Despite the apparently precise repetition of McElheny's glass forms, closer inspection revealed variation. Three blue tempiettos arched with slightly different curves, and the interiors of four yellow needle pyramids were each hollowed out by distinctly different volumes. Perhaps this was merely a residue of McElheny's construction process, in which the glass is molded in fabricated metal casts, the incidental deviation this method produces betraying the impossibility of mechanical perfection. And as Hablik's and Luckhardt's forms proliferated endlessly in the mirrored glass landscape, so too did their differences, demonstrating that modernism's legacy of standardization and uniformity cannot be sustained.
While Crystalline Landscape modeled a varied and hypertrophic urban plan, the three double vitrines mounted on the surrounding walls offered comparative studies of historical difference. Each paired display case was backlit so that the glass objects within--facsimiles of twentieth-century designs--appeared to radiate in hues of modernism's prismatic trinity: blue, red, and yellow. Their titles--for example, Red Finnish Modernism and Yellow Czech Modernism--were straightforward and plainly described the small sets McElheny had grouped according to national origin. Bathed in a phosphorescent glow and organized in uniformly staggered rows, these three wall pieces read like clinical displays containing not sculptures but perhaps lab-ready modernist specimens.
Notably, McElheny's selection of nations--Finland, Czechoslovakia, and Italy--directed attention away from modernism's paradigmatic geographical center (and indeed, clear temporal coordinates). But this was hardly sculpture about the periphery. Instead, correspondences staged between the vessels (each mirroring the others in number, height, and often form) suggested a central theme. In Blue Italian Modernism and Red Finnish Modernism, for example, a bulbous Italian vessel with, a ballooning spherical top and short narrow neck opposed a squat cylindrical Finnish piece featuring a mushroom cap protruding from its rim. Though their proportions were inverted, the objects mimed one another in their distended shapes and downward thrust. In effect, they were bound both by an ambient colored glow to the other objects of shared national origin, and by formal links to pieces similarly positioned across the diptych's divide.
This proclivity for variation across the show reproduced a tendency already evident in the opening images sourced from Mies's Glass Skyscraper project, images that constitute but two of the architect's countless versions. As though celebrating the lesson learned by Mies after the failure of FriedrichstraBe, McElheny's exhibition articulated a vocabulary of modernism that, rather than tending toward homogeneity, produces a language for difference--one that he insists history already offers.
DONALD YOUNG GALLERY
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Crystalline Modernity|
|Date:||Feb 1, 2011|
|Previous Article:||Christopher Wool.|
|Next Article:||Gary Simmons.|