Investigations of the livelihood strategies of young men and women in forested landscapes of eastern Cameroon.
C. MACNEIL, H.C.P. BROWN et D.J. SONWA
Dans l'Afrique rurale, les autochtones maintiennent des strategies diversifiees, visant a generer des revenus, afin de reduire les risques et d'assurer la rentree des fonds. Bien que les jeunes soient actuellement le plus important groupe demographique, et un groupe important dans les communautes forestieres de l'Afrique centrale, peu de faits sont connus quant a leur dependance sur la foret pour leurs revenus. Etant donne que les jeunes sont sous-representes dans les etudes de rec herche, cette etude s'est efforcee de saisir si les jeunes (tranche 19-30 ans) obtiennent une large proportion de leurs revenus a partir des ressources forestieres (agroforesterie incluse). Des groupes de focus et des enquetes ont ete employes dans six villages de l'est du Cameroun, pour identifier la subsistance et les activites visant a generer des revenus chez les jeunes. Dans un contexte a changements multiples, les jeunes continuent a deriver une forte proportion de leurs revenus des ressources forestieres, et de l'agroforesterie en particulier. Les changements dans les activites de travail etaient notes dans la division par sexe du travail et de l'acces aux ressources. Les pressions environnementales vont probablement impacter les revenus de ces communautes forestieres dans le futur.
Investigaciones sobre las estrategias de medios de vida de hombres y mujeres jovenes en paisajes forestales del este de Camerun
C. MACNEIL, H.C.P. BROWN y D.J. SONWA
Los habitantes de los entornos rurales africanos mantienen estrategias diversificadas en sus medios de vida para reducir los riesgos y obtener ingresos. Aunque actualmente la juventud es el grupo demografico dominante y un grupo importante dentro de las comunidades forestales de Africa Central, se sabe poco sobre su dependencia del bosque en relacion con sus medios de vida. Dado que la juventud no esta suficientemente representada en los estudios de investigacion, este estudio tuvo como objetivo averiguar si los jovenes (entre 19 y 30 anos) obtienen una gran parte de sus medios de vida de los recursos forestales (incluida la agroforesteria). Se realizaron grupos focales y encuestas en seis aldeas del este de Camerun para identificar las actividades de subsistencia y de generacion de ingresos de los jovenes. En un contexto con muchos cambios, los jovenes continuan obteniendo una gran parte de sus medios de vida de los recursos forestales, especialmente la agroforesteria. Se observaron cambios en las actividades relacionadas con los medios de vida en cuanto a la division del trabajo por generos y en el acceso a los recursos. Es probable que en el futuro la presion medioambiental afecte los medios de vida de estas comunidades forestales.
In forested landscapes, local people are typically dependent on the forest for part or all of their livelihood--their reliance on forests being either difficult or impossible to replace for various environmental services, subsistence needs, safety net and gap filler functions, especially during lean periods (Ingram et al. 2017a and Sunderlin et al. 2005). Globally natural forests provide 21% of income compared to 29% from agriculture (Wunder et al. 2014), and up to 59% in Cameroon (Angelsen et al. 2014). Agriculture and agroforestry, hunting, fishing and non-timber forest product (NTFP) collection are common livelihood activities in the forested landscapes of Cameroon (Awono et al. 2009, 2016, Beauchamp and Ingram 2011, Lescuyer 2010, Levang et al. 2015, Tieguhong and Zwolinski 2008).
The livelihoods literature repeatedly concludes that income diversification is an important strategy for rural populations (Barrett, Reardon and Webb 2001, Loison 2015, McCusker 2002, Sunderlin et al. 2005). In sub-Saharan Africa, 30-50% reliance on non-farm income sources is common and growing (Barrett et al. 2001, Ellis 1999, Loison 2015). The reasons behind such diversification remain contested as either a response to economic stress or a pathway out of poverty (Ambrose-Oji 2003, Bryceson 2002). NTFPs are an important income generator for people living in and near the forest, contributing on average 20-25% of annual household income (Ambrose-Oji 2003, Awono et al. 2009, 2016, Ingram et al. 2017b, Lescuyer 2010, Levang et al. 2015). The livelihood strategies of men and women also differ, particularly in the production of cacao and coffee in agroforests and the collection of NTFPs and fishing (Awono et al. 2009, Ingram et al. 2016, Sunderland et al. 2014).
The success of a livelihood strategy can be based on a number of variables, including age, ethnicity, gender, marital status, being part of a kinship group, a network of clients or a patron, among others (de Haan and Zoomers 2005, Ingram et al. 2016). It is expected that the livelihoods of young people would differ from those of adults as young people are constrained by their access to assets (Waldie 2004) with a consequence of continued dependence on their parents or family. Angelsen et al. (2014) found that older heads of households have lower total and relative forest income due to accumulated assets and a higher reliance on crop and livestock income. In some cases younger heads of households have also shown a tendency to engage in activities outside agriculture (Bryceson 2002). Young people are more likely to undertake enterprises that need heavy and sustained physical effort, to engage in high-risk enterprises with high and quick returns, or to develop short term enterprises, especially where they lack clear rights of control over land and other key assets (Waldie 2004). Young people have also been shown to have less access to mobility and therefore markets for their goods (Porter 2008). In a report, FAO (2014) highlighted some of the challenges to increasing the participation of youth in agriculture such as access to knowledge and education, access to land, access to financial services and access to markets. The choice of a livelihood strategy is therefore, driven in part by preferences and priorities, but is also influenced by the policies, the formal and informal institutions, and the processes that impinge on people's everyday lives (Ali et al. 2007, Lescuyer 2013, Loison 2015).
The livelihood strategies of forest dependant populations are increasingly being impacted by changes such as improvement in infrastructure, for example, investment in logging roads leading to deforestation (Enadamana et al. 2010, Mertens et al. 2000). People are also impacted by larger macroeconomic policies and changes. In Cameroon, the fall of coffee and cacao prices (Awono et al. 2009) and the economic downturn in 2008-2009 (Endamana et al. 2010) both led to changes in livelihood strategies. The current increase in the export of forest products, especially of NTFPs which are increasing in popularity in larger urban areas, has changed the type and amount of these products being collected. Changes in resource access due to increased pressure has been documented by Brown and Lapuyade (2001), Fa, Currie and Meeuwig (2003) and Wunder, Angelsen and Belcher (2014). It has been noted that increased access to markets for agricultural commodities could negatively impact forest cover in the short run, as land-use expansion increases with increased income (Babigumira et al. 2014). Improved forest management, therefore, should recognise the importance of forests to the livelihoods of local people (Endamana et al. 2010, Levang et al. 2015, Sandker et al. 2011, Sunderlin et al. 2005).
In 2015, 226 million youth aged 15-24 years lived in Africa representing 19% of the global youth population. Projections indicate that the numbers of African youth will more than double by the year 2055 (United Nations 2015). Integration of this growing demographic into society has enormous economic, cultural, political and social consequences (Diouf 2003). In Cameroon, the Early Working Age (15-29) population represents approximately 40% of the labour force. Specifically, in East Cameroon the average age of the population is 21.2 (CNIS 2005) with an average age of the head of household of 42 years (Levang et al. 2015).
While youth and young people have been a growing area of interest in development literature for some time, the youth livelihoods and policy literature remains fragmented. For instance, livelihoods research tends to consider either women or youth, neglecting the intersection of these dimensions (Chant and Jones 2005). Furthermore, young people are often left out of decision making spaces (Porter 2008, Chant and Jones 2005). Developing youth focused research may provide an opportunity to better understand the livelihoods of younger people and therefore understand how policy and external pressures may impact them differently. This study seeks to fill that gap.
This research examined the role of forest resources in the livelihoods of young people (ages 19-30) in the humid zone of Cameroon. Using a mixed methodological approach, it sought to identify the different forest resources young people use to earn income or sustenance and to identify how important each of these resources is to the overall portfolio of livelihood activities. It further explores factors likely to have an impact on the livelihood decisions of young people.
This research was conducted in six villages in the humid forest region near Yokadouma in the East Region of Cameroon during two research trips in 2013 and 2014. The research area was chosen to coincide with ongoing work by CIFOR (The Center for International Forestry Research) who provided preliminary results on initial research, including participatory mapping (using methods provided in Evans et al. 2006), of the region in which the research would take place. Four villages were selected to participate with the help of members of a local organisation, chosen based on number of households and distance from Yokadouma, the nearest commercial centre. Furthermore, permission was granted to work in these villages by the local authorities who were invited to a meeting to discuss the research prior to any work being carried out in the villages. Two additional villages were added to the study at the end of the first research trip in order to better understand the differences between the villages immediately adjacent to Yokadouma and those further away that were originally part of this research. Though this region includes both Baka and Mbimou (Bantu) populations, only the Bantu villages were included in this research.
In this study, the term 'forest resource' refers to the resources taken from the forest (bushmeat, NTFPs, firewood etc.). The term forested landscape also includes shifting cultivation and agroforestry. Descriptions of these forms of agriculture and their impact on the forests of the region has been well documented (Binam et al. 2004, Kotto-Same et al. 1997, Njomjang et al. 2010, Perez et al. 2002 and Sikod, 2007). The term hunting is used as a general category for both hunting and trapping activities. The collection of NTFPs includes the collection of any non-wood products such as plants, fruit, nuts, and insects (Awono et al. 2016b, Levang et al. 2015). Please note that in this study the collection of firewood is considered separately from the collection of NTFPs.
Data were collected with a quantitative survey and focus groups with young people, defined as those between the ages of 19-30 for the purposes of this study. This age group varies in marital status, number of children, current state of education, dependence on parents or family, and position within society. It makes up a large section of the population and is a major contributor to the village labour force.
Twelve focus groups were held to gain a general understanding of livelihood strategies before conducting the surveys, in order to validate the content of the individual the survey, and to increase the researcher's knowledge base. In each village two focus groups were held, (one with young men, one with young women), at a convenient time and place. Participation ranged in number from eight to 20 depending on the size of the village and the availability of young people. Although focus groups often work best in groups of six to 12, and this is what was advertised as the need for the research, it was impossible to limit the number of bystanders when meetings were held in accessible locations. Levang et al. (2015) encountered similar issues while conducting such group interviews. The conversations were recorded using a digital recorder and a local research assistant took notes. After each focus group, the researcher also wrote notes on what was discussed and experienced.
Individual surveys were administered to young men and women in the selected villages. Questions included demographic information about age, gender, village, and marital status in order to understand how livelihood strategies vary among young people. Questions also identified livelihood strategies including the types of forest resources that are exploited and the contribution of each to overall income, including questions about known livelihood activities in the area such as agriculture and agroforestry (Levang et al. 2015) and strategies that were discussed during the focus groups. Questions also asked whether young people work independently or as groups and their impression of resource depletion. Participants were asked to outline their year-round livelihood activities. The survey also asked about the importance of these livelihood strategies. This question was left intentionally open-ended to provide space for respondents to explain why these strategies were important to them. Other questions specifically questioned the importance of certain strategies to income generation.
Upon entering a village, a coin toss was used to decide at which household to begin the surveying (Potts et al. 2011). From the first household, every fourth house was chosen to participate in the survey. If all potential village households had been visited but the minimum number of surveys had not been completed (15 for smaller villages, 20 for larger villages), the process was restarted to include every other household. Alternatively, if the minimum number of surveys were administered before reaching the end of the village, surveys continued until the whole village was completed. It was not necessary to approach every household to meet the survey requirements in any of the villages. While the preferred sample size for each village was 20 respondents, in the case of smaller villages it was not always possible to obtain a sample of 20. Therefore, a sample of 15 surveys was considered acceptable for statistical data analysis. A total of 120 individual surveys (60 young men and 60 young women) were administered in six villages. Of the 120 respondents, 73% of respondents considered themselves married (formally or informally).
General research results were shared with village members to verify conclusions and solicit feedback. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-Square tests to assess significance. To ensure strength in the tests, no cases were included where the cells had an expected count less than 5 in more than 20% of the cells and no cells had an expected count of less than 1 (Yates, Moore and McCabe 1999). Prior to any tests, the variables were tested for correlation using a correlation matrix in order to ensure a more complete understanding of their relationship. This process showed which of the variables were statistically related, allowing the researcher to gain insight into the significance of each variable. For each survey question and mentioned livelihood activity, tests were conducted to assess the differences between villages and gender as well as marital status, number of children, level of education and household status (whether a person is the head of their household).
Young people engaged in a variety of forest and non-forest dependent activities throughout the year. Of 120 survey respondents, agriculture (97%) and commerce (42%) were most often mentioned as livelihood activities by both men and women. Commerce included the making and selling of prepared food, wine and other products, or purchasing and reselling items such as oil, soap and salt. Other less mentioned livelihood activities included hunting, collecting NTFPs, fishing, and skilled and unskilled labour. A smaller percentage of young people were either students, dependent on savings and loan groups, or remained dependent on family members for income and/or sustenance. All activities that did not fall into another category were included in the group "other activities".
To further explore livelihood strategies mentioned in the focus groups and to ensure non-income earning activities were included in the study, survey respondents were asked about specific livelihood strategies common to the region. When asked about these specific livelihood activities, agriculture remained the most cited livelihood activity (99% of respondents), while 88% said they collected NTFPs, 83% identified fishing, and 98% identified firewood collection as activities. The proportion participating in hunting activities was 35% while 22.5% participated in other activities, including artisanal gold and diamond collection, neither of which had been captured in the previous survey question. Seventeen percent of respondents indicated digging sand for construction materials as a livelihood activity (Table 2).
When the survey results were compared, there was little variation among the different subsets (village, marital status) of the respondents although some differences were noted. There were clear gender differences in livelihood activities, with women being significantly more likely to participate in fishing ([chi square] = 6.000, df = 1, N = 120), p = 0.014) while men were more likely to participate in hunting ([chi square] = 52.894, df = 1, N = 120, p = 0.001), digging sand ([chi square] = 6.000, df = 1, N = 120, p = 0.014), and "other activities" ([chi square] = 8.076, df = 1, N = 120, p = 0.004) as described above. Those who identified as heads of households were also statistically more likely to participate in hunting ([chi square] = 22.739, df = 1, p = 0.001). To further understand livelihood strategies, the survey questions examined in more detail the collection of NTFPs, hunting and fishing, and agricultural activities as these activities had been mentioned in previous research and had been discussed in the focus groups.
Non-Timber Forest Products
According to survey results, NTFPs collected included a variety of fruit, plants, nuts and other products. The only significant difference related to the collection of okok (Gnetum africanum), the leaf of an understory liana that is often cut into small strips and boiled for consumption, where more women than men were involved ([chi square] = 5.176, df = 1, n = 106, p = 0.023). Other common NTFPs collected included bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis), njansang (Ricinodendron heudelotii), kola nut (Garcinia kola), and balaka (Pentaclethra macrophylla), among others. Firewood was collected by the majority of the respondents; all with the exception of three individuals surveyed collected firewood.
Hunting and Fishing
The survey also indicated that respondents regularly caught a variety of animals ranging from small and midsize rodents and other mammals to large mammals such as the Western Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla). Regardless of age or location, many respondents stated that they hunt and trap any animals that are available to them. These activities remain gendered, with women participating very little in hunting and young men participating to a lesser extent in fishing activities.
All survey respondents except one mentioned agricultural activities as a part of their livelihood portfolio. Coffee and cacao production were mentioned less often than the cultivation of food crops. This is interesting as during the focus groups, cacao and coffee production were mentioned generally as important livelihood activities in the region. The most commonly grown crops included staple foods such as peanut (Arachis hypogea), plantain (Musa paradisacia), macabo (Xanthosoma sagitifolum), maize (Zea mays), and cassava (Maniot esculenta) although many respondents also grew a variety of other fruits and vegetables.
Importance of Livelihood Activities
Survey respondents were also asked to rate the importance of all livelihood strategies in which they engaged. When asked to rate their importance, in total 73% of respondents chose agriculture as the most important while 13% chose cacao production. When asked why the chosen activity was the most important, 43% of respondents said it was for income, 25% said it was for food, and 13% said it was for both food and income. For both young men and women, income and food were the most common responses for why these activities were important. When asked specifically about income, the majority of respondents said they were dependent on the forested landscape for their primary source of income (Figure 3).
Among agricultural products, 62% of respondents said cassava was the most important for income generation and 15% chose cacao. Young people also planted a variety of other crops that were said to be of importance for income generation, such as maize and plantain. Ten percent of respondents said that all crops contribute to income and they could not rank them. There was a similar divide in NTFPs when focusing on income generation. Sixty-one percent of respondents chose bush mango as the most important followed by caterpillars. Other responses included fruit bearing trees such as njembe (Afrostyrax lepidophyllus), njansang (Ricinodendron heudelotii) and snails among others. Again, 11% stated that all NTFPs were important for income. For both agricultural and NTFP products, women were more likely to state they were all important for income generation. However, these gender differences were not significant.
Factors Affecting Livelihood Activities
It was expected that distance from Yokadouma would impact access to markets and therefore the livelihood activities of young people (Perez et al. 2002). Access to markets mainly had an impact on the sale of firewood. Among the four villages furthest from Yokadouma, the regional centre, only one respondent was selling firewood, whereas the sale of firewood was an important livelihood strategy in the two villages closest to the town. The sale of NTFPs, bushmeat, and agricultural products also showed similar tendencies based on the proximity to Yokadouma. In all villages, with the exception of Biwala, the village closest to Yokadouma, the vast majority of participants sold their products to buyam-sellam merchants, who travel to villages and purchase forest products to be re-sold in Yokadouma or other urban centres. In the village of Biwala, participants sold their products to both buyamsellams and directly in the market in Yokadouma.
Of those that mentioned hunting as a livelihood strategy in the survey, 81% of stated that the number of animals available to be caught had decreased in the recent past, whereas only 9% claimed the numbers had stayed the same and 9% said it had been variable. Of those who fish, 58% identified that fish resources were depleted in comparison to the recent past, 27% identified variation from year to year, while only 13% stated that the resource had stayed the same and 2% stated that numbers had increased.
The results of this research indicate that the majority of young people in this region derive their livelihoods from the forested landscape. They rely heavily on agriculture (shifting cultivation) and are engaged in a number of forest and non-forest activities such as agroforestry, NTFP collection, fishing, hunting, commerce, and labour. Young people in this region could therefore be considered forest-dependent, based on the definition of Sunderlin et al. (2005). For the majority, agriculture, collection of NTFPs and firewood, and hunting and fishing, were the main sources of income and/or sustenance. Young people who are engaged in non-forest activities, such as commerce and waged labour as the primary source of income, remained dependent on forested landscapes, particularly for food crops and NTFPs. These results are consistent with other aggregate studies which have suggested that rural populations in the developing world maintain diversified livelihood strategies in order to reduce risks and relieve poverty (Barrett et al. 2001, Loison 2015, Sunderlin et al. 2005).
Agriculture and agroforestry, hunting, fishing and NTFP collection are common activities in the forested landscapes of East Cameroon (Levang et al. 2015) and continued forest dependence can be expected into the future. Agriculture, in the form of shifting cultivation, agroforestry and cacao production, is the primary livelihood activity, not only because nearly all young people surveyed participated in it, but also because it was deemed the most important by respondents. Agriculture was important to the overall portfolio as the main and most consistent source of food and main source of income for most respondents. This research is in line with livelihoods research from Cameroon which suggests that agriculture and other forest-based livelihood activities are major contributors to income (Awono et al. 2009, Lescuyer 2013, Levang et al. 2015, Nkem et al. 2013).
Livelihood differences observed in this research concern increasing diversification, changing gender roles, and resource availability. Improved road networks are believed to facilitate the development of livelihood activities (Levang et al. 2015). This seemed to influence access to motorcycles (moto-taxis), and Yokadouma, particularly in villages closer to the town and provided alternative livelihood activities. Young men sometimes drive a moto-taxi or work for a business which increases their access to goods for commerce. Such non-forest based activities were shown to be important to the overall livelihood portfolio of some young people, including young women who also participated in commerce activities. Within this sector, food marketing was particularly important. The importance of food marketing to women's livelihoods has also been noted by Perez et al. 2002. Such opportunities may allow for a more diversified livelihood portfolio among young people.
Though coffee and cacao are considered the main cash crops in the region (Levang et al. 2015), coffee production not a significant part the livelihood strategy of young men. They were also less likely than their older counterparts to own livestock or cacao fields, especially those that are producing fruit. This could be the result of external economic factors, such as the decrease in export crop prices, which have made these activities less appealing to young people (Awono et al. 2016a). This could also be a response to the system of land tenure and a lack of assets among young men. Angelsen et al. (2014) has shown that an increase in the age of the head of household results in lower forest income due to reliance on crop and livestock income. While a comprehensive examination of the role of land tenure to income generation was beyond the scope of this study, it is important to acknowledge its potential influence on livelihood strategies. While it is difficult to understand all of the drivers, the results of this study clearly indicate that young people have a very diversified livelihood portfolio--one where a primarily agricultural livelihood is supplemented by a diverse range of forest and non-forest activities that play an important role in income generation and sustenance.
The livelihood strategies discussed in this work also included young men collecting NTFPs and women engaging in cacao production. This is similar to other aggregate research which indicated that gender constructs within forest use are more nuanced than previously suggested (Awono et al. 2009, Sunderland et al. 2014) and likely to become more complex as the resources and economy change. The marked increase in participation of young men is likely due to the increase in market value of particular NTFPs such as the bush mango and njembe. Furthermore, the collection of NTFPs is considered more important for those who have fewer assets or land (Ingram et al. 2016), which is often the case for young people. For example, Ingram et al. (2017b) found that men made up 84% of collectors of bush mango in East Cameroon which is likely due to the high commercial value of the species. Similarly, fishing, traditionally considered a female activity, is attracting significantly more young men, who fish not only among themselves, but also in groups with women. While done primarily as a way to supplement their diet, this is of interest as previous research has often indicated that NTFP collection and fishing are livelihood activities of women, not men (Awono et al. 2009 and Brummett et al. 2008). However, young women were more likely to suggest that fishing was a more consistent and important activity as they used the fish to feed their families.
Some female respondents participated in hunting, labour, and cacao production, activities traditionally considered the work of men in Cameroon (Ingram et al. 2016). In one village, some young women were renting cacao plantations in adjacent villages as a means of increasing their income. In this case, when they have the means to rent, they were able to access plantations of older men who were no longer able to participate in heavy labour and who would receive a portion of the revenue when the product was sold. This demonstrates a significant shift in the ability of young women to access income which was unavailable in the past. Ingram et al. (2016) found that women farmers with access to inputs had the ability to influence decisions, though made no reference to women controlling the entire process and income related to cacao production. These changes in gender roles suggest that young people are further diversifying livelihood strategies to include activities outside of the gender norms in order to increase their incomes.
It was difficult to assess any statistical findings for hunting because the subset of the population who participated in hunting activities was small. The laws surrounding the hunting and sale of bushmeat also made it difficult to get clear results. Villagers are legally able to hunt for sustenance but it is illegal to sell bushmeat. It was difficult to get a real understanding of how many young people are hunting and to whom they are selling the meat. This difficulty has also been noted in other work on livelihoods in Cameroon (ex. Ambrose-Oji 2003, Lescuyer and Nasi 2016).
Importance of Livelihood Activities
Agriculture, in the form of shifting cultivation and cacao production, is the primary livelihood activity, not only because all but one youth surveyed participate in agriculture but also because it was deemed the most important by respondents. Income generation was considered to be dependent on the forested landscape as a large proportion of survey respondents indicated that the majority of their income came from these sources. Levang et al. (2015) found that in the East region of Cameroon, activities directly related to natural resources contributed close to 84% of total income. Angelson et al. (2014) found that in Cameroon, 59% of total income came from forest sources. Though they contributed less to total income, NTFPs were also considered to be important to young people in the region. The important role of NTFPs in household livelihoods in Cameroon has been explored by Levang et al. (2015) and Awono et al. (2016a, b). It should also be noted that some young people are contributing unpaid labour to their household for which they receive no income. These activities include transportation of goods, farming, hunting and gathering, and chores, among others (Porter 2008).
Factors Affecting Livelihood Activities
Although the distance to Yokadouma had an impact on where and to whom survey respondents sold forest products, being far from Yokadouma did not exclude participants from the market. Through buyam-sellams schemes, young people were able to sell their goods without having to leave the village. Though all of the villages studied were linked to Yokadouma by the same road, these results suggest that the distance to the physical markets is less important when such schemes are in place. This is especially true as all villages are along the same road indicating that transport costs wouldn't be significantly different for traders as was observed in other studies (Bryceson 2002). It was beyond the scope of this research to assess the prices of goods at the various markets though others have looked at the absolute income of forest products in Cameroon (Angelsen et al. 2014).
The majority of survey respondents stated that fish and bush meat resources had decreased in the recent past. Increased pressure on forest resources have also been documented by Brown and Lapuyade (2001), Fa, Currie and Meeuwig (2003), Wunder et al. (2014) and Ingram et al. (2016, 2017). Respondents did not mention that NTFPs were becoming scarcer in the region which could be due to the still relatively low level of commercialisation of NTFPs in this area (Brown and Lassoie 2010). However, with increased road access and infrastructure, the longterm environmental situation that young people are facing is different than the situation faced by an older generation. Changing availability of resources now and into the future is likely to lead to increased competition over these resources, or a change in livelihood strategy. In the East of Cameroon, where isolation and lack of infrastructure limits alternative livelihood activities, this issue is likely to be exacerbated (Levang et al. 2015, Sandker et al. 2015).
The results of this study indicate that young people in East Cameroon maintain diverse livelihood strategies that are largely composed of shifting agriculture supported by agroforestry, forest, and non-forest activities. Young people appear largely dependent on the forested landscape for both income and sustenance, with food and cash income being of utmost importance. Since young people also indicated that they are experiencing changing availability of resources, particularly fish and bushmeat, this may have an impact on their ability to meet their livelihood needs in the long term. Though traditional gender divisions of labour were observed in the livelihoods of young people, there was also evidence that these roles are changing. Such changes included the increased participation of young men in NTFP collection and fishing, and young women gaining income from renting cacao plantations.
The observed differences suggest that forest-dependent communities are not homogenous in their use of resources in forest landscapes. This is particularly relevant as youth are a large and growing segment of the population and will be responsible for resource management in the long term. Due to a lack of youth focused research, it is not known how this large segment of the population will continue to adapt to changing situations, particularly in the face of climate change and increased globalisation. It is therefore imperative that local, national, and international policies aimed at addressing poverty, forest management, and climate change take into account the changing livelihood activities and challenges experienced by young people. Those involved in macroeconomic and conservation policies in this region should engage young people in dialogue so that they can contribute their knowledge and improve decision-making for all forest-dependent people into the future.
This study was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Insight Development Grant awarded to Dr. Brown. The research was completed as part of an MSc (Environmental Sciences) degree at UPEI and it was conducted in conjunction with the CIFOR Congo Basin Forests Adaptation and Mitigation (COBAM) project. The authors would like to thank the Center for International Forestry Research, particularly Anne Marie Tiani for her help. We would also like to thank Germain Mbock, members of ROSE (Reseau des ONGs locales du Sud-Est) and the community members for help with the field research. The valuable suggestions made by anonymous referees is gratefully acknowledged.
ALI, T., AHMAD, M., SHAHBAZ, B., and SULERI, A. 2007. Impact of participatory forest management on financial assets of rural communities in Northwest Pakistan. Ecological Economics 63: 588-593.
AMBROSE-OJI, B. 2003. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the 'forest poor': Evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. International Forestry Review 5(2): 106-117.
ANGELSEN, A., JAGGER, P., BABIGUMIRA, R., BELCHER, B., HOGARTH, N.J., BAUCH, S., BORNER, J., SMITH-HALL, C. and WUNDER, S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: A global-comparative analysis. World Development 64(1): 12-28.
AWONO, A., DJOUGUEP, A., ZAPFACK, L. and NDOYE, O. 2009. The potential of Irvingia gabonensis: Can it contribute to the improvement the livelihoods of producers in Southern Cameroon? International Journal of Social Forestry 2(1): 67-85.
AWONO, A., EBA'A ATYI, R., FOUNDJEM-TITA, D. and LEVANG, P. 2016. Vegetal non-timber forest products in Cameroon, contribution to the national economy. International Forestry Review 18(S1).
AWONO, A., TCHINDJANG, M. and Levang, P. 2016. Will the proposed forest policy and regulatory reforms boost the NTFP sector in Cameroon? International Forestry Review 18(Supp 1): 78-92
BABIGUMIRA, R., ANGELSEN, A., BUIS, M., BAUCH, S., SUNDERLAND, T., and WUNDER, S. 2014. Forest clearing in rural livelihoods: Household-level globalcomparative evidence. World Development 64: S67-S79.
BARRETT, C.B., REARDON, T. and WEBB, P. 2001. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 26: 315-331.
BEAUCHAMP, E. and INGRAM, V. 2011. Impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon: Lessons from two case studies. International Forestry Review 13(3): 389-403.
BINAM, J.N., TONYE, J., WANDJI, N., NYAMBI, G. and AKOA, M. 2004. Factors affecting the technical efficiency of smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agricultural zone of Cameroon. Food Policy 29: 531-545.
BROWN, K. and LAPUYADE, S. 2001. A livelihood from the forest: Gendered visions of social, economic and environmental change in Southern Cameroon. Journal of International Development 13: 1131-1149.
BROWN, H.C.P. and LASSOIE, J.P. 2010. The interaction between market forces and management systems: A case study of non-wood forest products in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. International Forestry Review 12(1), 13-26.
BRUMMETT, R., TANANIA, C., PANDI, A., LADEL, J., MUNZIMI, Y., RUSSELL, A., SIASSNY, M., THIEME, M., WHITE, S. and DAVIES, D. 2008. Water Resources, Forests and Ecosystem Goods and Services in The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forest Report 2008 (p. 141-158). Maryland, USA: Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment.
BRYCESON, D.F. 2002. The scramble in Africa: reorienting rural livelihoods. World Development 30 (5): 725-739.
CAMEROON'S NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS (CNIS). 2005. Cameroun Portail de Donnees: Census Data. www.cameroon.opendataforafrica.org/gallery/Census-Data
CHANT, S. and JONES, G.A. 2005. Youth, gender and livelihoods in West Africa: Perspectives from Ghana and The Gambia. Children's Geographies 3(2): 185-199.
DE HAAN, L. AND ZOOMERS, A. 2005. Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Development and Change 36(1): 27-47.
DIOUF, M. 2003. Engaging in postcolonial cultures: African youth and public space. African Studies Review 46: 1-12.
ELLIS, F. 1999. Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: Evidence and policy implications. Natural Resource perspectives 40.
ENDAMANA, D., BOEDHIHARTONO, A.K., BOKOTO, B., DEFO, L. EYEBE, A., NDIKUMAGENGE, C., NZOOH, Z., RUIZ-PEREZ, M. and SAYER, J.A. 2010. A framework for assessing conservation and development in a Congo Basin forest landscape. Tropical Conservation Science 3(3): 262-281.
FA, J.E., CURRIE, D. and MEEUWIG, J. 2003. Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: Linkages between wildlife and people's future. Environmental Conservation 30(1): 71-78.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO). 2014. Youth and agriculture: Key challenges and concrete solutions. FAO, CTA, IFAD, Rome.
INGRAM, V., HAVERHALS, M., PETERSEN, S., ELIAS, M., BASNETT, B.S., and PHOSISO, S. 2016. Gender and forest, tree and agroforestry value chains--Evidence from literature. In COLFER, C.J., BASNETT, B.S. and ELIAS, M. (eds.) Gender and forests: climate change, tenure, value chains, and emerging issues, Routledge, New York, USA. 221-242 pp.
INGRAM, V., AWONO, A., and SCHURE, J. 2017. NWFPs help to generate income for poor households. In Living in and from the forests of Central Africa, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 47pp.
INGRAM, V., EWANE, M., NDUMBE, L.N. and AWONO, A. 2017. Challenges to governing sustainable forest food: Irvingia spp. From southern Cameroon. Forest Policy and Economics 84: 29-37
KOTTO-SAME, J., WOOMER, P.L., APPOLINAIRE, M. & LOUIS, Z. 1997. Carbon dynamics in slash-and-bum agriculture and land use alternatives of the humid forest zone in Cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 65: 245-256.
LESCUYER, G. 2010. Importance economique des produits forestiers non ligneux dans quelques villages du Sud-Cameroun. Bois et Forets des Tropiques 304(2): 15-24.
LESCUYER, G. 2013. Sustainable forest management at the local scale: A comparative analysis of community forests and domestic forests in Cameroon. Small-scale Forestry 12(1): 51-66.
LESCUYER, G and NASI, R. 2016. Financial and economic values of bushmeat in rural and urban livelihoods in Cameroon: Inputs to the development of public policy. International Forestry Review 18(S1).
LEVANG, P., LESCUYER, G., NOUMBISSI, D., DEHU C. and BROUSOLLE, L. 2015. Does gathering really pay? Case studies from forest areas of the East and South regions of Cameroon. Forests, Tress and Livelihoods 24(2): 128-143.
LOISON, S.A. 2015. Rural livelihood diversification in Sub-Saharan Africa: A literature review. The Journal of Development Studies 51(9): 1125-1138.
MCCUSKER, B. 2002. The impacts of membership in communal property associations on livelihoods in the Northern Province, South Africa. GeoJournal 56: 113-122.
MERTENS, B., SUNDERLIN, W.D., NDOYE, O. and LAMBIN, E. 2000. Impact of macroeconomic change on deforestation in South Cameroon: Integration of household survey and remotely-sensed data. World Development 28(6): 983-999.
NJOMGANG, R., YEMEFACK, M., NOUNAMO, L., MOUKAM, A. & KOTTO-SAME, J. 2010. Dynamics of shifting agricultural systems and organic carbon sequestration in Southern Cameroon. Tropicultura 29(3): 176-182.
NKEM, J.N., SOMORIN, O.A., JUM, C., IDINOBA, M.E., BELE, Y.M. and SONWA, D.J. 2013. Profiling climate change vulnerability of forest indigenous communities in the Congo Basin. Mitigation and Adaption Strategies for Global Change 18(5): 513-533.
PEREZ, M.R., NDOYE, O., EYEBE, A. and NGONO, D.L. 2002. A gender analysis of forest markets in Cameroon. Africa Today 49: 96-126.
PORTER, G. 2008. Youth, mobility and rural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa: perspectives from Ghana and Nigeria. Africa insight 37(3): 420-431.
POTTS, A., MYER, K. and ROBERTS, L. 2011. Measuring human rights violations in a conflict-affected country: results from a nationwide cluster survey in Central African Republic. Conflict and Health 5.
SANDKER, M., SEMBOLI, B.B., ROTH, P., PELLISIER, C., RUIZ-PEREZ, M., SAYER J., TURKALO, A.K., OMOZE, F. and CAMPBELL, B.M. 2015. Logging or conservation concession: Exploring conservation and development outcomes in Dzanga-Sangha, Central African Republic. Conservation and Society 9(4): 299-310.
SIKOD, F. 2007. Gender division of labour and women's decision-making power in rural households in Cameroon. Africa Development 32(3): 58-71.
SUNDERLIN, W.D., ANGELSEN, A., BELCHER, B., BURGERS, P., NASI, R., SANTOSO, L. and WUNDER, S. 2005. Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development 33: 1383-1402.
TIEGUHONG, J.C. and ZWOLINSKI, J. 2008. Unrevealed economic benefits from forests in Cameroon. Proceedings from the International symposium on Emerging Needs of Society from Forest Ecosystems: Towards the Opportunities and Dilemmas in Forest Managerial Economics and Accounting.http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/ESRC_DFID/60612_unrevealed.pdf
UNITED NATIONS. 2015. Youth Population Trends and Sustainable Development. Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs. May 2015. United Nations.
WALDIE, K. 2004. Youth and rural livelihoods. Leisa Magazine 20: 6-8.
WUNDER, S., ANGELSEN, A. and BELCHER, B. 2014. Forests, livelihoods, and conservation: Broadening the empirical base. World Development 64: S1-S11.
YATES, D., MOORE, D. and MCCABE, G. 1999. The Practice of Statistics (1st Ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
C. MACNEIL (a), H.C.P. BROWN (a) and D.J. SONWA (b)
(a) University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Ave, Charlottetown, PEI, C1A 4P3, Canada
(b) Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Central African Regional Office, P.O. Box 2008 Messa, Yaounde, Cameroon
Email: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
TABLE 1 Demographics of villages of interest and number of surveys and focus groups administered in each Village Number of Households Distance from Yokadouma (Km) Mang 289 44 Bompello 138 39 Mopouo 147 14 Modoumo 119 12 Djalobekoe 201 7 Biwala 200 4 Village Number of Surveys Number of focus groups Mang 32 4 Bompello 17 4 Mopouo 21 4 Modoumo 15 4 Djalobekoe 20 4 Biwala 15 4 TABLE 2 Table showing livelihood activities of youth survey respondents by gender and village. Results are from questions that asked directly about these activities. (*) Signifies chi-square significance at p [less than or equal to] 0.05, (**) Signifies chi-square significance at p [less than or equal to] 0.01 Agriculture NTFPs Firewood Hunting Fishing Women (%) 100.00 93.33 100.00 3.33 91.67 (*) Men (%) 98.33 83.33 96.67 66.67 (**) 75.00 Total (%) 99.20 88.30 98.30 35.00 83.30 Mang (%) 96.88 68.75 100.00 28.13 71.88 Bompello (%) 100.00 94.12 94.12 52.94 94.12 Mopouo (%) 100.00 95.24 100.00 33.33 85.71 Modoumo (%) 100.00 86.67 93.33 40.00 86.67 Ndjalobekoe(%) 100.00 100.00 100.00 40.00 95.00 Biwala (%) 100.00 100.00 100.00 20.00 73.33 Total (%) 99.20 88.30 98.30 35.00 83.30 Digging Sand Other Women (%) 8.33 11.67 Men (%) 25.00 (*) 33.33 (*) Total (%) 16.70 22.50 Mang (%) 3.13 15.63 Bompello (%) 29.41 35.29 Mopouo (%) 28.57 14.29 Modoumo (%) 0.00 13.33 Ndjalobekoe(%) 30.00 50.00 Biwala (%) 13.33 6.67 Total (%) 16.70 22.50
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Macneil, C.; Brown, H.C.P.; Sonwa, D.J.|
|Publication:||International Forestry Review|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||First come, first served? The partial devolution of forest management promotes rights competition--from the application process for hutan desa, East...|
|Next Article:||A theoretical framework for transparency and accountability (T&A): empirical lessons from participatory forest management (PFM) in Tanzania.|