Printer Friendly

Isotopic differences between the left and right side otoliths of flatfish indicating growth rather than environment.


Fish otoliths are laminated aragonite structures that have been used as a proxy of time series for environmental studies. Among the three pairs of otoliths (sagittae, lapilli and asterisci) in teleost fish, sagittae are usually the largest and most commonly used in age determination and subsampling for stable isotope analysis [1-3]. Otoliths begin to form before hatching and grow continuously through the entire life of a fish, thus preserving an uninterrupted record of the internal and external environment of the fish. It was reported that the left and right side sagittal otoliths of most marine fishes were identical and no significant morphological and isotopic differences were found between them [4-6], with an exception of flatfish [7-9]. In particular, Loher et al. [10] reported a significant difference between the left and right side otoliths of Pacific halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis in Sr/Ca, [[delta].sup.13]C and [[delta].sup.18]O ratios, but not in other trace elements (i.e., Li, Mg, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ba, and Pb) in the same analysis. They processed sagittal otoliths of age-2 Pacific halibut collected from the Gulf of Alaska, and used the whole-otolith method for trace element and stable isotope analyses. In view of the interest in comparison between the left and right side otoliths of flatfish, better resolved isotopic sampling warrants further investigation. Pacific halibut is perhaps the best flatfish species for testing the otolith asymmetry and isotopic differences due to biological observations on its early life history. Halibut spawning occurs annually from November to March along the edge of the continental shelf at depths between 100 and 550 m [11]. During the early development, particularly at the post-larva stage (about 4-6 months) [12,13], a distinct transformation or metamorphosis occurs in halibut as the left eye migrates to the right side (left side blind) and their characteristics change from roundfish to flatfish [8]. As adults, the left side otoliths of halibut are distinctly different from the right side otoliths in size, shape, and morphological features [14]. Questions are raised and need to verify: (1) there was no significant difference between the paired left-right otoliths because halibut had roundfish features in their larval stage; and (2) there was significant difference between the paired left-right otoliths in adult stage because the animal had flatfish features. The period before and after metamorphosis is so critical to the halibut's life and cranial asymmetry that isotopic examinations from larval to adult stages are necessary. Previous studies using whole otoliths [10] cannot answer these questions because they only obtain a mixed isotopic composition for the young halibut. The microsampling techniques, which have been used in fisheries science and management since 1990s [2,15,16], should be capable of separating the larval stage and resolving the short-term isotopic record of the left and right side otoliths of flatfish. In this study we examined the isotopic differences between the left and right side otoliths by separating the larval growth of Pacific halibut just after metamorphosis [12]. First, we collected a large number of halibut otoliths from one area, and analyzed the nucleus (corresponding to the initial 4-6 months in larval growth over the first annulus) and the 5th annulus (young halibut with reduced migration; [17]). Second, we extended the sampling to a distinctly different area or stock [14], and analyzed the otolith nucleus and the 8th annulus (the early maturity age for male halibut; [11]). By compiling the otolith data from two areas with two slightly different sampling protocols we expect to find out if there are true isotopic differences between the left and right side otoliths for larval versus adult (5 or 8 years old) halibut.


Otolith microsampling and isotopic analysis

Thirty-two pairs of Pacific halibut sagittae were collected from commercial fisheries off the Washington Coast in 2013 and kept in dried conditions. After field collection, the otolith pairs were first cleaned in an ultrasonic water bath for about 15 min, and then transferred to a tap-water filled transparent vessel for age determination under a VanGuard microscope. The surface-aged otolith samples were rinsed with ethanol, and dried at room temperature. The left and right side otoliths were each weighed using a Torbal AGCN balance, with a precision of 0.0001 g. Other morphological features, such as the shape of the otolith (convex or concave) between the left and right side otoliths, were also examined and recorded for comparison The methods for otolith slide preparation, such as resin embedding, cutting, and thin-sectioning, have been reported elsewhere [18]. Microsampling was conducted using the Dremel method as described by Gao [16]. Based on research objectives, two subsamples were carefully taken from each left and right side otolith. One powder sample was taken from the nucleus and extracted 1/3 to 1/2 interval of the first annulus which represents the initial 4-6 months of the larval growth; the other was taken from the 5th annulus because previous studies indicated that age-5 is the time when Pacific halibut typically reduce migration [17]. The microsampling was about 100 pm in resolution and at least 50 pg of aragonite powder were collected for stable isotope analysis. Once a subsample was finished, the powder was carefully tapped on aluminum foil and placed into a metal cup. The otolith slide and the sampling bit were then cleaned using an Aero-Duster gas. Analysis of otolith powder samples was conducted in the Environmental Isotope Laboratory of University of Arizona in Tucson, USA, using Finnigan MAT 252 and Delta-plus mass spectrometers. All the isotope ratio measurements were reported in the standard 5 notation (%): [[delta].sup.18]O={[([sup.18]O/[sup.16]O)A/ ([sup.18]O/16O)S]-1} x 1000, for instance, where A is otolith aragonite sample and S is an international standard (VPDB, Vienna Peedee belemnite). Calibration of isotopic enrichments to VPDB standard is based on daily analysis of NBS-19 (National Bureau of Standards) powdered carbonate and the analytical precision is better than 0.1% for both [[delta].sup.13]C and [[delta].sup.18]O values.

Data from the 2008 collection

To verify the analytical results from the Washington Coast samples, 31 pairs of sagittal otoliths of halibut from the northern Puget Sound (a distinctly different area or stock from the Washington Coast [14]) were analyzed. These otoliths were collected during the 2008 commercial fishing season and were sampled with a slightly different protocol. One powder sample was taken from the nucleus identically to the Washington Coast samples, and another sample was taken from the 8th annulus (the early maturity age for male halibut [11]). The microsampling procedures were the same as described on the Washington Coast samples

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test [19] and Shapiro-Wilk W-statistic [20] were first performed to test if the isotope measurements from the left and right side otoliths were in normal distribution. If the isotopic data are normally distributed, traditional parametric statistical analyses (e.g., ANOVA, t-test, LDFA) can be used to compare the mean and the standard deviation of the difference; otherwise nonparametric methods (e.g., F-ANOVA, WSRT) should be considered [21]. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and its significance were estimated to evaluate the consistency of the relationship between the isotope measurements from the left and right side otoliths. Scatter plots were also used to visually compare and evaluate these relationships. The left and right side otoliths from a sampled halibut were treated as paired samples and tested for equality of isotope measurements using the paired-sample t test. All differences were calculated as the left side otolith measurement minus the right side otolith measurement. The hypothesis that the mean of the differences is equal to 0 was tested by the paired-sample t test and, if this hypothesis was rejected, it was concluded that the samples were significantly different. All analyses were conducted using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics (v21).


For the 32 pairs of sagittal otoliths from the Washington Coast, halibut ages ranged from 9 to 15 years. There were no significant differences in weight (p=0.502) between the left and right side otoliths as previously documented [8], and the weights of left and right side otolit were highly correlated (Figure 1). The surfaces of the left side otoliths were mostly convex while the right side otoliths mostly concave. For the nucleus, most left side otoliths had well developed concentric microstructure whereas the right side otoliths did not. These morphological features of the right side otoliths often make them difficult to age. Based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, only the distribution of the differences for the [[delta].sup.13]C data sampled at the 5th annulus was significantly different from the normal distribution (Table 1). Investigation of this difference showed that the significance was mostly due to the two large negative [[delta].sup.13]C values on the left side of the distribution. The paired-sample t test was used for comparing the left-right otolith isotopic composition because the departure from normality was slight and could be attributed to basically one observation. Analyses showed there was a significant (p<0.05) difference between the paired left-right otoliths mostly for [[delta].sup.13]C values sampled from the otolith nucleus in both Washington Coast and Puget Sound samples (Table 2). In contrast, the differences between the paired left-right otoliths for both [[delta].sup.13]C and [[delta].sup.18]O sampled from the 5th and 8th annulus were not significantly different (both p>0.160). For the [[delta].sup.13]C and [[delta].sup.18]O composition of otolith pairs from the Washington Coast, the right side otoliths had higher mean isotope values than the left side, particularly for isotopic measurements from the nucleus (cf. Table 2). A similar isotopic trend was displayed in otolith pairs from the Puget Sound. The correlations of isotopic composition between the left and right side otoliths ranged from 0.328 to 0.777 (Table 3). Interestingly, correlations for the Washington Coast samples were all higher than for the Puget Sound samples; and correlations in isotopic measurements from the 5th or 8th annulus were generally higher than those from the nucleus except for [[delta].sup.18]O from the Puget Sound samples (cf. Table 3). Scatter plots of [[delta].sup.13]C and [[delta].sup.18]O values for paired left-right otolith samples from the nucleus and the 5th and 8th annulus, relative to the line of unity where both measurements are equal, showed an unequal distribution of data points mostly in the nucleus (Figures 2 and 3).


Using microsampling techniques we were able to analyze the nucleus and the 5th and 8th annulus from the left and right side otoliths of Pacific halibut. Our results indicated that there were significant isotopic differences between the left and right side otoliths for samples collected from the nucleus in both Washington Coast and Puget Sound samples; but no significant isotopic differences for samples collected from the 5th and 8th annulus of the same individual otoliths. These results clearly differ from the previous reports on marine fish otoliths [4-6], nor agree well with the whole-otolith studies on Gulf of Alaska halibut [10]. The nucleus in our sampling represents the initial 4-6 months in growth which encompasses halibut metamorphosis [12]; in contrast, the 5th and 8th annuli represent the time of reduced migration and onset of halibut maturation. Because the 63 pairs of otolith samples in this study came from two distinctly different areas or stocks [14], the results and conclusions are tenable and may be of significance for other flatfishes. Based on the principle of carbonate geochemistry, the 518C values of otoliths reflect the ambient seawater temperature and the [[delta].sup.13]C values are related to a fish's diet [22-25]. For the same fish at the early life and adult stage as examined here, isotopic differences between the left and right side otoliths are difficult to interpret with respect to environmental factors such as water temperature, salinity, and diet [10]. Experimental observations [13] showed that in incubators Pacific halibut larvae floated passively in the water column with the head pointing downward. By 55 days after hatching (or 70 days after fertilization), the yolk sac was fully absorbed. As the larvae continuously grow, along with the yolk sac absorption and a decrease in specific gravity, they were capable of moving upright towards the shallower surface water [13]. In the natural environment these changes in water column (from about 500m to 100m) and gravitational force (1g=9.81 m/s2) must be rapid (less than 4-6 months), during which metamorphosis occurs such that the left eye of halibut larvae moves over the snout to the right side of the head [12]. Thus it is reasonable to assume that the halibut larvae are subjected to weightlessness or postural control, and their otolith organs are sensitive to changes in position. The development of lateralized swimming posture and morphological asymmetry during halibut metamorphosis are unknown [9], because there are few experimental observations and no detailed information available for halibut metamorphosis or exact days of eye migration. The mechanism could be explained from the theory and experiments of space motion sickness [26-29], which is caused primarily by the mismatch between expected and sensed gravity direction.

Differences in collective otoconial mass between the paired otolith organs could in principle result in asymmetric shear forces on the otolith membranes, although a compensation for asymmetries in vestibular function typically occurs [29]. Schreiber [9] pointed out that the development of a lateralized swimming posture occurred during late pre-metamorphosis and eye migration took place later during metamorphic climax, both influenced by thyroid hormone (TH) levels. Anken et al. [30] reported an experimental result in otoliths of "shifted" and "stationary" cichlid fish, and found that the lapillar otolith asymmetry of stationary samples showed a highly significant increase in late yolk-sac stages. When the fish began to swim freely, the asymmetry was decreased dramatically [30]. They suggest that the development of otolith asymmetry depends on the direction of the acting gravity vector relative to the positioning of the larvae. During metamorphosis, flatfishes undergo a 90 tilt to the right or left side to become bottom-adapted animals; however, the otolith organs do not rotate with the skull as the eyes did [7,31,32]. These neurophysiological studies and results might be helpful to explain why the left and right side otoliths of Pacific halibut are isotopically different. During the early development and metamorphosis, halibut larvae might be less active [8] and passively moved up to the shallower surface water [13]. Because of the tilted forces and gravity decrease, their sagittal otoliths became asymmetric and as a result the masses of right side otolith were larger than those of the left side. When the young halibut (after 6 months old) began to move offshore and migrate to the east and south of the US Pacific coast [12,33], the otolith asymmetry was decreased [30] so that the masses between the left and right side otoliths were nearly balanced. In other words, mass accumulation rates in the paired left-right otoliths are not identical throughout the early life history of halibut and the development of mass asymmetry and its later reduction reflect growth biases rather than environment. When we analyzed samples from the nucleus and the 5th and 8th annulus, the otolith asymmetry just after metamorphosis and the otolith symmetry of the adult halibut may be responsible for the 013C and [[delta].sup.18]O differences. Why does a flatfish have asymmetric otolith organs during metamorphosis but symmetric otoliths as an adult? Some research suggests that "motion" is the key [8] and this physiological design may be of great importance for flatfish to protect them from predators. If we agree with the above interpretation, the results of this study not only provide some details on the early development of halibut larvae, but have management implications as well. When using the nucleus of flatfish otoliths and stable isotope ratios in stock structure studies, one should consider the possible differences between the left and right side otoliths in isotope measurements. However, when dealing with the same samples for adult population, one can choose otoliths from either sides as proxies.


This project was supported by multi-level governments and fisheries agencies such as Makah Fisheries Management (MFM), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission (NWIFC). We are grateful to many staff and colleague for their help, particularly Russell Svec (MFM) for his interest, Zac Espinoza (MFM) for otolith collections and Greg Bargmann (WDFW), for providing Puget Sound otolith samples. Financial support partly from an NWIFC grant is also gratefully acknowledged.


[1.] Beamish RJ, McFarlane GA (1987) Current trends in age determination methodology. In: Summerfelt RC, Hall GE (eds.) Age and growth of fish, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa: pp. 15-42.

[2.] Patterson WP, Smith GR, Lohmann KC (1993) Continental paleothermometry and seasonality using the isotopic composition of aragonitic otoliths of freshwater fishes. Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records, Geophysical Monograph 78, Washington, DC.

[3.] Gao YW, Dettman D, Piner K, Wallace F, Thef KW, et al. (2010) Isotopic correlation ([[delta].sup.18]O and [[delta].sup.13]C) of otoliths in identification of groundfish stocks. Trans Am Fish Soc 139: 491-501.

[4.] Hunt JJ (1992) Morphological characteristics of otoliths for selected fish in the Northwest Atlantic. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 13: 63-75.

[5.] Harvey JT, Loughlin TR, Perez MA, Oxman DS (2000) Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Tech Rep, NMFS150.

[6.] Geffen AJ (2012) Otolith oxygen and carbon stable isotopes in wild and laboratory-reared plaice (Pleuronectos platessa). Environ Biol Fish 95: 419430.

[7.] Helling K, Scherer H, Hausmann S, Clarke AH (2005) Otolith mass asymmetries in the utricle and saccule of flatfish. J Vestib Res 15: 59-64.

[8.] Lychakov DV, Rebane YT, Lombarte A, Demestre M, Fuiman LA (2008) Saccular otolith mass asymmetry in adult flatfishes. J Fish Biol 72: 2579-2594.

[9.] Schreiber AM (2013) Flatfish: an asymmetric perspective on metamorphosis. Curr Top Dev Biol 103: 167-194.

[10.] Loher T, Wischniowski S, Martin GB (2008) Elemental chemistry of left and right sagittal otoliths in a marine fish Hippoglossus stenolepis displaying cranial asymmetry. J Fish Biol 73: 870-887.

[11.] St-Pierre G (1984) Spawning locations and season for Pacific halibut. IPHC Sci Rep 70.

[12.] International Pacific Halibut Commission (1987) The Pacific halibut: biology, fishery, and management. IPHC Tech Rep 22.

[13.] McFarlane GA, Jensen JOT, Andrews WT, Groot EP (1991) Egg and yolk sac larval development of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis). IPHC Tech Rep 24.

[14.] Gao YW (2012) Otoliths speak out: why the Pacific halibut in Puget Sound are different.Environ Biol Fish 95: 469-479.

[15.] Dettman DL, Lohmann KC (1995) Approaches to microsampling carbonates for stable isotope and minor element analysis: physical separation of samples on a 20 micrometer scale. J Sediment Petrol A65: 566-569.

[16.] Gao YW (1999) Microsampling of fish otoliths: a comparison between DM 2800 and Dremel in stable isotope analysis. Environ Biol Fish 55: 443-448.

[17.] Gao YW, Beamish RJ (2003) Stable isotope variations in otoliths of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and indications of the possible 1990 regime shift. J Fish Res 60:393-404.

[18.] Gao YW, Beamish RJ (1999) Isotopic composition of otoliths as a chemical tracer in population identification of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56: 2062-2068.

[19.] Conover WJ (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd edn.) John Wiley & Sons.

[20.] Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical Analysis (5th edn.) Prentice-Hall, USA.

[21.] Gao YW, Conrad R, Bean D, Noakes DLG (2013) Statistical analysis on otolith data of anadromous fishes. Environ Biol Fish 96: 799-810.

[22.] Urey HC (1947) The thermodynamic properties of isotopic substances. J Chem Soc. 562-581.

[23.] Epstein S, Buchsbaum R, Lowenstam HA, Urey HC (1953) Revised carbonatewater isotopic temperature scale. Geol Soc Am Bull 64: 1315-1326.

[24.] DeNiro MJ, Epstein S (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42: 495-506.

[25.] Schwarcz HP, Gao Y, Campana S, Browne D, Knyf M, Brand U (1998) Stable carbon isotope variations in otoliths of cod (Gadus morhua). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 1798-1806.

[26.] von Baumgarten RJ, Thumler R (1979) A model for vestibular function in altered gravitational states. Life Sci Space Res 17: 161-170.

[27.] Wetzig J, Reiser M, Martin E, Bregenzer N, von Baumgarten RJ (1990) Unilateral centrifugation of the otoliths as a new method to determine bilateral asymmetries of the otolith apparatus in man. Acta Astronaut 21: 519-525.

[28.] Anken RH, Rahmann H (1999) Effect of altered gravity on the neurobiology of fish. Naturwissenschaften 86: 155-167.

[29.] Lackner JR, Dizio P (2006) Space motion sickness. Exp Brain Res 175: 377399.

[30.] Anken RH, Werner K, Ibsch M, Rahmann H (1998) Fish inner ear otolith size and bilateral asymmetry during development. Hear Res 121: 77-83.

[31.] Platt C (1973) Central control of postural orientation in flatfish. I. Postural change dependence on central neural changes. J Exp Biol 59: 491-521.

[32.] Sogard SM (1991) Interpretation of otolith microstructure in juvenile winter flounde (Pseudopleuronectes americanus): ontogenetic development, daily increment validation,and somatic growth relationships. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48: 1862-1871.

[33.] Trumble RJ, Neilson JD, Bowering WR, McCaughran DA (1993) Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) and Pacific halibut (H. stenolepis) and their North American fisheries. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 227.

Citation: Gao Y, Petersen J, Conrad R, Dettman DL (2015) Isotopic Differences between the Left and Right Side Otoliths of Flatfish Indicating Growth rather than Environment. Fish Aquac J 6: 114. doi:10.4172/2150-3508.1000114

Yongwen Gao (1) *, Joseph Petersen (1), Robert Conrad (2) and David L Dettman (3)

(1) Makah Fisheries Management, P.O. Box 115, Neah Bay, WA 98357, USA

(2) Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, 6730 Martin Way East, Olympia, WA 98516, USA

(3) Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

* Corresponding author: Gao Y, Makah Fisheries Management, P.O. Box 115, Neah Bay, WA 98357, USA, Tel: 360-645-3164; Fax: 360-645-2323; E-mail:

Received January 06, 2015; Accepted January 27, 2015; Published February 01, 2015

Table 1: Summary of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk
tests for normality of the distribution of isotopic differences
between paired left-right otoliths for Pacific halibut from the
Washington Coast (n=32).

                               Smirnov test

Isotope       Microsampling     Statistic      P

[delta]13C    Nucleus              0.112       0.2
              5th annulus          0.158       0.042
[delta]18O    Nucleus              0.086       0.2.00
              5th annulus          0.095       0.2.00

?                                  test

Isotope       Microsampling     Statistic      P

[delta]13C    Nucleus              0.975       0.628
              5th annulus          0.919       0.019
[delta]18O    Nucleus              0.967       0.413
              5th annulus          0.937       0.063

Table 2: Results of the paired-sample t test for the equality of
[delta]13C and [delta]180 measurements from the left and right
side otoliths of Pacific halibut.

                Micro               Difference
                sampling               ([per
                and                 thousand],         Standard
Isotope         Location               VPDB)           Deviation

[delta]13C      WA Coast

                Nucleus               -0.175             0.366

                5th annulus           -0.096             0.380

[delta]180      Nucleus               -0.136             0.316

                5th annulus           -0.071             0.380

                Puget Sound
[delta]13C      Nucleus               -0.269             0.421
                8th annulus           -0.002             0.326

[delta]180      Nucleus               -0.128             0.375

                8th annulus           -0.153             0.474

                and                     t
Isotope         Location            Statistics             P

[delta]13C      WA Coast

                Nucleus               -2.713             0.011

                5th annulus           -1.430             0.163

[delta]18O      Nucleus               -2.429             0.021

                5th annulus           -1.061             0.297

                Puget Sound
[delta]13C      Nucleus               -3.565             0.001
                8th annulus           -0.024             0.981

[delta]18O      Nucleus               -1.902             0.067

                8th annulus           -1.252             0.231

Table 3: Correlations between [delta]13C and [delta]180 values
from paired left-right otoliths of pacific halibut.

Isotope      Microsampling        r       Pa
             and Location

             WA Coast (n=32)

[delta]13C   Nucleus              0.619   <0.001
             5th annulus          0.634   <0.001

[delta]180   Nucleus              0.639   <0.001

             5th annulus          0.777   <0.001

             Puget Sound (n=31)

[delta]13C   Nucleus              0.337   0.064
             8th annulus          0.541   0.037

[delta]180   Nucleus              0.496   0.005
             8th annulus          0.328   0.233
COPYRIGHT 2015 HATASO Enterprises, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Gao, Yongwen; Petersen, Joseph; Conrad, Robert; Dettman, David L.
Publication:Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2015
Previous Article:Influence of stocking density on growth and survival of post fry of the African mud catfish, Clarias gariepinus.
Next Article:Length-weight relationships of twelve fishes from the River Padma near Rajshahi City, Bangladesh.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters