Printer Friendly

Laparoscopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder perforation due to indwelling urethral catheter.

INTRODUCTION

Intraperitoneal perforation is a rare and serious complication of indwelling urethral catheters. Bladder perforation should be included in the differential diagnosis, especially if patients are known to have an indwelling catheter. The laparoscopic approach is the best short recovery and less traumatic treatment for simple and accessible bladder injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 73-year-old woman with a medical history of Parkinson's disease and chronic restrictive respiratory failure due to kyphoscoliosis was hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome. During hospitalisation, a bladder Foley catheter of size 16 French was placed for drainage and haemodynamic monitoring.

Forty-eight hours later, she presented with acute respiratory distress and septic shock requiring ventilatory assistance. She had no abdominal pain and no signs of peritoneal irritation. The daily diuresis was around 900 mL. The urinalysis was positive for nitrites, leukocytes and hematuria. Laboratory tests showed serum urea 10 mM/L and serum creatinine 232 [micro]M/L. Plain radiographs of the abdomen did not reveal any signs of perforation or intestinal obstruction.

Together with vasoactive medication, intravenous antibiotics (Tazocilline and Linezolid) for nosocomial-acquired pneumonia were administrated. The patient showed no sign of haemodynamic improvement regardless of the antibiotic therapy.

Thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan was then performed. The pelvic sagittal scan showed the Foley catheter perforated the urinary bladder and liquid effusion likely to be urine (Figure 1). The Foley catheter was unfortunately withdrawn to be well replaced.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Due to systemic infection with no sign of improvement, a laparoscopic surgical exploration was decided. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery with three trocars, a 10 mm umbilical trocar and two 5 mm trocars, one in each iliac fossa. Abdominal exploration found bowel loops of the ileum clustered at the bladder and liquid in the peritoneal cavity. Despite adhesiolysis, the perforation was not visualized. Methylene blue dye was injected through the Foley catheter and it highlighted a 1 cm perforation in the bladder dome (Figure 2) with no other macroscopic lesions. The perforated part was sutured with interrupted vicryl in one layer. A methylene blue dye test was performed and excluded a leak. Abdominal cavity lavage with 0.9 % saline was performed. A suction drain was placed into the pouch of Douglas.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The patient's condition improved 24 hours after surgery allowing cessation of catecholamine and extubation. Renal function returned to normal with a good urine output from the Foley catheter. The Foley catheter was removed on day 15. The postoperative course was uncomplicated.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic repair of intraperitoneal bladder perforation was first described in 1994 and since then, a few cases of such approach have been reported to treat traumatic, spontaneous and iatrogenic bladder rupture, avoiding laparotomy (1). The laparoscopic approach is the best short recovery and less traumatic treatment allowing visualization of the entire peritoneal cavity to exclude others lesions.

Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique to treat abdominal trauma. It can avoid laparotomy in 63% of the cases, decreasing its associated morbidity (2). In the presence of simple and accessible injuries the therapeutic laparoscopy is performed.

Abdomino-pelvic CT scan is frequently performed in hospitalised patients and the bladder is included in the examination. In many cases the urinary bladder is catheterised for various indications. Familiarity with the different bladder pathologies and a routine meticulous search for them are indicated in every case. (3)

Early diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment might decrease the high mortality rate associated with this uncommon but treatable condition (4).

Aged patients with an acute abdomen might not complain of abdominal pain, and abdominal tenderness might be relatively mild (5). However, bladder perforation should be included in the differential diagnosis, especially if patients are known to have an indwelling catheter.

REFERENCES

(1.) Matsui Y, Ohara H, Ichioka K, Terada N, Yoshimura K, Terai A: Traumatic bladder rupture managed successfully by laparoscopic surgery. Int J Urol. 2003; 10:278-80

(2.) Gorecki PJ, Cottam D, Angus LD, Shaftan GW: Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for trauma: a technique of safe and systematic exploration. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12:195-8

(3.) Abadi S, Brook OR, Solomonov E, Fischer D. Misleading positioning of a Foley catheter balloon. British Journal of Radiology. 2006; 79:175-176

(4.) Figuerdo A. Laparoscopic treatment of traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture. Int Braz J Urol. 2007; 33:380-2

(5.) Bender JF. Approach to the acute abdomen. Med Clin North Am 1989; 73:1413-22

Location: CHU Jean-Verdier, Universite Paris-XIII, Bondy, France

Article Date: February 2012
COPYRIGHT 2012 JSCR Publishing Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Suffee, M.T.; Barrat, C.; Vons, C.; Champault, G.; Paolino, L.A.
Publication:Journal of Surgical Case Reports
Article Type:Case study
Geographic Code:4EUFR
Date:Feb 1, 2012
Words:732
Previous Article:Fistula after pyloroplasty--a novel approach to the management of a leak following oesophagectomy.
Next Article:Stomach torsion in pregnancy as a complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters