Influence of Nitrogen Availability on Seed Nitrogen Accumulation in Pea.
At each nodal position, the changes in seed N concentration during seed filling can be analyzed as the ratio of the seed N accumulation rate and the seed growth rate. Changes in the assimilate availability at the time when seed number cannot be altered have no effect on seed growth rate [Jones and Simmons, 1983 with maize; Munier-Jolain et al., 1998 with pea, lupin (Lupinus albus L.), and soybean]. The seed growth rate is related to the cotyledon cell number which is fixed before the beginning of seed filling (Egli et al., 1989; Guldan and Brun, 1985 with soybean; Munier-Jolain and Ney, 1998 with pea and soybean). In contrast, N accumulation of in vitro cultured seed was positively correlated with the medium N concentration (soybean: Hayati et al., 1996; maize: Singletary and Below, 1989). Thus, the variations in seed N concentration during the filling period could be mainly due to changes in the seed N accumulation rate which seems to depend on N assimilate availability.
Pea is an indeterminate plant whose pods and seeds are set on successive reproductive nodes at different heights of the plant. The development of pods from various positions is asynchronous and the seeds from higher pods begin to fill later than seeds from lower pods (Ney and Turc, 1993). This characteristic may lead to variations in the seed N accumulation rate between nodes. As N concentration in vegetative parts increases from the base to the top of the shoot (Lemaire et al., 1991), the amount of N available to the seeds may increase with their nodal position. Thus, the rate of seed N accumulation at a given time may be higher in the upper seeds than in the lower seeds of the plant. Moreover, in legumes, the amount of N available in the vegetative organs decreases during the filling period because plant [N.sub.2] fixation decreases after the onset of seed filling (Sparrow et al., 1995), and because remobilization leads to a decrease in the N content in vegetative parts of the plant over time (Warembourg and Fernandez, 1985; Pate, 1985; Peoples and Dalling, 1988). This reduction in N availability is likely to affect the rate of seed N accumulation during the filling period. However, the pattern of N partitioning to seeds growing in pods from various intra-plant positions has not been extensively studied in planta for legume species.
The aim of this study was to investigate how N availability and distribution in a pea plant influence the rate of seed N accumulation by analyzing N accumulation in seeds of different reproductive nodes during the seed filling period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant Culture and Experimental Treatments
A field experiment was sown on 5 March 1996 on a clayey calcic brown soil (clayey eutric Cambisol). Pea plants were grown in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Each block consisted of six plots of six rows for each experimental treatment. The rows were 11.25 m long and 0.20 m apart. The field received 47 kg P [ha.sup.-1], 94 kg K [ha.sup.-1], and 17 kg Mg [ha.sup.-1] during the autumn preceding the experiments. The field experiment was well irrigated in order to avoid moisture stress. Rhizobium leguminosarum was naturally present in the soil. Different experimental treatments were used in order to manipulate the amount of N available per seed. Three genotypes (`P2', `Frisson', and `Solara') were used. The genotype P2 was sown at 120 plants [m.sup.-2] and genotypes Frisson and Solara were sown at 100 plants [m.sup.-2]. P2 is a non-nodulating mutant isogenic of the cultivar Frisson obtained after chemical mutagenesis (Duc and Messager, 1989). At sowing, either 0 or 25 g N [m.sup.-2] as ammonium nitrate were applied to plants of the genotype Frisson. Thus, four experimental treatments were obtained, the genotypes P2, Frisson, and Solara not fertilized with N (treatments [P.sub.ON], [F.sub.ON], and [S.sub.ON] respectively) and the genotype Frisson fertilized with N (treatment [F.sub.25N]).
A glasshouse experiment was sown with the genotype Solara on 24 Dec. 1996 and 260 7-L pots filled with a siliceous sand (particle size of 1- to 2-mm) were used. Eight seeds were sown in each pot and inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum. When the fifth leaf was fully expanded, the pots were thinned to four plants per pot and all branches were removed from each plant. The glasshouse temperature was maintained above 5 [degrees] C during winter and the roof of the glasshouse opened automatically when temperature exceeded 20 [degrees] C to avoid temperature stress. Nutrient solution (P, K, and micronutrients--B, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo and Zn) was provided by regular watering of pots. Three depodding and two defoliation treatments were applied to manipulate the seed location, the amount of N available per seed, and the N distribution within plants. In the three depodding treatments, pods were removed from all but two nodes: the first and the second nodes ([depodding.sub.1-2], 42 pots), the third and the fourth nodes ([depodding.sub.3-4], 38 pots), and the fifth and the sixth nodes ([depodding.sup.5-6], 34 pots). For each depodding treatment, pod removal occurred when the seeds at the selected nodes had reached the beginning of seed filling. Two different defoliation treatments were applied on non-depodded plants: the first one ([defoliation.sub.veg], 34 pots) consisted of removing the leaves from the first vegetative node to the second reproductive node and the second one ([defoliation.sub.rep], 34 pots) consisted of removing the leaves from the third to the last reproductive node. Plants were defoliated when all seeds had begun to fill. Remaining pots were left untreated as control plants. Pots were randomly allocated to depodded, defoliated, or control plants and were arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications (where one pot was a replication).
From the middle of the flowering period until maturity, samples were taken three times a week for each treatment by randomly choosing 10 plants per replicate in the field and four pots in the glasshouse. All measurements were applied separately to each replicate of each treatment in the field and glasshouse experiments.
At Each Sampling Date
Seeds at three nodal positions of the mainstem (when they were left on the plant) were collected separately: the first, the third, and the fifth reproductive nodes for genotypes Solara and P2; the first, the fourth, and the seventh for genotype Frisson.
For each seed group, fresh weight and dry weight after oven drying at 85 [degrees] C for 48 h were measured in order to calculate the seed water concentration. At each of the three nodal positions, the beginning of seed filling and the physiological maturity were determined as times when the water concentration were 850 and 550 g [kg.sup.-1] by linear regression between the seed water concentration and the cumulative degree-days during the linear decline of seed water concentration (Ney et al., 1993). The progressions of these reproductive stages along the mainstem were described by linear functions based on cumulative degree-days (Ney and Turc, 1993) to define the dates when depodding and defoliation treatments should be applied. The date of the beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node was determined for each treatment in the field experiment and for the control in the glasshouse experiment.
Seeds of each node group (Nodes 1, 3, and 5 for P2 and Solara; Nodes 1, 4, and 7 for Frisson) were ground and N concentrations were determined by Kjeldahl procedure (Lepo and Ferrenbach, 1987). Individual seed N content at each node was calculated as the multiplication of the seed N concentration and the individual seed dry weight.
The mean rate of individual seed N accumulation at Node 1 was assessed as (i) in the field experiment and for the control in the glasshouse experiment, the amount of N accumulated in a seed during seed filling divided by the degree-days cumulated during the same period, and (ii) for the depodding and defoliation treatments in the glasshouse experiment, the amount of N accumulated in a seed from the treatment date until maturity divided by the degree-days cumulated during the same period.
During the seed filling, the rate of individual seed N accumulation at a given node between two sampling dates ([SNR.sub.n(t to t+1)]) was calculated by dividing the individual seed N accumulation during this period by the cumulative degree days between the two sampling dates; the data were smoothed by a moving average of three between-sampling date rates of individual seed N accumulation.
Remaining seeds and vegetative tissues--leaves, stems, and podwalls--were collected, weighed after oven drying at 85 [degrees] C for 48 h, ground, and N concentrations were determined by Kjeldahl procedure (Lepo and Ferrenbach, 1987). Total plant N content was calculated as the sum of all seed N content and vegetative parts N content in order to calculate total plant N accumulation between two sampling dates.
Seeds of each reproductive node of the mainstem and seeds of branches (only in the field experiment) were collected separately and counted. Vegetative tissues--leaves, stems, and podwalls--were collected separately and N concentrations were determined by Kjeldahl procedure (Lepo and Ferrenbach, 1987).
Time was expressed as degree-days cumulated from thebeginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node with a 0 [degrees] C base temperature (Ney and Turc, 1993). Statistical analyses were performed by the GLM and the NLIN procedures of SAS (SAS Institute, 1987). Means were compared by the least significant difference (LSD) at the 0.05 probability level.
Assessment of the Amount of N Available to Seeds
The changes in the amount of N available to seeds were estimated during the seed filling for each treatment in both experiments. The N accumulated in seeds comes from the remobilization of N already in vegetative parts at the beginning of seed filling and from the N currently accumulated by the plant during seed filling (Pate, 1985; Jensen, 1987). According to Caloin and Yu (1984) a proportion of the N in vegetative parts is not available for the remobilization to the seeds because it is associated with structural components. Minimal values of N concentrations of each vegetative organ (leaves, stems, podwalls, and roots) at maturity, similar in different conditions of N starvation, were considered in soybean as the concentrations of non-remobilizable N (Hanway and Weber, 1971; Streeter, 1978; Munier-Jolain et al., 1996). Because roots were shown to provide very little N to seeds (Peoples and Dalling, 1988), root N was neglected in this study. Minimal values of N concentration of leaves, stems, and podwalls in pea at maturity were obtained for the [P.sub.ON] and [S.sub.ON] treatments (field experiment). These values were not significantly different between treatments, consequently mean values of non-remobilizable N concentrations were calculated for each vegetative organ analyzed and they were 8.6 g [kg.sup.-1] dry matter for leaves, 6.6 g [kg.sup.-1] for stems, and 6.2 g [kg.sup.-1] for podwalls. These values were consistent with concentrations of non-remobilizable nitrogen observed in soybean for each vegetative organ (Streeter, 1978; Munier-Jolain, 1994) and were consequently used to estimate the amount of shoot N available for remobilization to filling seeds at a Sampling Date t ([Nremob.sub.(t)]):
[Nremob.sub.(t)] = [Nveg.sub.(t)] - [(0.0086 x [DW.sub.1]) + (0.0066 x [DW.sub.s]) + [(0.0062 x [DW.sub.pw])].sub.(t)],
where Nveg is the amount of N in the vegetative parts; [DW.sub.1], [DW.sub.s] and [DW.sub.p]w are the dry weights of leaves, stems, and podwalls (Munier-Jolain et al., 1996).
The total amount of N available to the seeds between two sampling dates ([NA.sub.(t to t+1]), presumed to be the sum of the amount of N accumulated by the plant between the two dates and the amount of remobilizable N at the Sampling Date t ([Nremob.sub.(t)]), was calculated as:
[NA.sub.(t to t+1] = ([Ntot.sub.(t+1)] - [Ntot.sub.(t+1)]) + [Nremob.sub.(t),
where Ntot is the total amount of N in the plant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Variation in N Availability and Mean Rate of Individual Seed N Accumulation
In both field and glasshouse experiments, the seed number per plant and the N content of vegetative plant parts at the beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node varied widely for the different genotypes (Solara, Frisson, and P2) and treatments (N supply, depodding, and defoliation) (Table 1). These variations led to a large range of vegetative parts N content per seed (Table 1). The vegetative parts N content per seed varied from 3 mg N [seed.sup.-1] for the treatment [P.sub.ON] (non-nodulating) in the field experiment to 30 mg N [seed.sup.-1] for the treatment [depodding.sub.5-6] in the glasshouse experiment (Table 1). Moreover, in the glasshouse experiment, the vegetative parts N content per seed was increased and decreased in depodded and defoliated plants compared with the control plants (Table 1). In both field and glasshouse experiments, the mean rate of individual seed N accumulation at the first reproductive node increased with vegetative parts N content per seed, regardless of genotype. This rate varied from 11 [micro]g [seed.sup.-1] degree-[day.sup.-1] in the lowest vegetative parts N content per seed situation ([P.sub.ON]) to 38 [micro]g [seed.sup.-1] degree-[day.sup.-1] in the highest vegetative parts N content per seed situation ([depodding.sub.1.2]).
Table 1. Seed number per plant at maturity, N content of vegetative plant parts and vegetative N content per seed at the beginning of seed filling of the last reproductive node and mean rate of individual seed N accumulation of the first reproductive node.
Experiment Treatment Seed number seed [plant.sup.-1] Field [F.sub.ON]([double dagger]) 42 [F.sub.25N] 57 [P.sub.ON] 9 [S.sub.ON] 21 Glasshouse control 30 [depodding.sub.1-2]([sections]) 10 [depodding.sub.3-4] 7 [depodding.sub.5-6] 5 [defoliation.sub.veg]([paragraph] 27 [defoliation.sub.rep] 24 [LSD.sub.0.05] 8 Vegetative Experiment Treatment N content mg N [plant.sup.-1] Field [F.sub.ON]([double dagger]) 187 [F.sub.25N] 221 [P.sub.ON] 28 [S.sub.ON] 118 Glasshouse control 140 [depodding.sub.1-2]([sections]) 178 [depodding.sub.3-4] 176 [depodding.sub.5-6] 142 [defoliation.sub.veg]([paragraph] 81 [defoliation.sub.rep] 80 [LSD.sub.0.05] 47 Vegetative N content Experiment Treatment per seed mg N [plant.sup.-1] [seed.sup.-1] Field [F.sub.ON]([double dagger]) 4.5 [F.sub.25N] 3.8 [P.sub.ON] 3.0 [S.sub.ON] 5.5 Glasshouse control 4.7 [depodding.sub.1-2]([sections]) 17.6 [depodding.sub.3-4] 24.1 [depodding.sub.5-6] 29.6 [defoliation.sub.veg]([paragraph] 3.0 [defoliation.sub.rep] 3.3 [LSD.sub.0.05] - Mean rate of individual seed N Experiment Treatment accumulation [micro] g N [seed.sup.-1] degree [day.sup.-1] Field [F.sub.ON]([double dagger]) 19 [F.sub.25N] 16 [P.sub.ON] 11 [S.sub.ON] 32 Glasshouse control 27 [depodding.sub.1-2]([sections]) 38 [depodding.sub.3-4] [depodding.sub.5-6] [defoliation.sub.veg]([paragraph] 13 [defoliation.sub.rep] 14 [LSD.sub.0.05] -
([dagger]) The first reproductive node was removed.
([double dagger]) F = cv. Frisson, P = cv. [P.sub.2], S = cv. Solara, ON = 0 kg N [ha.sup.-1], 25N = 25 kg N [ha.sup.-1].
([sections]) Pods were removed from all nodes except Nodes 1 and 2 ([depodding.sub.3-4]), Nodes 3 and 4 ([depodding.sub.3-4]) and Nodes 5 and 6 ([depoddings.sub.5-6]).
([paragraph]) Defoliation consisted of removing the leaves from the first vegetative to the second reproductive node ([defoliation.sub.veg]) and from the third to the last reproductive node ([defoliation.sub.rep]).
Because seed N comes from the N currently accumulated by the plants and in an important proportion from N remobilized from vegetative parts (Pate, 1985; Jensen 1987), the variations in vegetative parts N content observed in both field and greenhouse experiments led to variations in the amount of N available to seeds. Consequently, our results suggest that the rate of individual seed N accumulation varies with the amount of N available per seed. These results confirm other reports suggesting that the rate of individual seed N accumulation is positively correlated to plant N availability (Hayati et al., 1995, 1996; Singletary and Below, 1989).
Seed N Accumulation at Different Nodes during Seed Filling
For the genotypes Solara and Frisson ([F.sub.ON] and [F.sub.25N] treatments) sown in field, the patterns of individual seed N accumulation from the beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node were similar at the three different nodal positions (Nodes 1, 3, and 5 for Solara and Nodes 1,4, and 7 for Frisson) (Fig. 1). Seeds at Node 1 reached maturity earlier than for the other nodes. Consequently, at the maturity date of Node 1, seed N accumulation stopped at Node 1, whereas N was still accumulated at similar rates in the seeds at the two other nodes (Fig. 1).
[Figure 1 ILLUSTRATION OMNITTED]
Increasing N available per seed by depodding (glasshouse experiment) increased the rate of seed N accumulation and the final individual seed N content compared with the control regardless the nodal position of the seeds left on the plant (Nodes 1, 3, or 5; Fig. 2). Decreasing N available per seed by defoliation (glasshouse experiment) reduced the rate of seed N accumulation and the final individual seed N accumulation compared with the control at Nodes 1, 3, and 5 (Fig. 2). Moreover, defoliation reduced the final individual seed N accumulation from the beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node approximately in the same proportion at the three nodes compared with the control, 30, 22, and 23%, at Nodes 1, 3, and 5, respectively.
[Figure 2 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
In the glasshouse experiment, the two different defoliation treatments ([defoliation.sub.veg] and [defoliation.sub.rep]) provided two contrasting situations of plant N partitioning; only leaves located above the third reproductive node were left on the plant in the [defoliation.sub.veg] treatment, whereas only leaves below the second reproductive node were left on the plant in the [defoliation.sub.rep] treatment. The N content in vegetative parts was similar for both defoliation treatments (Table 1), but not similarly distributed within the plant. However, individual seed N accumulation patterns were similar in both [defoliation.sub.veg] and [defoliation.sub.rep] treatments, whatever the nodal position, Nodes 1, 3, or 5 (Fig. 3).
[Figure 3 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
As the rate of seed N accumulation is positively correlated to the N available to a seed (Hayati et al., 1996), this rate was hypothesized to increase from the first to the last reproductive node since leaf N content per square centimeter increases from basal to apical leaves (Lemaire et al., 1991). However, in the field experiment, the pattern of seed N accumulation from beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node was similar during seed filling at all nodes analyzed, suggesting that the rate of seed N accumulation could be similar, at a given time, for all filling seeds of a plant. Moreover, our results give other evidences to support this hypothesis. Manipulating N partitioning in the glasshouse experiment by two different defoliation treatments demonstrated that the amount of N accumulated by a given seed is not related to the proximity of leaf N assimilates. This result is consistent with results for cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] indicating that seeds at different nodal positions may receive N from all sources of nitrogen, newly accumulated N as well as N remobilized from all vegetative parts (Peoples et al., 1983). Thus, the amount of N available at a given time can be considered one common pool distributed among all filling seeds regardless of the distribution of N in vegetative organs and the seed position on the plant.
Increasing or decreasing N available per seed in the glasshouse experiment enhanced and reduced the rate of individual seed N accumulation at the three different nodal positions analyzed (Fig. 2). However, decreasing N available per seed did not change the relative distribution of N assimilates among seeds of the different nodes. Thus, there could be no clear-cut priority of filling seeds at one nodal position over others regarding N accumulation. Whatever the amount of N available at a given time, it seems to be equitably divided among all filling seeds.
As recently suggested by other reports (Jenner et al., 1991; Hayati et al., 1996), our results show that the rate of seed N accumulation is not directly correlated with individual seed growth rate. The individual seed growth rate can vary between morphological positions (Munier-Jolain and Ney, 1998), but it is not affected by changes in C and N assimilate availability during seed filling (Jones and Simmons, 1983; Munier-Jolain et al., 1998) because this rate depends mainly on the seed cell number (Guldan and Brun, 1985; Munier-Jolain and Ney, 1998). In contrast, the rate of individual seed N accumulation seems to be similar in all filling seeds of a plant at a given time and depends on the pool of N available per seed at a given time. This rate is likely to decrease during the seed filling period because the N available per seed decreases during this period (Warembourg and Fernandez, 1985). Consequently, the mean rate of individual seed N accumulation could be higher for the oldest seeds at the first reproductive nodes than for the youngest seeds at the last reproductive nodes at the top of the plant. This hypothesis could explain the decrease of seed N concentration (the ratio of the individual seed N accumulation rate and the individual seed growth rate) from the oldest reproductive node to the youngest at the top of the plant (Cousin, 1983; Monti 1983).
Relationship between the Rate of Individual Seed N Accumulation and the N Available per Seed at a Given Time
For each experiment (field and glasshouse) and for each treatment, N available per seed between two sampling dates ([NAS.sub.(t to t+1)]) was estimated as the ratio of N available to filling seeds from vegetative parts and current plant N accumulation ([NA.sub.(t to t+1)]) divided by the number of filling seeds at Sampling Date t.
Our results demonstrate that the rate of individual seed N accumulation is unaffected by intra-plant position of seeds. Consequently, the rates of individual seed N accumulation ([SNR.sub.n (t to t+1]) at each analyzed node (Nodes 1, 3, and 5 for P2 and Solara; Nodes 1, 4, and 7 for Frisson) were averaged to assess the rate of individual seed N accumulation between two sampling dates in all filling seeds ([SNR.sub.(t to t+1)]) for each treatment in both experiments.
Regardless of the experiment (field or glasshouse), the genotype (P2, Frisson, or Solara), and the treatment (N supply, depodding, and defoliation), the rate of individual seed N accumulation was related to the N available per seed (Fig. 4): the rate of individual seed N accumulation increased sharply with N available per seed until a N available per seed of approximately 15 mg N [seed.sup.-1]. Above this level, the rate of individual seed N accumulation was constant. The data were well fitted ([r.sup.2] = 0.94) by the following equation:
[SNR.sub.(t to t+1]) = 4311 - exp(-0.209 x [NAS.sub.(t to t+1)])],
where 43 [micro]g [seed.sup.-1] degree-day-1 can be considered as the maximum rate of individual seed N accumulation.
[Figure 4 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The relationship between the N available per seed and the rate of individual seed N accumulation is biphasic. In the first phase, increasing the N available per seed produced an increase in the rate of individual seed N accumulation. During this phase, the N available per seed and the rate of individual seed N accumulation were generally lower for genotype Frisson than for Solara (Fig. 4). These results suggest that when N available per seed is source limiting, in planta genotypic differences in the rate of seed N accumulation could be in part due to differences in N available per seed between genotypes. This hypothesis is consistent with results for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), showing that the differences in ear N accumulation between two genotypes are greatly decreased by in vitro culture in the same medium (Donovan and Lee, 1978). In the second phase of the relationship, increasing the N available per seed did not allow any increase in the rate of individual seed N accumulation. The maximum rate of seed N accumulation was mainly observed with the depodding treatments on the genotype Solara in the glasshouse experiment (Fig. 4). Consequently, it was not possible to establish whether the maximum rate of seed N accumulation depended on genotype.
Seed N accumulation during the filling period is a key feature of models simulating yield establishment in grain legumes (Sinclair and de Wit, 1976; Sinclair, 1986). The loss of nitrogen transferred from leaves to filling seeds has been shown to lead to a decline in leaf photosynthetic capability (Lugg and Sinclair, 1981; Sinclair and Horie, 1989). To simulate this plant "self destruction'' process, Sinclair and de Wit (1976) estimated the rate of seed N accumulation by a constant proportion of the seed growth rate, corresponding to an assumed mean N concentration of seeds valid during all the filling period. Our data give evidences against this assumption. These data are consistent with the results obtained in vitro by Hayati et al. (1996), showing that the seed N accumulation rate was independent of the seed growth rate in soybean.
The relationship between the rate of individual seed N accumulation and the N available per seed presented in this study should lead to great improvements in the modeling of N partitioning during seed filling in legume plants. This relationship will be useful to determine the amount of N provided to filling seeds in pea. Thus, the decrease in N content in vegetative plant parts could be better simulated in order to determine the duration of seed filling (Munier-Jolain et al., 1996). This relationship will be also of value for predicting final seed N concentration (the ratio of the seed N accumulation rate and the seed growth rate).
However, this relationship has limitations. Some reports suggest that the processes leading to N assimilate availability to the seeds such as remobilization of N from vegetative parts can be influenced by temperature (Paulsen, 1994) or by diseases (Garry et al., 1996). Thus, the simulation of the seed N accumulation rate during the filling period presented in this study could be further improved by a better understanding of these processes.
Our grateful thanks are due to the technical assistance of the INRA laboratory and the experimental management staff in Dijon. This work was partly funded by UNIP, Biopole Vegetal de Picardie, SIDO and Conseil Regional de Picardie.
Abbreviations: BSL, beginning of seed filling at the last reproductive node; DW, dry weight; NA, amount of nitrogen available to seeds; NAS, nitrogen available per seed; Nremob; amount of remobilizable nitrogen; Nveg, nitrogen content in vegetative parts; SNR, individual seed nitrogen accumulation rate.
Caloin, M., and O. Yu. 1984. Analysis of the time course of change in nitrogen concentration in Dactylis glomerata L. using a model of plant growth. Ann. Bot. (London) 54:69-76.
Cousin, R. 1983. Breeding for yield and for protein content in pea. p. 146-164. In R. Thompson and R. Casey (ed.) Perspectives for peas and lupinus as protein crops. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Donovan, G.R., and J.W. Lee. 1978. Effect of nitrogen source on grain development in detached wheat heads in liquid culture. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:81-87.
Duc, G., and A. Messager. 1989. Mutagenesis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and the isolation of mutants for nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Plant Sci. 60:207-213.
Egli, D.B., E.L. Ramseur, Y. Zhen-Wen, and C.H. Sullivan. 1989. Source-sink alterations affect the number of cells in soybean cotyledons. Crop Sci. 29:732-735.
Garry, G., B. Tivoli, M.H. Jeuffroy, and J. Citharel. 1996. Effects of Aschochyta caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes on the translocation of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds from the leaf and hull to the seed of dried-pea. Plant Pathol. 45:769-777.
Guldan, S.J., and W.A. Brun. 1985. Relationship of cotyledon cell number and seed respiration to soybean seed growth. Crop Sci. 25:815-819.
Hanway, J.J., and C.R. Weber. 1971. Dry matter accumulation of eight soybean cultivars (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) varieties. Agron. J. 63:227-230.
Hayati, R., D.B. Egli, and S.J. Crafts-Brandner. 1995. Carbon and nitrogen supply during seed filling and leaf senescence in soybean. Crop Sci. 35:1063-1069.
Hayati, R., D.B. Egli, and S.J. Crafts-Brandner. 1996. Independence of nitrogen supply and seed growth in soybean: studies using an in vitro culture system. J. Exp. Bot. 47:33-40.
Holl, F.B., and J.R. Vose. 1980. Carbohydrate and protein accumulation in the developing field pea seed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:1109-I 114. Jenner, C.F., T.D. Ugalde, and D. Aspinall. 1991. The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18:211-226.
Jensen, E.S. 1987. Seasonal patterns of growth and nitrogen fixation in field-grown pea. Plant Soil. 101:29-37.
Jones, R.J., and S.R. Simmons. 1983. Effect of altered source-sink ratio on growth of maize kernels. Crop Sci. 23:129-134.
Karjalainen, R., and S. Kortet. 1987. Environmental and genetic variation in protein content of peas under northern conditions and breeding implications. J. Agric. Sci. Finl. 59:1-9.
Lemaire, G., B. Onillon, G. Gosse, M. Chartier, and J.M. Allirand. 1991. Nitrogen distribution within a lucerne canopy during re-growth: Relation with light distribution. Ann. Bot. (London) 68: 483-488.
Lepo, J.E., and S.M. Ferrenbach. 1987. Measurement of nitrogen fixation by direct means, p. 221-255. In G.H. Elkan (ed.) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation technology. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Lugg, D.G., and T.R. Sinclair. 1981. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis of field-grown soybean leaflets. II. Relation to nitrogen content. Photosynthetica 15:138-144.
Monti, L.M. 1983. Natural and induced variability in peas for protein production, p. 23-29. In R. Thompson and R. Casey (ed.) Perspectives for peas and lupinus as protein crops. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Munier-Jolain, N.G. 1994. Etude de la variabilite du poids individuel des graines du soja de type indetermine (Glycine max (L.) Merrill, cv Maple Arrow). Influence de l'apparition sequentielle des organes reproducteurs. These de Doctorat INA-PG, Institut National Agronomique, Paris.
Munier-Jolain, N.G., N.M. Munier-Jolain, R. Roche, B. Ney, and C. Duthion. 1998. Seed growth rate in legumes. I: Effect of photoassimilate availability on seed growth rate. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1963-1969.
Munier-Jolain, N.G., and B. Ney. 1998. Seed growth rate in legumes. II: Seed growth rate depends on cotyledon cell number. J. Exp. Bot. 49:1971-1976.
Munier-Jolain, N.G., B. Ney, and C. Duthion. 1996. Termination of seed growth in relation to nitrogen content of vegetative parts in soybean plants. Eur. J. Agron. 5:219--225.
Ney, B., and O. Turc. 1993. Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci. 33:510-514.
Ney, B., C. Duthion, and E. Fontaine. 1993. Timing of reproductive abortions in relation to cell division, water content, and growth of pea seeds. Crop Sci. 33:267-270.
Pate, J.S. 1985. Physiology of pea -- A comparison with other legumes in terms of economy of carbon and nitrogen in whole-plant and organ functioning, p. 279-295. In P.D. Hebblethwaite et al. (ed.) The pea crop. Butterworth, London.
Paulsen, G.M. 1994. High temperature response of crop plants, p. 365-389. In K.J. Boote et al. (ed.) Physiology and determination of crop yield. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
Peoples, M.B.. and M.J. Dalling. 1988. The inter-play between proteolysis and amino acid metabolism during senescence and nitrogen re-allocation, p. 181-217. In L.D. Nooden and A.C. Leopold (ed.) Senescence and aging in plants. Academic Press, New York.
Peoples, M.B., J.S. Pate, and C.A. Atkins. 1983. Mobilization of nitrogen in fruiting plants of a cultivar of cowpea. J. Exp. Bot. 34: 563-578.
SAS Institute, 1987. SAS/STAT guide for personal computer, 6th ed., SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
Sinclair, T.R. 1986. Water and nitrogen limitations in soybean grain production. I. Model development. Field Crop Res. 15:125-141.
Sinclair, T.R., and C.T. de Wit. 1975. Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 18: 565-567.
Sinclair, T.R., and C.T. de Wit. 1976. Analysis of carbon and nitrogen limitations to soybean yield. Agron. J. 68:319-324.
Sinclair, T.R., and T. Horie. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Sci. 29:90-98.
Singletary, G.W., and F.E. Below. 1989. Growth and composition of maize kernels cultured in vitro with varying supplies of carbon and nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 89:341-346.
Sparrow, S.D., V.L. Cochran, and E.B. Sparrow. 1995. Dinitrogen fixation by seven legumes crops in Alaska. Agron. J. 87:34-41.
Streeter, J.G. 1978. Effect of N starvation of soybean plants at various stages of growth on seed yield and N concentration of plant parts at maturity. Agron. J. 70:74-76.
Warembourg, F.R., and M.P. Fernandez. 1985. Distribution and remobilization of symbiotically fixed nitrogen in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Physiol. Plant. 65:281-286.
Annabelle Lhuillier-Soundele, Nathalie G. Munier-Jolain,(*) and Bertrand Ney
A. Lhuillier-Soundele and N.G. Munier-Jolain, Unite de Malherbologie et Agronomie, INRA, 17 rue Sully, BV 1540, F-21034 Dijon cedex, France. B. Ney, Laboratoire d'Agronomie, INRA INAP-G, F-78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France. Received 14 Dec. 1998. (*)Corresponding author (email@example.com).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Lhuillier-Soundele, Annabelle; Munier-Jolain, Nathalie G.; Ney, Bertrand|
|Date:||Nov 1, 1999|
|Previous Article:||CROP PHYSIOLOGY & METABOLISM.|
|Next Article:||Carbon and Nitrogen Reserve Remobilization Following Defoliation: Nitrogen and Elevated [CO.sub.2] Effects.|