Printer Friendly

Judge: Ethan fight mother 'irresponsible'.

A JUDGE has branded a Somerset mother who went on the run with her three-year-old son after becoming embroiled in a bitter custody battle with the boy's father "utterly irresponsible".

Judge Stephen Wildblood QC said that if everyone behaved like Rebecca Minnock there would be "anarchy" as he criticised the 35-year-old and her family for trying to "manipulate the press" - insisting it was "her choice" to go on the run.

Miss Minnock, from Highbridge, handed herself in to the police in Oxford on Friday night after 17 days on the run with her son, Ethan Williams - sparking a nationwide hunt for the pair.

She was driven to Bristol Crown Court by friends but did not speak to waiting reporters.

The mother-of-one disappeared on May 27, the day she was meant to hand Ethan over to his father, Roger Williams, 39, following a ruling in the family court.

Judge Wildblood spoke out in open court before he held a private hearing to discuss the boy's future.

Last week the judge jailed Miss Minnock's mother, Louise, 52, and her partner, Andrew Butt, 56, after finding them in contempt of court for withholding information about Ethan's disappearance.

"A singularly unattractive feature of this case that was revealed last week by Mr Butt was that he, and according to him other members of the mother's family, sought to manipulate the press to their advantage," he said.

"Mr Butt said in evidence that, when Rebecca Minnock did not achieve what she wanted to achieve in the family litigation, he and others took the view that Rebecca should go into hiding with Ethan to attract the attention of the press.

"As Mr Butt himself said, if everyone who is dissatisfied with the outcome of a case behaved in that way it would lead to anarchy. Huge amounts of time, effort and money were spent on the case and it is simply unfair for a party to attempt to use the press in an attempt to deny another person justice.

"Not only is it absurd for anyone to try to 'play the press' in that way, because that inevitably backfires, but it is also an utterly irresponsible way to behave from the point of view of the welfare of a child.

"It means that an attempt has been made to use each one of you, members of the press, and the court system as a whole as a part of a publicity stunt that has now been played out in public.

"Another singularly unattractive feature is that, by engaging in that publicity stunt, those in the mother's family who have behaved in this way have ensured that you and the public hear the mother's side of the story in very full detail."

The judge added: "It was the mother's choice to behave as she did since May 27.

Ethan, who was born on January 25, 2012, has lived with Miss Minnock since his parents separated in February 2013. A custody battle began the following month. Miss Minnock made allegations about Mr Williams which a district judge later ruled were false.

On May 27, it was found Miss Minnock exposed Ethan to emotional harm and should only have supervised contact with him.

It was ordered that the boy should live with Mr Williams fulltime.

CAPTION(S):

Rebecca Minnock and Ethan

COPYRIGHT 2015 Coventry Newpapers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Coventry Evening Telegraph (England)
Date:Jun 16, 2015
Words:552
Previous Article:PM in pledge on the Magna Carta.
Next Article:Mystery after city student, 20 found dead.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters