Printer Friendly

Invasive drosophilid pests Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Veracruz, Mexico.

The spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), and the African fig fly, Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae), are invasive pests of soft fruit and berries that have recently been introduced to the Americas. Drosophila suzukii is native to Southeast Asia (Walsh et al. 2011). It was collected for the first time in North America in California in 2008 and rapidly spread to Utah, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, Montana, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, and reached parts of Canada in 2010 (Hauser 2011; Lee et al. 2011). The pest was recorded for the first time in Mexico in 2011 in Los Reyes, Michoacan State, and rapidly expanded to the states Colima, Guanajuato, Aguascalientes, State of Mexico, and Baja California (SENASICA 2013). Drosophila suzukii is considered a primary pest, and the host range includes a number of soft- and thin-skinned fruit such as cherry, Prunus spp. (Rosales: Rosaceae), and blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. (Ericales: Ericaceae) (Walsh et al. 2011). Recently, high capture levels of D. suzukii were observed in traps hung on guava (Psidium guajava L.; Myrtales: Myrtaceae) trees in Baja California (De los Santos Ramos et al. 2014). Guava is not included as a host in Mexico (SENASICA 2013), and detailed studies are still needed to determine if D. susuzkii is a primary or secondary pest on this crop.

The African fig fly, Z. indianus, is native to sub-Saharan Africa (van der Linde et al. 2006). This pest was first recorded in the New World in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in 1999 (Vilela 1999), and rapidly expanded along the Atlantic coast of South America. This fly was detected for the first time on the North American continent in Chiapas, Mexico, in 2002 (Castrezana 2007), and Florida in 2005 (van der Linde et al. 2006). The current distribution of this pest in North America is uncertain but it has been recorded from the US states South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, Oklahoma, Arizona, California, and Virginia (van der Linde 2010; Joshi et al. 2014), and Southern Ontario and Quebec in Canada (Renkena et al. 2013). This pest has received little attention in Mexico, but has been reported from the states Sonora, Guanajuato, Queretaro, and Oaxaca (Castrezana 2007; Markow et al. 2014). The fly is mainly considered a secondary pest, infesting damaged fruits of more than 70 species from over 30 families, including guava (van der Linde et al. 2006). This pest has been considered a primary pest only in the fig Ficus carica L. var. Roxo de Valinhos (Rosales: Moraceae), but a secondary pest in other fig cultivars (Vilela & Goni 2015). Steck (2005) also indicated its presence in ripe fruits taken directly from the tree of Malpighia emarginata [Moc. & Sesse] ex. DC. (Barbados cherry, acerola; Malpighiales: Malpighiaceae) and Dimocarpus longan Lour. (longan; Sapindales: Sapindaceae) in Florida, and noted that only a small percentage of them may have been damaged.

In a recent study performed between 26 Aug and 23 Sep 2014, both species were detected in experimental bottle traps (polyethylene) that were being used to evaluate the efficacy of 2 hydrolyzed proteins as lures for monitoring Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations in guava. This trap has been described elsewhere (Lasa et al. 2014). The experiment consisted of 10 bottle traps baited with either the chemically hydrolyzed protein Captor 300 + borax (Promotora Agropecuaria Universal, Mexico City, Mexico) or the enzymatically hydrolyzed protein CeraTrap[R] (Bioiberica, Barcelona, Spain) and placed at a height of 3 m on the branches of guava trees in an orchard located at 1,183 m attitude in Xico, Veracruz, Mexico (19[degrees]25'8.21"N, 96[degrees]58'30.74"W). Traps were emptied, sorted, and rotated during 4 consecutive weeks to avoid a position effect.

In total, 471 drosophilid flies were observed in all traps; 55.0% (259) of these were D. suzukii and 26.3% (124) were Z. indianus (Table 1). CeraTrap[R]-baited traps captured significantly more D. suzukii and Z. indianus than Captor + borax-baited traps (Table 1). CeraTrap[R] also tended to capture a greater number of other drosophilids (Table 1). No significant differences were observed between lures in the mean percentage of females captured per trap for D. suzukii(t = 0.238; df = 8; P = 0.818) and other drosophilids (t = 1.99; df = 8; P = 0.081), but Captor + borax captured a higher percentage of Z. indianus females than CeraTrap[R] (t = 2.417; df = 8; P = 0.042) (Table 1). Hydrolyzed proteins are not commonly used to monitor drosophilids, but CeraTrap[R] was reported as an effective lure for monitoring D. suzukii when compared with apple cider vinegar in Spain (Escudero et al. 2011).

This scientific note represents the first records of these invasive species in Veracruz, a state in which large areas are dedicated to the production of Citrus species (Sapindales: Rutaceae); mango, Mangifera indica L. (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae); pineapple, Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. (Poales: Bromeliaceae); tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L. (Solanales: Solanaceae); watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsumara & Nakai (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae); and papaya, Carica papaya L. (Capparales: Caricaceae). The region of Xico, Veracruz, Mexico, is characterized by a humid climate (average annual temperature 19-20 [degrees]C), warm winters, and rainfall throughout the year. These conditions favor the reproduction of D. suzukii populations (Hauser et al. 2009; Walsh et al. 2011). Calabria et al. (2010) suggested that D. suzukii appears to prefer higher altitudes with less extreme summer temperatures and high humidity, which differs from the warmer Mediterranean-type climate in which this pest was discovered initially in the United States and Europe. In contrast, Z. indianus usually prefers a warm climate although adaptation to cooler climates has been documented previously (da Mata et al. 2010), indicating plasticity in tolerance to environmental conditions and an ability to survive in temperate regions.

The rapid and widespread invasion by both pests in North America is an indication of their great colonizing ability. The prevalence of both invasive pest species in guava orchards, with more than 80% of captured drosophilid flies comprising these exotic species, highlights the importance of defining the ecological niche of these pests in Mexico and their possible interaction with pestiferous tephritids (Anastrepha spp.) that commonly infest guava. Studies on the impact of both pests in commercial guava, their current geographical distribution, and infestation of other commercial and natural fruit species in this region should be considered a priority.

We thank the Centro Nacional de Referencia (SENASICA) for confirmation of the identification of exotic drosophilid species.

References Cited

Calabria G, Maca J, Bachli G, Serra L, Pascual M. 2010. First records of the potential pest species Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Europe. Journal of Applied Entomology 136: 139-143.

Castrezana S. 2007. New records of Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in North America and a key to identify some Zaprionus species deposited in the Drosophila Tucson Stock Center. Drosophila Information Service 90: 34-36.

da Mata RA, Tidon R, Cortes LG, De Marco Jr P, Diniz-Filho JAF. 2010. Invasive and flexible: niche shift in the drosophilid Zaprionus indianus (Insecta, Diptera). Biological Invasions 12: 1231-1241.

De los Santo Ramos M, Bello A, Gomez RJ, Hernandez R, Iribe TJ. 2014. Monitoring of spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii Mats.) and assessment of the new attractant SuzukiiTrap[R] in Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 12: 349-355.

Escudero LA, Gomez A, Penarrubia E, Alacala F, Vilajeliu M, Batllori L. 2011. Evaluation of food based attractants for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in NE Spain. Workshop: Drosophila suzukii: New Threat for European Fruit Production. 2 Dec 2011, Trento, South Tyrol.

Hauser MA. 2011. A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science 67: 13521357.

Hauser M, Gaimari S, Damus M. 2009. Drosophila suzukii new to North America. (last accessed 1 Jun 2015).

Joshi NK, Biddinger DJ, Demchak K, Dippen A. 2014. First report of Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in commercial fruits and vegetables in Pennsylvania. Journal of Insect Science 14: 1-4.

Lasa R, Toxtega Y, Herrera F, Cruz A, Navarrete MA, Antonio A. 2014. Inexpensive traps for use in mass trapping Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 97: 1123-1130.

Lee JC, Bruck DJ, Curry H, Edwards D, Haviland DR, Van Steenwyk R, Yorgey B. 2011. The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science 67: 1358-1367.

Markow TA, Hanna G, Riesgo-Escovar JR, Tellez-Garcia AA, Richmond M, Nazario-Yepiz NO, Laclete MRL, Carpinteyro-Ponce J, Pfeiler E. 2014. Population genetics and recent colonization history of the invasive drosophilid Zaprionus indianus in Mexico and Central America. Biological Invasions 16: 2427-2434.

Renkena JM, Miller M, Fraser H, Legare JPH, Hallett RH. 2013. First records of Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from commercial fruit fields in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario 144: 125-130.

SENASICA. 2013. Mosca del vinagre de alas manchadas (Drosophila suzukii Mastsumura). Direccion General de Sanidad Vegetal-Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiolofica Fitosanitaria. Mexico D.F., Ficha Tecnica No 7, 22 pp.

Steck GJ. 2005. Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae), a genus and species new to Florida and North America. (last accessed 1 Jun 2015).

van der Linde K. 2010. Zaprionus indianus: species identification and taxonomic position. Drosophila Information Service 93: 5-6. (last accessed 1 Jun 2015).

van der Linde K, Steck GJ, Hibbard K, Birdsley JS, Alonso LM, Houle D. 2006. First records of Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae), a pest species on commercial fruits, from Panama and the United States of America. Florida Entomologist 89: 402-404.

Vilela CR. 1999. Is Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae) currently colonizing the Neotropical Region? Drosophila Information Service 82: 37-39.

Vilela CR, Goni B. 2015. Mosca-africana-do-figo, Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae), pp. 48-52 In Vilela E, Zucchi RA, Cantor F [eds.], Historico e impacto das pragas introduzidas no Brasil, 2nd edition. Holos Editora, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Walsh DB, Bolda MP, Goodhue RE, Dreves AJ, Lee J, Bruck DJ, Walton VM, O'Neal SD, Zalom FG. 2011. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): invasive pest of ripening soft fruit expanding its geographic range and damage potential. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 2: G1-G7.

Rodrigo Lasa * and Eduardo Tadeo

Instituto de Ecologia AC, Red de Manejo Biorracional de Plagas y Vectores, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

* Corresponding author; E-mail:
Table 1. Mean ([+ or -] SE) number of flies per trap per day of
Drosophila suzukii, Zaprionus indianus, and other drosophilids
captured in traps baited with CeraTrap[R] and Captor + borax in a
guava orchard in Xico, Veracruz, Mexico.

Species                               CeraTrap[R]
                        Flies/trap/day      Percentage female

D. suzukii           1.47 [+ or -] 0.38 *   79.6 [+ or -] 6.2
Z. indianus          0.59 [+ or -] 0.04 *   56.7 [+ or -] 5.0
Other drosophilids   0.46 [+ or -] 0.11     74.4 [+ or -] 5.0

Species                           Captor + borax
                       Flies/trap/day     Percentage female

D. suzukii           0.38 [+ or -] 0.11   94.3 [+ or -] 3.9
Z. indianus          0.29 [+ or -] 0.12   76.0 [+ or -] 6.2
Other drosophilids   0.17 [+ or -] 0.08   69.8 [+ or -] 18.4

Species              Flies/trap/day comparison
                         t     df     P

D. suzukii             2.743   8    0.041
Z. indianus            2.125   8    0.042
Other drosophilids     2.107   8    0.068

* Indicates significant difference in flies per trap per
day within a row.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Florida Entomological Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lasa, Rodrigo; Tadeo, Eduardo
Publication:Florida Entomologist
Article Type:Report
Date:Sep 1, 2015
Previous Article:Effects of cold-acclimation, pathogen infection, and varying temperatures on insecticide susceptibility, feeding, and detoxifying enzyme levels in...
Next Article:First record of Sesbania punicea (Fabales: Fabaceae) as a host plant for Chinavia hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters