Printer Friendly

Interest stripping regulations create unexpected affiliated groups.

Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.163(j)-5(a)(3) provides a special rule resulting in the creation of an affiliated group where affiliated group status would not otherwise exist for Sec. 163(j) earnings stripping purposes. Consider, for example, the situation in which a U.S. corporation (USP) owns 100% of U.S. subsidiary A and 60% of U.S. subsidiary B. As drafted, Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.163(j)-5(a)(3) would apply the Sec. 318(a)(2)(C) attribution rules resulting in an affiliated group for earnings stripping purposes consisting of USP, A and B. This would result even though a less-than-80% indirect ownership link exists between A and B.

Consider also, for example, a situation in which foreign parent corporation F owns 100% of U.S. subsidiary A, which owns 60% of U.S. subsidiary B. F also owns 100% of U.S. subsidiary C. Without modification, Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.163(j)-5(a)(3) results in A, B and C being treated as members of the same affiliated group for earnings stripping purposes.

Similarly, the equity investments of venture capital funds and investment bankers (operating as a partnership) may be treated as members of a single affiliated group. Given the current economic climate, many companies are having difficulties borrowing funds and raising capital through public offerings. As a consequence, venture capital firms and investment bankers are providing their portfolio of companies with relatively large amounts of capital and taking, in many cases, a greater-than-50% equity interest in such companies. Under the Sec. 318 attribution rules reference in Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.163(j)-5(a)(3), such companies may be treated as a single taxpayer for Sec. 163(j) purposes.

As a result, the books and records of companies so affected would have to be shared among such companies in order to perform the calculations required under Sec. 163(j). For companies included in the portfolio of a venture capital fund or investment banker, the individual companies are distinctly separate and independent business interests, and would not freely share books and records for tax reporting purposes.
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Plutte, Kerry L.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Jan 1, 1992
Words:352
Previous Article:Employer's trustee reimbursements for administrative expenses deemed plan contributions.
Next Article:Research credit AMT carryovers and carrybacks.
Topics:


Related Articles
Allocating interest and other expenses under Section 864(e).
TEI comments on Section 482 penalty, notional principal contracts, earnings stripping, and information reporting penalties.
Comments on proposed earnings stripping regulations under Section 163(j).
Highlights of the proposed earnings stripping regulations under Sec. 163(j); an admirable first effort in implementing a harsh statutory rule.
Earnings stripping and foreign-owned controlled groups.
Tax Court rules out section 267 regulations.
Attribution rules applicable to commercial activities or controlled commercial entities of a foreign government for sec. 163(j) purposes.
Proposed section 368 regulations (remote continuity-of-interest doctrine). (Tax Executive Institute's comments submitted to IRS on April 30, 1997).
New Canadian technical bill affects foreign affiliates.
Revised Canadian proposals affecting foreign affiliates.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters