Printer Friendly

Length-weight relationships of the Emerald Shiner (Notropis atherinoides--Rafinesque, 1818) in the Western Basin of Lake Erie.

ABSTRACT. Total length and standard length (mm) were compared to weight (mg) in the Emerald Shiner (Notropis atherinoides--Rafinesque, 1818) in the western basin of Lake Erie. Length and weight relationship (n = 400), length- frequency distribution, and sex ratios were evaluated for coastal and tributary habitats and compared to open water habitats. A strong positive correlation was observed between length and weight for both males and females. For males (n = 195) there was a significant positive relationship between standard length (SL) and weight (F = 935.64, d.f = 195; [R.sup.2] = 0.989) and between total length (TL) and weight (F = 918.75, d.f. = 195; [R.sup.2] = 0.991). In females (n = 205), there was also a strong positive correlation between SL and weight (F = 1108.18, d.f. = 204; [R.sup.2] = 0.976) and between TL and weight (F = 1208.86, d.f. = 204; [R.sup.2] = 0.983). This same positive relationship between SL and weight (F = 1909.58, d.f. = 399; [R.sup.2] = 0.984,) and between TL and weight (F = 1960.07, d.f. = 399; [R.sup.2] = 0.988) that was found for the individual sexes was present in the combined data for the two sexes. Length-weight relationship patterns in Emerald Shiner were significantly influenced by sex (ANCOVA, F= 313.03, p < 0.01) and habitat (ANCOVA, F = 6.693, p = 0.013). Three separate age classes were distinguished in the data. Age 0 males ranged from 15-33 mm TL, while age 0 females ranged from 18-30 mm TL. Age I males ranged from 39-78 mm TL and Age I females ranged from 42-78 mm TL. Age II+ males ranged from 78-111 mm TL and Age II+ females ranged from 81-108 mm TL. Emerald Shiner exhibit indeterminate growth and sex influenced growth patterns based on the von Bertalanffy growth model.

Date of Publication: 02 February 2015


The fish fauna of Lake Erie is comprised of an estimated 114 species (Leach and Nepszy 1976); however, little information is available on the basic life history for the majority of the non-game species (Hartman and others 1992). Cyprinidae represent 51 percent of the Lake Erie fish fauna (Hubbs and others 2004) and are an important staple of most game fish species diets (Simon 2011). Minnows are essential to energy transfer from lower to upper trophic levels by converting nutrients from zooplankton and aquatic insects to the broader food web (Hartman and others 1992). Understanding the rates of growth and relationships between weight and length are important for our knowledge of life history and population age structure. Accurately modeling aquatic ecosystem function depends on information that can be acquired through simple and cost effective techniques (Froese 2006).

The Emerald Shiner (Notropis atherinoides--Rafinesque, 1818) is a relatively abundant minnow native to the Great Lakes. Its range extends from Eastern Texas to Alabama and northward to the Finger Lakes of New York State and the Mackenzie River of the Northwest Territories (Campbell and MacCrimm 1970). Emerald Shiner inhabits lakes and rivers and is a popular prey item for highly sought after piscivores, such as Sander vitreus. A regional bait industry has developed around its use by sport fisherman (Pothoven and others 2009). Despite their extensive range and relative abundance, Emerald Shiner populations declined in the Great Lakes during the 1950s, coinciding with the introduction of the Alewife, Alas a pseudoharengus, which is known to compete directly for zooplankton prey items and also is known to consume Emerald Shiner eggs and larvae (Schaeffer and others 2008). Although Emerald Shiner has recovered, the condition remains unknown throughout much of its range.

This study investigated the relationship between length and weight in Emerald Shiner to understand growth patterns based on sex with respect to habitat. In addition, the sex ratio and length-frequency distribution was used to predict age structure. Both length and weight relationships are useful in comparing different populations and evaluating ecological patterns. Lake Erie individuals were collected from both coastal shoreline and tributary habitats in the western basin and were compared to open water populations. The purpose of this study was to determine patterns in sex growth differences, and specific correlations between two measures of length (i.e., total length [TL] and standard length [SL]) and weight based on sex. Differences in growth were assessed to find whether differences between Emerald Shiner populations in the western basin were associated with coastal (i.e., shoreline and tributary water) compared to open water habitats. Lastly, the growth range and age structure of individuals from the Bass Islands were compared to other populations in the Great Lakes region.


Study Area

The Laurentian Great Lakes encompass one-fifth of the available freshwater in the world (Steffen and others 2014). Lake Erie is globally the 10th largest lake and stores about two percent of the total volume of all of the Great Lakes (FWPCA 1968; Munawar and others 1999). Lake Erie is the shallowest, most southern, and the most productive of the Great Lakes (Michalak and others 2013). It has three separate basins, the western, central, and eastern basins, with depth increasing in an easterly direction (FWPCA 1968). This study was conducted in the western basin near the Bass island archipelago, which is comprised of 31 islands in Ottawa County, Ohio. The study area has four major tributaries that include the Huron, Portage, Sandusky, and Vermillion rivers (Fig. 1).

Field Methods

All study data were collected in the western basin of Lake Erie between 2004 and 2014 using a variety of gears to reduce bias. Studies were collected for a variety of purposes as part of investigations of the Bass Island region. Individual Emerald Shiner were collected from coastal (including shoreline and tributary habitats) and open water habitats. Individuals used in the current study were collected during ichthyological investigations during the spawning season of 2014 (June-July) (see Supplemental Materials: Specimens Examined Section). Length and weight relationships were based on 400 individuals from coastal and open water habitats, while length-frequency distribution and sex ratios were based on random samples of 400 individuals from dates in July. Lot collections are part of the permanent collection of the Museum of Biodiversity, F.T. Stone Laboratory, The Ohio State University and are housed at Gibraltar Island.

Laboratory Methods

Individual fish were randomly subsampled from site-specific collection lots and blotted dry to remove excess moisture prior to wet weighing using a Sartorius balance with a resolution of 1 [micro]g (Middleton and others 2013). Due to the precision of the balance used in the analysis it was impractical to measure live individuals or to attempt to weigh fish in the field. Fish were anesthetized in MS222 and fixed in 10 percent formalin. Fish used in the laboratory analysis were soaked in water just prior to being measured. The relationship between freshly preserved individuals was tested to verify weight accuracy. Fish shrinkage was stable after seven days after which lengths and weights were measured. Shrinkage was less than five percent of the true weight of live individuals; however, it is recognized that data might not completely reflect the length-weight relationships of live individuals. All specimens had similar treatment methods, so it is assumed that there is no reason to expect that preservation bias varied by location or sex. Sex was determined using a Zeiss dissection microscope. Male gonopods were elongated, sausage-shaped, and resided within a shallow trough just posterior to the anus and anterior to the anal fin origin, while the female cloaca possessed a circular, mound of villiform tissue with a short, flattened tube for egg deposition. Length measurements included standard length (SL) and total length (TL), which was measured using digital calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm. The SL was measured from the tip of the snout, horizontally, to the posterior tip of the notochord at the hypural plate, while TL was measured from the tip of the snout, horizontally, to the tip of the depressed caudal fin (Hubbs and Lagler 2004). All measurements were based on the standard procedure described in Hubbs and Lagler (2004). Age groups of individual Emerald Shiner were determined using length-frequency distribution analysis (Nielson and Johnson 1983), where ages were decided according to elevated peaks in the distribution.


Regression analysis was used to model weight as a function of length (i.e., SL and TL). Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)(STATISITICA 11.0) with length as the covariate was used to compare weight between sexes and habitats. Habitat class was assessed to determine size effect, by separating populations into coastal (tributary and shoreline) and open water groups (Sokal and Rohlf 2012). Emerald Shiner age groups were determined by sex using length-frequency distribution analysis (Nielsen and Johnson 1983). A two way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (Sokal and Rohlf 2011) was used to determine if there were significant differences in size distribution according to age or sex. A chi-squared test was performed to see if there was any significant difference in the sex ratio between males and females in the random subsample. Fulton's condition factors for males, females, and the general population were calculated using the relationship between weight and total length (TL) of each individual (Nielson and Johnson 1983). Weight was plotted by TL for all individuals within each subset and a trend line was applied to best fit each scatter plot graph, with the b value of each line equation representing the Fulton's condition factor. The von Bertalanffy growth model was used to determine growth rate for each sex using the formula,

L(t) = [L.sub.[infinity]] * (1 - exp (-[K.sup.*] (t -[t.sub.0])))

where, L (t) is the length at any given age (years), K is equal to the b-value or slope of the regression plot of -ln (1 - [L.sub.(t)]/[L.sub.[infinity]]) (von Bertalanffy 1934; Ricker 1975).


We examined 12,863 individuals from 19 Western basin Lake Erie sites and randomly subsampled 400 individuals based on coastal (n = 265 individuals), tributary (n = 19 individuals), and open water (n = 116 individuals). Male Emerald Shiner showed a significant positive, power function between SL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.989, F = 935.64, d.f. = 194, Fig. 2a) and between TL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.991, F = 918.75, d.f. = 194; Fig. 3a). Female Emerald Shiner had a strong positive, power function between SL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.976, F = 1108.18, d.f. = 204; Fig. 2b) and between TL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.983, F = 1208.86, d.f. = 204; Fig. 3b). The combined data for the two sexes showed a significant positive, power function between SL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.984, F = 1909.58, d.f. = 399; Fig. 2c) and between TL and weight ([R.sup.2] = 0.988, F = 1960.07, d.f. = 399; Fig. 3c). These regression analyses, comparing TL to weight and SL to weight, were found to have Fulton Condition Factors (b) of -5.379 and -4.995, both representing negative allometric growth (Fig. 4a and 4b).

Length-weight relationship patterns in Emerald Shiner were significantly influenced by sex (ANCOVA, F = 313.03, p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in length-weight relationships between coastal compared to open water habitats (ANCOVA, F = 6.693, p = 0.013).

The sex ratio from the random subsample of 400 individuals was not significantly different (Chi-squared p = 0.383). Males were slightly outnumbered byfemales 1:1.05. Length-frequency distribution of male (Fig. 5a) and female (Fig. 5b) individuals showed no significant size difference within age class (p > 0.05). There were no significant difference in age class size for Age 0 male and female individuals (ANOVA F = 0.506, d.f. = 25, p = 0.483); Age I (ANOVA, F = 0.567, d.f. = 317, p = 0.452); and Age II+ (ANOVA, F = 0.271, d.f. = 52, p = 0.605). Male Age 0 individuals ranged from 15-33 mm TL, while female Age 0 ranged from 1830 mm TL. Male Age I ranged from 39-78 mm TL, while female Age I ranged from 42-78 mm TL. Male Age II+ ranged from 78-111 mm TL, and female Age II+ ranged from 81-108 mm TL (Table 1). The von Bertalanffy growth model observed that individual growth occurred at a greater rare in males than females for the Western Lake Erie population (Fig. 6).


Carlander's (1969) review of age and growth relationship studies found three previous studies had been published. Relationships on size and age included South Dakota (Fuchs 1967), Alabama (Swingle 1965), and Manitoba, Canada (Schaap 1989). Relationships between length and age (in years) have been studied in Illinois (Dobie and others 1948, 1956), Michigan (Hubbs 1922), Ohio (Fish 1932; Gray 1942; Trautman 1957,1981), South Dakota (Fuchs 1967), Wisconsin (Becker 1964, 1983), and Canada (Campbell and MacCrimmon 1970) (Table 1). No latitudinal gradient was observed within the Great Lakes region, i.e., northern latitudes of Wisconsin to southern latitudes of Ohio. This study found that southern populations attained larger size at age than northern populations. In addition a positive relationship was observed between age and weight. Sex based differential growth was observed with females tending to be larger than males based on both mean TL and mean weight; however, in this study males attained larger size within age than females for every age class. The positive regression analysis relationships of Emerald Shiners show that they are indeterminate growers. Positive correlations between length and weight show that a significant, positive relationship between age and length, as well as age and weight, exists for Western basin populations. A difference in size at age between sexes was observed between males and females with mean male differences of 3-5 mm TL larger than females. The analysis of length and weight by sex were not statistically different; however, other studies found size differences between sex. These were not statistically tested, but were based on observed differences. We evaluated our results using ANOVA, ANCOVA, length-frequency, and von Bertalanffy growth models. Our results show that although males were on average larger than females at each age class that the variance associated with each sex was not statistically significant. Growth rates from the von Bertalanffy calculations showed that males grew at a faster rate than females.

Our test of habitat was simply the difference between tribuatary compared to lake coastal shoreline and island populations. Significant differences in TL and weight were not expected between sex or habitat due to lack of isolation and ability to migrate freely between habitats. ANCOVA analyses and von Bertalanffy growth models found that there was a difference in relationship between sex, while ANCOVA analyses showed that lake individuals were larger than tributary individuals based on slope differences in habitat length-weight relationships. Differences might have been attributed to females were expected to have increased weights and increased Fulton Condition factors than males due to the timing of the study. The Fulton Condition factor, which is based on the b-factor in the logarithmic relationship between length and weight, showed that Emerald Shiner exhibited negative allometric growth. This suggests that individuals were growing in length faster than they were putting on weight. Potential explanations might be that the metabolic energy needs to yolk ova in females caused a decrease in expected weight.

Gray (1942) reported on Emerald Shiner growth in the Bass Island region of Lake Erie. Our current study revealed increased growth for every age class compared to Gray's (1942) study of Emerald Shiner from the Bass Islands. Our study also found that Bass Island region individuals exhibited smaller size than statewide individuals during age 0, while better growth was seen during ages I and II+. Similar growth was observed during age II for most of the Great Lakes populations (Table 1). Length at age relationships found in this study of the Bass Island region of Lake Erie found that maximum length sizes, i.e., [L.sub.[infinity]] values are the highest in the Great Lakes.

The importance of understanding basic length-weight, age and growth, and condition factors of members of the family Cyprinidae is critical for determining the trophic structure of a dynamic system such as Lake Erie. Although population dynamics of cyprinids have not been well studied, the high economic significance of a strong minnow foundation in the food web is critical for stability in the Western basin (Hubbs and others 2004). Emerald Shiner populations may reflect changing conditions and can serve as an early warning indicator of Lake Erie fish assemblage stability. They are extremely important commercially since they support a large bait fish industry and can serve as a dominant food source for top predator, whole body carnivores (Hubbs and others 2004).


Specimens Examined

OHIO: Ottawa Co. Lake Erie, Alligator bar, SW Shore Gibraltar, Gibraltar Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.657450N -82.822980W, VI:19:2013, EEOB 5930, (N=26 [25]); Lake Erie, Eastpointe, East North Bass Island, North Bass Island, Put-in-Bay Twp. 41.280900N -82.169910W, VIII:5:2004, N. Utrup & EEOB621 (N=15 [14]); Lake Erie, NE Island, Rattlesnake Island, Trawl 0.125 mi NE of Rattlesnake Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 40.965000N -82.511360W (B), 41.412990N -82.507820W (E), VI:24:2013 TP Simon & EEOB 5930 (N = 5 [5]); Lake Erie, 1.3 mi off Catawba Island, ODNR Trawl track #021, Catawba Island, Put-in-Bay Twp. 41.561683N -82.867983W (B), 41.556423N -82.867400W (E), VI:27:2011, TP Simon & EEOB 621 (N=5634 [33]); Lake Erie, off Lutz Point Trawl #2, Schoolhouse Bay, Middle Bass Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.686417N -82.784533W (B), 41.685517N -82.795533W (E), VII:8:2011, TP Simon & EEOB 621 (N=3594 [30]); Lake Erie, Dock Beach, 0.5 mi N Put-in-Bay, SW Gibraltar Island, Gibraltar Island, 41.657648W- 82.820960W, V1:25:2014, TP Simon & EEOB 5930 (N=166 [46]); Lake Erie, NE Beach Access, NE Beach, 0.5 mi N Put-in-Bay, Gibraltar Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.657648N -82.820960W, VI:25:2014, TP Simon & EEOB 5930, (N=166 [30]); Lake Erie, Dock Beach, SW Gibraltar Island, 0.5 mi N Put-in-Bay, Gibraltar Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.657710N -82.821800W, VI:22:2012, TP Simon & EEOB 5930 (N=2365 [40]); Portage River, at Ohio State Rd 590 bridge, Elmore, Elmore Twp., 41.476660N -82.953200W, VII:9:2001, NJ Utrup & EEOB 621, (N=2 [2]); Portage River, Ohio State Road 51 bridge, Elmore, Elmore Twp., 41.476660N -82.953200W, VII:7:2000, C.L. Smith & EEOB 621 (N=17 [17]); Lake Erie, 1.3 mi off Rattlesnake Island, Rattlesnake Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.6761 ION -82.854500W (B), 41.668170N - 82.856900W (E), VI:23:2003, C.L. Smith & EEOB 621 (N=16 [16]); Lake Erie, Lookout beach, N side Gibraltar Island, 0.6 mi N Put-in-Bay, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.688773N -82.820780W, VI:25:2014, TP Simon & EEOB 5930 (N=30 [30]); Lake Erie, South side End of Catawba Ave, 1.6 mi S Put-in-Bay, South Bass Island, Put-in-Bay Twp. 41.642120N -82.836490W, VI:27:2014, TP Simon &EEOB 5930, (N=23 [22]); Lake Erie, Trawled NE direction off trawl position B, Schoolhouse Bay, Middle Bass Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.666928N -82.783509W (B), 41.683413N -82.783427W (E), VI:30:2014, TP Simon & EEOB 5930, (N=26 [26]); Lake Erie, Alligator Bar, SW Shore Gibraltar, 0.5 mi NW of Put-in-Bay, Gibraltar Island, Put-in-Bay Twp., 41.65745N -82.822980W, VII:6:1983, RF Jezerinac (N=356 [10]); Lake Erie, 1.3 mi off Rattlesnake Island, Rattlesnake Island-Green Island trawl track, Green Island, Putt-in-Bay Twp., 41.676110N--82.8545W (B), 41.668170N -82.856900W, VI:27:2011, TP Simon & EEOB 621, (N=212 [6]).


The authors appreciate the assistance of faculty, students, and staff of the Stone Laboratory who collected, curated, and maintained the specimens used in this study. We specifically thank Matt Thomas, Kevin Hart, Dr. Christopher Winslow, and Dr. Jeffrey Reutter for their support. We acknowledge the Friends of Stone Laboratory and Ohio Sea Grant for financial support of this study.


Becker GC. 1964. The fishes of Pewaukee Lake. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 53: 19-27.

Becker GC. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 1083 pp.

Bertalanffy Lvon. 1934. Untersuchungen uberdie Gesetzlichkeiten des Wachstums. I. Allgemeine Grundlagen der Theorie. Roux' Arch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 131:613-653.

Campbell JS, and MacCrimm HR. 1970. Biology of Emerald Shiner Notropis atherinoides Rafinesque in Lake Simcoe, Canada. Journal of Fish Biology 2(3): 259-273.

Carlander KD. 1969. Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. Volume 1. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 752 pp,

Dobie J, Meehean GL, Washburn GN. 1948. Propagation of minnows and other bait species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 12: 1-113.

Dobie J, Meehean OL, Snieszko SF, Washburn GN. 1956. Raising bait fishes. US Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 35: 1-124.

Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA). 1968. Lake Erie Environmental Summary 1963-1964. Edited by Department of Interior.

Fish MP. 1932. Contributions to the early life histories of sixty-two species of fishes from Lake Erie and its tributary waters. Bulletin US Bureau of Fisheries 47(10): 293-398.

Froese R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 22 (4):241 -253.

Fuchs EH. 1967. Life history of the Emerald Shiner, Notropis atherinoides, in Lewis and Clark Lake, South Dakota. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 96(3):347-256.

Gray JW. 1942. Studies of Notropis atherinoides atherinoides Rafinesque, in the Bass Island region of Lake Erie. MS Thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus. 29 pp.

Hartman KJ, Vondracek B, Parrish DL, and Muth KM. 1992. Diets of Emerald Shiners and Spottail Shiners and potential interactions with other western Lake Erie planktivorous fishes. Journal of Great Lakes Research 18 (l):43-50.

Hubbs CL. 1922. Variation in the number of vertebrae of fishes. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science Arts and Letters 2: 207-214.

Hubbs CL, Lagler KF, Smith GR. 2004. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. 3rd edition. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 90 pp.

Leach JH, and Nepszy SJ. 1979. The fish community in Lake Erie. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33(3) 622-636.

Michalak AM, Anderson EJ, Beletsky D, Boland S, Bosch, NS, Bridgeman.TB, Chaffin JD, Chog K, Confesor R, Daloglu I, DePintoJV, Evans MA, Fahnenstiel GL, He L, Ho JC, Jenkins L, Johengen TH, Kuo KC, LaPorte E, Liu X, McWilliams MR, Moore MR, Posselt DJ, Richards RP, Scavia D, Steiner AL, Verhamme E, Wright DM, and Zagorski MA. 2013. Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 6448-6452.

Middleton S, Perello M, and Simon TP. 2013. Length-weight relationships of the mimic shiner Notropis volucellus (Cope 1865) in the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Ohio Journal of Science 112: 44-50.

Munawar M, Edsall T, and Munawar IF. 1999. State of Lake Erie (SOLE): Past, Present, and Future. Ecovision World Monograph Series. Backhuys Publishers, Netherlands. 500 pp.

Nielsen LA, and Johnson DL. 1983. Fisheries Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD. 468 pp.

Pothoven SA, Vanderploeg HA, Ludsin SA, Hook TO, and Brandt SB. 2009. Feeding ecology of Emerald Shiners and Rainbow Smelt in central Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 35 (2): 190-198.

Ricker WE. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191. 382 pp.

Schaap PRH. 1989. Ecology of the Emerald Shiner Notropis atherinoides Rafinesque in Dauphin Lake, Manitoba. Master of Science Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. 178 pp.

Schaeffer JS, Warner DM, and O'Brien TP. 2008. Resurgence of Emerald Shiners Notropis atherinoides in Lake Huron's Main Basin. Journal of Great Lakes Research 34 (3):395-403.

Simon, TP. 2011. Fishes of Indiana: A Field Guide. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Sokal, RR, and Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Steffen MM, Belisle BS, Watson SB, Boyer GL, Wilhelm SW. 2014. Status, causes and controls of cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 40:215-225.

Swingle WE. 1965. Length-weight relationship of Alabama fishes. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Zoology-Entomology Department Fisheries Series No. 3. 86 pp.

Trautman MB. 1982. Fishes of Ohio. The Ohio State University Press: 318-320 pp.

Trautman MB. 1957. The Fishes of Ohio. The Ohio State University Press: Columbus. 683 pp.


(1) F.T. Stone Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 878 Bayview Drive, Put-in-Bay, OH, USA (2) F.T. Stone Laboratory, The Ohio State University and the School of Public and Enviromental Affairs, Indiana University, 1315 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN, USA

(1) Address correspondence to Thomas P. Simon, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, 1315 E. Tenth St., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405. E-mail:

Table 1
Emerald Shiner age and growth relationships based on literature
from the Great Lakes region and Midwestern United States

                           TL Range (mm)

Location           Age 0   Age I   Age II+   Study

  Male             18-38   50-79   82-88     Campbell and
                                               MacCrimmon (1970)
  Female           --      51-84   85-96
Illinois           --      44      76        Dobie and others
                                               (1948); Dobie and
                                               others (1956)
Michigan           --      32-72   84-108    Hobbs (1922)
Ohio               35-58   33-71   64-84     Trautman (1981)
Ohio (statewide)   25-58   33-71   99        Trautman (1957)
Lake Erie,         10-23   30-63   55-89     Gray (1942)
  Bass Islands
Lake Erie          5-23    --      --        Fish (1932)
Lake Erie,                                   Current Study
  Bass Islands
Male               15-33   39-78   78-111
Female             18-30   42-78   81-108
South Dakota       --      45-92   75-95     Fuchs (2011)
Wisconsin          38-45   45-61   73-95     Becker (1983)
                   41-53   --      --        Becker (1964)
COPYRIGHT 2014 Ohio Academy of Science
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Atkinson, Tiffany; Desrosiers, Scott; Townsend, Tessa; Simon, Thomas P.
Publication:The Ohio Journal of Science
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2014
Previous Article:Revised predictive model for successful introduction of native Ohio brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in select streams in Geauga and Lake...
Next Article:Obituaries of the members of The Ohio Academy of Science report of the Necrology Committee, 2013.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters