Printer Friendly

Investigation of Optical Ionization of Strontium via 5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0] [right arrow] 5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1] [right arrow] 5s5d [sup.3][D.sub.2] [right arrow] 4dnp (or 4ndf, n = 39) for Isotope Selectivity Enhancement.

1. Introduction

Radioactive isotope determination in nature remains a topic of high research interest due to their hazardous nature [1-6]. In particular, the radioactive isotope of strontium, [sup.90]Sr ([T.sub.1/2] = 28.8 years, [[beta]] = 0 .546 MeV), is one of the several fission nuclides typically produced in large amounts from the operation of nuclear facilities. The chemical characteristics of Sr are very similar to those of calcium and may substitute for it in chemical reactions. Regarding radioactive isotope accumulation through the food chain (fish, oysters, milk, etc.), the Japanese government has set the limit of food contamination at the level of 100Bq/kg [7]. Developing isotope determination methods for these kinds of samples is therefore required.

Many groups have performed research for [sup.90]Sr monitoring, using such methods as radiometric techniques and mass spectrometric analysis methods. Some research groups have reported applied radiometric techniques to separate and determine the [sup.90]Sr content from field samples with high selectivity. However, these methods make use of relatively complicated chemical procedures and have detector limitations due to the relatively weak energy emission during decay of [sup.90]Sr. Furthermore, they are time-consuming, generally requiring several weeks for separation and quantification [4, 5, 8].

Several research groups have also reported measurement of [sup.90]Sr in an environmental sample by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). However, although the AMS method shows enhancement of measurement results with a relatively less time-consuming process, they had to perform complex chemical pretreatment. Moreover, the experimental system has a very large facility/apparatus footprint [4-6, 9-11].

Other groups have explored alternative approaches, such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with additional application of dynamic reaction cells (DRCs) to suppress the interference of isobars. However, these reports also comment that there still remains some existences of isobaric interference (due to [sup.90]Y and [sup.90]Zr), which is an issue due to the relatively low natural abundance of [sup.90]Sr ([sup.90]Sr/Sr~[10.sup.-13]) in nature [12, 13].

Alternatively, other groups have suggested resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS) for the determination of isotope content by multiphoton excitation ionization applications [4, 5, 11-14]. Regarding these methods, this technique offers outstanding properties. For example, firstly, effective isobaric suppression due to the unique isotopedependent optical transition properties; secondly, high ionization efficiency; thirdly, high sensitivity with effectively low detection limit; and lastly, high isotopic selectivity (~[10.sup.13]). In particular, the isotope selectivity enhancement can be achieved with the Doppler broadening reduction, through effective multistep resonance ionization transition [14-16].

The optical isotopic selectivity is strongly dependent on the particular photoexcitation scheme and its resonance ionization transitions. The isotope shift, particularly, is one of the dominant factors in achieving isotopic selectivity and is required to be optimized for each excitation transition by identification. The isotope selectivity can be defined as below [17-19]:

isotope selectivity S = [[2[DELTA]v/[[GAMMA].sub.nat]].sup.2], (1)

where [[GAMMA].sub.nat] is the homogeneous natural linewidth and [DELTA]v is the isotope shift of the specific transition. Enhancement of isotope selectivity can be obtained by implementing multistep resonance ionization using narrow natural linewidth transitions as described in Reference [15].

Bushaw and Cannon conducted three-step resonance ionization of [sup.90]Sr using the 689.4 nm-688 nm-487.6 nm excitation transition scheme (5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]-5s6s [sup.3][S.sub.1]-4d6p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]) with two diode lasers and one high power [Ar.sup.+] laser [16]. In this scheme, the first-step transition at 689.4 nm (5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]) is the so-called intercombination transition with narrow natural linewidth (~7.4kHz). They showed that the optical selectivity of Sr-90 of the scheme is around [10.sup.6]; however, the linewidth of the third-step transition of 487 nm is so large that the isotope shift cannot be evaluated [16]. Thus if one can find an autoionizing transition of which linewidth is narrower than the isotope shift, higher optical isotope selectivity can be realized.

In this context, it is therefore required to investigate alternatives for effective resonance ionization transition schemes of Sr based on the first-step narrow linewidth excitation transition (689.4 nm, 5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]). Spectroscopic studies of autoionization transitions of Sr have been reported by several research groups [20-22]. Kompitsas et al. studied a detailed autoionizing Rydberg spectrum converging to the 4d threshold [20]. According to their report, the linewidths of the series members decrease with increasing principal quantum number and approach typical pulse dye laser bandwidths in the vicinity of n = 30. Thus, to access the autoionizing Rydberg levels in this region with a three-step ionization scheme using commercially available diode lasers, in this study, we focus on a novel ionization scheme of 689.4nm-487.4nm-393.8nm (5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]-5s5d [sup.3] [D.sub.2]-4dnp (or 4dnf, [sub.n = 39])). A partial energy-level diagram including the 5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1] transition is shown in Figure 1.

In the following sections, we will describe the experimental setup used in this study, and discuss measurement results of spectra for the 2nd and 3rd transitions.

2. Experimental Setup

The complete experimental setup scheme is shown in Figure 2. For the experiment, we prepared three external cavity diode laser systems at three wavelengths (689.4 nm, 487.4 nm, and 393.8 nm). Each laser system was constructed using the Littrow configuration of diffraction grating external cavity. Each output beam, after optical isolation, was divided into three beams: main experimental beam, beam for wavelength monitoring, and beam for wavelength locking. The wavelengths of all lasers were continuously monitored with a Fizeau-type wavemeter (HighFinesse WS-U). Wavelength locking was achieved by a computer-controlled fringe offset lock system [23] incorporating a Fabry-Perot interferometer and frequency-stabilized He-Ne laser (SIOS, SL-03, 5mW). The two laser beams for the first (689.4 nm) and second (487.4 nm) transitions were overlapped with each other using a dichroic mirror and then introduced into the vacuum chamber from the same direction. The beam for the third transition (393.8 nm) was introduced from the opposite direction to suppress Doppler broadening, which would negatively affect the isotope selectivity. The Sr atomic vapor was produced by electrical heating of the titanium foil which is containing the dried liquid droplet of the strontium sample [24]. Due to the relatively low natural abundance (~0.56%) of [sup.84]Sr, we prepared an [sup.84]Sr enriched (68.7%) liquid sample mixed in equal amounts with a natural sample. A quadrupole mass spectrometer (HIDEN, EPIC-300) was installed at the top of the vacuum chamber to observe the spectra of the Sr stable isotopes: [sup.84]Sr, [sup.86]Sr, and [sup.88]Sr. For the ionization efficiency evaluation, the giant resonance ionization transition (460 nm-405 nm; 5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.1][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]-(4[d.sup.2] + 5p2) [sup.1][D.sub.2]) of strontium was compared with the transition scheme of this study [25]. The resonance ionization at the transition of 460 nm-405 nm revealed ~[10.sup.6-7] counts per second by the few milliwatt output two external cavity diode lasers (ECDLs), respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

In this work, we investigated the transition scheme 689.4 nm-487.4nm-393.8nm (5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0]-5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]-5s5d [sup.3][D.sub.2]-4dnp (or 4dnf)) which is close to limitation of 4d transition (n = 39) with narrow linewidth [20]. The first transition is the same as that reported in [16]; however, we were not able to find any other studies regarding resonance ionization spectroscopy of the 2nd and 3rd transitions. Therefore, regarding the above transition scheme, we observed the spectra of Sr stable isotopes ([sup.84]Sr, [sup.86]Sr, and [sup.88]Sr) to verify the narrow width of the 3rd autoionization transition are suitable for isotope separation.

Figure 3 shows an example of the obtained spectrum of [sup.88]Sr for the 2nd (487.4 nm) transition, where the wavelength of the 1st laser at 689.4 nm was locked at the resonant wavelength. The beam powers of the 1st and 2nd lasers measured at near to the vacuum chamber were 12 mW and 0.2 mW, respectively. For this measurement, the 3rd laser at 393.8 nm was not introduced, so the photoionization was mainly achieved by additional absorption of the 1st laser light, as indicated by the "*" mark in Figure 1. In Figure 3, the black dots with error bars were used for the Voigt function fitting to evaluate the Gaussian and Lorentzian components of the spectrum. The gray dots in the measurement data were not used for the fitting because they contained zero-value data, making the results of fitting as infinite, which were not suitable for weighted fitting. According to the fitting results, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian component ([[GAMMA].sub.G]) was about 39 MHz. The magnitude of this value is mainly due to the Doppler broadening caused by the Sr atomic velocity distribution. This value is consistent with the value of 34.3 MHz, reported in [16], where the geometry of the Sr atomic vapor source was similar to that used in this study. The FWHM of the Lorentzian component ([[GAMMA].sub.L]) was about 42 MHz, which is attributed to the natural linewidth and power broadening. According to the database [26] published by NIST, the natural linewidth of this transition is []/2[pi]~7.6 kHz. This is much lower than the measured Lorentzian component. Therefore, we consider the observed Lorentzian component to be mainly attributed to the power broadening. This means the saturation of the 5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]-5s5d [sup.3][D.sub.2] transition may be achieved with a second-step laser power of less than 0.2 mW. The power broadening decreases isotope selectivity, so there is a trade-off relation between transition efficiency and isotope selectivity. We consider that the laser power of this transition should be tuned so that the Sr ion signal intensity is about 1-1/e (~0.6) of the maximum value observed at saturation.

Figure 4 shows an example of the obtained spectra of [sup.84]Sr, [sup.86]Sr, and [sup.88]Sr with the inclusion of the 3rd (393.8 nm) transition. The wavelengths of the 1st and 2nd lasers were locked to the resonant wavelengths of each of the three isotopes. The 1st and 2nd step laser powers were the same as in the previous experiment, and the 3rd laser power at the vacuum chamber beam input was about 4 mW. The results of the Voigt function fitting for all isotopes are also shown in the same figure. The spectra show that the spectrum widths are substantially narrower than the isotope shifts. Unlike the 3rd transition (487.6 nm) reported in [16], a certain degree of isotope selectivity can be promised with this transition. Under the present system setup, the observed consistent background signal (about 1/7 of the maximum ion signal) limits the isotope selectivity. This background corresponds to the transition path indicated by the "*" mark in Figure 1. This transition was also used for ionization for observing the spectrum of [sup.88]Sr with respect to the 2nd transition laser frequency as described above. Alternatively, a method of reducing the effect of this background signal would be to move the 1st (689.4 nm) laser beam crossover point with the atomic vapor closer to the atomic vapor source, about 5 mm from its initial position. Due to the long lifetime (~21 [micro]s) of the 1st excited state (5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1]), [sup.88]Sr atomic vapor at a temperature of 1000 K travels up to 10 mm during the 1st excited state lifetime. Also of note is the fact that the 1st intercombination transition efficiency is too low to be saturated by the laser output of about 12 mW. One future plan is to have a tapered amplifier [27]coupled with our ECDL, which would be effective for increasing the laser power up to watt class while maintaining the basic characteristics of our ECDL, such as its narrow linewidth. However, without optical amplification of the laser output, the resonance ion counts at the newly investigated 689 nm-487 nm-393 nm transition revealed near to the resonance ion counts at the referenced giant resonance transition (460 nm-405 nm). The relative resonance ionization efficiency presents ~[10.sup.-1] with few mW output ECDLs (Figure 4). This is higher than the relative resonance ionization efficiency (~[10.sup.-2]) between 689 nm-688 nm-487 nm and 460 nm-405 nm. The ionization rate would be enhanced further with applying the optical amplification system. Hence, the ionization efficiency is also relatively higher than the result of Reference [16].

4. Conclusion

The unreported three-step resonance ionization scheme of Sr 5[s.sup.2] [sup.1][S.sub.0] [right arrow] 5s5p [sup.3][P.sup.[omicron].sub.1] [right arrow] 5s5d [sup.3][D.sub.2] [right arrow] 4dnp (or 4dnf), n = 39 with an intercombination transition as the first step, has been investigated for isotope selectivity enhancement. We successfully observed the ion signal spectra of Sr-stable isotopes with respect to the 2nd and 3rd transition laser frequencies. The observed Lorentzian component was about 42 MHz in the 2nd step transition, which indicates that the laser power of 0.2 mW is sufficient for the saturation of the 2nd transition. This laser power has to be decreased for improvement of isotope selectivity to be obtained, due to power broadening, with the trade-off of reduced transition efficiency. The observed spectra of [sup.84]Sr, [sup.86]Sr, and [sup.88]Sr with respect to the 3rd transition laser frequency indicate that the spectra widths are sufficiently narrow for isotope separation to be feasible. A consistent background signal was observed with the present system setup. And it could be decreased by spatially separating the 1st laser beam from the other two beams. The relative resonance ionization efficiency at the transition of our study revealed ~[10.sup.-1] with few milliwatt output power diode laser systems corresponding the reference, giant resonance, transition. This is 10 times higher than that of the ionization transition scheme of Bushaw (689.4 nm-688nm-487.6nm). A tapered amplifier system would be effective for dramatically increasing the 1st laser power to improve the efficiency of the first-step intercombination transition. Higher isotope selectivity of Sr can be expected with our proposed transition, which would be useful for trace analysis of [sup.90]Sr in environmental applications.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.


A part of this work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP16H04639. The authors deeply appreciate for the enthusiatstic assistance of lingual corrections by S. Wells.


[1] E. I. Stevenson, M. Hermoso, R. E. M. Rickaby et al., "Controls on stable strontium isotope fractionation in coccolithophores with implications for the marine Sr cycle," Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 128, pp. 225-235, 2014.

[2] J. Lewis, A. W. G. Pike, C. D. Coathm, and R. P. Evershed, "Strontium concentration, radiogenic ([sup.87]Sr/[sup.86]Sr) and stable (5[sup.88]Sr) strontium isotope systematics in a controlled feeding study," STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53-65, 2017.

[3] O. L. Miller, D. K. Solomon, D. P. Fernandez, T. E. Cerling, and D. P. Bowling, "Evaluating the use of strontium isotopes in tree rings to record the isotopic signal of dust deposited on the Wasatch Mountains," Applied Geochemistry, vol. 50, pp. 53-65, 2014.

[4] W. Bu, J. Zheng, X. Liu, K. Long, S. Hu, and S. Uchida, "Mass spectrometry for the determination of fission products [sup.135]Cs, [sup.137]Cs and [sup.90]Sr: a review of methodology and applications," Spectrochimica Acta Part B, vol. 119, pp. 65-75, 2016.

[5] X. Hou and P. Roos, "Critical comparison of radiometric and mass spectrometric methods for the determination of radionuclides in environmental, biological and nuclear waste samples," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 608, no. 2,pp. 105-139, 2008.

[6] M. Paul, D. Berkovits, L. D. Cecil et al., "Environmental [sup.90]Sr Measurements," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 123, no. 1-4, pp. 394-399, 1997.

[7] Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Department of Japan, Radioactive Materials in Foods: Current Situation and Protective Measures, MHLW, Tokyo, Japan, 2017, https://www.

[8] Q. Chen, X. Hou, Y. Yu, H. Dahlgaard, and S. P. Nielsen, "Separation of Sr from Ca, Ba and Ra by means of Ca[(OH).sub.2] and Ba(Ra)[Cl.sub.2] or Ba(Ra)S[O.sub.4] for the determination of radiostrontium," Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 466, no. 1, pp. 109-116, 2002.

[9] F. Arslan, M. Behrendt, W. Ernst et al., "Trace analysis of the radionuclides [sup.90]Sr and 89Sr in environmental samples II: accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)," Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 183-186, 1995.

[10] K. Wendt, G. K. Bhowmick, B. A. Bushaw et al., "Rapid trace analysis of 89 [sup.90]Sr in environmental samples by collinear laser resonance ionization mass spectrometry," Radiochimica Acta, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 183-190, 1997.

[11] J. Alfaro, T. Apfel, H. Diercks et al., "Trace analysis of the radionuclides [sup.90]Sr and 89Sr in environmental samples III: development of a fast analytical method," Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 186-189, 1995.

[12] Y. Takagai, M. Furukawa, Y. Kameo, and K. Suzuki, "Sequential inductively coupled plasma quadrupole massspectrometric quantification of radioactive strontium-90 incorporating cascade separation steps for radioactive contamination rapid survey," Analyticasl Methods, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 355-362, 2014.

[13] V. F. Taylor, R. D. Evans, and R. J. Cornett, "Determination of [sup.90]Sr in contaminated environmental samples by tuneable bandpass dynamic reaction cell ICP-MS," Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 343-350, 2007.

[14] K. Wendt, N. Trautmann, and R. A. Bushaw, "Resonant laser ionization mass spectrometry: an alternative to AMS?," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 172, no. 1-4, pp. 162-169, 2000.

[15] V. S. Letokhov and V. I. Mishin, "Highly selective multistep ionization of atoms by laser radiation," Optics Communications, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 168-170, 1979.

[16] B.A. Bushaw and B. D. Cannon, "Diode laser based resonance ionization mass spectrometric measurement of strontium90," Spectrochimica Acta Part B, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1839-1854, 1997.

[17] M. Sankari and M. V. Suryanarayana, "Effect of [sup.87]Sr hyperfine structure on the isotope selective excitation of 89Sr and [sup.90]Sr isotopes in collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy," Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 983-995, 2002.

[18] M. Sankari, "Optical selectivity calculations of [sup.90]Sr isotope in double optical resonance photoionization schemes," Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 400-412, 2009.

[19] L. Monz, R. Hohmann, H. J. Kluge et al., "Fast, low-level detection of strontium-90 and strontium-89 in environmental samples by collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy," Spectrochrmrca Acra, vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 1655-1671, 1993.

[20] M. Kompitsas, S. Cohen, C. A. Nicolaides, O. Robaux, M. Aymar, and P. Camus, "Observation and theoretical analysis of the odd J = 3 autoionising spectrum of Sr up to the 4d threshold," Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 2247-2267, 1990.

[21] M. Yaseen, R. Ali, A. Nadeem, S. A. Bhatti, and M. A. Baig, "Two-color three-photon resonant excitation spectrum of strontium in the autoionization region," European Physical Journal D--Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 177-189, 2002.

[22] A. Jimoyiannis, A. Bolovinos, and P. Tsekeris, "Detection of the even parity, J = 0-3, autoionizing 4dnl Rydberg states of strontium by two-step laser optogalvanic spectroscopy," Zeitschriftfur PhysikD Atoms, Molecules and Clusters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 577-589, 1992.

[23] M. Miyabe, M. Oba, M. Kato, I. Wakaida, and K. Watanabe, "Development of RIMS apparatus for isotope analysis of calcium in nuclear waste materials," Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 305-310, 2006.

[24] K. Jung, Y. Iwata, M. Miyabe et al., "Laser cooling and imaging of individual radioactive [sup.90][Sr.sup.+] ions," Physical Review A, vol. 96, no. 4, 2017.

[25] M. Brownnutt, V. Letchumanan, G. Wilpers, R. C. Thompson, P. Gill, and A. G. Sinclair, "Controlled photoionization loading of [sup.88][Sr.sup.+] for precision ion-trap experiments," Applied Physics B, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 411-415, 2007.

[26] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Atomic Spectra Database, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997,

[27] J. C. B. Knagara, A. J. Hachtel, M. C. Gillette et al., "Design and construction of cost-effective tapered amplifier systems for laser cooling and trapping experiments," American Journal of Physics, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 805-817, 2014.

Donguk Cheon (iD), (1) Yoshihiro Iwata (iD), (2) Masabumi Miyabe, (3) Ikuo Wakaida, (3) and Shuichi Hasegawa (iD), (1,2)

(1) Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

(2) Nuclear Professional School, The University of Tokyo, Shirakata-shirane 2-22, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1188, Japan

(3) Remote Analytical Technology Group, Collaborative Laboratories for Advanced Decommissioning Sciences, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Shirakata-shirane 2-4, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Yoshihiro Iwata;

Received 18 June 2018; Accepted 30 August 2018; Published 28 October 2018

Academic Editor: Arnaud Cuisset

Caption: Figure 1: Excitation transition schemes described in the present study. The left-side transition (689.4 nm-688 nm-487.6 nm) is quoted from Reference [16].

Caption: Figure 2: Experimental setup for the three-step resonance ionization 689.4 nm-487.4nm-393.8nm.

Caption: Figure 3: The Voigt profile of the [sup.88]Sr ion signal with respect to the 487.4 transition laser frequency.

Caption: Figure 4: Isotope shift of strontium for the 393.8 nm transition.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Cheon, Donguk; Iwata, Yoshihiro; Miyabe, Masabumi; Wakaida, Ikuo; Hasegawa, Shuichi
Publication:Journal of Spectroscopy
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Evaluation of Colorimetric BCA-Based Quantification of Hydrazide Groups on Magnetic Particles.
Next Article:Different Spectrophotometric Methods Manipulating Ratio Spectra Applied for the Analysis of Aclidinium in Duaklir[R] Genuair[R] Inhalation Powder.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters