Printer Friendly

Isolation and risk assessment of Geotrichum spp. in the white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931) from culture ponds/Aislamiento y evaluacion de riesgos de Geotrichum spp. en el camaron blanco (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931) en estanques de cultivo.

INTRODUCTION

Shrimp aquaculture is at present an attractive economic activity of great impact and commercial importance in Mexico (Gillett, 2008). Unfortunately, disease incidence affects production and commercialization success. Thus, shrimp-farming success depends on the application of procedures aimed at preventing and controlling the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in the ponds. Fungi are considered opportunistic pathogens in aquaculture because they usually affect stressed or immunocompromised animals (Pelczar et al., 2001; Leslie & Summerell, 2006; Madigan et al, 2009). Lightner (1996) reported 100% mortalities of shrimp eggs and larvae exposed to Lagenidium callinectes while other researchers found that such fungus is also capable of infecting juvenile and adult shrimps in culture (Bertke & Aronson, 1992; Nakamura et al, 1994; Khoa et al, 2004, 2005; Cruz da Silva et al, 2011). Other fungi belonging to the genera Haliphtrofos and Sirolpidium provoke diseases in cultured shrimp larvae (Noga, 1990); Fusarium, on the other hand, is capable of affecting practically all developmental stages of shrimp (Bachere et al., 2000; Bugni & Ireland, 2004). Some toxic strains of Fusarium have been found responsible for different epizootic episodes in cultures of Penaeus chinensis (Chen et al., 1992), P. californiensis (Lightner & Hose, 1984), P. stylirostris (Lightner, 1996), P. japonicus (Lightner & Hose, 1984; Noga, 1990; Lightner, 1996), and Litopenaeus vannamei (Cruz da Silva et al., 2011; Lozano-Olvera et al., 2012).

Our work is the first report referring to the pathogenicity of Geotrichum strains towards American white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. This yeast like fungus, found in soil, water, and air worldwide is a colonizer of the intestinal tract. It may cause opportunistic infections (geotrichosis) in immunocompromised hosts, which usually acquire it via ingestion or inhalation (Buchta & Otcenasek, 1998). The isolation from walls and bottom of a shrimp pond in La Paz, Baja California Sur (BCS), Mexico was conducted in order to determine the pathogenicity of isolated strains of filamentous fungi that implied a potential risk in shrimp farming success. Pathogenic fungi were assessed by determining their virulence and adhesive capacity on cells in primary culture of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fungus isolation and characterization

During the preparation of experimental ponds for cultivation of L. vannamei at Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR) in La Paz, BCS, Mexico, the presence of white spots of microbial colonies in the walls and bottoms of the ponds were frequently noticed. The isolation of the corresponding microorganisms by common microbiological procedures was done (Hyde et al., 2000). The samples, collected with a sterile scraper and poured in 250 [micro]L of glycerol, were plated in PDA medium and incubated at 22[degrees]C for 48 h (Newell, 2001). Purification was done streaking in various Petri dishes containing the same culture media and stored at -80[degrees]C and -20[degrees]C until use (Hernandez-Saavedra, 1990). Microorganism identification was performed by morphological criteria using a Nikon Optihot-2 microscope (Nikon, Japan) according to Pitt & Hocking (1997). Distinctive morphological characteristics for the Geotrichum genus were observed (Pitt & Hocking, 1997; Kurtzman & Robnett, 1998; Smith et al., 2000). Identification keys were obtained from Tortora et al. (2012) and the identification was done only up to genus.

Growth kinetics determination was done using 125 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 mL of M-1 medium [glucose 2% (w/v), peptone 1% (w/v), yeast extract 0.5% (w/v)], and incubated at 25[degrees]C with constant orbital shaking (110 rpm) according to Hernandez-Saavedra (1990). The mycelium was recovered from the culture by filtration using Whatman No 1 paper, washed with distilled water, and afterwards placed in an oven at 80[degrees]C for 24 h to get a constant weight. The dry weight of the sample was determined with an analytical balance (Ohaus, AP210S) and plotted against the time of collection. The analysis of enzymatic activity, compared with collection strains obtained from infected shrimp; Fusarium solani (ATCC 46940), isolated from Penaeus japonicus; and Fusarium javanicum (CBS 420.76), isolated from Penaeus californiensis.

Shrimp and primary shrimp tissue culture cells

The white shrimp juveniles (12-14 g) and post-larvae (PL8) were acquired from two local commercial shrimp farms (APSA, La Paz, BCS, Mexico and Acuacultores Marh, La Paz, BCS, Mexico, respectively). Primary cell cultures of different shrimp tissues (tegument, gill, intestine, and hemocytes) were prepared by an enzymatic disaggregation procedure modified from Fuerst et al. (1991), Jackson et al. (1993), and Alexopoulos et al. (1996). Hemocyte culture was prepared from haemolymph obtained by puncture at the pleopod base of the first abdominal segment near the genital pore from juvenile shrimp, with a 1-mL syringe (Hernandez et al., 1996). Essentially, aliquots of 100 [micro]L of cell suspension (of 2.4x[10.sup.5] cells [mL.sup.-1]) were placed in 96-wells microplate, mixed with 90 [micro]L Leibovitz's L-15 complete medium containing 10% (v/v) of fetal bovine serum (FBS), (Sigma, Chemical Co., St Louis, USA) and incubated at 22[degrees]C in a C[O.sub.2] incubator (Shel-Lab, VWR 1810) for 16 h to obtain a primary culture. Cell counting in 100 [micro]L aliquots of primary cultures was done with a hematocytometer using an Optiphot-2 microscope under the contrast phase mode. Trypan blue staining (Sigma, Chemical Co., USA), was carried out to estimate cell viability.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay

The in vitro cytotoxic assays were done with 100 [micro]L of shrimp tissue cell cultures that were first washed with 250 [micro]L of PBS (137 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM KCl, 1.44 mM [Na.sub.2]HP[O.sub.4], 0.24 mM K[H.sub.2]P[O.sub.4]; pH 7.2), and mixed with 100 [micro]L of a cytotoxic preparation according to Varughese et al. (1999). Such preparations consisted of the supernatant and the fungal extract obtained by sonication. The culture fluid supernatants of Vibrio alginolyticus, V. cholera, and V. parahaemolyticus, which are known to be toxic for shrimps, were used as positive controls (Aguirre et al., 2003). The plates were incubated in C[O.sub.2] atmosphere at 37[degrees]C for 2 h. After, they were washed 3 times with PBS before adding 50 [micro]L of cold methanol and allowed to evaporate under a hood for 2 min. Cell staining was done with 50 [micro]L crystal violet in PBS by letting them standstill for 20 min; then the plates were washed three times with PBS, air dried before adding to each well 200 [micro]L of sodium duodecyl sulfate (SDS) (1 g/50 mL ethanol), and incubated for 20 min. Finally, absorbance at 595 nm was determined in a plate reader (BioRad 3550-UV). Each toxin preparation was evaluated by triplicate with each culture.

Adhesion assay

The adhesion capacity of the isolated fungi (mycelium and spores) to primary cultures of shrimp tissues and hemocytes was estimated following the procedure described by Guzman-Murillo & Ascencio (2001). In this case, the mycelium was obtained as recommended by Saha et al. (2008) from M-1 broth culture medium (pH 4.5) at 22[degrees]C and constant orbital shaking (110 rpm). A sample was collected on the 5 th day of incubation and adjusted to 1.0 optical density (Beckman DU 640 Spectrophotometer).

The spores were collected from 15 mL assay tubes containing solid M-1 culture medium (pH 4.5) after incubation at 22[degrees]C for 10-12 days and suspended in 10 mL of an aseptic 0.15 M NaCl solution containing 1% (w/v) Tween 60. This mixture was carefully transferred in portions and rotated slowly to a sterile tube. The recovered spores were counted with a hematocytometer, and their viability was evidenced by staining with malachite green.

Biotin labeling of fungal mycelium and spores was done according to Hernandez et al. (1996). For this purpose, 15 mL of mycelium suspension with an optical density of 1.0 nm and a spore suspension at 1x[10.sup.7] spores-[mL.sup.-1] in bicarbonate buffer (0.1 M de NaHC[O.sub.3], pH 8.0) were centrifuged at 6,000 rpm at 22[degrees]C for 5 min. The supernatant was discharged. Cell sediment was then suspended in 1 mL of bicarbonate buffer and 100 [micro]L of biotin-DMSO (1.3 mg in 1.0 mL). Incubation was carried out at 22[degrees]C under darkness with manual stirring every 30 min for 2-3 h. After this period, 9 mL of PBS were added, and the mixtures were centrifuged at 6,000 rpm at 22[degrees]C for 20 min. Finally, spores and mycelium were suspended in 2.5 mL of PBS and stored under darkness at 4[degrees]C until use. For the adhesion assay, 100 [micro]L aliquots adjusted at 1x[10.sup.4] spores [mL.sup.-1] were used. The adhesion assay was done in a 96-wells microplate containing the primary cell culture of the various shrimp tissues. The cells were fixed with 100 [micro]L of 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and rinsed with PBS. To each well, 100 [micro]L of labeled spore or mycelium suspension were added and incubated for 0, 30, 60, and 180 min. The plates were washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 to eliminate non-adhered cells. Then, 100 [micro]L of streptoavidine-POD (1 [micro]L in 2 mL of PBS) were added to each well, and incubation was carried out at 37[degrees]C for 90 min. Finally, the wells were washed 3 times with PBS-0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 and re-suspended in 100 [micro]L of OPD reagent (2 mg OPD, 12 mL sodium citrate plus 5 mL [H.sub.2][O.sub.2]). The plates were incubated under darkness at 22[micro]C for 20 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding 100 [micro]L at 1 M [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4]. Absorbance was determined at 490 nm in a plate reader (BIORAD 3550-UV).

Extracellular enzyme production as virulence factors

The extracellular production of amylase, lipase, protease, and chitinase was evaluated in plates containing M-1 modified medium (glucose 0.4%, peptone 0.2%, yeast extract 0.5% and agar 4%; all w/v). The medium in each case was supplemented with the specific substrate (starch 1% for amylase; 0.5% Tween 80 and 10 mM Ca[Cl.sub.2] for lipase; 1% partially hydrolyzed casein for protease; and 3% colloidal chitin for chitinase). The plates were inoculated by puncture with a needle and incubated at room temperature for 48-72 h. Amylase production was considered positive by the appearance of a translucent halo after overlaying 3 mL of fresh lugol (3.3 g Iodine crystals; 6.6. g KI; 1 L of distilled water) on the gel; lipase production was revealed by the formation of a precipitate surrounding the colony; protease and chitinase production was revealed by the appearance of a halo (Pierce & Leboffe, 2011).

Acute toxicity test on white shrimp post-larvae (PL8)

Shrimp post-larvae (PL8) survival was evaluated under two conditions: (a) exposure to mycelium suspension; and (b) exposure to culture supernatant. In the first case, the isolated fungi were grown in 25 mL of liquid M-1 medium in 125 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, at 22[degrees]C for 3 days and under constant orbital shaking (110 rpm) to reach the logarithmic phase. The cell suspension was adjusted to different optical densities (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0) at 540 nm with a 0.85% NaCl solution. In the second bioassay, the culture was incubated at 22[degrees]C and constant orbital stirring (110 rpm) for 10 days (stationary phase).

The cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (Beckman J2-HS centrifuge) at 4[degrees]C for 10 min, to obtain both the supernatant and the pellet. To assess survival of post-larvae (PL8) exposed directly to the supernatant and mycelium. Before bioassay, the shrimp post-larvae (PL8) was collected in plastic bags with seawater for to acclimate at 22[degrees]C for 2 h. Specimens (20) were placed in a 6-well polystyrene plate with flat bottom (BD Falcon) containing 5 mL sterile seawater. To each well, 8 mL of the mycelium suspension of different optical densities and of the culture supernatant were added. The final volume in each well was adjusted to 15 mL with sterile seawater, and a coverlid was applied. The controls were prepared replacing the cell suspension and supernatant by sterile seawater. Observations were done with a stereoscope (SP Southern Precision 1839) at 5x magnification during a 24-h period every 2 h as described Sainz et al. (1998). All assays were performed in triplicate

Statistical analysis

All data were normalized using their corresponding logarithms and ANOVA analysis was performed twoway. Type of cell culture and toxins were considered assuming absorbance as a dependent variable. Normalization was done by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis and homoscedasticity by the Bartlett test. Whenever significant differences were found, the Tukey analysis was performed (Zar, 1996).

RESULTS

Fungus identification

The samples collected from CIBNORs shrimp ponds yielded two different yeast-like fungal strains. Both isolates showed similar morphological features with white, dry, and dusty colonies (http://www.doctor-fungus.org/thefungi/Geotrichum.htm). Hence, the Isolated strains were designed as Geotrichum sp. 1 (Gsp. 1) and Geotrichum sp. 2 (Gsp. 2). Table 1 summarizes the properties of Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2. In Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 growth kinetics was similar (Fig. 1), which allowed us to employ similar incubation time for cell biomass preparation in both cases. Because the start of the exponential phase was observed very early between the first and the second day of incubation, and the stationary phase was reached after 7 days, it was decided to carry out mycelium collection at day 3, whereas the cell biomass was collected at day 20. It is important to mention that by adjusting growth to the equation: y = K- [(1+A[e.sup.-bx]).sup.-1], an [R.sup.2] = 0.9926 was found for Gsp. 1 and an [R.sup.2] = 0.9949 for Gsp. 2; hence, a difference in growth rate between the two isolates became apparent, where Gsp. 1 was faster than Gsp. 2. In consequence, at least with regards to growth rate, Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 showed different properties, and thus they may correspond to different strains.

In vitro cytotoxicity of Geotrichum strains on shrimp tissues

The various shrimp tissue cultures tested showed a distinct susceptibility to the extract or the supernatant of each fungal strain (P < 0.001). Hemocytes were more sensitive than tegument, intestine, and gill cells (Fig. 2). Interestingly, Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 toxicity was higher than the preparations obtained from V. alginoliticus, V. parahemoliticus, or V. cholera but lower than the Fusarium strains. Primary cell cultures of gill and intestine showed no differences (P > 0.05) with regard to their susceptibility towards the fungal extracts, and they were more affected than the tegument tissues. In general, no differences were observed between fungal extracts and their corresponding supernatant with primary shrimp tissue culture gill and intestine cells, which were also the least affected.

Fungal adhesiveness

Geotrichum sp. 1 and Geotrichum sp. 2 showed a higher tendency to adhere to hemocytes than to other shrimp tissues (Fig. 3). However, some differences in adhesion between spores and filaments were observed. The spores were always less adhesive than the corres ponding filament stage, indicating some advantage for the multiple-point attachment that a filament can exert. Also, a significant increase in adhesion tendency was observed with elapsed time. No difference in spore adhesion between the strains was observed, but their corresponding filament stages showed different attachment abilities, where Gsp. 2 was more adhesive than Gsp.1 (P < 0.001; Fig. 3).

Toxicity study on shrimp post-larvae (PL8)

Geotrichum sp. 1 supernatant at a concentration of 0.1 optical density (O.D.) caused 25% post-larvae (PL8) mortality after 7 h and total loss at 20 h. Lower doses were innocuous. On the other hand, the culture supernatant of Geotrichum sp. 2 showed a similar effect but at earlier times, 25% mortality after 5 h and total loss at 16 h. It was noted that the toxicity is dosedependent as it is observed that post-larvae mortality tends to be higher with increasing the optical density at 540 nm of the extract. In the case of Fusarium strains, the supernatant caused 100% mortalities after only 2 h (Table 2).

Fungi extracellular enzymatic activity

The strains Geotrichum sp. 1 and Geotrichum sp. 2 produced less amylase than Fusarium reference strains.

All strains tested produced lipase. Strains Geotrichum sp. 2 not produce protease, and none of the tested strains, produced chitinase (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

As pointed out, from the walls and bottoms of ponds utilized for shrimp culture at CIBNOR, we isolated 2 Geotrichum strains using M-1 marine culture medium that favors the growth of marine yeasts and fungi (Deacon, 2005). The isolated strain, were grown on PDA medium prepared with distilled water, which suggests that it may be regarded as facultative marine fungi strains, and were identified as members of Geotrichum genus. Their growth characteristics were at temperatures in the ranges 25-30[degrees]C, and both strains were capable of growing with very low oxygen tension but not under anaerobic conditions (Pitt & Hocking, 1997).

All pathogenic microorganisms possess some attributes known as virulence factors by which they can invade and cause damage to host organisms (Atlas, 1995). Virulence depends to a large extent on two properties: Invasion capacity and toxin production. Invasion refers to the capacity of the microorganism to adhere to host tissues, attack the cells, and proliferate inside the tissues causing an infection. Toxicity refers to the ability of the microorganism to produce toxins capable of altering the normal function of cells or tissues and/or destroy them. Some toxins are secreted outside the host and cause severe damage when they penetrate the body (Atlas, 1995). Based on these facts, the virulence of Gsp. m1 and Gsp. 2 towards various shrimp primary cultures and hemocytes was demonstrated, showing that both have a significant cytotoxic effect, especially against hemocyte and tegument cells (Fig. 2). This finding is important because hemocytes are known to play an important role in shrimp defense mechanism (Bachere et al., 2000; Vargas-Albores & Yepiz-Plasencia, 2000), being the first line of cells that detect invading microorganisms, and their response or reaction may determine the susceptibility of the organism towards infection (Bachere et al., 2000). Adhesion as a virulence factor has been studied in other pathogens because it is known that through this mechanism colonization and infection development is facilitated (Rhem et al, 2000; Krachler et al., 2011). Other reports have focused on the nature of the host-pathogen interaction and have identified the corresponding host receptors to which the pathogens show affinity (Guzman-Murillo & Ascencio, 2001; Wiles et al., 2008). In this case, we observed that the filaments of both Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 strains showed a significantly higher adhesion capacity (P < 0.001) than that the spores (Fig. 3).

Such difference may be attributed to the fact that filaments are developing structures that help the fungus to attach to different substrates through multiple contacts, while spores are reproductive structures aimed to warrant species conservation rather than to facilitate attachment to a host surface (Tortora et al., 2012). Alexopoulos et al. (1996), for instance, suggests that fungal spores may require from several hours to various days to germinate and produce infection under proper conditions, which is in agreement with our results. Lozano-Olvera et al. (2012) have reported that the filaments of Fusarium solani cause death by gill blockage and the resulting melanization, making the gill to appear black, causing the death by asphyxia (Lightner, 1996; Lignot et al., 2000; Nosanchuk et al., 2002; Pantoja & Lightner, 2008). In the case of the crab Astacus leptodactyles, Lignot et al. (2000) observed that F. oxysporum hyphae produced black spots in the gills after a 36-h exposure, which was attributed to melanization; on the other hand, Arala-Chavez & Sequeira (2000) observed an increased hemocyte proliferation in Penaeus monodon and Drosophila using various fungal antigens. In our case, exposure of L. vannamei post-larvae (PL8) to Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 filaments produced mortality within the 24 h (Table 2), and perhaps in this short interval melanization could not occur (Lignot et al., 2000). Johansson et al. (2000) reported in shrimp hemolymph, the presence of a protein which specifically binds [beta]-1,3 glucan in response to a fungus infection. Apparently, this protein triggers the shrimp immune system designed to combat the infection that also agrees with the results of our experiments in which the filaments reacting with hemocytes may contribute to accelerate shrimp response against fungal infection.

Because fungi are unable to produce their own food, they are prepared to ingest nutrients from the surrounding medium making use of several extracellular enzymes that degrade large molecules into smaller and more assimilated compounds. Hence, extracellular enzyme production may favor the infection process. Among the enzymes produced by fungi for this purpose, lipases and amylases are the most common (Bugni & Ireland, 2004). In our study, we observed that both Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 strains produce extracellular lipases, amylases, and proteases (Table 3), which could promote colonization as it occurs in the case of G. candidum (Mukkerjee & Kiewitt, 1996). Nakamura et al. (1994) also confirmed the production of polygalacturonase as a mechanism of citrus infection and the development of sour rot in fruits by Geotrichum.

Finally, we observed that when post-larvae (PL8) are in contact with the culture supernatant of Gsp. 1 and Gsp. 2 strains, shrimp started to die after 2 h and up reaching a total mortality within 20 h (Table 2). This observation is similar to those made with other crustacean eggs and post-larvae (PL8) exposed to filamentous fungi (Noga, 1990; Nakamura et al, 1994). In particular, Lagenidium, Haliphthoros and Sirolpidium produce severe mycosis in shrimp protozoa and mysis with 100% mortality after only 1-2 days. Also Fusarium strains tested produced 100% mortality after only a 2-h exposure, which could be attributed to the excretion of potent toxic secondary metabolites (Nelson et al, 1995); in the case of Geotrichum, ammonia excretion could be toxic to shrimp (O'Donnell, 1996; Aldarf et al., 2002; Bugni & Ireland, 2004). Le Moullac & Haffner (2000) consider that ammonia is very toxic to aquatic organisms and found that the number of hemocytes is severely reduced in shrimp exposed to 3.0 mg [L.sup.-1] of ammonia. The dose at which a pathogen may cause damage to a given host is of extreme importance (Atlas, 1995). In our case, mortality increased with higher concentrations of the fungus cells or supernatant (Table 2). In the present study, it was possible to show that Geotrichum species may indeed constitute a serious threat in shrimp culture, and that monitoring and good management practices are the only strategies that could reduce the risk of collapse and total culture loss. Isolated fungal strains, and partially identified as Geotrichum sp. 1 and sp. 2, produce proteolytic enzymes (Table 3), and these filamentous fungal strains were cytotoxic for primary shrimp cell culture, where hemocytes showed greater susceptibility followed by tegument cells. In comparison, the adhesion of spores and filaments of Geotrichum fungi to primary cultured cells was higher in hemocytes than in any other cell types tested. Shrimp postlarval PL8 exposed to Geotrichum filaments showed mortalities in a dose-dependent manner. Based on our results, we can suggest that isolated strains of Geotrichum may represent a health risk for white shrimp culture. It should be noted that Getrichum is a saprophytic fungus that develops in decaying organic matter and that its presence can be avoided if proper measures are taken to minimize the unfavorable conditions at the bottom and the water column at pound; thus, having optimal conditions in the cultures, the chances of that organisms be susceptible to infection decreases.

It is necessary to mention that micro-flora at ponds are closely associated with trophic conditions, ecological factors and physic chemical parameters; so it has been considered, that the presence of yeast structures in the digestive tract of organisms in culture or in aquatic environment can be used as a tool for monitoring environmental quality to be a valid instrument for the assessment of eutrophication of the environment. Thus, the presence of these microorganisms can be used as a bio-marker that allows us to assess environmental changes; correlating either genus recovered from various species in different environmental conditions, taking into account the presence of pollution sources; or, by evaluating the phenotypic changes in organisms recovered disturbed habitats (Coelho et al., 2010; Brilhante et al., 2012).

DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue4-fulltext-14

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was part of NOA's M.Sc. thesis. We thank Drs. Francisco Magallon & Guillermo Portillo, CIBNOR for introducing us to this problem. We also acknowledge the assistance and material provided by Dr. Hector Nolasco to carry out the enzyme test and to Diana Dorantes for editorial services.

REFERENCES

Aguirre, G.G., R. Vazquez-Juarez & F. Ascencio. 2003. Efecto de diferentes especies de Vibrio sobre la sobrevivencia y desarrollo larval del camaron blanco de acuacultura (L. vannamei). VI Congreso Ecuatoriano de Acuacultura. V Congreso Latinoamericano de Acuicultura, pp. 94-103.

Aldarf, M., A. Amrane & Y. Prigent. 2002 Reconstruction of the biomass history from carbon and nitrogen substrate consumption, ammonia release and proton transfer during solid cultures of Geotrichum candidum and Penicillium camembertii. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 58: 823-829.

Alexopoulos, C.J., C.W. Mims & M. Blackwell. 1996. Introductory mycology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 869 pp.

Arala-Chavez, M. & T. Sequeira. 2000 Is there any kind of adaptative immunity in invertebrates? Aquaculture, 191: 247-258.

Atlas, R.M. 1995. Microorganisms in our world. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp. 5-13.

Bachere, E., D. Destoumieux & P. Bulet. 2000. Penaeidins, antimicrobial peptides of shrimp: a comparison with other effectors of innate immunity. Aquaculture, 191: 71-88.

Bertke, C.C. & J.M. Aronson. 1992. Hyphal wall chemistry of Lagenidium callinectes and L. chthamalophilum. Bot. Mar., 35: 147-152.

Brilhante, R.S.N., D.S.C.M. Catelo-Branco, G.P.S. Duarte, M.A.N. Paiva, C.E.C. Teixeira, J.P.O. Zeferino, A.J. Monteiro, R.A. Cordeiro, J.J. Sidrim & M.F.G. Rocha. 2012. Yeast microbiota of raptor: a possible tool for environmental monoitoring. Environ. Microbiol. Rep., 4: 189-193.

Buchta, V. & M. Otcenasek. 1998. Geotrichum candidum, an opportunistic agent of mycotic diseases. Mycoses, 31: 363-370.

Bugni, T. & C. Ireland. 2004. Marine-derived fungi: a chemically and biologically diverse group of microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep., 21: 143-163.

Chen, B.O., Y. Wu & J. Yang. 1992. Studies on pathogenicity of a species Fusarium in the cultured adult prawn (Penaeus chinensis Donghai). Mar. Sci., 10: 7-15.

Coelho, M.A., J.M.F. Almeida, I.M. Martins, A.J. Silva & J.P. Sampaio. 2010. The dynamics of the yeast community of the Tangs River Estuary: testing the hypothesis of the multiple origins of the estuarine yeast. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 98: 331-342.

Cruz da Silva, L.R., O.C. de Souza, M.J. dos Santos Fernandes, D.M. Massa Lima, R.R. Rodrigues Coelho & C.M. Souza-Motta. 2011. Culturable fungal diversity of shrimp Litopenaues vannamei Boone from breeding farms in Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol., 42: 49-56.

Deacon, J. 2005 Environmental conditions for growth, and tolerance of extremes, in fungal biology, Blackwell Publishing, Malden. doi: 10.1002/9781118685068.ch8

Fuerst, J.A., S.K. Sambhi, J.L. Paynter, J.A. Hawkins & J.G. Atherton. 1991. Isolation of a bacterium resembling Pirellula species from primary tissue culture of the giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57: 3127-3134.

Gillett, R.D. 2008. Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO Doc. Tech. Peches, 475: 331 pp.

Guzman-Murillo, M.A. & F. Ascencio. 2001. Enzyme-linked, biotin-streptavidin bacterial-adhesion assay for Helicobacter pylori lectin-like Interactions with cultured cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 11: 35-39.

Hernandez, L.J., T. Gollas-Galvan & F. Vargas-Albores. 1996. Activation of the prophenoloxidase system of the brown shrimp (Penaeus californiensis Holmes). Comp. Biochem. Phys. C, 113: 61-66.

Hernandez-Saavedra, N.Y. 1990. Aislamiento y caracterizacion de levaduras marinas aisladas de la costa occidental de Baja California Sur, Mexico. Bachelor Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico, 92 pp.

Hyde, K., V. Sarma & E. Jones. 2000. Morphology and taxonomy of higher marine fungi. In: K.D. Hyde & S.B. Pointing (eds.). Marine mycology. A practical approach. Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong, pp. 172-204.

Jackson, R.J., K. Fuhihashi, J. Xu-Amano, H. Kiyono, C.O. Elson & J.R. McGhee. 1993. Optimizing oral vaccines: induction of systemic and mucosal B-cell and antibody responses to tetanus toxoid by use of cholera toxin as adjuvant. Infect. Immunity, 61(10): 4272-4279.

Johansson, M.W., P. Keyser, K. Sritunyalucksana & K. Soderhall. 2000. Crustacean haemocytes and haematopoiesis. Aquaculture, 191: 45-52.

Khoa, L.V., K. Hatai & T. Aoki. 2004. Fusarium incarnatum isolated from black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon Fabricius, with black gill disease cultured in Vietnam. J. Fish. Dis., 27: 507-515.

Khoa, L.V., K. Hatai, A. Yuasa & K. Sawada. 2005. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Fusarium solani isolated from kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus with black gills. Fish. Pathol., 40: 103-109.

Krachler, A.M., H. Ham & K. Orth. 2011. Outer membrane adhesion factor multivalent adhesion molecule 7 initiates host cell binding during infection by Gram-negative pathogens. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/ 10.1073/pnas.1102360108.

Kurtzman, C.P. & C.J. Robnett. 1998. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek, 73: 331-371.

Le Moullac, G. & P. Haffner. 2000. Environmental factors affecting immune responses in Crustacea. Aquaculture, 191: 121-132.

Leslie, J. & B. Summerell. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishing, New Jersey, 338 pp.

Lightner, D.V. 1996. A handbook of shrimp pathology and diagnostic procedures for disease of cultured penaeid shrimp. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, World Aquaculture Society, 304 pp.

Lightner, D.V. & J.E. Hose. 1984. Observations on the pathogenesis of the imperfect fungus, Fusarium solani, in the California brown shrimp Penaeus californensis. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 44: 292-303.

Lignot, J.H., C. Spanings-Pierrot & G. Chamantier. 2000. Osmorregulatory capacity as a tool in monitoring the physiological condition and the effect of stress in crustaceans. Aquaculture, 191: 209-246.

Lozano-Olvera, R., F.I. Marrujo-Lopez & S.M. Abad-Rosales. 2012. Necrosis cuticular en camaron

Litopenaeus vannamei asociada a Fusarium sp. Redvet, 13(7): 1-7.

Madigan, M.T., J.M. Martinko, P.V. Dunlap & D.P. Clark. 2009. Biologia de los microorganismos. Pearson Educacion, Madrid, pp. 592-601.

Mukkeijee, K.D. & I. Kiewitt. 1996. Enrichment of very-long-chain mono-unsaturated fatty acids by lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis and transesterification. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 44: 557-562.

Nakamura, K., S. Wada, K. Hatai & T. Sugimoto. 1994. Lagenidium myophilum infection in the coonstripe shrimp, Pandalus hypsinotus. Mycoscience, 35: 99-104.

Nelson, P.E., M.C. Dignan & E.J. Anaissie. 1995. Taxonomi, biology and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 7(4): 479-504.

Newell, S.Y. 2001. Fungal biomass and productivity. In: J. Paul (ed.). Methods in microbiology. Marine microbiology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 357-366.

Noga, E.J. 1990. A synopsis of mycotic diseases of marine fish and invertebrates. In: F.O. Perkins & T. Cheng (eds.). Patology in marine science. Academic Press, New York, pp. 143-160.

Nosanchuk, J.D., B.L. Gomez, S. Diez, S. Youngchim, P. Aisen, R.M. Zancope-Oliviera, A. Restrepo, A. Casadevall & A.J. Hamilton. 2002. Histoplasma capsulatum synthesizes melanin-like pigments in vitro and during mammalian infection. Abs. Gen. Meeting Am. Soc. Microbiol., 102: 204-205.

O'Donnell, K. 1996. Progress towards a phylogenetic classification of Fusarium. Sydowia, 48(1): 57-70.

Pantoja, C.R. & D.V. Lightner. 2008. Enfermedades causadas por hongos. In: V. Morales & J. Cuellar (eds.). Guia tecnica-patologia e inmunologia de camarones peneidos. Programa CYTED Red II Vannamei, Panama, pp. 174-186.

Pelczar, M.J., E.C.S. Chan & N.R. Krieg. 2001. Microbiology. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi, 524 pp.

Pierce, B.E. & M.J. Leboffe. 2011. Exercises for the mirobiology laboratory. Morton Publishing Company, Denver, pp. 79-123.

Pitt, J.L. & A.D. Hocking. 1997. Fungi and food spoilage. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 39 pp.

Rhem, M.N., E.M. Lech, J.M. Patti, D. McDevitt, M. Hook, D.B. Jones, &. K.R. Wilhelmus. 2000. The collagen-binding adhesin is a keratitis virulence factor in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immunity, 68(6): 3776-3779.

Saha, A., P. Mandal, S. Dasgupta & D. Saha. 2008. Influence of culture media and environmental factors on mycelial growth and sporulation of Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griffon and Maubl. J. Environ. Biol., 29(3): 407-410.

Sainz, J.C., A.N. Maeda-Martinez & F. Ascencio-Valle. 1998. Experimental vibriosis induction with Vibrio alginolyticus of larvae of the catarina scallop (Argopecten ventricosus: circularas) (Sowerby II, 1842). Microbial. Ecol., 35: 188-192.

Smith, M., G. Poot & A. de Cock. 2000. Re-examination of some species of the genus Geotrichum. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 77: 71-81.

Tortora, G.J., R.F. Berdell & C.L. Case. 2012. Microbiology: an introduction. Benjamin Cumming Publishing, San Francisco, pp. 122-320.

Vargas-Albores, F. & G. Yepiz-Plasencia. 2000. Beta glucan binding protein and its role in shrimp immune response. Aquaculture, 191: 13-21.

Varughese, M., A.V. Teixeira, S. Liu & H. Leppla. 1999. Identification of a receptor-binding region within domain 4 of the protective antigen component of anthrax toxin. Infect. Immunity, 67: 1860-1865.

Wiles, T.J., R.R. Kulesus & M.A. Mulvey. 2008. Origins and virulence mechanisms of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Exp. Mol. Pathol., 85(1): 11-19.

Zar, J.H. 1996. Bio-statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 662 pp.

Received: 22 October 2013; Accepted: 10 July 2015

Jose Luis Ochoa (1) ([dagger]), Norma Ochoa-Alvarez (1), Maria Antonia Guzman-Murillo (1) Sergio Hernandez (2) & Felipe Ascencio (1)

(1) Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), Instituto Politecnico Nacional No 195 Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz, BCS, 23096, Mexico

(2) Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (IPN), Instituto Politecnico Nacional s/n Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita. La Paz BCS, 23096, Mexico

Corresponding author: Felipe Ascencio (ascencio@cibnor.mx)

([dagger]) This study is dedicated in memory of the late Prof. Jose Luis Ochoa

Corresponding editor: Cesar Lodeiros

Caption: Figure 1. Growth kinetics of Geotrichum sp. 1, Geotrichum sp. 2 and Fusarium solani.

Caption: Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of the supernatant (black bars) and sonicated extracts (grey bars) of Geotrichum sp. 1, Geotrichum sp. 2, Fusarium solani (F45), Fusarium javanicum (F37), Vibrio alginolyticus (Va), Vibrio cholera (Vc), and Vibrio parahemolyticus (Vp) against primary cell cultures of a) hemocytes, b) gills, c) intestine, and d) tegument of Litopenaeus vannamei. Each point represents the mean of three experiments; bars indicate SD.

Caption: Figure 3. Adhesion time-kinetics of Geotrichum sp. 1, Geotrichum sp. 2 spores (top panel), and filaments (bottom panel) to primary cell cultures of intestine, gills, tegument, and hemocytes of Litopenaeus vannamei. Each point represents the mean of three experiments; bars indicate SD.
Table 1. Properties of Geotrichum sp. 1 and Geotrichum sp. 2
isolated from shrimp ponds in Baja California Sur, Mexico.
* Strain used as reference.

Characteristics   Geotrichum sp. 1     Geotrichum sp. 2

Colony diameter   > 45 mm              > 45 mm
Colony color      Black                Black
  (Stationary
  phase)
Mycelium          Cottonish, hyaline   Cottonish, hyaline
Spore type        Arthrospore;         Arthrospore;
                    cylindrical        cylindrical
                    3-6 x 6-12           3-6 x 6-12
                    [micro]m             [micro]m
Type of hypha     Septed               Septed

Characteristics   Fusarium solani *

Colony diameter   60-65 mm
Colony color      White-cream
  (Stationary
  phase)
Mycelium          Cottonish
Spore type        Macroconidia (half
                    moon shape)
                    3-4 conidias

Type of hypha     Septed

Table 2. Survival percentage of PL8 white shrimp post-larvae
exposed to Geotrichum sp. 1, Geotrichum sp. 2, and Fusarium
javanicus CBS, and Fusarium solani ATCC culture media
supernatants for a 24-h period. Data correspond to averages
(Standard deviation).

Dilution   Geotrichum sp. 1   Geotrichum sp. 2
factor

1            0.00 (0.00)        1.66 (2.88)
0.5          3.33 (2.88)        6.66 (2.88)
0.25         11.66 (7.63)      61.66 (16.07)
0.10         15.00 (5.00)       96.66 (2.88)
0.01        90.00 (13.22)       96.66 (2.88)

Dilution   F. javanicus      F. solani
factor

1           0.00 (0.00)     0.00 (0.00)
0.5         0.00 (0.00)     3.33 (2.88)
0.25       16.66 (20.81)   26.66 (7.63)
0.10       65.00 (8.66)    71.66 (7.63)
0.01       66.66 (14.43)   50.00 (45.00)

Table 3. Extracellular enzymes of Geotrichum sp. 1, Geotrichum
sp. 2, Fusarium javanicum, and Fusarium solani strains. Data
correspond to averages. Standard deviation is indicated in
parenthesis. * Hydrolysis halo (mm), ** Appearance of
precipitate.

Strain                     Amylase*     Lipase **

Geotrichum sp. 1         1.36 (0.170)       +
Geotrichum sp. 2         0.27 (0.075)       +
Fusarium javanicum CBS   2.83 (0.170)       +
Fusarium solani ATCC     1.53 (0.050)       +

Strain                   Protease *     Chitinase **

Geotrichum sp. 1         0.63 (0.050)        --
Geotrichum sp. 2              --             --
Fusarium javanicum CBS   1.83 (0.038)        --
Fusarium solani ATCC     3.16 (0.340)        --
COPYRIGHT 2015 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Ochoa, Jose Luis; Ochoa-Alvarez, Norma; Guzman-Murillo, Maria Antonia; Hernandez, Sergio; Ascencio,
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Sep 1, 2015
Words:6095
Previous Article:Chemical composition of the freshwater prawn Cryphiops caementarius (Molina, 1782) (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) in two populations in northern Chile:...
Next Article:Probiotic modulation of the gut bacterial community of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus CAIM 170/Modulacion por...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters