Printer Friendly

Inside Air Travel.

New York (AirGuide - Inside Air Travel) Mon, Aug 26, 2013

Fire danger from HoneywellOs emergency locator transmitter may exist on aircraft other than the 787 Fire danger from Honeywell ELTs may exist on aircraft beyond the 787 After last month's fire involving the emergency locator transmitter (ELT) on a Ethiopian 787 in London, the FAA and other regulatory agencies around the world have ordered that these ELTs be deactivated, inspected, or removed. The ELT on that aircraft was manufactured by Honeywell, which has produced about 6,000 ELTs for use in aircraft around the world. A recent airworthiness directive from Transport Canada airworthiness directive (AD), which takes effect on 26 August 2013, has gone a step further, requiring that Honeywell ELTs on a variety of aircraft be inspected by the end of 2013. Transport Canada stated that the AD was issued as a precautionary measure to address the possibility of a fire due to wiring installation discrepancies of the ELT system. Depending on the outcome of the AAIB investigation, Transport Canada may revise the AD or mandate additional corrective actions. Affected aircraft Previous directives from the UK and US authorities were limited to the 787. This latest Canadian AD covers a much wider range of aircraft, including the Boeing models 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, MD11, MD80 and MD90; and the Airbus models A300, A310, A320, A321, A330, A340 and A380. Other countries following Canada's lead The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has also adopted the Canadian AD. According to various media reports, the FAA also plans to issue a similar AD for US-registered aircraft. Why ELT fires are potentially catastrophic As was described in some detail in an earlier article on the Ethiopian 787 event, fire caused by an ELT would be particularly worrisome because these devices, unlike other systems such as engines and auxiliary power units, do not come equipped with fire suppression systems, and they are typically located in parts of the aircraft that are inaccessible from the cabin. In the event of an in flight fire, it may not be possible to put out the fire, and it may spread to other parts of the aircraft. In the event of an onboard fire, typical emergency procedures include landing at the closest suitable airport, but if the fire occurred if the aircraft were far from a a suitable airport, which would be the case for many transatlantic or transpacific flights, passengers and crew could be exposed to large amounts of smoke and fumes for a significant amount of time. In such a situation, emergency oxygen systems may not have been useful for passengers since these systems are typically designed to supply passenger with a combination of oxygen from the emergency oxygen system and ambient air from the cabin, including any smoke or fumes that are present in the cabin. Mon, Aug 26, 2013 AirGuideOnline ISSN 1544-3760


Editorial eMail: Subscribe to get our free AirGuide Airline & Travel Newsletter by eMail For Advertising and Marketing: For Custom Content and Content Solutions: For Air Transport & Travel Business Analysis contact our Director of Content Aram Gesar eMail: ISSN 1544-3760 - Copyright [c] 2013 AirGuide / Pyramid Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2013 Pyramid Media Group, Inc
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Airguide Online
Date:Aug 26, 2013
Previous Article:Inside Air Travel.
Next Article:Inside Air Travel.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters