# Inventory Model with Price Related Demand, Weibull Distributed Deterioration & Uncertainty.

1.1 Introduction:To adapt more realistic features in the literature of inventory theory researchers have been continuously improving inventory models. Fuzzy set theory in fuzzy decision making processes was first introduced by Bellman and Zadeh (1970). Zadeh (1965, 1973) showed that for new products and seasonal items it is better to use fuzzy numbers rather than probabilistic approaches. Dubois and Prade (1978) described some operations on fuzzy numbers. Kacpryzk and Staniewski (1982) introduced a fuzzy decision-making inventory model for long-term inventory policy. Zimmerman (1983) also used fuzzy sets in their research. Park (1987) discussed the fuzzy set theoretical interpretation of an EOQ problem. Vujosevic, et.al (1996) developed an EOQ formula by introducing inventory cost as a fuzzy number. Yao and Lee (1999) studied a fuzzy inventory model by considering backorder as a trapezoidal fuzzy number. Kao and Hsu (2002) discussed a single period inventory model with fuzzy demand. Hsieh (2002) studied an inventory model by introducing optimization approach of fuzzy production. Yao and Chiang (2003) introduced an inventory model without backorders and defuzzified the fuzzy holding cost by introducing signed distance and centroid methods. Kumar, et. al (2003) studied an economic production quantity model with fuzzy demand and deterioration rate. Syed and Aziz (2007) considered the signed distance method to introduce a fuzzy inventory model without shortages. De and Sana (2013) developed a backorder Economic Order Quantity model with promotional index for fuzzy decision variables. Pal, et. al (2015) considered a production inventory model for deteriorating items with ramp type demand rate where deterioration rate was represented by a two-parameter Weibull distribution and solved under fuzzy environment to evaluate the optimum solution of the model. Roy, (2015) developed a fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with price dependent demand.

Selling price plays an essential role in inventory systems. Burwell, Dave, Fitzpatrick, and Roy (1997) studied an economic lot size model for price-dependent demand under quantity and freight discounts. An inventory system for price dependent demand rate was developed by Mondal, Bhunia, and Maiti (2003). You (2005) introduced an inventory model with time and price dependent demand. Begum, Sahoo, and Sahu (2012) studied a pricing and replenishment policy for an inventory system with price-sensitive demand rate and time-proportional deterioration rate. Shah, Soni and Gupta (2014) revised Begum et. al's (2012) model and showed a complete model formulation for Begum et al. (2012) with price-sensitive demand rate. Roy, (2015) developed a fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with price dependent demand where deterioration rate and holding cost were linearly increasing functions of time. To the best of the author's knowledge, no one has developed any inventory model considering fuzzy cycle time with selling price dependent demand rate where deterioration rate follows weibull distribution.

In this article, we focus on the implementation of fuzzy set theory in the inventory control of deteriorating items where deterioration rate follows weibull distribution and the demand rate is a function of selling price. During time [t.sub.1], inventory is depleted due to demand and deterioration of the item. At time [t.sub.1] the inventory becomes zero and shortages start occurring. To capture the real life situation, we consider that the cycle time is uncertain and that it is possible to describe it by a (symmetric) triangular fuzzy number. Below is the list of assumptions we have considered in order to develop the model.

1.1.1 Assumptions and Notations:

The fundamental assumptions of the model are as follows.

(a) The demand rate is a function of selling price. []

b) Shortages are allowed and are fully backlogged. []

(c) The deterioration rate follows weibull distribution. []

(d) Holding cost h per item per time-unit. []

(e) Replenishment is instantaneous and lead time is zero. []

(f) T is the length of the cycle. []

(g) A is the cost of placing an order. []

(h) The selling price per unit item is p. []

(i) C is the unit cost of an item. []

(j) [C.sub.1] is the shortage cost per unit per unit time.

(k) [theta] (t) = [alpha] [beta] [(t).sup.[beta]-1], 0 [less than or equal to] [alpha] < 1, [beta] > 0, is the deterioration rate.

1.1.2 Model Formulation:

The length of the cycle is T. during time t1 inventory is depleted due to deterioration and demand of the items. At the time [t.sub.1] the inventory level becomes zero and shortages occur in the period ([t.sub.1], T), which is completely backlogged. Let I(t) be the inventory level at time t (0[less than or equal to] t < T). The differential equation can be defined when the instantaneous state over (0, T) are given by

dI(t)/dt + [alpha][beta][t.sup.([beta]-1)]I(t) = -(a - p), 0 [less than or equal to] t [less than or equal to] [t.sub.1] (1)

dI(t) = -(a - p), [t.sub.1] [less than or equal to] t [less than or equal to] T (2)

With I([t.sub.1]) = 0 at t= [t.sub.1]

The total crisp profit P(T) per unit time is

p(a - p) - 1/T [Ordering cost + Purchase cost + Shortage cost + Holding cost]

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

Let [t.sub.1] =[mu]T, 0<[mu] <1

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (3)

1.1.3 Fuzzy Continuous Review Inventory Model:

Let us consider that the cycle time is uncertain and it is possible to describe it with triangular fuzzy number (symmetric). Then the cycle time is = T = (T - [DELTA], [DELTA], T + [DELTA]) So from (3) the profit function P(T) with fuzzy cycle time is:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

To defuzzify the cost function we will introduce the signed distance. We know for any a and 0 [member of] R, the signed distance from a to 0 is [d.sub.0] (a, 0) = a. If a [??] 0, the distance from a to 0 is -a = -[d.sub.0] (a, 0). Let [PSI] be the family of all fuzzy sets B defined on R for which the [alpha] -cut B([alpha]) = [[B.sub.L]([alpha]), [B.sub.U] ([alpha])] exists for every [alpha] [member of] [0, 1]. Both [B.sub.L] ([alpha]) and [B.sub.L] ([alpha]) are continuous functions on [alpha] [member of] [0, 1]. Then we can say for any B [member of] [PSI] we have [mathematical expression not reproducible].

So for B [member of] [PSI] we can define the signed distance of B to [??] (y axis) as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

For the triangular fuzzy number A =(a, b, c), the [alpha] -cut of A is A([alpha])=[[A.sub.L] ([alpha]), [A.sub.U] ([alpha])], for [alpha] [member of] [0,1], where [A.sub.L] ([alpha]) = a + (b - c)[alpha] and [A.sub.U] ([alpha]) = c - (c - b)[alpha], the signed distance of A to [??] (y axis) is

d([??], [[??].sub.1]) = 1/4(a + 2b + c)

The signed distance of P(T) and 0 is d(P, [??]) =

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (4)

From the definition of signed distance we can write d([??], [??]) = T and as T [member of] [PSI], where [PSI] be the family of all fuzzy sets [??] defined on R for which the [alpha]-cut T([alpha])=[[T.sub.L] ([alpha]), [T.sub.L] ([alpha])] exists for every [alpha] [member of] [0,1] and both [T.sub.L] ([alpha]), [T.sub.U] ([alpha]) are continuous functions on [alpha] [member of] [0,1]. Then for [??] [member of] [PSI], the signed distance is

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (5)

From (3), (4), (5) we can write the defuzzified total profit

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (6)

Theorem 1.1: The average system profit function P(T), given by (6), is strictly concave.

Proof. Here

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

And

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

Hence P(T) is strictly concave.

Since P(T) is strictly concave in T, there exists an unique optimal cycle time T* that maximizes P(T). This optimal cycle time T* is the solution of the equation dP/dT=0.

1.2 Numerical Solution:

Example 1.1: a = 450, p = 91.59, C1 = 1, [mu] = 0.2, C = 1, [alpha] = 0.4, [beta] = 2.0, h = 100, A = 4000, [DELTA] = 3.95 in appropriate units. Based on these input data, the computer outputs are as follows.

T* = 4.001, Crisp Profit = 32440.93, Fuzzy Profit = 29884.36.

Figures (I, II, III) are based on the result of Example 1.1, which will give the readers the graphical representation of P(T).

The effects of the changes of the parameters on the optimal profit derived by the proposed method have a key impact on profits. In Example 1 both crisp and fuzzy models are highly sensitive to the changes in the percentage of uncertainty, demand and deterioration. Always success depends on the correctness of the estimation of the input parameters. In real life, these parameters values could change over time due to their complex structures. Therefore, it is more reasonable to assume that these parameters are known only within some given ranges.

1.3 Conclusion:

In this paper we have developed an inventory model for deteriorating items, which follows weibull distribution. To capture the real life situation we have considered uncertain cycle time and we introduced triangular fuzzy number (symmetric) to describe it. The optimum results of the fuzzy model are defuzzified by the signed distance method. In the numerical example, Example 1.1, it is found that the optimum average profit in the crisp model is 8.55% more than that in the fuzzy model. This percentage is highly correlated with the change of uncertainty, as for more uncertainty we achieve less profit in the fuzzy model. Both numerically and graphically we tried to compare the crisp model with fuzzy model and we concluded that if the uncertainties are accounted for in appropriate manner the cycle time would increase. In future different costs such as holding cost and deterioration cost etc. could be replaced by fuzzy numbers to incorporate real life situations.

References:

[1] Aggarwal, S. P. 1978. A note on an order-level inventory model for a system with constant rate of deterioration. Opsearch. 15, 184-187.

[2] Begum, R., Sahoo, R. R., Sahu, S. K., 2012. A replenishment policy for items with price-dependent demand, time- proportional deterioration and no shortages. International Journal of Systems Science. 43, 903-910.

[3] Bellman, R. E., Zadeh, L. A., 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science.17, 141-164.

[4] Burwell, T. H., Dave, D. S., Fitzpatrick, K. E., Roy, M. R., 1997. Economic lot size model for price-dependent demand under quantity and freight discounts. International Journal of Production Economics. 48, 141-155.

[5] De, P.K., Rawat, A., 2011. A Fuzzy Inventory Model without Shortages Using Triangular Fuzzy Number. Fuzzy Information and Engineering. 3, 59-68.

[6] De, S., K., Sana, S., S., 2013. Fuzzy order quantity inventory model with fuzzy shortage quantity and fuzzy promotional index. Economic Modelling. 31, 351-358.

[7] Dubois, D., Prade,H., 1978. Operations on Fuzzy Numbers. International Journal of System Science. 9, 613-626.

[8] Ghare, P. M., Schrader, G. P., 1963. A model for exponentially decaying inventories. Journal of Industrial Engineering.14, 238-243.

[9] Hsieh, C. H., 2002. Optimization of Fuzzy Production Inventory Models. Information Sciences. 146, 29-40.

[10] Kacpryzk, J., Staniewski, P., 1982. Long Term Inventory Policy Makingthrough Fuzzy Decision Making Methods. Fuzzy Sets and System, 8, 117-132.

[11] Kao, C. K., Hsu, W.K., 2002. A Single Period Inventory Model with Fuzzy Demand. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 43, 841-848.

[12] Kumar, S. D., Kundu, P.K., Goswami, A., 2007. An Economic Production Quantity Inventory Model Involving Fuzzy Demand Rate and Fuzzy Deterioration Rate. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing. 12, 251-260.

[13] Mondal, B., Bhunia, A. K., Maiti, M., 2003. An inventory system of ameliorating items for price dependent demand rate. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 45, 443-456.

[14] Pal, S., Mahapatra, G., S., Samanta, G., P., 2015. A production inventory model for deteriorating item with ramp type demand allowing inflation and shortages under fuzziness. Economic Modelling. 46, 334-345.

[15] Park, K.S., 1987. Fuzzy Set Theoretical Interpretation of Economic Order Quantity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 17, 1082-1084.

[16] Roy, A., 2015. Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with price dependent demand. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 10(4), 237-241.

[17] Shah, N., Soni, H. N., Gupta, J., 2014. A note on a replenishment policy for items with price-dependent demand, time-proportional deterioration and no shortages. International Journal of Systems Science. 45, 1723-1727.

[18] Shah, Y. K., Jaiswal, M. C., 1977. An order-level inventory model for a system with constant rate of deterioration. Opsearch. 14, 174-184. ?

[19] Vujosevic, M., Petrovic, D., 1996. EOQ Formula When Inventory Cost Is Fuzzy. International Journal of Production Economics. 45, 499-504.

[20] Whitin, T. M., 1957. Theory of Inventory Management. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[21] Yao, J.S., Chiang, J., 2003. Inventory without Backorder with Fuzzy Total Cost and Fuzzy Storing Cost Defuzzified by Centroid and Signed Distance. European Journal of Operational Research. 148, 401-409.

[22] Yao, J.S., Lee, H.M., 1999. Economic Order Quantity in Fuzzy Sense for Inventory without Backorder Model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 105,13-31.

[23] Yao, J.S., Lee, H.M., 1999. Fuzzy Inventory with or without Backorder for Fuzzy Order Quantity with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 105, 311-337.

[24] You, S. P., 2005. Inventory policy for products with price and time-dependent demands. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 56, 870-873. ?

[25] Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8, 338 - 353.

[26] Zadeh, L. A., 1973. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 3, 28-44.

[27] Zimmerman, H.J., 1983. Using Fuzzy Sets in Operational Research. European Journal of Operational Research. 13, 201-206.

Ajanta Roy

Bennett College, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 900 E. Washington St.,Greensboro, NC 27401

Email: ajanta.roy@bennett.edu

Received December, 22, 2017, Accepted June, 25, 2018

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Author: | Roy, Ajanta |
---|---|

Publication: | Tamsui Oxford Journal of Information and Mathematical Sciences |

Article Type: | Report |

Date: | Jun 28, 2018 |

Words: | 2326 |

Previous Article: | Certain Coefficient inequalities for transforms of Bounded turning functions. |

Topics: |