Printer Friendly

Initial development and chemical components of sugarcane under water stress associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi/Desenvolvimento inicial e componentes quimicos da cana-de-acucar sob estresse hidrico associadoa fungos micorrizicos arbusculares.

INTRODUCTION

The use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has major importance for the growth of various plant species, due to the great potential for a more efficient crop development and to the reduction in the use of fertilizers, especially in the beginning of plant development (Russomanno et al., 2008; Subramanian et al., 2011). AMF increase the absorption of soil nutrients, especially phosphorus, and plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Russomanno et al., 2008; Smith & Read, 2008; Kiriachek et al., 2009; Silva & Amorim, 2009; Ngwene et al., 2010; Subramanian et al., 2011). According to Abdel-Fattah & Asrar (2012), in addition to the nutritional effects, the association provides plants with tolerance to water stress, contributing to aggregate stability, increase in soil aeration and subsequent water availability (Borie et al., 2008), since plants with mycorrhizae maintain higher stomatal conductance during water deficit periods and, in return, higher diffusive dependence (Zhang et al., 2011).

Studies on the interaction between AMF and sugarcane, however, are scarce and, although the sugarcane response to AMF in field conditions is not expressive, there is a great potential to use this technology in the production of pathogen-free seedlings, with increases in plant survival indices and higher initial vigor, making them more adapted to the transplanting in the field (Silva et al., 2009).

On the other hand, it is important to develop studies on water use efficiency with the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis aiming to increase the production with minimum use of the available water resources (Asrar et al., 2012). Given the above, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of water stress levels in the soil and inoculation with AMF on the initial vegetative development, fresh and dry biomass production, mycorrhizal colonization and contents of phosphorus, proteins, enzymes and amino acid of sugarcane.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse (8[degrees] 01' 05" S; 34[degrees] 56' 48" W; 4 m) of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE) in Recife-PE, Brazil, with minimum and maximum temperatures of 23.8 and 36.7 [degrees]C, respectively, and average relative air humidity of 77.38%.

Pots with 30 cm of height, 17 cm of diameter and a volume of 3.8 [m.sup.3] were filled with soil material of a distrophic Yellow Argisol, with sandy-loam texture, collected in the municipality of Carpina, Pernambuco, from the layer of 0.5-0.9 m, with the following characteristics: pH ([H.sub.2]O) = 4.6; [Ca.sup.2+] = 0.37 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; [Mg.sup.2+] = 0.51 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; [Na.sup.+] = 0.03 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; [K.sup.+] = 0.04 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; [H.sup.+] + [Al.sup.3+] = 2.84 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; [Al.sup.3+] = 0.91 [cmol.sub.c] [kg.sup.-1]; C = 7.0 g [kg.sup.-1]; N = 0.3 g [kg.sup.-1]; O.M. = 23 g [kg.sup.-1]; assimilable P = 8 mg [kg.sup.-1]; and K = 0.04 mg [dm.sup.-3]. The soil was initially sieved (5-mm grid), autoclaved twice (120 [degrees]C, 101 kPa), for 1 h and 30 min, with an interval of 24 h, and used 30 days after disinfection.

The sugarcane variety used in the experiment was RB 857515. The micropropagated seedlings were provided by the Biofactory of the Northeast Center for Strategic Technologies (CETENE). The seedlings remained 20 days in acclimation in pots with humus, in a greenhouse, and then were transplanted to pots with autoclaved soil.

The pot capacity (PC) was considered as being the content of water retained by the soil after saturation and the action of gravity, until drainage stopped (Souza et al., 2000). The irrigation of the pots was controlled by daily weighing, using a precision scale with sensitivity of 1 g, between 7 and 9 a.m., for later replenishment of the water evapotranspired in the period, maintaining the soil in the pots close to the field capacity, which began 50 days after transplanting the seedlings into the pots.

The statistical design adopted was randomized blocks, in a [2.sup.2] factorial scheme, with 4 treatments (T1--50% PC with AMF; T2--100% PC with AMF; T3--50% PC without AMF; T4--100% PC without AMF) and 16 replicates.

The AMF used in the mix were: Claroideoglomus etunicatum URM-FMA 03W. N. (Becker & Gerd) C. Walker & A. Schussler, Gigaspora rosea URM-FMA 01T. H. Nicolson & N. C. Schenck, Acaulospora longula URM-FMA 07 Spain & N. C. Schenck and Fuscutata heterogama URM-FMA 04 Oehl, F. A. Souza, L. C. Maia & Sieverd., from the Mycorrhiza Laboratory of the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE). The AMF were separately multiplied, for three months, in pots planted with millet (Panicum miliaceum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). The pots contained 3 kg of soil sterilized in an autoclave at 120 [degrees]C, in two periods of 1 h and 30 min, on consecutive days. The AMF (200 spores [plant.sup.-1]) were deposited around the roots of the sugarcane seedlings, 20 days after transplantation into a greenhouse. The harvest was performed 90 days after AMF inoculation.

The evaluated variables were based on the morphological growth (stem length, stem diameter and number of leaves), on shoot and root fresh matter, shoot dry matter, number of glomerospores in the soil, mycorrhizal colonization rate, shoot phosphorus content, total soluble proteins, the enzymes catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and peroxidase, and on proline.

The morphological growth was evaluated by measurements using a tape measure and a caliper rule, on the 90th day after mycorrhizal inoculation. For dry matter determinations, the collected samples were stored in previously identified paper bags, and then weighed and dried in a forced-air oven at 65 [degrees]C, until constant mass. After determining shoot dry mass, the samples were ground and placed in polyethylene bags, while aliquots were used for phosphorus (P) analysis using the method of Miyazawa et al. (1984), at the Plant Chemistry Laboratory of the UFRPE.

AMF were extracted from 100 g of soil, using the technique of wet sieving (Gerdemann & Nicolson, 1963) followed by water centrifugation and sucrose solution (Jenkins, 1964) at 50% (w/v). Mycorrhizal colonization was estimated in a hundred 1 cm root fragments (Giovannetti & Mosse, 1980), after clearing with KOH (10%) and [H.sub.2][O.sub.2] (10%), stained with Trypan blue at 0.05% (Phillips & Hayman, 1970), mounted in glass slides and observed in the microscope.

The biochemical analysis was performed using the third leaf of each plant, which, after harvested, was submersed in liquid nitrogen and stored in a freezer. Sample extract was prepared for the analysis through the homogenization of 0.1 g of fresh matter in 4 mL of the buffer sodium phosphate 0.1 M (pH 6.5), mixed with 0.05 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10.000 x g at 4[degrees]C for 10 min (Zeraik et al., 2008), and then analysed for total soluble proteins (Bradford, 1976) and the enzymes catalase (Berrs & Sizer 1952), ascorbate peroxidase (Nakano & Asada, 1981), polyphenoloxidase (Kar & Mishra, 1976) and peroxidase (Fatibelho Filho & Vieira, 2002). For the analysis of the amino acid proline, an extract obtained from 1 g of dry matter in 5 mL of sulfosalicylic acid at 3% was used. The homogenate was centrifuged at 2.000 x g for 10 min, filtered using No. 2 filter paper and determined according to Bates et al. (1973).

The data were subjected to analysis of variance and, when significant, subjected to Tukey test (p [less than or equal to] 0.05) using the statistical software SAS.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was no interaction between AMF and water stress, and no effect of AMF on stem length, stem diameter, number of leaves, shoot and root fresh matter, shoot dry matter and P content in the plant (Tables 1 and 2). Similar results were obtained by Russomanno et al. (2008), in rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) and basil plants (Ocimum basilicum L.), and by Silva et al. (2009) in sweet passion fruit plants (Passiflora alata).

Water stress significantly affected stem diameter and shoot and root fresh matter. On the other hand, there was interaction between water stress and AMF; water stress affected the number of glomerospores in the soil and the AMF root colonization rate of sugarcane seedlings. However, the concentration of assimilable P in the studied soil was equal to 8 mg [kg.sup.-1], which is considered as intermediate for sugarcane, since high P availabilities would inhibit AMF root colonization (Zhang et al., 2011), considering that plants would not need to spend photoassimilates with AMF. In this case, the fungus would behave as a parasite and could interfere with plant development. For this reason, most studies on AMF are performed in soils either poor or dependent on phosphorus (Smith & Read, 2008; Kiriacher et al., 2009).

Beltrano & Ronco (2008) reported significant increases in maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum spp.), respectively under moderate and extreme water stress, inoculated with Glomus claroideum. According to Sanchez-Blanco et al. (2004) and Goicoechea et al. (2005), this symbiosis (AMF) has proved to increase the tolerance to water stress, although the mechanisms involved are controversial, because under drought conditions the leaf water potential may or may not be lower in plants with AMF. This decrease, however, is lower in plants with AMF and under stress, possibly due to the fact that in low soil water potentials, plants with AMF can absorb more water compared with AMF-free plants, as mentioned by Porcel & Ruiz-Lozano (2004).

The stress level of 50% PC was enough to change the development and the vegetative growth of sugarcane seedlings, even in the presence of AMF, with decrease of 75, 83.55 and 80.54% in stem diameter, shoot fresh matter and root fresh matter, respectively (Table 3). Russomanno et al. (2008) obtained the opposite result for root fresh biomass, in rosemary plants, with no differences between the AMF-inoculated species (C. etunicatum and G. clarum), while in basil plants, root fresh biomass increased in 93.10% when compared with the control, non-inoculated, which also occurred in other crops associated with AMF (Silva et al., 2009).

The obtained results are contrary to the ones found by Silva et al. (2009), who observed that seedlings of yellow passion fruit did not show differences in stem diameter when inoculated with G. albida and S. heterogama.

The highest results for AMF population occurred when sugarcane was not subjected to water stress, indicating that AMF develop better (both in roots and in soil) when sugarcane is supplied with water, i.e., when the soil is at field capacity (Table 4).

With the water stress, both colonization and sporulation were reduced in 25 and 35%, respectively (Table 4). Inoculation was performed with 200 glomerospores per pot, which corresponds to approximately 6.66 glomerospores per 100 g soil. The percentage of root colonization was low for the plants in the two water systems, which suggests that a few glomerospores managed to germinate, penetrate and colonize the roots. Usually, mycorrhizal efficiency is related to the amount of external mycelium formed in soil, varying with AMF and plant species (Rossumanno et al., 2008).

Other factors that reflect on mycorrhizal efficiency are related to edaphoclimatic conditions and aspects of the fungusplant relationship, i.e., they depend on fungus species, plant species and environmental conditions (Zhang et al., 2011; Asrar et al., 2012). Ngwene et al. (2010), studying cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) inoculated with AMF, found that the colonization was severely reduced when plants received phosphate and nitrogen fertilization. Bonfim et al. (2010) observed higher number of AMF spores in the system with arboreal component (larger root area) and in coffee crop (Coffea arabica L.) in dry period, indicating that the restriction in water availability in this season has induced microorganism association with plants and the manifestation of adaptation mechanisms, like increase in sporulation. However, for both evaluated seasons (dry and rainy), there was no correlation between number of spores and leaf water potential, indicating that, regardless of water regime, AMF act normally in the crop and in the soil. Similar results were observed by Amorim et al. (2004), in Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) and 'umbu' trees (Spondias tuberosa L.) under water stress conditions.

The summary of analysis of variance of the enzymes present in tissues of sugarcane plants subjected to different levels of water stress and inoculated with AMF is shown in Table 5.

There was no interaction between AMF and water stress, and no isolated effect of AMF and water stress for the enzymes catalase, peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase, soluble protein and the amino acid proline. Similar results for total protein activity in wheat leaves, with and without water stress, were observed by Beltrano & Ronco (2008), although plants with AMF had higher protein concentration than plants without AMF under severe stress.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The water stress levels of 50 and 100% pot capacity were not enough to interfere with the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, and with growth and initial development of the sugarcane variety RB857515.

2. The water stress level of 50% pot capacity (PC) affected the initial development of sugarcane seedlings and the AMF colonization in the soil and in plant roots. The AMF species Claroideoglomus etunicatum, Gigaspora rosea, Acaulospora longula and Fuscutata heterogama, and the water stress level of 50% PC, separately or combined, did not affect the initial development, dry matter production and the contents of P, total soluble proteins, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and proline of the sugarcane variety RB857515.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p548-552

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Science and Technology Support Foundation of Pernambuco (FACEPE), for providing the financial support to conduct this study.

LITERATURE CITED

Abdel-Fattah, G. M.; Asrar, A. A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal application to improve growth and tolerance of wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) plants grown in saline soil. Acta Physiology Plant, v.34, p.267-277, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738011-0825-6

Amorim, S. M. C.; Paim, A. C. B.; Silva, M. G. Efeito do deficit hidrico sobre a colonizacao endomicorrizica em duas especies vegetais tipicas da regiao semi-arida do nordeste. Revista de Biotecnologia, Ciencia e Desenvolvimento, v.33, p.23-26, 2004.

Asrar, A. A.; Abdel-Fattah, G. M.; Elhindi, K. M. Improving growth, flower yield, and water relations of snapdragon (Antirhinum majus L.) plants grown under well-watered and water-stress conditions using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Photosynthetica, v.50, p.305316, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0024-8

Bates, L. S.; Waltren, R. B.; Teare, I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water--stress studies. Plant and Soil, v.39, p.205-207, 1973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Beltrano, J.; Ronco, M. G. Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticuma estivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology, v.20, p.29-37, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S167704202008000100004

Berrs, L. S. J.; Sizer, I. W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, v.195, p.133-140, 1952.

Bonfim, J. A.; Matsumoto, S. N.; Lima, J. M.; Cesar, F. R. C. F.; Santos, M. A. F. Fungos micorrizicos arbusculares (FMA) e aspectos fisiologicos em cafeeiros cultivados em sistema agroflorestal eaplenosol. Bragantia, v.69, p.201-206, 2010. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0006-87052010000100025

Borie, F.; Rubio, R.; Morales, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil aggregation. Revista de la Ciencia del Suelo y Nutricion Vegetal, v.8, p.9-18, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27912008000200003 Bradford, M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities ofprotein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry. v.72, p.248-254, 1976. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Fatibelho Filho, O.; Vieira, I. C. Uso analitico de tecidos e de extratos brutos vegetais como fonte enzimatica. Quimica Nova, v.25, p.455-464, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422002000300019

Gerdemann, J. W; Nicolson, T H. Spores of micorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. v.46, p.235-244, 1963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(63)80079-0

Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytologist, v.84, p.489-500, 1980. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x

Goicoechea, N.; Merino, S.; Sanchez-Diaz, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can contribute to maintain antioxidant and carbon metabolism in nodules of Anthyllis cytisoides L. subjected to drought. Journal of Plant Physiology, v.162, p.27-35, 2005. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.03.011

Jenkins, W. R. A. Rapid centrifugal flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Disease Reporter, v.48, p.692, 1964.

Kar, M.; Mishra, D. Catalase, peroxidase and poliphenoloxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiology, v.57, p.315-319, 1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.57.2315

Kiriachek, S. G.; Azevedo, L. C. B. de; Peres, L. E. P.; Lambais, M. R. Regulacao do desenvolvimento de micorrizas arbusculares. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, v.33, p.1-16, 2009. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000100001

Miyazawa, M.; Pavan, M. A.; Bloch, M. F. M. Avaliacao de metodos com e sem digestao para extracao de elementos em tecidos de plantas. Ciencia e Cultura, v.36, p.1953-1958, 1984.

Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiology, v.22, p.867-880, 1981.

Ngwene, B.; George, E.; Claussen, W.; Neumann, E. Phosphorus uptake by cowpea plants from sparingly available or soluble-sources as affected by nitrogen form and arbuscular-mycorrhizafungalinoculation. Journal Plant Nutrition Soil Science, v.173, p.353-359, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900203

Phillips, J. M.; Hayman, D. S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, v.55, p.157-161, 1970. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3

Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. Arbuscularmycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, v.55, p.1743-1750, 2004. http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/jxb/erh188

Russomanno, O. M. R.; Kruppa, P. C.; Minhomi, M. T. A. Influencia de fungos micorrizicos arbusculares no desenvolvimento de plantas de alecrim e manjericao. Arquivos do Instituto Biologico, v.75, p.37-43, 2008.

Sanchez-Blanco, M. J.; Fernandez, T.; Morales, M. A.; Morte, A.; Alarcon, J. J. Variations in water status, gasexchange, and growth in Rosmarinusofficinalisplantsinfected with Glomusdeserticolaunder droughtconditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, v.161, p.675-682, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01191

Silva, M. G.; Amorim, S. M. C. Estresse salino em plantas de Spondias tuberosa Arruda Camara colonizadas com fungos micorrizicos arbusculares. Revista Caatinga, v.22, p.91-96, 2009.

Silva, T. F. B.; Santos, A. B. S.; Rozas, C. E. O.; Santos, A. C.; Paiva, L. M. Influencia da densidade de fungos micorrizicos arbusculares na producao do maracujazeiro-doce (Passiflora alata Curtis). Revista Caatinga, v.22, p.1-6, 2009.

Smith, S. E.; Read, D. J. Mycorrihzal symbiosis. 3.ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008. 814p.

Souza, C. C.; Oliveira, F. A.; Silva, I. F.; Amorim Neto, M. S. Avaliacao de metodos de determinacao de agua disponivel e manejo da irrigacao em terra roxa sob cultivo de algodoeiro herbaceo. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.4, p.338-342, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662000000300006

Subramanian, K. S.; Tenshia, J. S. V.; Jayalakshmi, K.; Ramachandran, V. Antioxidant enzyme activitiesminarbuscularmycorrhizal (Glomusin traradices) fungus inoculated and non-inoculated maize plants under zinc deficiency. Indian Journal Microbiology, v.51, p.37-43, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12088-0110078-5

Zeraik, A. E., Souza, F. S., Fatibelho Filho, O.; Leite, O. D. Desenvolvimento de um spot test para o monitoramento da atividade da peroxidase em um procedimento de purificacao. Quimica Nova, v.31, p.731-734, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S0100-40422008000400003

Zhang, Q.; Xu, L.; Tang, J.; Bai, M.; Chen, X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal mediation of biomass-density relationship of Medicago sativa L. under two water conditions in a field experiment. Mycorrhiza. v.21, p.269-277, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-010-0331-5

Carmem C. M. de Sousa (1), Elvira M. R. Pedrosa (2), Mario M. Rolim (2), Uided M. T. Cavalcante (3), Inacio P. Monte Junior (4) & Joao V. Pereira Filho (5)

(1) Engenheira Agricola. Fortaleza, CE. E-mail: crismareco@hotmail.com (Corresponding author)

(2) Departamento de Engenharia Agricola/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Recife, PE. E-mail: elvira.pedrosa@deagri.ufrpe.br; rolim@deagri.ufrpe.br

(3) Departamento de Biologia/Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, PE. E-mail: umaaze@yahoo.com.br

(4) Biologo. Recife, PE. E-mail: inaciopascoal@hotmail.com

(5) Departamento de Engenharia Agricola/Universidade Federal do Ceara. Fortaleza, CE. E-mail: joao_valdenor@hotmail.com

Protocolo 134-2014--25/04/2014 * Aprovado em 26/12/2014 * Publicado em 04/05/2015
Table 1. Analysis of variance for stem length (SL), stem diameter
(SD), number of leaves (NL), shoot fresh matter (SFM), root fresh
matter (RFM) of RB85751 sugarcane seedlings subjected to water stress
levels and inoculated with AMF, in greenhouse.

Source of variation   DF                Mean squares

                                 SL           SD           NL

Stress (S)             1    3066.70 (ns)    0.34 *     25.25 (ns)
AMF                    1     0.24 (ns)     0.04 (ns)   0.02 (ns)
S x AMF                1    113.70 (ns)    0.27 (ns)   0.17 (ns)
Residue               58       108.80        0.06         1.67
C.V. (%)              --       16.79         23.29       17.71

Source of variation           Mean squares

                           SFM           RFM

Stress (S)               1.10 *         0.61 *
AMF                   0.000002 (ns)   0.004 (ns)
S x AMF                0.057 (ns)     0.07 (ns)
Residue                   0.032         0.029
C.V. (%)                  9.19          11.64

* Significant at 0.05 probability level; (ns)--not-significant
by F test

Table 2. Summary of analysis of variance of shoot dry matter (SDM),
number of glomerospores (NGS), AMF root colonization rate (RCR) and
plant phosphorus content (PP) of RB 857515 sugarcane seedlings
subjected to water stress levels and inoculated with AMF, in
greenhouse.

Source of     DF    Mean squares
variation
                       SDM         NGS         RCR         PP

Stress (S)     1    0.81 (ns)   30938.20 *   0.81 *    0.055 (ns)
AMF            1    0.001 (ns)   27.04 *     0.001 *   0.01 (ns)
S x AMF        1    0.03 (ns)    208.43 *    0.03 *    0.04 (ns)
Residue       58      0.04       2050.20      0.04        0.02
C.V. (%)      --      16.01       17.71       16.01      20.28

* Significant at 0.05 probability level; (ns)--not-significant
by F test

Table 3. Mean values of stem diameter (SD), shoot fresh biomass (SFB)
and root fresh biomass (RFB) of sugarcane variety RB857515 under water
stress (50% PC) 90 days after inoculation in greenhouse

Stress                 SD        SFB        RFB
                      (mm)
                                       (g)

With (50% PC)        0.63 B    64.69 A    19.83 A
Without (100% PC)    0.84 A    77.43 A    24.62 A
LSD                   0.24      23.75       7.93

Different letters in the columns have significantly different means by
Tukey test at 0.05 probability level; With--50% of the pot capacity;
Without--100% of the pot capacity; LSD--Least significant difference

Table 4. Mean values of the number of glomerospores of arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the soil (NGS) and AMF root colonization
rate (RCR) in the sugarcane variety RB 857515 under water stress (50%
PC) 90 days after inoculation in greenhouse

          NGS (100[g.sup.-1] soil)         RCR (%)

Stress               AMF                    AMF

             With        Without      With     Without

With       853.10 aB     0.00 bA    4.89 aB    0.00 bA
Without   2.406.30 aA    0.00 bA    19.37 aA   0.00 bA
LSD          54.41                    4.48

Different letters have significantly different means for each variable
by Tukey test at 0.05 probability level, and lowercase letters refer
to rows and uppercase letters refer to columns; LSD--least significant
difference.

PC = pot capacity, according to Souza et al. (2000)

Table 5. Analysis of variance for the enzymes catalase (CAT),
peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), polyphenoloxidase (PPO),
soluble protein (SP) and the amino acid proline (PRO) in RB 857515
sugarcane plants subjected to water stress levels and inoculated with
AMF in greenhouse

   Source                          Mean squares
of variation   DF
                        CAT           POD           APX

Stress (S)      1    0.013 (ns)    3.67 (ns)     0.002 (ns)
AMF             1    2.89 (ns)    2519.07 (ns)   0.014 (ns)
S X AMF         1      0.5TS      1779.86 (ns)   0.003 (ns)
Residue        58       0.42         777.33        0.018
CV (%)         --      34.59         12.32          8.99

   Source                    Mean squares
of variation
                   PPO           SP           PRO

Stress (S)     2298.31 (ns)   1,02 (ns)   0.0002 (ns)
AMF            633.71 (ns)    1,67 (ns)   0.0002 (ns)
S X AMF        811.17 (ns)    2.95 (ns)   0.009 (ns)
Residue           375.69        5.69         0.005
CV (%)            24.01         19.89        8.61

* Significant at 0.05 probability level; (ns)--not-significant
by F test
COPYRIGHT 2015 ATECEL--Associacao Tecnico Cientifica Ernesto Luiz de Oliveira Junior
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:texto en ingles
Author:de Sousa, Carmem C.M.; Pedrosa, Elvira M.R.; Rolim, Mario M.; Cavalcante, Uided M.T.; Monte, Inacio
Publication:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental
Date:Jun 1, 2015
Words:4178
Previous Article:Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia/ Manejo de plantas daninhas em milho usando capinas e...
Next Article:Yield and nutrition of sunflower fertilized with sewage sludge/ Producao e nutricao de girassol adubado com lodo de esgoto.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters