Judge dismisses lawsuit against SPSA.
Judge Rodham Delk Jr. dismissed the $20 million lawsuit filed by Holland, which claimed that the regional waste authority provided predatory pricing when it introduced the program.
Rodham has not yet decided whether SPSA properly may accept for disposal construction and demolition debris in competition with Holland.
While dismissing the charge, the judge in the case noted in his opinion that at this stage of the case, he must accept all of Holland's allegations as true.
The suit, filed earlier this year, claimed that SPSA's contract with Bay Disposal was a "sweetheart deal" which violated local law.
In refuting the claim, the SPSA claimed that the contract offered to Bay is available to any of its customers under the same terms and conditions.
The court has asked the parties to submit briefs addressing whether the court has the authority to enjoin or prevent SPSA from accepting construction and demolition debris should the court conclude that SPSA is not allowed to accept such debris either from Bay Disposal or under the circumstances of this case.
A statement from SPSA notes: "As we understand the Court's ruling, the conspiracy and antitrust claims now have been permanently dismissed by the Court."
According to local reports, SPSA's board of directors never voted on the Bay Disposal contract, nor was a public hearing held about it. Only after the contract with Bay was publicized did the board hold a public hearing and agree to offer similar costs and services to other qualified waste haulers.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Southeastern Public Service Authority|
|Publication:||Construction & Demolition Recycling|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||Ohio EPA finds toxic chemicals in C&D landfills.|
|Next Article:||Rockwood pigments announces price increase.|
|State suport: yes, Virginia, C&D recycling can save money.|
|Public agency muscles into C&D market.|
|Virginia reports 2005 recycling rates.|