Le Temps Des Foires: Foires et Marches Dans le Midi Toulousain de la Fin de l'Ancien Regime a 1914.
Thomas covers markets during their golden age. A fixture in the eternal countryside, they, nonetheless, flourished when a small to middling peasantry had surpluses to dispose of. Whereas commercial intermediaries handled the produce of large landlords and by-passed local markets, the farmer with barely a cartload of grain or a few extra animals needed the commercial outlets a few kilometers away. This was especially true when transportation costs were painfully high and cumbersome. Such economic realities made the nineteenth century the apogee of markets and fairs. No wonder that villages fought over the privilege of holding a market day and that prefects spent much time arbitrating disputes involving markets. The pressure from below to create new ones was constant down to the Great War.
Fairs and markets were where rural dwellers took care of all the business which transcended the resources of their villages. Tax collectors arranged to be present on fair days to take advantage of peasants who suddenly had cash on hand after selling their produce. Notaries did a third of their weekly business on the market day. In times of harvest failure, grain riots started at the markets. Once universal manhood suffrage was established, political organizations used markets to reach voters. Certain fairs were well-known meeting places for young men and women who could not find lifetime partners within their own villages. Inevitably, too, the markets witnessed the ritualized violence (Bagarres) between gangs of village youths intent on establishing a reputation for prowess. One cannot help but agree with the author that to seize the range of activities transpiring at the markets would be to grasp rural life in all its richness.
Unfortunately, Thomas does not do much more than paint vivid scenes of this rural life. He does not organize his rich material into arguments, and still less does he address the current debates in peasant history, a field which is undergoing fundamental revisionism at the moment. The author vaguely assumes some sort of linear modernization of peasant life, a narrative which has been under steady attack from such scholars as Charles Tilly, Ted Margadant, David Sabean, and Susan Rogers. Was there really a steady transition from isolation to integration, from subsistence to markets, from folklore to commercialized culture? The subject of this study would seem to be particularly useful for exploring these big issues; however, this is not its purpose or achievement. Instead, Thomas evokes for us "the world we have lost" in the rural markets in rich and fascinating detail.
Lenard R. Berlanstein The University of Virginia
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Berlanstein, Lenard R.|
|Publication:||Journal of Social History|
|Article Type:||Book Review|
|Date:||Jun 22, 1995|
|Previous Article:||Theatre and Disorder in Late Georgian London.|
|Next Article:||Germany After the First World War.|