Printer Friendly

Keep Gary Stager, lose the apologies.

Joe Hanson has invited readers to share their thoughts about Gary Stager's two columns ("Kerry's Educational Plan," August 2004, and "Direct Instruction," October 2004).

Here goes: Stager is absolutely right about the ignorance of politicians about education; the dangers of extrinsic rewards and vouchers; the mindlessness and heartlessness of the Direct Instruction approach; and the well-documented cozy relationship between the Bush family and McGraw-Hill, the publishers of many Direct Instruction materials and tests mandated by No Child Left Behind.

Stager concludes there is a war on public education. He is not alone in these views. A number of recent books by well-respected educators have documented the highjacking of curricula in the service of corporate profits, the suppression of voices of opposition, and the failings of Direct Instruction programs. For those interested, two of these books are: Why is

Corporate America Bashing our Public Schools? (Kathy Emery and Susan Ohanian) and Education, Inc." Turning Education into a Business (Patrick Shannon and Alfie Kohn). Educators, as well as the general public, need to hear from both sides.

Stephen Krashen

Professor Emeritus

Rossier School of Education

University of Southern California

Please save your apologies about running two recent columns by Gary Stager. Mr. Stager reflected the disappointment of many of us who longed for a clear choice on Election Day.

What we got from the presidential candidates was a lot of nit-picking about whether or not the ill-conceived No Child Left Behind law was adequately funded or not. Perhaps if John Kerry had had the courage to challenge the shallow high-stakes testing reforms that are sucking the last bit of joy out of public education and the teaching profession, he would have been swept into once by millions of thankful parents and educators.

You shouldn't be embarrassed but proud to feature the work of a columnist who is so clearly tuned in to the views of a frustrated electorate.

Sue Allison

The Coordinator of Marylanders Against

High Stakes Testing

I'm deeply disturbed by your recent "Mea Culpa." In this piece, you advance the idea that Stager's opinions about "educational matters" are appropriate for publication, but his questions about "the motives of elected officials or candidates" are inappropriate.

How sad.

At any time, but this year in particular, presidential politics is all about "educational matters" and the candidates themselves ask the voters to evaluate their opponents' and their own motives. Campaigners demand that we look at the record, assess their policies, and, most of all, judge them on their "motives."

Since I doubt you actually believe national politics is not an "educational matter," I have to conclude your embarrassment results more from Stager's criticism of Mr. Bush's policies and the motives that appear to undergird them.

Is District Administration going to a closed room full of "appropriate" cheerleaders for Bush's policies? If not, then you owe Mr. Stager and your readers a "mea maxima culpa."

Roger Leege

District Director of Technology Services

Tolland (CT) Public Schools

What kind of bubble do you live in? Education is not now and never has been neutral. How can you write, "We at District Administration value the open exchange of ideas about improving public education." And then contradict that by condemning one of your own columnists for speaking his mind on an extremely important topic. Don't district administrators keep up with what is happening to education under the Bush regime?

I'm very worried that my cash-strapped district is going to end up with one of those tedious Direct Instruction programs that cost so much money and bore students and teachers to death. I'm eternally grateful to people like Gary Stager for bravely standing up and protesting "phony science-based" programs.

We need more, not less, of this kind of discussion.

Nancy S. Elkins

A parent from an embattled district

Maplewood, NJ

Letters can be sent to Please include your name, title and district (including state). We reserve the right to edit all letters.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Elkins, Nancy S.
Publication:District Administration
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Jan 1, 2005
Previous Article:Thanks for the apology.
Next Article:ETS Pulliam's focus on standards drives student scores past expectations: Paramount High School showed significant improvement in almost every area.

Related Articles
There's something about Gary. (editor's Letter).
Oregon's credibility takes direct hit.
Mea Culpa.
Debating one-sided parent contracts.
Thanks for the apology.
Gary Stager on adults behaving badly: why are students and adults becoming antagonists?
Extreme makeover.
"... And I approved this message".
Company Watch - Southwest Airlines.
A transforming redesign: the bold new pages of DA magazine offer a compelling take on K12 education.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters