Printer Friendly

Legal Decision: Inclusion of Public-Private Partnership Roadways in Calculating Total Lane Miles When Apportioning Highway Trust Funds.

B-317634 August 17, 2009

Section 104(b) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code requires the Secretary of Transportation to make an annual apportionment among the states of federal-aid highway funds authorized to be drawn from the Highway Trust Fund. The Highway Trust Fund is funded from federal highway user tax receipts and is the principal mechanism for funding federal highway programs. Based in part on specified formulas, and after making certain required set-asides, 23 U.S.C. 104(b) directs the Secretary to apportion the authorized sums for the following highway-related programs using formulas based on "total lane miles".

We conclude that DOT may include privately operated or maintained highway lane miles in the calculation used to apportion highway funds to states under 23 U.S.C. 104(b). We note further that pending legislation--S. 884, the Transportation Equity for All Americans Act, which you have introduced--would change the statutory apportionment formulas. Among other things, the bill would explicitly exclude lane miles traveled on privatized highways from most of DOT's apportionment determinations under 23 U.S.C. 104 and 105.

Categories: Legal Decision, Budget apportionment, Construction costs, Federal aid for highways, Federal aid for transportation, Federal aid to states, Highway planning, Maintenance costs, Public roads or highways, Requirements definition, Toll roads, Transportation costs, Transportation law, Trust funds
COPYRIGHT 2009 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Sep 1, 2009
Previous Article:Ensuring Accountability In a Time of Financial and Fiscal Stress.
Next Article:Bid Protest Ruling: Glenn Defense Marine-Asia PTE, Ltd.

Related Articles
Direct user charges.
Privatize the highways? Why private capital has discovered the U.S. highway market--and why you should care.
Highway Public-Private Partnerships: More Rigorous Up-front Analysis Could Better Secure Potential Benefits and Protect the Public Interest.
Surface Transportation: Principles Can Guide Efforts to Restructure and Fund Federal Programs.
Guest editorial: new era for highways demands new financing.
Private activity bonds issued for congestion relief in northern Virginia.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters