Innovative perioperative role improves patient and organisational outcomes in minimal invasive surgery.
Given the current economic climate within the UK, the NHS, as with many organisations, faces increasingly challenging financial and structural changes. During the past decade the government has endeavoured to reform and modernise healthcare (DH 2000) to improve productivity and efficiencies. Crucially the Lord Darzi report (DH 2008) and Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) (DH 2010a) have firmly shifted the focus to improving the quality of patient care and experiences. Therefore health professionals and management teams are working hard to improve both the quality and productivity of patient services.
This renewed focus on quality has created local innovations, many led by nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs), to support patients and organisations in achieving a safe, effective quality service. Innovation in clinical practice, developing care pathways and enhancing the patient experience will ultimately improve effectiveness, thus providing value for money alongside quality of care (DH 2006a). This has allowed a range of innovative new perioperative roles to be developed, fulfilling the operational and clinical priorities set by these agendas (Kneebone & Darzi 2005).
Cholecystectomy surgery has routinely been performed using minimal invasive techniques since the early 1990s. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers many advantages for patients such as a quicker recovery, a reduction in postoperative complications, less time off work and reduced hospital stay (Cushieri 1991). The British Association of Day Surgery (BADS) has identified laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery as a safe and suitable procedure, which could be performed as a day case or 23 hour stay (Cahill 1999, BADS 2009a).
Recent studies in the UK (Gurusamy et al 2008, Briggs et al 2009) and Ireland (Ahmed et al 2008) confirm that laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures performed as day surgery continue to be both safe and acceptable to patients. However, according to the Department of Health (DH 2006a) the percentage of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients treated as day cases varies from 5 to 60%, with a national average of approximately 13%. The NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (DH 2006a) suggests that targets of 70% are achievable, whereas BADS recommends that approximately 50 to 60% of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures should be treated as day surgery. Factors that influence day surgery discharge vary. They include organisational reasons, patient co-morbidities and associated complication risks, discharging processes, follow-up and readmission facilities (Blatt & Chen 2003).
Advanced nurse role
Advanced nurse practitioners and AHPs are well positioned to enhance this type of service, being an integral part of a multidisciplinary team and the patient journey. These professionals are experienced, skilled and knowledgeable having the ability to manage patient expectations, and coordinate patient optimisation alongside service requirements (Scott 2005). Their roles are extremely patient focused, enabling a holistic caring approach through a therapeutic patient relationship, a relationship which is key to producing high levels of patient satisfaction (Mottram 2009).
Advanced practitioner roles are derived from a variety of backgrounds and create an array of different titles such as advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). More recently two new roles: perioperative specialist practitioners (PSPs) and surgical care practitioners (SCPs) have evolved, primarily due to the introduction of the European Working Time Directive (DH 2003) and the New Ways of Working agenda (DH 2007). Non-medically qualified practitioners working within these roles undertake many functions traditionally associated with doctors' roles (Kneebone & Darzi 2005). This has proved controversial, particularly within the medical profession (Beckwith 2005, Dehn 2005), but also from within nursing (Edwards 1996, Bernthal 1999, Scott 2004, Dimond 2008), possibly because it challenges traditional boundaries and the status quo. However, many see these new roles working to benefit both patients and organisations (McWhinnie 2005, Kingsnorth 2005, Martin et al 2007). In modernising healthcare today nurses and organisations alike should see this as an opportunity to challenge these boundaries to improve patient care. However, competence will be the determining factor both from a professional perspective (RCN 2008), but also legally and ethically (Quick 2010). Advance practice roles have established a clear validated, educational pathway at graduate and masters level (DH 2006b). Currently no advance practice register exists for nurses or AHPs, although, consultation has taken place within the nursing profession (Wilson & Bunnell 2007).
UHCW NHS trust was instrumental in piloting the new perioperative specialist practitioner (PSP) in 2004 within breast surgery, as part of the New Ways of Working agenda (DH 2007), adding to the advanced roles within the Trust. Since 2004 the trust has reconfigured services and extended PSPs to other specialities including cardiac and orthopaedics. These roles proved popular and influential in improving patient care and developing services, each being uniquely integrated within the contexts of their speciality teams. The perioperative specialist laparoscopic nurse post was appointed in mid August 2009. The aim of its role was to:
1. reduce the length of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patient stay by improving the same-day-discharge
2. improve the quality of patient care.
Within UHCW trust the majority of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients are operated within the main operating theatre complex on all-day lists, due to the lack of available general surgical day surgery sessions. Therefore, patients are restricted to morning or early afternoon operations to enable same-day-discharge to be achieved. Evidence suggests that many laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients require between 4 and 6 hours to recover sufficiently for safe discharge (BADS 2010, Huang et al 2000).
Role of the perioperative nurse within the patient pathway
Clinical performance will be discussed and measured using the Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention scale (DH 2010a). Figure 1 details the involvement of the perioperative nurse throughout the patient's journey. The innovations, developments and involvement of the perioperative nurse's role are discussed preoperatively (Table1), intra-operatively and postoperatively (Table 2).
Preoperative assessment is performed on the same day as the OPD visit, to ensure timely patient optimisation (Beck 2007, BADS 2010, AAGBI 2010). Optimisation of physiological and psychological (Anderson et al 2003, Awad & Chung 2006) aspects of care facilitates self-recovery (Bramhall 2002, AAGBI 2010). According to Suhonen and Leino-Kilpi (2006) it is crucial that this preparation is individually tailored; therefore a varied resource strategy is required (Blay & Donoghue 2006). However, in practice this holistic approach rarely occurs (Mitchell 2010), possibly due to staffing levels and time restraints. Many patients fear postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (Walling 2006) and it is imperative that these complications are effectively managed since they both affect same-day-discharge (Chung 2006,
BADS 2010). Management includes psychological (Mitchell 2002), pharmacological (Skilton 2003) and nonpharmacological approaches by reviewing the patient's previous experience of pain and surgery, and their coping strategies such as positioning, breathing and preferred analgesic and antiemetic requirements. Providing patients with regular paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs enhances patient recovery thus facilitating same-day discharge (BADS 2010).
Examples of the perioperative nurse's improvements and developments are shown in Table 1 with associated patient and organisation outcomes. Organisationally this provides additional efficiencies (NHS Modernisation Agency 2002, Beck 2007).
The perioperative nurse acts as camera holder, infiltrates local anaesthetic to the wounds incisions and undertakes wound closure. This skilled assistance can help in reducing the operative time (McWhinnie 2005) and it is reported that reducing the operative time to less than 45 minutes improves postoperative recovery (BADS 2010). Subcuticular infiltration of local anaesthetic occurs prior to the insertion of the ports (Raeder 2006, BADS 2010) and intra-peritoneal injection/spraying over the liver and gall bladder bed assists in reducing the requirement of analgesia postoperatively, as well as reducing shoulder tip pain (Boddy et al 2006) caused by the insufflation of carbon dioxide gas. The perioperative nurse continually encourages, monitors and requests the use of these techniques as appropriate for each individual patient. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is managed in accordance with the patient assessment (NICE 2010); unless contraindicated mechanical devices are routinely applied.
Mitchell (2007) suggests that nurses need to support and motivate patient recovery. To assist with this a poster and staff information booklet were developed. This prompted staff in assessment, review and measurement of the patient's recovery by identifying milestones/targets. These targets are required to be met before discharge and can be used as an indicator in reducing adverse events by recognising deterioration (DH 2010a, NPSA 2010).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
The perioperative nurse reviews the day case patients postoperatively which facilitates nurse-led discharge. The nurse ensures that pre-packed analgesia is available and that sick notes are completed. Nurse-led discharge has been used within day surgery for many years and facilitates safe and efficient patient discharge (BADS 2009b).
Fallis and Scurrah (2001) suggest that telephone follow-up is an acceptable support mechanism, and this has been positively evaluated by patients (Flanagan 2009). The perioperative nurse telephones patients the working day after their surgery to review their health status, pain relief, PONV and wound management. This also provides reassurance and confidence to the patient and carers. This service can highlight postoperative complications and readmission can be expedited. Anecdotally many patients have highlighted the value of this service.
These innovations have improved the quality of care to both the patient and the organisation (Table 2).
Measuring the impact of the role
In delivering quality improvements it is important that new developments are robustly audited and evaluated to understand their impact. Although measuring improvements in service quality can be difficult and creates a challenge, quality is closely associated with prevention and safety during patient care. Clinical outcome can be measured by length of stay, readmission and complication rates. Therefore, a program of clinical and operational audit was introduced to identify the key areas of impact for the role.
Auditing the service
The perioperative nurse role was measured against the existing data prior to commencement of the role and targets published by BADS and the Department of Health. Data were collected regarding the length of stay, categorising patients into same-day-discharge (day case), 23 hour stay, and inpatient stay (greater than 24 hours).
Pre-commencement of perioperative nurse role
To see whether the introduction of the perioperative nurse's role had made an impact on the service, performance data were analysed from July 2008 to August 2009, which was before the introduction of the role in mid August 2009. For this period 551 patients were reported as having had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure performed at UHCW Trust; 19% of these were admitted as a day case (same-day-discharge).
Post-commencement of laparoscopic nurse role
Data from May 2009 to April 2010 were collected to provide a baseline for comparison against new developments (Figure 2). The graph indicates the benchmark targets from BADS and the Department of Health and has been illustrated as percentages. Twenty-three hour stay data from before September 2009 is poorly documented and therefore was not included.
Following the introduction of the role, analysis of the data shows a significant increase in same-day and 23 hour discharge. On average 38% laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were sent home on the same day. Although this increase is still below the national recommended target, the trend continued during the first 12 months of the role with the percentages increasing to between 40 and 50%, see Figure 3.
UHCW have found it difficult to move above the 50% same-day-discharge, primarily due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients being performed within main theatre, as previously discussed.
Organisationally where same-day-discharge is not possible, there are additional benefits in converting elective inpatients to 23 hour stay. This reduces the length of stay and if the patients are discharged promptly the next morning, releases bed capacity for next day elective admissions. The perioperative nurse proactively discharges the day cases and the day surgery unit 23 hour stay patients at 7.30am. Currently UHCW Trust discharges over 70% of patients as combined day case and 23 hour. With further developments such as nurse-led discharge and the supply of pre-packed discharge medication from the main wards, this rate could be further increased.
From a patient, an organisational and a national (NPSA 2010) perspective, patient safety is paramount. Many aspects of prevention and safety have been discussed during the section on the preoperative role of the perioperative nurse, such as assessment, consenting, information, and VTE assessment. However analysing readmission and complication rates can provide a measure to a quality service.
Nationally elective readmission rates vary from 1 to 12% (DH 2008). BADS (2010) suggests that readmission rates tend to rise with increased same-day-discharge, possibly due to health professionals erring on the side of causation. However UHCW Trust readmissions were equally represented in both elective in-patient (8%) and day case procedures (9%). All patients are provided with verbal and written details of when and how to contact the hospital if complications arise after discharge. The majority of readmissions were patient self-referral.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Readmissions were analysed between May 2009 and April 2010. A total of 51 patients were readmitted within 28 days of the initial operation. The majority of these were for minor complications (Table 3).
A few were more serious complications such as bile leaks (0.1%) and stone retention (1%), however these were considered to be within normal parameters.
There were a number of factors, which assisted in the successful introduction of this role.
* Review of patient information, introduction of patient journey leaflet and wall poster. This assisted in aligning both the patients and staff expectations of the process ahead.
* A clinical trigger tool and pocket guide was designed for ward staff with expected patient achievement milestones, to assist with identifying preoperative investigations and postoperative complications, recovery progress and discharge process.
* Staff training sessions were provided for the perioperative staff - to assist in the correct use and trouble shooting of the equipment.
* Involvement of the perioperative nurse in pre-booking day surgery beds and organising operating list reduced patient transfer between wards and enabled the release of inpatient beds, which improved bed capacity.
* The perioperative nurse was central in a team approach enabling the implementation of changes whilst creating holistic patient-centred patient care.
* Nurse-led discharge reduced the length of patient stay, whilst generating additional income.
As with all new roles barriers were encountered. The main barrier was a cultural shift from in-patient to day surgery both from staff and patients, alongside the need to streamline some parts of the service. Since the role was not linked specifically to one or two consultant led teams, there were a number of individuals to consult with and seek agreement from. Inevitably in some areas there were issues, such as the need for Patient Group Directive and consultant preferences. Although there was the potential for conflict from the junior medical staff, this did not emerge as a problem. In reality a successful working relationship emerged through respect, understanding and good communication. On an organisation level difficulties remain in securing morning day surgery theatre sessions, this is mainly due to the complexity of consultant job plans.
Significant cost improvements have been made by converting elective in-patients to 23 hour stay (one-night), as well as increasing the numbers of same-day admissions. The additional financial incentive of approximately 300 [pounds sterling] per same day-discharge (DH 2010b) from April 2010 has covered the nurse's salary and also generated income; this income has supported the supply of the additional discharge medications.
An integrated care pathway is being developed to streamline patient care within the hospital. Clinical pathways can both clinically and economically benefit patient care and organisations (Muller et al 2009) and are seen as a high-quality tool in reducing adverse events (NPSA 2010). The Enhanced Recovery Programme (DH 2010c) also supports their use in reducing the length of stay, reducing repetition and improving communication.
A research proposal has been submitted to evaluate the service from a patient's perspective, including the value and involvement of the perioperative specialist laparoscopic nurse within their care pathway.
The perioperative specialist laparoscopic nurse has coordinated and assisted in leading the service by developing and delivering different strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy care. A vital element of the role is psychological support provided to patients to motivate, encourage and support their recovery to an early, safe discharge. Improvements made by reviewing the patient journey, improving patient information, educating staff, measuring productivity and patient outcomes have shown the nurse's role to have a positive effect. Remodelling the delivery of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patient care to same-day-discharge has benefited the organisation by improved bed capacity, increasing productivity, costs and positivism within the workforce. However, further research, streamlining and organisational developments are required to create additional improvements to support the sustainability of this service.
Prof Mark Radford (Divisional Director of NursingSurgical Services, UHCW hosp) for constant encouragement to submit article proofing, and feedback given.
No competing interests declared
Provenance and Peer review: Unsolicited contribution; Peer reviewed; Accepted for publication February 2011.
Ahmed NZ, Byrnes G, Naqui SA 2008 A metaanalysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surgical Endoscopy 22 1928-1934
Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ 2003 Randomised clinical trial of multimodal optimisation and standard perioperative surgical care British Journal of Surgery 90 (12) 1497-1504
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 2010 Pre-operative Assessment and Patient Preparation. The role of the anaesthetist 2 London, AAGBI [Last Accessed 16 Nov 2010] http://www.aagbi.org/publications/guidelines/docs/preop2010.pdf
Awad IT, Chung F 2006 Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 53 (9) 858-872
Beck A 2007 Nurse-led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients Nursing Standard 21 (51) 35-38
Beckwith PT 2005 Surgical care practitioners--a return to the barber surgeons of yesterday? Journal of Operating Department Practice 2 (8) 11-13
Bernthal E 1999 The nurse as first assistant to the surgeon: is this a perioperative nursing role? British Journal of Theatre Nursing 9 (2) 74-77
Blatt A, Chen S 2003 Day-only laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a regional teaching hospital Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 73 (5) 321-325
Blay N, Donoghue J 2006 Source and content of health information for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy International Journal of Nursing Practice 12 64-70
Boddy AP, Mehta S, Rhodes M 2006 The effect of
intraperiotoneal local anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review and meta-analysis Anesthesia and analgesia 103 682-688
Bramhall J 2002 The role of nurses in preoperative assessment Nursing Times 98 (40) 34-35
Briggs CD, Irving GB, Mann CD et al 2009 Introduction of day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy service in the UK: A critical analysis of factors influencing same day discharge and contact with primary care providers Annals of Royal College of Surgeons England Oct 91 (7) 583-590
British Association of Day Surgery (BADS) 2009a 3rd Edition, BADS Directory of Procedures London, BADS
British Association of Day Surgery (BADS) 2009b Nurse-led Discharge London, BADS
British Association of Day Surgery (BADS) 2010 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Berkshire, Ethicon Johnson & Johnson
Cahill J 1999 Basket cases and trolleys: day surgery proposals for the millennium Journal of One-Day Surgery 9 (1) 11-12
Chung F 2006 Adverse events in ambulatory care Journal of One-Day Surgery 16 (4) 100-103
Cushieri A 1991 Minimal access surgery and the future of interventional laparoscopy American Journal of Surgery 161 (3) 404-407
Dehn T 2005 Controversial topics in surgery Annuals of the Royal College of Surgeons England (Sup) 87 (4) 239
Department of Health 2000 The NHS Plan: A plan for investment and a plan for reform Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/ dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/ digitalasset/dh_118522.pdf [Accessed March 2011]
Department of Health 2003 HSC 2003/001 Protecting Staff; Delivering Services: Implementing the European Working Time Directive for doctors in training London, DH Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Lettersandcirculars/Healthservicecirculars/DH_4003588 [Accessed March 2011
Department of Health 2006a Delivering Quality and Value: Focus on productivity and efficiency London, NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
Department of Health 2006b The curriculum framework for the surgical care practitioner National Practitioner Programme London, DH
Department of Health 2007 New Ways of Working for Everyone: A best practice guide London, DH
Department of Health 2008 Lord Darzi Report High Quality Care for All (Next Stage Review) London, DH
Department of Health 2010a Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention London, DH
Department of Health 2010b Confirmation of Payment by Results (PbR) arrangements for 2010-2011 Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/ dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/@sta/@perf/documents/digitalasset/dh_115898.xls [Accessed March 2011]
Department of Health 2010c Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme. Delivering enhanced recovery: Helping patients to get better sooner after surgery London, DH
Dimond B 2008 Legal Aspects of Nursing (5th ed) England, Pearson Education Ltd
Edwards SD 1996 Nursing Ethics: A principlebased approach UK, Macmillan Press
Fallis WM, Scurrah D 2001 Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Home visit versus telephone follow-up Canadian Journal of Surgery 44 (1) 39-44
Flanagan J 2009 Postoperative telephone calls: Timing is everything AORN 90 (1) 41-51
Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR 2008 Meta-analysis of RCT on the safety and effectiveness of day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy British Journal of Surgery 95 (2) 161-168
Huang A, Stinchcombe C, Davis M, McWhinnie DL 2000 Prospective randomised five year audit for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy Journal of One-Day Surgery 9 (4) 15-17
Kingsnorth AN 2005 Training SCPs to perform inguinal hernia surgery Annuals of the Royal College of Surgeons (Sup) 87 (4) 242-243
Kneebone R, Darzi A 2005 New professional roles within surgery British Medical Journal 330 (7495) 803-804
McWhinnie DL 2005 Surgical care practitioners: the case for Annuals of the Royal College of Surgeons England (Sup) 87 (4) 239-240
Martin S, Purkayastha S, Massey R et al 2007 The surgical care practitioner: a feasible alternative. Results of a 4-year audit at St Mary's Hospital Trust London Annuals of the Royal College of Surgeons England 89 (1) 30-36
Mitchell M 2002 Guidance for the psychological care of day case surgery patients Nursing Standard 16 (40) 41-42
Mitchell M 2007 Psychological care of patients undergoing elective surgery Nursing Standard 21 (30) 40-46
Mitchell M 2010 A patient-centred approach to day surgery nursing Nursing Standard 24 (44) 48-55
Mottram A 2009 Therapeutic relationships in day surgery: a grounded theory study Journal of Clinical Nursing 18 (20) 2830-2837
Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien P-A 2009 Impact of clinical pathways in surgery Lagenbecks Arch Surg 394: 31-39
NICE 2010 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylactic Guidance London NICE
NHS Modernisation Agency 2002 National Good Practice Guidance on Pre-operative Assessment for In-patient Surgery London, The Stationery Office
National Patient Safety Agency 2010 Rapid Response Report npsa/2010/RRR016 Laparoscopic Surgery: Failure to recognise postoperative deterioration London, NPSA
Quick J 2010 Legal, professional and ethical considerations of advanced perioperative practice Journal of Perioperative Practice 20 (5) 177-182
Raeder J 2006 Aneshetic techniques for ambulatory surgery. In: Lemos P, Jarret P, Philip B (eds) Day Surgery: Development and Practice International Association of Day Surgery, Porto 185-188
Royal College of Nursing 2008 Advanced Nursing Practitioners: A RCN guide to the advanced practitioner role, competencies and programme accreditation London, RCN
Scott H 2004 RCN warns that the nursing profession is in danger British Journal of Nursing 13 (20)
Scott H 2005 Nurse's expanded roles are beneficial to patients British Journal of Nursing 14 (10) Editorial
Skilton M 2003 Post-operative pain management in day surgery Nursing Standard 17 (38) 39-44
Suhonen R, Leino-Kilpi H 2006 Adult surgical patients and the information provided to them by nurses: A literature review Patient Education and Counselling 61 (1) 5-15
Walling AD 2006 Preventing nausea and vomiting American Family Physician 74 (8) 1418-1419
Wilson J, Bunnell T 2007 A review of the merits of the nurse practitioner role Nursing Standard 21 (18) 35-40
Correspondence address: Jenny Abraham, Surgical Division, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
About the author
RGN, BSc (hons), PgCert HE, SCP
Perioperative Specialist Laparoscopic Nurse Practitioner, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
Table 1 Role of the perioperative nurse in preoperative care, identifying benefits to the patient and the organisation Perioperative nurse Patient outcome Organisational role outcome Information Improved expectations Reduced length of Patient journey stay poster and Informed patients and Productive service leaflet carers Information booklet Motivated Less complaints Staff information poster Empowered Staff education Streamlined care Assessment Optimisation Reduced DNA and Physiological Reduced risks cancellation rates Psychological Individualised care Reduced infection planning risk Pharmacological Patient concordance Improved theatre (paracetamol, codeine, capacity ibuprofen/diclofenac) Coping strategies Reduced adverse reviewed events Medication discussed Discharge planning Pre-booked postoperative Reduced risk of Improved bed DSU beds cancellation due to capacity no bed Reduced on the day Discharge medication cancellation available Family aware of postoperative ward Risk reduction Risks explained, Efficient service Consent Risks reduced Reduced adverse Thromboprophylaxis events Table 2 Role of the perioperative nurse in postoperative care, identifying benefits to the patient and the organisation Perioperative Patient outcome Organisational outcome nurse role Assessment Motivational Quality service Individualised care delivery Early detection of Reduced adverse deterioration/ events complications Nurse-led discharge Continuity of care Reduced readmission * Medication Pain relief rates * Sick note Timely discharge Staff education & support Productive service Telephone follow-up Continuity of care Improved hospital to service Support following home communication discharge Increased patient Reduced adverse events confidence Opportunity to discuss Improved readmission concerns process Prompt readmission process Table 3 Minor complications linked to improvements in practice Minor complications Improvements in practice Pain Increased pre/packed TTO (to take out/home medication) analgesia from 3 to 5 days' (BADS 2010) (Paracetamol, codeine, ibuprofen/ diclofenac) Constipation Senna as TTO, advised on increasing fluid intake Nausea and vomiting Nausea is a common side effect of anaesthetic and medication. Use of local PONV guidence, including perioperative hydration Readmission if 2 or more episodes of vomiting in 24 hours Wound heamatoma Changed timing of Enoxaparin administration At least 2 hours postoperatively, normally given at 18.00hrs
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||CLINICAL FEATURE|
|Publication:||Journal of Perioperative Practice|
|Date:||May 1, 2011|
|Previous Article:||The early days of surgery for stones in the bladder.|
|Next Article:||The patient with a pierced tongue.|