Hariri, he added, was completely opposed to the notion of local militias and refused to create one of his own. Hence, the argument that only Israel was capable of and interested in killing Hariri to spark sectarian strife is flawed because there were already forces adopting a sectarian rhetoric and involved in sectarian killing, he said. So the attempt to point the finger at Israel, which the guerrilla group Hizbullah and its allied opposition are doing, is weak and without any strong evidence to corroborate it, according to Rashed. Unlike what the opposition would like to suggest, the real danger in Lebanon is not the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) trying Hariri's assassins, but the crimes committed in Lebanon, Rashed opined. The opposition did not try to make amends over the past few years but turned even more hostile, provoked sectarian strife, and threatened with the power of arms instead of answering to the state and its institutions. It is unclear what the price of the STL and trying Hariri's killers will be, Rashed noted. Recent statements suggest that it will be high. However, the question is what will be the price of canceling the tribunal, as the crimes will not be punished, he went on to say.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||EDITORIAL REVIEW|
|Publication:||The Daily Middle East Reporter (Beirut, Lebanon)|
|Date:||Aug 13, 2010|
|Previous Article:||Justice vs. stability.|
|Next Article:||Hunger in Yemen 'silent emergency', 'Worse than sub-Saharan Africa'.|