Printer Friendly

Larval duration, settlement, and larval growth rates of the endangered Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) and the Arrow Goby (Clevelandia ios) (Pisces, Teleostei).

Many fish species inhabit estuarine habitats during their early life history. These habitats are quite variable, with some remaining open to the ocean year round and others typically closing seasonally. Species that inhabit seasonally closing estuaries may exhibit different larval traits than those that inhabit permanently open estuaries, and these traits may contribute to genetic isolation by limiting dispersal (Bilton et al. 2002, Watts and Johnson 2004). For example, Dawson et al. (2002) found genetic evidence of limited dispersal in the Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi), which inhabits seasonally closed estuaries, whereas its sister species the Arrow Goby (Clevelandia ios), which inhabits open systems, lacked regional genetic divergence. This difference is likely due to greater marine larval dispersal and gene flow between populations of arrow gobies. Larval duration has long been thought to influence dispersal, and differences in larval duration could confound this interpretation.

Closed estuaries experience greater seasonal variation in environmental conditions than is seen in estuaries perennially open to marine influence, and such variation is known to significantly influence larval development (McCormick and Molony 1995, Green and Fisher 2004). Along the California coast, many estuaries are partially or completely isolated from tidal influence either seasonally or episodically (Jacobs et al. 2011). Opening or "breaching" is usually a function of streamflow (Rich and Keller 2013), which is driven by seasonal precipitation. Isolation, or closure, occurs when a sand bar or raised beach berm impounds systems during periods of lowered "summer" streamflow, creating variable salinity. Such dynamic lagoonal systems are a product of the Mediterranean climate that characterizes California. Similar lagoonal processes are known to occur in other regions of the globe with similar climate (Jacobs et al. 2011).

The federally endangered Tidewater Goby is a California endemic that occurs in estuaries that experience seasonal or episodic closure (Swift et al. 1989). The Tidewater Goby is a small benthic fish that seldom exceeds 55 mm standard length (SL) (Miller and Lea 1972). Lagoons with seasonally closing stream mouths on the outer coast are the typical Tidewater Goby habitat, although they also occupy or historically occupied, naturally closing, tide-gated, or marginal pond habitats around Humboldt, Tomales, and San Francisco Bays (Swift et al. 1989, Moyle 2002, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2005). This species exhibits local genetic divergence at a finer geographic scale than any other Pacific coast vertebrate (Barlow 2002, Dawson et al. 2002, Earl et al. 2010). Its preference for small and isolated estuaries is one of the main reasons why it is predisposed to local extirpation (Lafferty et al. 1999a,b).

Dispersal of the Tidewater Goby is associated with high streamflow events (Lafferty et al. 1999a,b), which cause breaching of the estuary mouth, permitting dispersal (Earl et al. 2010). Breaching events occur most frequently during winter months when reproduction is limited and larvae are generally absent. As confirmed by genetic divergence, marine larval dispersal appears to be extremely limited, if it occurs at all (Barlow 2002, Dawson et al. 2002, Earl et al. 2010). This conclusion is supported by the work of Hellmair and Kinziger (2014), which showed that small tidewater gobies (<25 mm total length) experience higher mortality rates than larger individuals (>25 mm) when salinity was raised from 6 [per thousand] to 26 [per thousand]. Presumably this intolerance to seawater in young tidewater gobies is related to the isolated nature of their lagoonal habitats during the summer peak reproductive months (Swenson 1999). Thus, dispersal appears limited to adult movement over sandy substrate following breaching events (Earl et al. 2010).

The Arrow Goby is the sister species to the Tidewater Goby (Dawson et al. 2002), and it ranges from Bahia Magdalena, Baja California Sur (C. Swift, pers. comm.) to British Colombia (Miller and Lea 1972). Similar to the Tidewater Goby, the Arrow Goby is a small benthic fish that rarely exceeds 60 mm SL (Miller and Lea 1972, Hart 1974). It prefers more open, fully tidal estuaries and mudflats, which are typically cooler and higher in salinity. This preference for open estuaries is thought to facilitate marine larval dispersal.

Here, we compare the early life history of the Arrow Goby and the Tidewater Goby collected from eighteen California estuaries. Larval traits were determined from daily bands and settlement marks in lapillar otoliths of recently settled gobies. Larval duration, size at settlement, and pre-settlement growth rates were compared between the two species.

Materials and Methods

Study Sites

Gobies were collected from eighteen estuaries in California (Fig. 1). Sites were chosen based on the presence of healthy and abundant populations of the Arrow Goby or Tidewater Goby, in addition to their mouth dynamics (closed vs. open estuary mouth). The Tidewater Goby was collected at ten seasonally closing estuaries: Ten Mile River (39[degrees]32'43.86"N, 123[degrees]45'25.04"W); Salmon Creek (38021'10.87"N, 123[degrees]03'57.19"W); Rodeo Lagoon (37[degrees]49'54.41"N, 122[degrees]31'43.31"W); San Gregorio (37[degrees]19' 14.29"N, 122[degrees]24'03.38"W); Moore Creek (36[degrees]57'4.50"N, 122[degrees]03'29.85"W); San Luis Obispo Creek (35[degrees]11'13.35"N, 120[degrees]43'33.47"W); Santa Ynez River (34[degrees]41'30.57"N, 120[degrees]35'00.70"W); Arroyo Burro Lagoon (34[degrees]24'1L77"N, 119[degrees]44'35.12"W); Santa Clara River (34[degrees]14'07.19"N, 119[degrees]15'27.46"W); and Las Flores Marsh (33[degrees]17'25.79"N, 117[degrees]27'53.91"W). The Arrow Goby was collected at eight estuaries that are typically fully tidal: Arcata Bay (40[degrees]51'30.57"N, 124[degrees]06'00.08"W); Bodega Bay (38[degrees]18'59.42"N, 123[degrees]02'43.12"W); San Lorenzo River (36[degrees]57'56.41"N, 122[degrees]00'45.46"W); Elkhorn Slough (36[degrees]48'40.14"N, 121[degrees]44'38.77"W); Morro Bay (36[degrees]57'56.41"N, 122[degrees]00'45.46"W); Carpinteria Salt Marsh (34[degrees]23'52.97"N, 119[degrees]32'16.72"W); Colorado Lagoon (33[degrees]45'10.52"N, 118[degrees]07'47.37"W); and Los Penasquitos (32[degrees]55'57.84"N, 117[degrees]15'29.11"W). Due to the differences in habitat preference of the Arrow Goby and Tidewater Goby, none of the eighteen study sites had both species present at the time of collection.

Collection Methods

Larval, transitional, and recently settled gobies (Fig. 2) were collected between August and October of 2011. Both species were collected using a 3.7 x 1.2 m beach seine with a 1.6-mm mesh, and in some cases, a one-man push net with 1.6-mm mesh (Strawn 1954). The Arrow Goby was collected at low tide in all eight study sites. The ten study sites where the Tidewater Goby was collected were all completely closed to marine tidal influence at the time of collection. Once collected, the fishes were euthanized and preserved in 95% ethanol.

Otolith Analysis

Otoliths were used to measure larval traits of the study species. Otoliths have been used for these purposes in a wide variety of fishes, including many species in the family Gobiidae (Sponaugle and Cowen 1994, Hernaman et al. 2000, Radtke et al. 2001, Yamasaki and Maeda 2007, Wilson et al. 2009, Samhouri et al. 2009). Both the sagittal and lapillar otoliths were extracted from all individuals using standard techniques (Brothers 1987, Hellmair 2010) and placed in immersion oil for >30 days to clear (Samhouri et al. 2009). For both species, lapilli were used because they were clearer and easier to interpret than sagittae, and they did not require sectioning or polishing. Lapilli were read whole from images on a computer monitor that were captured by a digital camera mounted on a compound microscope at 200 X magnification, with a polarizing filter placed between the light source and the first stage. Increment measurements were made along the longest axis, from the core to the outermost complete ring using ImagePro Plus image analysis software.

Larval duration, size at settlement, and growth rates were estimated from the otoliths. Previous work has validated daily otolith increment deposition in the Tidewater Goby (Hellmair 2010), and increments were assumed to be daily in the Arrow Goby. Settlement was recorded in the otolith structure as a distinct transition in increment widths (Fig. 3), as noted in other gobies by Sponaugle and Cowen (1994). Larval duration was determined from a count of the rings from the hatch mark (first band from otolith core) to the settlement mark. Average pre-settlement growth rates were estimated as average increment width between the hatch mark and the settlement mark (McCormick and Molony 1995). All otoliths were read twice by one person (B.T. Spies), and all unclear and abnormally shaped otoliths were discarded. If the two readings were more then 10% different, then that otolith was not included in any analysis. If the two readings were less than 10% different but not the same, then the second reading was used for the analysis.

Data Analysis

To validate that the presumed settlement mark actually corresponded to settlement, the number of presumed post-settlement bands was regressed against body length for both species. The x-intercept of the linear regression equation estimates size at settlement, which was compared to the size of fish known to have recently settled based on their morphology. Further regression analyses examined the relationship between body length and age (days) to determine whether otolith measurements provide accurate proxies of somatic traits (Booth and Parkinson 2011). Back calculation was used to estimate body size at settlement for each fish using the equation calculated by ordinary least square linear regression of body size (mm SL) on otolith radius, of the form L = mx + b; where L represents the body length, m represents the slope, x represents the otolith radius at settlement, and b represents the y-intercept. A nested ANOVA with the factors Species (fixed effect) and Site nested within species (random effect) was used to test whether larval traits differed between species and collection sites.

Results

Otolith-based estimates of larval traits appeared to be appropriate for both the Tidewater Goby and Arrow Goby due to the fact that body length was tightly related to age as estimated from otoliths (Arrow Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.75, n=317; Tidewater Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.71, n=406; Fig. 4). The number of post-settlement otolith bands and body length were also tightly related (Arrow Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.79; Tidewater Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.73) and the fitted lines predicted realistic sizes at settlement (Fig. 5). This result indicates that the distinguishable transition zone in the otolith is the settlement band (Fig. 3A), and that all bands between the core and the settlement mark indicate the larval duration (Sponaugle and Cowen 1994). Otolith radius was a good proxy for body length, as indicated by a strong linear relationship between body length and otolith radius (Arrow Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.80; Tidewater Goby: [r.sup.2]=0.78; Fig. 6). Based on back-calculation, mean [+ or -] SD size at settlement was 11.45 [+ or -] 0.23 mm SL for the Tidewater Goby and 9.32 [+ or -] 0.63 mm for the Arrow Goby, slightly smaller than the estimates of size at settlement based on the x-intercept of the regressions of post-settlement age on size (Fig. 5, Table 1).

The Arrow Goby had a significantly longer larval duration ([F.sub.1,705] = 227.3, p < 0.0001), larger otolith radius at settlement ([F.sub.1,705] = 28.4, p < 0.0001), and slower larval growth rates ([F.sub.1,705] =399.8, p < 0.0001) than the Tidewater Goby (Table 1). Size at settlement (back calculated) of the Tidewater Goby was significantly larger than that of the Arrow Goby ([F.sub.1,705] =5360.1, p < 0.0001). All larval traits varied significantly among sites for both species (larval duration: [F.sub.16,705]=42.5, p < 0.0001; otolith radius at settlement: [F.sub.16,705] = 43.9, p < 0.0001; pre-settlement growth rate: [F.sub.16,705] = 33.53, p <0.0001; back calculated body size at settlement: [F.sub.16,705] = 25.9, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Analysis of lapillar otoliths revealed that larval duration, size at settlement, and presettlement growth rates of the two sister species, the Arrow Goby and Tidewater Goby, were statistically different, though not dramatically different. The similarity between the two species in larval duration is somewhat surprising given known differences in their habitat usage and methods of dispersal. Despite inhabiting two different kinds of estuaries, "open" versus "closed", and dispersing as larvae (Arrow Goby) versus adults (Tidewater Goby), the duration of the larval phase was only 8% shorter in the Tidewater Goby. Due to faster larval growth rates, the Tidewater Goby settled at larger size than did the Arrow Goby. It is likely that the Tidewater Goby has evolved the ability to settle and reach maturity faster than the Arrow Goby due to its shorter, annual life cycle.

Larval durations of other related goby species (e.g. Gillichthys mirabilis, Ilypnus gilberti, Lepidogobius lepidus, Quietula y-cauda), commonly referred to as the "bay gobies" (Teleostei: Gobionellidae) (Thacker 2009, Ellingson et al. 2014) have not yet been determined. In fact, detailed knowledge of early life history characteristics does not exist for many native fishes that occupy estuaries and wetlands in California. Larval traits have been studied more regularly in tropical gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae), which on average, tend to exhibit more prolonged larval stages than those of the species in this study. Yamasaki and Maeda (2007) documented a 78-146 day larval duration in Stiphodon percnopterygionus, a stream-associated goby found in Okinawa Island, southern Japan. Lentipes concolor, an endemic Hawaiian amphidromous goby was found to have a larval duration between 63-106 days (Radtke et al. 2001). The goldspot goby (Gnatholepis thompsoni), commonly found on coral reefs in the Caribbean, was found to have a larval duration between 45-80 days (Samhouri et al. 2009), with the potential of reaching 112 days (Sponaugle and Cowen 1994). Another common goby in the Caribbean (Coryphopterus glaucofraenum), however, had a much shorter larval duration of 27 days (Sponaugle and Cowen 1994), similar to that found in this study for the Arrow Goby.

Previous estimates of larval characteristics of these two study species have varied widely, presumably due to methodological limitations. Estimates of larval duration for the Tidewater Goby have ranged from as little as several days (Capelli 1997) to a few weeks (Dawson et al. 2002). Past research on the Arrow Goby has provided a broad range of estimates of larval duration using both field collected and laboratory-reared specimens. However, none of these estimates were obtained from otolith analysis. Brothers (1975) estimated larval duration at approximately 30 days from the timing of annual reproduction and recruitment. Dawson et al. (2002) estimated a 2-4 week larval duration by extrapolating the time to reach 7 mm (10 days; Hart 1973) to the time to reach the average size at settlement of 13.1 [+ or -] 1.3 mm (range 10.0-16.6 mm) observed by Kent and Marliave (1997) for newly settled arrow gobies from British Colombia. Our back-calculated estimate of size at settlement (10.00 [+ or -] 0.6 mm) falls on the lower end of Kent and Marliave's (1997) range of size at settlement, but overlaps with measurements of nearshore postlarvae collected by Brothers (1975). Morphological descriptions of transitional juveniles (12.5 mm SL) from British Colombia are consistent with the morphology of juveniles in southern California estuaries that settled at a smaller size, perhaps indicating regional differences in size at settlement. It is possible, however, that some of these apparent differences in size at settlement are related to how fish were preserved in various studies, which can cause them to shrink (Hay 1982).

The larval traits investigated in this study varied among populations, possibly due to differences among estuaries in environmental conditions, such as temperature, water quality, or food resources. This could be one explanation for the different estimates of settlement size from this study, done in southern California, and that of Kent and Marliave (1997) conducted in British Colombia. Brothers (1975) found that the Arrow Goby lives for approximately one year in southern California, similar to the annual lifespan of the Tidewater Goby throughout its range, but has an extended lifespan in the more northern portions of its range (2-3 years). Swenson (1999) found that the average size of the Tidewater Goby was significantly larger in marsh habitats than in lagoons or creeks. She speculated that this was due to the more stable physical conditions of the marsh, which fosters improved growth, perhaps due to a more consistent or abundant supply of prey. It is also worth noting that, given genetic isolation of populations (e.g. Earl et al. 2010), adaptation to local conditions is also possible in the Tidewater Goby. Our findings provide baseline estimates of some of the early life history traits of the Tidewater Goby and the Arrow Goby, but these attributes are likely to vary with environmental parameters.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mike Rouse, Rhys Evans, Darren Fong, Kevin Lafferty, and Rikke Kvist Preisle for their help gaining access to study sites, collections, and project logistics. Thanks to Larry Allen, Camm Swift, David Jacobs, and Steve Dudgeon for their wealth of knowledge and project guidance. We appreciate the help of Aaron Dufault in collecting fish, and Brian Pena and Rando Has for their long hours spent in the lab dissecting fish and preparing otoliths. This project was supported by the Department of Biology at California State University, Northridge, and the International Women's Fishing Association (IWFA). Thanks to Chris Dellith and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their help, guidance, and permit support. This research was conducted under the permitted support of California State Parks, National Parks Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (recovery permit #TE-43944A-0), and the CA Department of Fish and Wildlife (permit #SC-10750).

Literature Cited

Barlow, M. 2002. Phylogeographic structure of the Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei: Gobiidae), in the San Francisco Bay area and Ventura County: implications for conservation management. Masters Thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.

Bilton, D. T., J. Paula, and J. D. D. Bishop. 2002. Dispersal, genetic differentiation and speciation in estuarine organisms. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55:937-952.

Booth, D. J. and K. Parkinson. 2011. Pelagic larval duration is similar across 23[degrees] of latitude for two species of butterflyfish (Chaetodontidae) in eastern Australia. Coral Reefs, 30:1071-1075.

Brothers, E. B. 1975. The comparative ecology and behavior of three sympatric California gobies. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, San Diego.

--. 1987. Methodological approaches to the examination of otoliths in aging studies. Pp. 319-330 in Summerfeldt R. C., and G. E. Hall, eds., The Age and Growth of Fish. Iowa State University Press, Des Moines.

Capelli, M. H. 1997. Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) management in California estuaries. Proceedings, California and the World Ocean Conference, San Diego, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1247-1264.

Dawson, M. N., K. D. Louie, M. Barlow, D. K. Jacobs, and C. C. Swift. 2002. Comparative phylogeography of sympatric sister species, Clevelandia ios and Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei, Gobiidae), across the California Transition Zone. Molecular Ecology, 11:1065-1075.

Earl, D.A., K. D. Louie, C. Bardeleben, C. C. Swift, and D. K. Jacobs. 2010. Rangewide microsatellite phylogeography of the endangered Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (Teleostei: Gobiidae), a genetically subdivided coastal fish with limited marine dispersal. Conservation Genetics, 11:103-114.

Ellingson, R. A., C. C. Swift, L. T. Findley, and D. K. Jacobs. 2014. Convergent evolution of ecomorphological adaptations in geographically isolated Bay gobies (Teleostei: Gobionellidae) of the temperate North Pacific. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 70:464-477.

Green, B. S. and R. Fisher. 2004. Temperature influences swimming speed, growth and larval duration in coral reef fish larvae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 299:115-132.

Hart, J. L. 1974. Pacific Fishes of Canada. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 740 pp.

Hay, D. E. 1982. Fixation shrinkage of herring larvae: effects of salinity, formalin concentration, and other factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39:1138-1143.

Hellmair, M. 2010. Manual for Otolith Based Age Determination of Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi. Scientific Report. Humboldt State University, 22 pp.

--and A. P. Kinziger. 2014. Increased extinction potential of insular fish populations with reduced life history variation and low genetic diversity. PLoS ONE, in press.

Hernaman, V., P. L. Munday, and M. L. Schlappy. 2000. Validation of otolith growth-increment periodicity in tropical gobies. Marine Biology, 137:715-726.

Jacobs, D. K., E. D. Stein, and T. Longcore. 2011. Classification of California estuaries based on natural closure patterns: templates for restoration and management. Southern California Coastal Waters Research Project, 619.a, 72 pp.

Kent, D. I. and J. B. Marliave. 1997. Early life history of the Arrow Goby, Clevelandia ios (Jordan & Gilbert), Gobiidae. Micronesica, 30:15-23.

Lafferty, K. D., C. C. Swift, and R. F. Ambrose. 1999a. Postflood persistence and recolonization of endangered Tidewater Goby populations. North American Journal Fisheries Management, 19: 618-622.

--, and--. 1999b. Extirpation and recolonization in a metapopulation of an endangered fish, the Tidewater Goby. Conservation Biology, 13:1447-1453.

McCormick, M. I. and B. W. Molony. 1995. Influence of water temperature during the larval stage on size, age and body condition of a tropical reef fish at settlement. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 118: 59-68.

Miller, D. J. and R. N. Lea. 1972. Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California. California Department of Fish and Game. Fish Bulletin 157, 235 pp.

Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland Fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley. 502 pp.

Radtke, R. L., R. A. Kinzie, and D. J. Shafer. 2001. Temporal and spatial variation in length of larval life and size at settlement of the Hawaiian amphidromous goby Lentipes concolor. Journal of Fish Biology, 59:928-938.

Rich, A. and E. A. Keller. 2013. A hydrologic and geomorphic model of estuary breaching and closure. Geomorphology, 191:64-74.

Samhouri, J. F., M. A. Steele, and G. E. Forrester. 2009. Inter-cohort competition drives density dependence and selective mortality in a marine fish. Ecology, 90:1009-1020.

Sponaugle, S. and R. K. Cowen. 1994. Larval durations and recruitment patterns of two Caribbean gobies (Gobiidae): contrasting early life histories in demersal spawners. Marine Biology, 120:133-143.

Strawn, K. 1954. The pushnet, a one-man net for collecting in attached vegetation. Copeia, 1954:195-197.

Swenson, R. O. 1999The ecology, behavior, and conservation of the Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 55:99-114.

Swift, C. C., J. L. Nelson, C. Maslow, and T. Stein. 1989. Biology and distribution of the Tidewater Goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi (Pisces: Gobiidae) of California. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, No 404, 19 pp.

Thacker, C. 2009. Phylogeny of Gobioidei and placement within Acanthomorpha, with a new classification and investigation of diversification and character evolution. Copeia, 2009:93-104.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Recovery plan for the Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland Oregon, vi + 199 pp.

Watts, R. J. and M. S. Johnson. 2004. Estuaries, lagoons and enclosed embayments: habitats that enhance population subdivision of inshore fishes. Marine and Freshwater Research, 55:641-651.

Wilson, J. A., L. Vigliola, and M. G. Meekan. 2009. The back-calculation of size and growth from otoliths: Validation and comparison of models at an individual level. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 368:9-21.

Yamasaki, N. and K. Maeda. 2007. Pelagic larval duration and morphology at recruitment of Stiphodon percnopterygionus (Gobiidae: Sicydiinae). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 14:209-214.

Brenton T Spies

California State University--Northridge, brenton.spies@gmail.com

Berenice C. Tarango

California State University--Northridge, berenice.tarango.18@my.csun.edu

Mark A. Steele

California State University--Northridge, msteele@csun.edu

Cover Page Footnote

Thanks to Mike Rouse, Rhys Evans, Darren Fong, Kevin Lafferty, and Rikke Kvist Preisle for their help gaining access to study sites, collections, and project logistics. Thanks to Larry Allen, Camm Swift, David Jacobs, and Steve Dudgeon for their wealth of knowledge and project guidance. We appreciate the help of Aaron Dufault in collecting fish, and Brian Pena and Rando Has for their long hours spent in the lab dissecting fish and preparing otoliths. This project was supported by the Department of Biology at California State University, Northridge, and the International Women's Fishing Association (IWFA). Thanks to Chris Dellith and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their help, guidance, and permit support. This research was conducted under the permitted support of California State Parks, National Parks Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (recovery permit #TE-43944A-0), and the CA Department of Fish and Wildlife (permit #SC-10750).

Brenton T. Spies, Berenice C. Tarango, and Mark A. Steele

Department of Biology, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330-8303

brenton.spies@gmail.com

Table 1. Estimated larval durations, settlement sizes (standard
length), and growth rates of the Arrow Goby (Clevelandia ios) and
Tidewater Goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) pooled over all study sites
(n = 8 and 10 study sites for the two species, respectively).

                            Larval duration

Species        Range (days)   Mean [+ or -] SD (days)

E. newberryi      18-31         23.95 [+ or -] 2.71
C. ios            20-33         26.11 [+ or -] 2.40

                                 Settlement

Species        Otolith radius (mm)       Length (mm)

E. newberryi   75.62 [+ or -] 6.40   12.38 [+ or -] 0.36
C. ios         77.61 [+ or -] 6.37   10.00 [+ or -] 0.71

                      Growth rate

Species           Mean [+ or -] SD        N
               ([micro]m/[day.sup.-1])

E. newberryi     2.86 [+ or -] 0.23      406
C. ios           2.60 [+ or -] 0.22      317
COPYRIGHT 2014 Southern California Academy of Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Spies, Brenton T.; Tarango, Berenice C.; Steele, Mark A.
Publication:Bulletin (Southern California Academy of Sciences)
Date:Dec 1, 2014
Words:4243
Previous Article:Expansion of the non-native Mississippi Silverside, Menidia audens (Pisces, Atherinopsidae), into fresh and marine waters of coastal southern...
Next Article:Male mating posture and courtship coloration of the temperate marine tubesnout, Aulorhynchus flavidus (Gill).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters