Is Selfie-Posting Behavior a Kind of Nonpathological Narcissism?
The psychological states influenced by taking and posting selfies online are particularly associated with emotional states of self-consciousness and/or anxiety of unfavorable assessment by other individuals. (Mills et al., 2018) The selfie phenomenon prolongs societal surveillance and bolsters up power relations. (Kedzior and Allen, 2016) Digital self-portraits can be employed as a go-between for intentions of self-extension and personal branding. (Ozansoy Cadirci and Sagkaya Gungor, 2019) An individual's selfie-posting behavior on social networking sites is relevantly predicted by an impulsion to post selfies. (Kim et al., 2016) More than just photos, selfies draw attention to the link between the figure and digital technology via the interactive somatic harmony with the gadget and through the virtual realms such self-portraits are designed to travel in. (Hess, 2015) Posting and editing pictures embolden users to concentrate on supercilious and meaningless behaviors. (Halpern et al., 2016) Selfie culture cannot be thoroughly dissolved into the rhetoric of ascendancy. (Giroux, 2015) Selfie-takers may subvert their strivings to overwhelm their peers by taking selfies. (Re et al., 2016)
2. Conceptual Framework and Literature Review
The selfie functions as an articulation of coexistence, of epitomizing the corporeal, digital, and connected realms in concert, being a token of diverse memberships to material, collective spaces and shared networked settings (Cruciani, 2018; Fielden et al., 2018; Freeman-Moir, 2017; Krizanova et al., 2019; Lazaroiu, 2018; Nica, 2018; Roberts and Marchais, 2018; Roca-Sales and Lopez-Garcia, 2017) linked through online social networking services. (Hess, 2015) Selfie-takers may consider truthful they are good-looking and appealing and may self-improve by thinking they are endowed with the photography abilities required to reproduce such valuable qualities thus surpassing other people. (Re et al., 2016) Selfie taking and sharing may generate superior social sensitivity and inferior self-confidence of users. (Shin et al., 2017) Digital self-portraits comprise insufficient personality-related indications and are unmanageable for fact-based zero-acquaintance character judgment by permitting selfie takers to have entire control of their looks (people can effortlessly misrepresent their facial appearance and eye contact to show up dissimilar from how they typically seem to be), are frequently taken for distribution on visual content-sharing sites, and nearly all of them only encompass faces, thus hindering significant hints (e.g. body posture and style of apparel) to come into view in the photo. (Qiu et al., 2015)
Selfie culture is progressively fashioned within a way of transience in which swift rates of replacement and brief attention periods turn into the extent of how an individual monopolizes the conceptual and emotional areas of the market, highlighted by expedition, immediate recompense, volatility, and disposability. (Giroux, 2015) The selfie, a kind of conceptualization with a history, is visual material form and consumer behavior. (Iqani and Schroeder, 2016) Impression management is decisive in grasping the consumer selfie-posting mechanism. (Pounders et al., 2016) The drives and operations of online social networking to a certain extent may be evidence of strategic self-presentation. (Sorokowski et al., 2015) Selfies are swift reproducing memes intended at no individual destination and revolving in the digital realm as personalities turned into virtual signs, possibly constituting pathological symptoms of inferior self-confidence and attention-seeking behavior. (Lee, 2017) The routine of taking selfies is symptomatic of the ambiguity of the confines between public and private social manner of living. (Walsh and Baker, 2017)
3. Methodology and Empirical Analysis
Building my argument by drawing on data collected from FHEHealth, GfK, Nielsen, OPPO, and Statista, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding U.S. adults who think it is acceptable to take a selfie in various circumstances (%, by age group), the ways in which U.S. Internet users share selfies (%, by demographic profile), and how social media impacts the way U.S. adults see themselves (%). Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the collected data.
4. Results and Discussion
Intentional utilization of the selfie demonstrates adjustments in the established roles of the advertising image, from sources of evidence, inducement, and characterization to symbols of social fashionableness. (Iqani and Schroeder, 2016) As selfies turn into the digital connection for grasping physicality, the apprehension between space and network is intensified. (Hess, 2015) If digital self-portraits are contingent on self-favoring predispositions, as a consequence selfie-takers may overrate how appreciatively their pictures are viewed, bringing about a kind of weakness whereby other users perceive targets' selfies as less appealing than the subject grasps. (Re et al., 2016) Selfies constitute an adequate tool for self-presentation, displaying users' personality and assisting in transmitting their impeccable self-concept, as digital self-portraits can be manipulated effortlessly. (Shin et al., 2017) Although the digital self-portrait designates an implication of human involvement, selfies are produced, exhibited, shared, and tracked via a cluster of nonhuman surrogates. The principles of this aggregation converts the selfie, a conventional indication of contiguity and togetherness, into a persistent suggestion that once anything penetrates the digital realm, it forthwith emerges as component of the fabric of the digital citizenship, riding out the moment and setting in which it was initially created, observed, or disseminated. (Senft and Baym, 2015)
The selfie is linked to notions of veracity, consumption, and assertiveness, in addition to routines of art history, media patterns, and self-portraiture. (Iqani and Schroeder, 2016) As a social routine, the selfie symbolizes an expression of human beings' antithetical perseverance in hybridity. (Hess, 2015) The operation of taking a selfie may briefly decrease users' cognizance of their proximate surroundings and expose them to unanticipated risks. (Flaherty and Choi, 2016) The burgeoning of selfie as a type of graphic expression is linked to the intensifying propensity to display a flawless conceptualization of the self. The endeavor to remain connected notwithstanding one's setting indicates that the demarcation between public and private is less relevant. (Walsh and Baker, 2017) (Tables 1-5)
5. Conclusions and Implications
Selfies constitute an ordinary activity and an unrefined performance of the subject, also incorporating additional contextual information concerning the user. (Ozansoy Cadirci and Sagkaya Gungor, 2019) By getting involved in careful self-presentation, individuals ask for confirmation from other people to fortify their self-concept. (Shin et al., 2017) If digital self-portraits are met with widespread appreciation as likes but in no circumstances disagreement due to the fact that such an option is nonexistent, it may result in distorted reactions that activate self-favoring tendencies by boosting posters' self-assessments. (Re et al., 2016) Selfies act both as a routine of ordinary existence and as the commodity of current rhetoric about how individuals should represent, validate, and convey their behaviors. (Senft and Baym, 2015)
The interviews were conducted online and data were weighted by five variables (age, race/ethnicity, gender, education, and geographic region) using the Census Bureau's American Community Survey to reflect reliably and accurately the demographic composition of the United States. The precision of the online polls was measured using a Bayesian credibility interval.
This paper was supported by Grant GE-1489262 from the Center for Big Data-driven Algorithmic Decision-Making, Portland, OR.
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Cruciani, M. (2018). "Explicit Communication: An Interest and Belief-based Model," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 17: 50-70.
Fielden, A., M. Grupac, and P. Adamko (2018). "How Users Validate the Information They Encounter on Digital Content Platforms: The Production and Proliferation of Fake Social Media News, the Likelihood of Consumer Exposure, and Online Deceptions," Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 10(2): 51-57.
Flaherty, G. T., and J. Choi (2016). "The 'Selfie' Phenomenon: Reducing the Risk of Harm while Using Smartphones during International Travel," Journal of Travel Medicine 23(2): 1-3.
Freeman-Moir, J. (2017). "Aims as Experience," Knowledge Cultures 5(6): 16-24.
Giroux, H. A. (2015). "Selfie Culture in the Age of Corporate and State Surveillance," Third Text 29(3): 155-164.
Halpern, D., S. Valenzuela, and J. E. Katz (2016). "'Selfie-ists' or 'Narci-selfiers'?: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis of Selfie Taking and Narcissism," Personality and Individual Differences 97: 98-101.
Hess, A. (2015). "The Selfie Assemblage," International Journal of Communication 9: 1629-1646.
Iqani, M., and J. E. Schroeder (2016). "#selfie: Digital Self-Portraits as Commodity Form and Consumption Practice," Consumption Markets & Culture 19(5): 405-415.
Kedzior, R., and D. E. Allen (2016). "From Liberation to Control: Understanding the Selfie Experience," European Journal of Marketing 50(9/10): 1893-1902.
Kim, E., J.-A. Lee, Y. Sung, and S. M. Choi (2016). "Predicting Selfie-Posting Behavior on Social Networking Sites: An Extension of Theory of Planned Behavior," Computers in Human Behavior 62: 116-123.
Krizanova, A., G. Lazaroiu, L. Gajanova, J. Kliestikova, M. Nadanyiova, and D. Moravcikova (2019). "The Effectiveness of Marketing Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment," Sustainability 11: 7016.
Lazaroiu, G. (2018). "Postmodernism as an Epistemological Phenomenon," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1389-1390.
Lee, R. L. M. (2017). "Diagnosing the Selfie: Pathology or Parody? Networking the Spectacle in Late Capitalism," Third Text 30(3/4): 264-273.
Mills, J. S., S. Musto, L. Williams, and M. Tiggemann (2018). "'Selfie' Harm: Effects on Mood and Body Image in Young Women," Body Image 27: 86-92.
Nica, E. (2018). "The Social Concretisation of Educational Postmodernism," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1659-1660.
Ozansoy Cadirci, T., and A. Sagkaya Gungor (2019). "Love My Selfie: Selfies in Managing Impressions on Social Networks," Journal of Marketing Communications 25(3): 268-287.
Pounders, K., C. M. Kowalczyk, and K. Stowers (2016). "Insight into the Motivation of Selfie Postings: Impression Management and Self-Esteem," European Journal of Marketing 50(9/10): 1879-1892.
Qiu, L., J. Lu, S. Yang, W. Qu, and T. Zhu (2015). "What Does Your Selfie Say about You?," Computers in Human Behavior 52: 443-449.
Re, D. E., S. A. Wang, J. C. He, and N. O. Rule (2016). "Selfie Indulgence: Self-Favoring Biases in Perceptions of Selfies," Social Psychological and Personality Science 7(6): 588-596.
Roberts, T., and G. Marchais (2018). "Assessing the Role of Social Media and Digital Technology in Violence Reporting," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 10(2): 9-42.
Roca-Sales, M., and G. Lopez-Garcia (2017). "Contemporary Portrayals of Women and Femininity. A Case Study of Lifestyle Blogs in the U.S.," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 7(2): 186-210.
Senft, T. M., and N. K. Baym (2015). "What Does the Selfie Say? Investigating a Global Phenomenon," International Journal of Communication 9: 1588-1606.
Shin, Y., M. Kim, C. Im, and S. C. Chong (2017). "Selfie and Self: The Effect of Selfies on Self-Esteem and Social Sensitivity," Personality and Individual Differences 111: 139-145.
Sorokowski, P., A. Sorokowska, A. Oleszkiewicz, T. Frackowiak, A. Huk, and K. Pisanski (2015). "Selfie Posting Behaviors Are Associated with Narcissism among Men," Personality and Individual Differences 85: 123-127.
Walsh, M. J., and S. A. Baker (2017). "The Selfie and the Transformation of the Public-Private Distinction," Information, Communication & Society 20(8): 1185-1203.
Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania
Received 19 May 2019 * Received in revised form 2 December 2019
Accepted 4 December 2019 * Available online 10 December 2019
Table 1 U.S. adults who think it is acceptable to take a selfie in various circumstances (%, by age group) 18-34 35-54 55+ While at a concert 60 28 12 While visiting a tourist destination 46 29 25 While attending a party 54 30 16 While at a wedding 58 25 17 While at a gym 63 23 14 While dining at a restaurant 67 23 10 While riding public transport 66 22 12 While in the bath 71 19 10 While attending a funeral 69 21 10 Sources: Statista; my survey among 5,200 individuals conducted April 2019. Table 2 Selfie usage patterns Selfies taken with Family and friends (32%), solo (51%), in front of a landmark (7%) Group selfies are Partying (33%), family function (9%), travelling taken while (58%) What constitutes Big eyes (17%), flawless skin (13%), sharp a perfect selfie face (7%), clear subject (47%), wide angle (16%) Top reasons for Difficulty in fitting all people in frame (50%), taking more than issue with lighting (21%), difficulty in fitting one shot the background scene (29%) 79% Send pictures to connect with friends 86% Upload selfies on social media to share their new experiences 89% Take more than one shot every time to ensure a perfect selfie Sources: Nielsen; OPPO; my survey among 5,200 individuals conducted April 2019. Table 3 Do U.S. adults become more or less confident about their bodies over time on social media? (%) Women Men Less confident 46 30 More confident 32 35 Same level of confidence 17 27 I'm not sure 5 8 Sources: FHEHealth; my survey among 5,200 individuals conducted April 2019. Table 4 The ways in which U.S. Internet users share selfies (%, by demographic profile) 18-24 25-34 35-44 Publish it in social media 39 23 17 Send it in private to your close friends 27 24 23 Send it in private to your partner 14 18 27 Keep it for yourself 8 12 20 45-54 55+ Publish it in social media 12 9 Send it in private to your close friends 15 11 Send it in private to your partner 24 17 Keep it for yourself 26 34 Sources: Statista; my survey among 5,200 individuals conducted April 2019. Table 5 How social media impacts the way U.S. adults see themselves (%) Men Women Taking multiple selfies before choosing one to post 38 44 Editing or cropping a photo to make themselves look better online 39 42 Feeling some pressure to look good on social media 28 26 Being teased, trolled, or body-shamed on social media 4 8 about their appearance or weight Sources: GfK; my survey among 5,200 individuals conducted April 2019.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Analysis and Metaphysics|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||Psychological and Contextual Risk Factors Related to Problematic Smartphone Use: Depression and Anxiety Symptom Severity.|