Printer Friendly

Intralesional sclerotherapy with 3% sodium tetradecyl sulphate in cutaneous vascular malformation: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: Venous malformations are part of the spectrum of vascular malformations in which dominant structures are histologically mature venous channels. [1] Venous malformations are difficult to treat. Various treatment modalities ranging from irradiation, electrocoagulation, intravascular needles and a long list of sclerosants have been described for their management [2],[3],[4],[5] Surgical excision is difficult and often complete removal is not possible.

Sclerotherapy is currently an established modality for the management of venous malformation. Sclerotherapy is direct injection of a sclerosing solution into the epicenter of the venous malformation during occlusion of the arterial inflow and venous outflow. The resultant endovascular obliteration of low flow venous anomalies results in satisfactory outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous sclerotherapy was performed with sodium tetradecyl sulfate in 60 patients of venous malformations who were aged between 1-45 years. Only significantly sized cutaneous and mucosal focal venous malformations (minimum diameter > 4 cm) were included in the study. Extensive venous malformations and those necessitating anesthesia were excluded from the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done for evaluation only in selected cases. Appropriate informed consent was obtained. Sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate was a sole therapy in 35 patients and was used in combination with surgical excision in five patients. With a single exception, all venous malformations were preset at birth. The male to female ratio was 1:2. The head and neck was involved in 37 patients, trunk in three, upper limbs in 13 and lower limbs in seven patients. Mean follow-up was two years. Each patient underwent one to six sclerotherapy sessions, followed by surgery in 8 cases.

Technique of injection after cleansing of the area, areas to be injected were marked 1 cm apart. 0.1 ml of sodium tetradecyl sulphate injection (3%) was given intralesionally with tuberculin syringe, directly into skin/mucosa, at multiple sites and contained within the lesion using manual compression for 15 minutes. The total dose was not exceeded by more than 2.0 ml and care was taken to prevent extravasation of sclerosant. Blood loss was minimal. Post sclerotherapy analgesics were given along with ice-pack applications. The injections were repeated after an interval of 4 weeks.

RESULTS: Sclerotherapy provided significant improvement or resolution of symptoms in good number of the patients. Out of the 60 patients, 42 patients showed moderate to fair improvement, with a very significant degree of satisfaction. In 8 patients, it facilitated subsequent surgery, which was rendered by it, a relatively easier procedure. 18 patients were dissatisfied for having no change or only slight improvement.

Complications and sequelae All patients experienced pain and swelling to a variable degree which lasted typically for one -two weeks. A mild degree of inflammatory reaction of the overlying skin/ mucosa occurred in majority of the cases. In none of the patients was any toxic-response noted at the time of injection. After injection, bleeding was noted in all the patients, which was easily controlled with pressure for five to ten minutes. In 5 patients, skin ulceration was noted which healed with local wound care.

DISCUSSION: Vascular malformations are true in-born errors in the embryologic development of the vascular tree and by definition are all present at birth though not all clinically apparent [6] The venous malformations are the commonest of all the vascular anomalies and have a propensity for the head and neck. [1] They can cause pain, bleeding, restriction of movement, pressure on adjacent structures, consumptive coagulopathy and aesthetic concern. They may be discrete or extensive. The overall incidence of venous malformations is reported to be 1-4% of the population and there is no predilection for either sex. They are usually singular, isolated presentations but may occur in multiple areas. They may manifest clinically in infancy, childhood, adulthood or they may remain asymptomatic throughout life.

They grow commensurately with the developing child and unlike hemangiomas do not regress. Venous malformations may occur in pure form or they may be combined capillary-venous or lymphaticovenous malformations. The microscopic examination reveals dilated proliferation in vascular channels lined by normal flattened endothelial with normal mast cells count. These endothelial cells characteristically have normal rate of turn-over. MRI is the most informative investigation for venous malformations and gives off a decreased signal intensity on the T1-weighted image as compared with fat and a hyperintense signal intensity on the T2-weighted image. [7]

MRI can distinguish low-flow venous malformations from high-flow arteriovenous malformations and fistulas along with delineation of the neurovascular structures, adjacent or involved with the malformations.

Management of venous malformations has always remained a major challenge because treatment carries a significant risk of morbidity and the recurrence. Surgical resection, though definitive treatment, is often not feasible except for smaller lesions because of deeper involvement of neurovascular structures particularly in the head and neck and extremity malformations. Incompletely excised lesions have a strong tendency to recur.

Laser treatment of venous malformations have also been attempted with varying success rate. [8] Laser photocoagulation with argon, Nd-Yag or combination lasers have been found to be somehow effective for tiny superficial venous or capillary-venous lesions but not for significantly sized lesions. Recurrence is common and often repeated treatments are necessary. Hence they may be useful in select group of patients. [9],[10]

Sclerotherapy alone or in combination with surgical excision is now the accepted treatment modality in symptomatic venous malformations. Localized areas can be treated without an incision and diffuse, extensive lesions may be symptomatically palliated. Conservative management with numerous sclerosing agents (boiling water, alcohol, sodium morrhuate, quinine, urethan, silver nitrate, iron, zinc chloride, liquid vegetable protein) [4],[5],[11],[12] have been used since the 18th century for the treatment of a wide variety of vascular anomalies.

Sclerosing agents basically are irritants that injure the endothelial surfaces, ultimately resulting in obliteration of the space between these surface. [13]

Direct injection sclerotherapy is a valuable treatment modality for venous malformations with promising results. Percutaneous ethanol has been found to be effective in various studies. [14],[15] However ethanol embolization is a significant risk. Absolute alcohol is the most effective sclerosant but should not be used near important structures like vessels and nerves, where 3% sodium tetradecylsulfate is preferred. [16] Ethibloc has also been utilized for sclerotherapy but the drawback of lack of commercial availability and necessity for GA precludes its use. [17] The sodium tetradecyl sulfate has been used extensively for sclerotherapy of varicose veins since it was first described by Reiner in 1946. [18]

Many of the previous studies have noted good results achieved in vascular malformations with the use of this substance. [1] [19] [20] However Sclerotherapy of major venous malformations is dangerous and must be performed by a skilled and experienced interventional radiologist. [1] There are no randomized studies that have compared the various sclerosing agents. We have chosen sodium tetradecyl sulfate as it is an easily available effective sclerosant, which is well-tolerated and is without systemic side-effects.

Sodium tetradecyl sulfate is a synthetic surface-acting substance. It is a long chain fatty acid set of an alkali metal with the property of a soap. It is a clear, nonviscous liquid with low surface tension. It is composed of sodium-1 isobutyl-4 ethyl octyl sulfate plus banzoyl alcohol 2% and phosphate buffered to a pH of 7.6.

CONCLUSIONS: An improvement in symptoms was observed in 70% of the patients with VVMs treated with percutaneous STS. Although the treatment is safe, complete cure is unusual and multiple treatment sessions are almost always required.

Sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate has been found to be an inexpensive, readily available outpatient procedure. Though it does not resolve larger venous malformations it does decreases the size and vascularity to facilitate future surgery or act as a palliative treatment.

DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/519

REFERENCES:

[1.] Berenguer B, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, Mulliken JB. Sclerotherapy of craniofacial venous malformations complications and results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1-15. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

[2.] Figi FA. Treatment of hemangiomas of the hand and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1948; 3: 1.

[3.] Goldwyn RM, Rosoff CB. Cryosurgery for large hemangiomas in adults. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 43: 605-11. [PUBMED]

[4.] Cole PP, Hunt AH. The treatment of cavernous haemangiomas and cirsoid aneurysms by the injection of boiling water. Br J Surg 1949; 36: 346.

[5.] Wilflingseder P, Martin R, Papp CH. Magnesium seeds in the treatment of lymph and haemangiomata. Chir Plast 1981; 6: 105.

[6.] Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: A classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 412-20. [PUBMED]

[7.] Rak KM, Yakes WF, Ray RL, Dreisbach JN, Parker SM, Luethke JM, et al. MR imaging of symptomatic peripheral vascular malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 107-12.

[8.] Sarig O, Kimel S, Orenstein A. Laser treatment of venous malformations. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57: 20-4. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

[9.] Ulrich H, Baumler W, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M. Neodymium-YAG Laser for hemangiomas and vascular malformations-long term results. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2005; 3: 436-40. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

[10.] Derby LD, Low DW. Laser treatment of facial venous vascular malformations. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 371-8. [PUBMED]

[11.] Morgan JF, Schow CE Jr. Use of sodium morrhuate in the management of hemangiomas. Oral Surg 1974; 32: 363-6. [PUBMED]

[12.] Riche MC, Hadjean E, Tran-Ba-Huy P, Merland JJ. The treatment of capillary- venous malformations using a new fibrosing agent. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 607-14. [PUBMED]

[13.] Ochsner A, Garside E. The intravenous injection of sclerosing substances; Experimental comparative studies of changes in the vessels. Ann Sug 1932; 96: 691-718.

[14.] Lee CH, Chen SG. Direct percutaneous ethanol instillation for treatment of venous malformation in the face and neck. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 1073-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]

[15.] Pappas DC Jr, Persky MS, Berenstein A. Evaluation and treatment of head and neck venous vascular malformations. Ear Nose Throat J 1998; 77: 914-6,918-22. [PUBMED]

[16.] Minkow B, Laufer D, Gutman D. Treatment of oral hemangiomas with local sclerosing agents. Int J Oral Surg 1979; 8: 18-21. [PUBMED]

[17.] Dubois JM, Sebag GH, De Prost Y, Teillac D, Chretien B, Brunelle FO. Soft-tissue venous malformations in children: Percutaneous sclerotherapy with Ethibloc. Radiology 1991; 180: 195-8. [PUBMED]

[18.] Reiner L. The activity of anionic surface active compounds in producing vascular obliteration. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1946; 62: 49-54.

[19.] Siniluoto M, Svendsen PA, Wikhoin GM, Fogdestam I, Edstrom S. Percutaneous sclerotherapy of venous malformations of the head and neck using sodium tetradecyl sulphate (sotradecol). Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1997; 31: 145-50.

[20.] O'Donovan JC, Donaldson JS, Morello FP, Pensler JM, Vogelzang RL, Bauer B. Symptomatic hemangiomas and venous malformations in infants, children, and young adults: Treatment with percutaneous injection of sodium tetradecyl sulfate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 723-9. [PUBMED]

Himanshu Saxena (1), Shraddha Shrivastava (2)

AUTHORS:

(1.) Himanshu Saxena

(2.) Shraddha Shrivastava

PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:

(1.) Assistant Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, Sushila Tiwari Hospital, Haldwani.

(2.) Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Sushila Tiwari Hospital, Haldwani.

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None

NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Dr. Himanshu Saxena, Department of Plastic Surgery, Sushila Tiwari Hospital, Haldwani-263139, Uttarakhand.

E-mail: hsdoctor@gmail.com

Date of Submission: 13/02/2015. Date of Peer Review: 14/02/2015. Date of Acceptance: 28/02/2015. Date of Publishing: 10/03/2015.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Saxena, Himanshu; Shrivastava, Shraddha
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Date:Mar 12, 2015
Words:1881
Previous Article:Gap arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a retrospective study.
Next Article:Role of surgical turbinoplasty in the management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a case series.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters