Printer Friendly

Information Security: Status of Federal Public Key Infrastructure Activities at Major Federal Departments and Agencies.

GAO-04-157 December 15, 2003

The federal government is increasingly using online applications to provide access to information and services and to conduct internal business operations. In light of this trend, strong security assurances are needed to properly safeguard sensitive, personal, and financial data, in part by ensuring that the identities of those who use such applications are appropriately authenticated. When fully and properly implemented, public key infrastructure (PKI) offers many of these assurances. In 2001, GAO reported that the federal government faces a number of challenges in deploying PKI technology (GAO-01-277). GAO was requested to follow up this work by (1) determining the status of federal PKI activities, including initiatives planned or under way at 24 major federal departments and agencies, as well as the status and planned activities of the Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) and Access Certificates for Electronic Services (ACES) programs, and (2) identifying challenges encountered by the 24 agencies in implementing PKI initiatives since the 2001 report was issued. In commenting on a draft of this report, GSA and OMB officials generally agreed with its content and conclusions. Technical comments provided by OMB have been addressed as appropriate.

PKI and its associated hardware, software, policies, and people can provide greater security assurances than simpler means of authenticating identity, such as passwords. In pursuit of these benefits, 20 of the 24 agencies reported that they are undertaking a total of 89 PKI initiatives. The 89 initiatives are at various stages of development, and collectively they represent a significant investment, estimated at about $1 billion. In addition, the governmentwide FBCA and ACES programs continue to promote the adoption and implementation of PKI, but these programs have seen mixed progress and results. The level of participation in the FBCA, which provides a means to link independent agency PKIs into a broader network, is the same as in 2001--four agencies have been certified as meeting technical and security requirements to interconnect through the network. Additional organizations are planning to participate in the future, including four federal agencies and some nonfederal organizations, such as the state of Illinois, the Canadian government, and educational consortiums. Similarly, the ACES program, which offers agencies various PKI services through a General Services Administration (GSA) contract, has seen lower than expected participation by federal agencies. GSA plans to revise the pricing structure associated with the ACES program to encourage participation. PKI implementation continues to pose major challenges for agencies. Many of these challenges are similar to those identified in GAO's 2001 report. In that report, GAO recommended that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), working with other key federal entities, take action to address these challenges, including establishing a governmentwide framework of policy and technical guidance and a program plan for the federal PKI. GAO also recommended that OMB take steps to ensure that agencies adhere to federal PKI guidance. OMB has not yet fully addressed the recommendations related to the construction of a PKI policy framework, but it issued a policy memorandum in July 2003 that lays out steps for consolidating investments related to authentication and identity management processes across government.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Feb 1, 2004
Previous Article:Foundation Engineering Sciences, Inc.
Next Article:Freight Transportation: Strategies Needed to Address Planning and Financing Limitations.

Related Articles
More information could mean less privacy: President Bush signed the E-Government Act to enhance public access to information after authorizing...
Federal government falls short in Cybersecurity.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Establishing Effective Information Sharing with Infrastructure Sectors.
Home on the page:
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Establishing Effective Information Sharing with Infrastructure Sectors.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Improving Information Sharing with Infrastructure Sectors.
Homeland Security: Agency Plans, Implementation, and Challenges Regarding the National Strategy for Homeland Security.
Information Technology: Federal Agencies Face Challenges in Implementing Initiatives to Improve Public Health Infrastructure.
Information Security: Progress Reported, but Weaknesses at Federal Agencies Persist.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: DHS Needs to Fully Address Lessons Learned from Its First Cyber Storm Exercise.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |