Printer Friendly

K.M. v. Alabama Dept. of Youth Services.

U.S. District Court

SEXUAL ASSAULT

JUVENILES

K.M. v. Alabama Dept. of Youth Services, 360 F.Supp.2d 1253 (M.D.Ala. 2005). Former juvenile detainees sued the Alabama Department of Youth Services (DYS), a former DYS employee, and others under [section] 1983 and state law, alleging that they were sexually and physically assaulted and harassed while in DYS custody. The former employee moved for summary judgment and the district court denied the motion. The court held that summary judgment was precluded by genuine issues of material fact as to whether the employee violated a detainee's due process right to bodily integrity, and whether a detainee suffered emotional distress so severe that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it, as the result of a sexual assault by the employee. The court noted that even if a juvenile detainee had serious mental health problems before an employee allegedly inserted his finger into her vagina, that fact would not preclude a finding that any mental distress she experienced was caused by the employee, for the purposes of the Alabama tort of outrage. The court found that the employee was not protected by state-agent immunity under Alabama law because the alleged acts were not committed in the performance of his job-related duties. (Department of Youth Services, Chalkville Campus, Alabama)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:cases of sexual harassment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U6AL
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:219
Previous Article:Gonzales v. Martinez.
Next Article:Merrriweather v. Marion County Sheriff.
Topics:


Related Articles
Same-sex harassment: gay men and lesbians being harassed in the workplace are about to have their day in court.
Title VII protects gay workers from sexual harassment, Ninth Circuit finds.
Iowa justices allow Title VII claim for fatal punch.
Personnel.
K.M. v. Alabama Dept. of Youth Services.
K.M. v. Alabama Dept. of Youth Services.
Acknowledging informal power dynamics in the workplace: a proposal for further development of the vicarious liability doctrine in hostile environment...
Sexual harassment, misconduct, and the atmosphere of the laboratory: the legal and professional challenges faced by women physical science...
Sexy dressing revisited: does target dress play a part in sexual harassment cases?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters