Printer Friendly

Law-related education.

The key to making civic education, including law-related education, really work is to make it part of the curriculum taught by professional teachers. For this reason, the most important article in the November 2006 special issue regarding law-related education was one the written by John Doyle and Stephen C. Shenkmen describing how law-related education can be included in the curriculum. I have personally seen the magic of John Doyle's programs in generating knowledge and excitement in high school students.

To make civic education really happen, the Bar must go beyond merely offering guest speakers or lawyer liaisons. Frankly, the single best thing the Bar could do would be to to lobby for adequate funding and inclusion in the curriculum of the programs like those that John and Stephen list.

Finally, let me say that we are extremely lucky to have a chief justice who has made civic education one of his priorities.

Thomas W. Logue, Miami

Although the subject article ("The American Voter," November 2006) contains important data about who is and who is not voting, it goes over board, into the depths of non sequitur, in the paragraph titled "Reasons for Not Voting." Specifically, that paragraph begins by identifying the number of millions who did register to vote in 2004 (142), then proceeds to catalogue the percentages of that population who did not vote and the reasons why. All is smooth sailing until the last sentence, which reads, in pertinent part, "Other reasons included ... confusion or uncertainty about registration requirements...." But that reason for not voting deals with the population who did not even register to do so, a citizen segment having nothing to do with the 142 million under the microscope of the paragraph. We have a right to expect better reporting from the authors, leaders in the League of Women Voters organization.

Ted Baumgardner, Winter Park

Editor's Note: In William C. Ballard's article, "Who Decides Whether to Build It Higher, the Condominium Community or the Courts?" on page 60 of the December Journal, the phrase, "the improvements required to ensure the ground floor units are not flooded might require a periodical special assessment" should read: "... the improvements required to ensure that the ground floor units are not periodically flooded might require a special assessment...." The Journal regrets the editorial error.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Florida Bar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Logue, Thomas W.; Baumgardner, Ted
Publication:Florida Bar Journal
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Jan 1, 2007
Previous Article:Economic redevelopment of small-city downtowns: options and considerations for the practitioner.
Next Article:Rasmussen court allows both spouses $125,000 exemptions and protects appreciation within 1,215 days of bankruptcy.

Related Articles
Despite intense lobbying effort HRSA's FY 2006 transplant program budget cut by $1.1 million.
Presbyterians call for action at International AIDS Conference.
Committee must OK bills; School board told action required.
Perspectives after the legislative session.
Aspen & CCH launch new information products; Aspen buys book series.
Confidential Iran memo exposes policy to deny Baha'i students university.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters