioning (THOMAZ et al., 2006). Another interesting hydrodynamic factor, not properly investigated, is the effect on lateral habitats of pronounced daily fluctuation of flow, downstream of dams, because of peaks of energy production/consumption along 24 hour periods. In case of the studied river stretch, the flow can vary from 500 to 1500 [m.sup.3] [s.sup.-1] in less than 12 hours (NALIATO et al., 2009).

The effects of seasonality on limnological variables (reduction of Secchi depth and increased turbidity) were clearly observed, especially in the river sampling site. In general the conductivity values were higher in the rainy period, probably due to the overall increase in nutrients and lower pH, mainly in the lagoons.

Furthermore, the increase of chlorophyll a and transparency during the dry period is a common pattern for large rivers and lakes of tropical/subtropical floodplains (BONETTO, 1986; CARVALHO et al., 2001; GARCIA DE EMILIANI, 1990; NEIFF, 1990; WELCOME, 1986). However, in the present study the increase in values of chlorophyll was associated with the reduction of transparency. The input of allochthonous nutrient in the river/reservoir and lagoons (FERRAREZE; NOGUEIRA, 2013) enables the increase in phytoplankton abundance and consequently the transparency decline. This pattern was previously verified for the Paranapanema River reservoir cascade and lotic stretches during summer (FERRAREZE; NOGUEIRA, 2006; NOGUEIRA et al., 2010), due to the growth of phytoplankton groups more tolerant to low light penetration, such as Cryptophyceae and Pennales (MINEEVA et al., 2008; REYNOLDS et al., 2002).

Besides that, the increase in the suspended solids during summer is explained by the entrance of external material originated from the drainage basin, as previously mentioned. This sediment input from the watershed also explains the increase of total nitrogen and total phosphorus. The increment rate of these nutrients was not proportional to the suspended solids. Probably, this is related to the type of soil of the basin, which is predominantly oligotrophic. In this region, the traditional land use is the extensive cattle breeding or familiar, low-scale agriculture with limited addition of industrial fertilizers.

The concentrations of ammonium were higher in summer, under lower oxygen concentrations. This suggests that ammonium is produced by the mineralization (ammonification) of the organic components from particulate and dissolved materials, probably exported from lagoons. Nitrate was the main nitrogen compound in the lagoons, due the permanent oxidation condition of the water column. The maximum values in the nitrite and nitrate, in addition to the allochthonous contributions, may also have been influenced by the ammonium nitrification.

For the dissolved phosphorus, the seasonal trend varied, with the inorganic fraction exhibiting higher values in summer, and organic, in winter. This corroborates the high influence of the sediment transport from adjacent soil into the river in the rainy period, once, its availability comes from the mineral decomposition, while the highest values of dissolved organic phosphate in the dry season should be associated to internal processes, such as the action of decomposers (bacteria and fungi) in the nutrients cycle and in environmental features.

Higher silicate concentrations were observed in the dry period, different from other nutrients. Silicate is probably accumulated in the lagoons during the rainy period and resuspended during the beginning of the dry period, due to the total circulation of the water column (temperature homogeneity), and it is also influenced by strong winds observed in this period.

Our results indicated that regional factors were the main responsible for the limnological dynamics of the study environments. The alternation between dry and rainy period changes significantly river and lagoons, mainly due to the contribution of tributaries located upstream. Magnitudes of changes were higher in the reservoir channel compared to the lagoons, which were more resilient. Spatially, even in the peak of the rainfall period, the system exhibited a remarkable limnological variability. This fact shows the complexity of river-reservoir-lagoons system and the need to consider these distinct habitats in regional conservation strategy, presently focused on terrestrial environments.


This study demonstrates that regional factors were the main responsible for the limnological dynamics of the study environments, indicated by significant seasonal changes in the limnology of river and lagoons, mainly due to the contribution of tributaries located upstream. This fact evidences the need to consider these distinct habitats in regional conservation strategy, presently focused on terrestrial habitats.

Doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v36i2.21491

Received on July 29, 2013.

Accepted on February 7, 2014.


We are grateful to Capes, for the scholarship conceived to the first author, and to Duke Energy Geracao Paranapanema, for the financial support.


AGOSTINHO, A. A.; THOMAZ, S. M.; MINTE-VERA, C. V.; WINEMILLER, K. O. Biodiversity in the Parana river floodplain. In: GOPAL, B.; JUNK, W. J.; DAVIS, J. A. (Ed.). Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation. The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 2000. p. 89-118.

BARBIERI, R.; ESTEVES, F. A. The chemical composition of some aquatic macrophyte species and implications for the metabolism of a tropical lacustrine ecosystem--Lobo Reservoir, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, v. 213, n. 2, p. 133-140, 1991.

BONETTO, A. A. The Parana river System. In: DAVIES, B. R.; WALKER, K. F. (Ed.). The ecology of river Systems. The Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, 1986. p. 541-555.

CARVALHO, P.; BINI, L. M.; THOMAZ, S. M.; GONCALVES, L. G.; ROBERTSON, B.; TAVECHIO, W. L. G.; DARWISCH, A. J. Comparative limnology of South American floodplain lakes and lagoons. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, v. 23, n. 2, p. 265-273, 2001.

COLE, G. A. Textbook of limnology. 2nd ed. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1979.

DOMITROVIC, Y. Z. Structure and variation of the Paraguay river phytoplankton in two periods of its hydrological cycle. Hydrobiologia, v. 472, n. 1-3, p. 177-196, 2002.

FERRAREZE, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. G. Phytoplankton assemblages in lotic systems of the Paranapanema Basin (Southeast Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensis, v. 18, n. 4, p. 389-405, 2006.

FERRAREZE, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. G. Importance of lateral lagoons for the ichthyofauna in a large tropical reservoir. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 71, n. 4, p. 807-820, 2011a.

FERRAREZE, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. G. Importance of lateral lagoons for the zooplankton assemblages (Cladocera and Copepoda) in a large tropical reservoir. Oecologia Brasiliensis, v. 15, n. 3, p. 522-536, 2011b.

FERRAREZE, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. G. Phytoplankton assemblages in lateral lagoons of a large tropical reservoir. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 73, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2013.

FERRAREZE, M.; NOGUEIRA, M. G.; VIANNA, N. C. Transporte de nutrientes e sedimentos no rio Paranapanema (SP/PR) e seus principais tributarios nas estacoes seca e chuvosa. In: NOGUEIRA, M. G.; HENRY, R.; JORCIN, A. (Ed.). Ecologia de reservatorios: impactos potenciais, acoes de manejo e sistema em cascata. Sao Carlos: Rima, 2006. p. 435-459.

GARCIA DE EMILIANI, M. O. Phytoplankton ecology of the middle Parana river. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensis, v. 3, n. 3, p. 391-417, 1990.

GOLTERMAN, H. L.; CLYMO, R. S.; OHSTAD, M. A. Methods for physical; chemical analysis of fresh waters. IBP N.8. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackweel Scientific Publications, 1978.

HENRY, R. Annual changes in sediment entrapment efficiency in lakes lateral to a river (Paranapanema River, Sao Paulo, Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensis, v. 21, n. 3, p. 25-34, 2009.

HENRY, R.; MARICATTO, F. E. Sedimentation rates of tripton in Jurumirim reservoir (Sao Paulo, Brasil). Limnologica, v. 26, n. 1, p. 15-25, 1996.

JOSE DE PAGGI, S. B.; PAGGI, J. C. Hydrological connectivity as a shaping force in the zooplankton community of two lakes in the Parana river floodplain. International Review of Hydrobiology, v. 93, n. 6, p. 659-678, 2008.

JUNK, W. J.; BAYLEY, P. B.; SPARKS, R. E. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, v. 106, n. 1, p. 110-127, 1989.

KOROLEFF, F. Determination of nutrients. In: GRASSHOFF, K. (Ed.). Methods of seawater analysis. Weinhein: Verlag, 1976. p. 89.

MACKRETH, F. J. H.; HERON, J.; F. J. TALLING. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Kendall: Titus Wilson; Sons LTD, 1978. (Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific Publication, n. 36).

MCCUNE, B.; MEFFORD, M. J. PC-ORD for windows: multivariate analysis of ecological data version 4.1. Oregon: MjM Software Design, 1999.

MITSCH, W. J. Manging the world's wetlands--preserving and enhancing their ecological functions. Verh. Internationalen Verein Limnologie, v. 26, n. 1, p. 139-147, 1996.

MINEEVA, N. M.; LITVINOV, A. S.; STEPANOVA, I.; KOCHETKOVA, E. M. Y. U. Chlorophyll content and factors affecting its spatial distribution in the Middle Volga reservoirs. Inland Water Biology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 64-72, 2008.

NAIMAN, R. J.; DECHAMPS, H. PASTOR, J.; JOHNSTON, C. A. The potencial importance of boundaries to fluvial ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, v. 7, n. 4, p. 289-306, 1988.

NALIATO, D. A. O.; NOGUEIRA, M. G.; PERBICHENEVES, G. Discharge pulses of hydroelectric dams and their effects in the downstream limnological conditions: a case study in a large tropical river (SE Brazil). Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 301-314, 2009.

NEIFF, J. J. Aspect of primary productivity in the lower Parana and Paraguay riverine system. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensis, v. 3, n. 1, p. 77-113, 1990.

NEIFF, J. J. Diversity in some tropical wetlands systems of South America. In: GOPAL, B.; JUNK, W. J. J.; DAVIS, A. (Ed.). Biodiversity in Wetlands: assessment, function and conservation. Leiden: Backhuys, 2001. p. 157-186.

NOGUEIRA, M. G.; HENRY, R.; MARICATTO, F. E. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the Jurumirim Reservoir, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, v. 4, n. 1, p. 107-120, 1999.

NOGUEIRA, M. G.; OLIVEIRA, P. C. R.; BRITTO, Y. C. T. Zooplankton assemblages (Copepoda and Cladocera) in a cascade of reservoirs of a large tropical river (SE Brazil). Limnetica, v. 27, n. 1, p. 151-170, 2008.

NOGUEIRA, M. G.; FERRAREZE, M.; MOREIRA, M. L.; GOUVEA, R. M. Phytoplankton assemblages in a reservoir cascade of a large tropical--subtropical river (SE, Brazil,). Brazilian Journal ofBiology, v. 70, n. 3, p. 781-793, 2010.

NOGUEIRA, M. G.; PERBICHE-NEVES G.; NALIATO, D. A. O. Limnology of two contrasting hydroelectric reservoirs (storage and run-of-river) in southeast Brazil. In: SAMADI-BOROUJENI, H. (Ed.). Hydropower Practice and Application. Croatia: Intech, 2012. p. 167-184.

PAGIORO, T. A.; THOMAZ, S. M. Longitudinal patterns of sedimentation in a deep, monomitic subtropical reservoir (Itaipu, Brazil-Paraguay). Archives Hydrobiology, v. 154, n. 3, p. 515-528, 2002.

PERBICHE-NEVES, G.; ROMERO, R. A.; NOGUEIRA, M. G. Phytoplankton structure in two contrasting cascade reservoirs (Paranapanema River, Southeast Brazil). Biologia Section Botany (Bratislava), v. 66, n. 6, p. 967-976, 2011.

POMPEO, M. L. M.; HENRY, R. Decomposition of macrophyte Echinochloa polystachya (H. B. K.) Hitchcock, in a Brazilian Reservoir (Paranapanema River mouth zone). Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, v. 26, n. 4, p. 1871-1875, 1998.

REYNOLDS, C. S.; HUSZAR, V. L. M.; KRUK, C.; FLORES, L. N.; MELO, S. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, v. 24, n. 2, p. 417-428, 2002.

SOARES, M. C. S.; MARINHO, M. M.; HUSZAR, V. L. M.; BRANCO, C. W. C.; AZEVEDO, S. M. F. O. The effects of water retention time and watershed features on the limnology of two tropical reservoirs in Brazil. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management, v. 13, n. 1, p. 257-269, 2008.

STATSOFT. Statistica (data analysis software system). Version 6. Tulsa: Statsoft Inc., 2001.

STRICKLAND, J. D.; PARSONS, T. R. A manual of sea water analysis. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, v. 125, n. 1, p. 1-185, 1960.

STRIPARI, N. H.; HENRY, R. The invertebrate colonization during decomposition of Eichhornia azurea Kunth in a lateral lake in the mouth zone of Paranapanema River in to Jurumirim Reservoir (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Brazilian Journal ofBiology, v. 62, n. 2, p. 293-310, 2002.

THOMAZ, S. M.; ROBERTO, M. C.; BINI, L. M. Caracterizacao limnologica dos ambientes aquaticos e influencia dos niveis fluviometricos. In: VAZZOLER, A. E. A. M.; AGOSTINHO, A. A.; HAHN, N. S. (Ed.). A Planicie de Inundacao do alto rio Parana: aspectos fisicos, biologicos e socioeconomicos. Maringa: Eduem, 1997. p. 73-102.

THOMAZ, S. M.; PAGIORO, T.; BINI, L. M.; MURPHY, K. J. Effect of reservoir drawdown on biomass of three species of aquatic macrophytes in a large subtropical reservoir (Itaipu, Brazil). Hydrobiologia, v. 570, n. 1, p. 53-59, 2006.

THOMAZ, S. M.; BINI, L. M.; BOZELLI, R. L. Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia, v. 579, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2007.

VALDERRAMA, J. G. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and phosphorus in natural waters. Marine Chemistry, v. 10, n. 1, p. 109-122, 1981.

VERISSIMO, S. Variacoes na composicao da ictiofauna em tres lagoas sazonalmente isoladas, na planicie de inundacao do alto rio Parana, ilha Porto Rico, PR-Brasil. Sao Carlos: UFSCar, 1994.

WELCOME, R. L. The Niger river system. In: DAVIES, B. R.; WALKER, K. F. (Ed.). The ecology of river systems. Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, 1986. p. 9-23.

WARD, J. V. The four-dimensional nature of lotic system. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, v. 8, n. 1, p. 2-8, 1989.

WARD, J. V.; TOCKNER, K.; SCHIMER, F. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, v. 15, n. 1, p. 125-139, 1999.

WETZEL, R. G.; LIKENS, G. E. Limnological Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.

Mateus Ferrareze *, Marcos Gomes Nogueira and Luciana Sartori

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Campus de Botucatu. Cx. Postal 510, 18618-970, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

* Author for correspondence. E-mail:

Table 1. Sampling sites, geographical location, lagoons surface
area, main aquatic macrophytes and connectivity area (mouth area)
of each lagoon with the reservoir channel.

Sampling sites    Geographical Area
                  coordinates ([km.sup.2])

Lateral           22[degrees] 34' 03.3"S /
lagoon A (P01)    52[degrees] 0.110 09' 11.4"W

Lateral           22[degrees] 36' 56.5"S /
lagoon B (P02)    52[degrees] 0.024 09' 47.3"W

Lateral           22[degrees] 37' 28,9"S /
lagoon C (P03)    52[degrees] 0.721 09' 21.1"W

Paranapanema      22[degrees] 37' 51.6"S /
River (P04)       52[degrees] -09' 30.5"W

Lateral           22[degrees] 38' 22.0"S /
lagoon D (P05)    52[degrees] 0.063 09' 29.0"W

Sampling sites           Dominant macrophytes           Connectivity

Lateral             Tipha dominguensis, Eichhornia           50
lagoon A (P01)         azurea, Brachiaria spp.,
                        Pontederia chordata and
                             Salvinia sp.

Lateral                   Eichhornia azurea,                6.5
lagoon B (P02)        Brachiaria spp., Pontederia
                  chordata, Salvinia sp., Pistia sp.,
                     Egeria spp. and Nymphaea sp.

Lateral           Eichhornia azurea, Brachiaria spp.,       525
lagoon C (P03)     Pontederia chordata, Salvinia sp.
                            and Egeria spp.

Paranapanema        Tipha dominguensis, Eichhornia           -
River (P04)          azurea, Eichhornia crassipes,
                      Brachiaria spp., Pontederia
                       chordata, Salvinia sp and
                              Pistia sp.

Lateral           Eichhornia azurea, Brachiaria spp.,       60.2
lagoon D (P05)    Pontederia chordata, Salvinia sp.,
                      Pistia sp. and Nymphaea sp.

Table 2. Mean values (between depths)
(except for Secchi disk transparency)
of limnological variables measured at
the different sampling sites and periods.


       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 5

P01     7.2      7.5      6.2      6.6      7.3      6.1
P02     7.3      6.6      6.3      6.6      7.3      7.6
P03     7.2      6.3      5.9      6.5      7.2      7.6
P04     7.2      6.2      5.2      6.4      6.9      7.2
P05     7.4      6.2      5.5      5.9      7.0      7.1

              Conductivity ([micro]S [cm.sup.-1])

       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 5

P01      46       70       70       70       48       64
P02      70       70       70       70       44       64
P03      90       80       90       80       80       65
P04      60       70       70       70       52       65
P05      60       70       90       80       85       65

                Dissolved oxygen (mg [L.sup.-1])

       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 5

P01     8.7      6.5      6.2      8.4      6.2      8.0
P02     8.6      7.7      6.3      5.0      9.5      8.3
P03     9.7      8.0      5.9      5.2      10.0     9.0
P04     9.6      7.8      6.0      6.4      9.2      12.0
P05     8.8      7.6      5.4      9.2      13.2     12.0

                        Transparency (m)

       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 5

P01     2.8      1.5      0.4       1        2       3.5*
P02     2.3      1.6      0.1      0.8      2.2      2.8*
P03     2.2       1       0.2       1       2.7       3*
P04     2.1      1.3      0.1      0.7      2.2      5.8*
P05     2.7      1.9      0.2       1       2.5      3.5*

                     Temperature ([degrees]C)

       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 05

P01     23.0     25.5     27.2     27.6     25.4     22.2
P02     22.1     25.5     27.1     27.4     25.3     22.4
P03     20.8     25.7     26.9     27.2     25.2     22.1
P04     20.5     25.2     27.1     26.9     24.6     22.4
P05     21.0     25.6     27.0     27.3     25.2     22.5

                        Turbidity (NTU)

       Sep 4    Nov 4    Jan 5    Mar 5    May 5    Aug 05

P01     8.2      36.7     52.4     17.3     15.1     9.0
P02     4.5      33.4     40.2     12.3     7.4      4.2
P03     5.1      55.1     83.4     14.0     7.8      6.0
P04     5.1      98.0    135.5     20.3     6.5      5.7
P05     5.0      94.7    140.0     21.0     6.9      5.8

* bottom.

Table 3. Correlations of limnological variables with the main
components 1 and 2 (PCA analysis).

Variable                         r (axis1)   r (axis 2)

Ammonium                          -0.1281      0.3959
Total phosphorus                  -0.1436     -0.4431
Total dissolved phosphate         -0.1907     -0.3967
Dissolved inorganic phosphate     -0.2616     -0.5664
Dissolved silicate                0.0242      -0.3962
pH                                0.6422       0.0177
Dissolved oxygen                  0.3964      -0.0053
Transparency                      0.4002      -0.0383
Turbidity                         -0.4466      0.2328
Suspended solids                  -0.4548      0.1951
Inorganic solids                  -0.4471      0.2499
COPYRIGHT 2014 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ferrareze, Mateus; Nogueira, Marcos Gomes; Sartori, Luciana
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences (UEM)
Date:Apr 1, 2014
Previous Article:Nesting of social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in a riparian forest of rio das Mortes in southeastern Brazil/Nidificacao de vespas sociais...
Next Article:Phytochemical analysis and modulation in aminoglycosides antibiotics activity by Lantana camara L./Analise fitoqufmica e modulacao sobre a atividade...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |