Printer Friendly

LETTER: Jockeys in control of how race is run.

Byline: Steve Prior

Steve Prior does not agree that the course is the reason for the Champion Hurdle not being a true test of stamina

I take issue with Tony

Harman's letter (November 21) suggesting the Champion Hurdle is not a true test of a champion, whereas two miles at Sandown would be.

Much as I am an enormous admirer of Sandown Park, I fail to see that the way in which races at Cheltenham are run could be blamed on the course itself.

The implication is that Cheltenham does not sufficiently test a horse's stamina over two miles. Setting aside for a moment the debate about whether two miles over any course can be a real test of stamina, the way in which races are run rests squarely with the jockeys.

If a horse has bags of

stamina, why not make the running? Surely this would test the true mettle of the opposition. In the event that another runner can `lay-up' with the pace and deliver a blow up the hill-that horse cannot surely be deemed to be lacking in stamina and guts? Is Mr Harman suggesting that Istabraq, for example, is simply some fortunate Flat-bred, who has races run to suit him? And, if that is the case, more fool the other jockeys.

In actual fact, Cheltenham and Sandown provide a similar test. They are both stiff tracks that demand exceptional stamina to deliver a

final blow.

Watch the finishes at both courses and you will find a horse in front off the final bend is often out-battled on the climb to the post.

If it is stamina and guts Mr Harman needs, can I suggest he attempts running at full speed up the Prestbury hill and then re-assesses his

assertion!

Steve Prior

Walton-on-Thames

Surrey
COPYRIGHT 2001 MGN LTD
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Sports
Publication:The Racing Post (London, England)
Date:Nov 30, 2001
Words:297
Previous Article:LETTER: Low-key approach the best option.
Next Article:LETTER: Cheltenham is in a class of its own.


Related Articles
Letter: Significant.
Spence takes charge.
Disillusioned with the game.
Letters: Supportive.
Deel out over panel letter.
Jockey Club denies bias over riders.
Who's to blame for wrong-trip fiasco?
Chandler: free bets for trainers were `a common practice' Firm's pre-2000 custom revealed as legal action against Panorama fails.
Dettori and Pipe join protest against proposed mobile ban.
Letter: 'We must react before it is too late'.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters