Influence of Marsh Flooding on the Abundance and Growth of Fundulus heteroclitus in Salt Marsh Creeks.
Tidal creek flooding onto the marsh determines the vegetation in the area surrounding the creek. Spartina alterniflora grows on the marsh adjacent to the creek that floods on every high tide, whereas S. patens grows on the higher marsh that floods less frequently. We measured the length from the creek edge to the transition between S. alterniflora and S. patens at increments along the creek. The mean of these measurements multiplied by the length of the creek was considered the area of marsh accessible to mummichogs at high tides. This area is equivalent to the area of marsh adjacent to the creek covered by S. alterniflora. A comparison of the regularly flooded area in the 5 tidal creeks that were part of our study is shown in Figure 1a.
We measured the abundance and growth of F. heteroclitus in tidal salt marsh creeks of the Rowley River in the Plum Island Estuary in northeastern Massachusetts (42 [degrees] 44[minutes] N x 70 [degrees] 50 [minutes] W). Over 6 weeks, catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) was measured three times in each of five salt marsh creeks. Ten minnow traps (6.35-mm mesh), spaced evenly in the primary tidal creeks, were set at high tide and retrieved about 5 h later during low tide. In two of the creeks, we measured growth of mummichog young-of-the-year, the life stage in which the most dramatic growth occurs. Four times during the 6 weeks (first three times coincided with CPUE measurements, plus one additional growth measurement), the total lengths of between 275 and 1000 fish from each creek were measured, and length-frequency histograms were constructed. Probability paper was used, according to the method described by Harding (6), to identify the young-of-the-year cohort from the length-frequency histograms. Mean values from each set of measurements were plotted to evaluate growth.
Catch-per-unit-effort measurements indicated that mummichogs tended to be more abundant in creeks with greater areas of frequently flooded marsh (correlation coefficient = 0.83, P = 0.09) [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1b OMITTED]. This relationship suggests that creeks with increased marsh flooding are able to support a larger population of mummichogs by providing greater regularly flooded areas for foraging, or that creeks with increased flooding offer greater refuge from predation. Mummichogs that follow the high tide onto the marsh surface become more exposed to predation by shorebirds, but they gain protection from predation by larger fish, the more likely predator. Although the creeks are very similar, properties other than regularly flooded area - including dimensions, water volume, temperature regime, productivity, and food availability - may affect the abundance of mummichogs in a creek.
The pattern of growth was the same for young-of-the-year mummichogs in Sweeney Creek and Club Head Creek [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1c OMITTED]. However, the mean total length values of mummichogs from Sweeney Creek were significantly greater than mean total length measurements from Club Head Creek (Complete Randomized Block ANOVA P [less than] 0.05). Though statistically significant, the very small mean difference between measurements of 1.25 mm is unlikely to be of ecological significance, especially since the pattern of growth did not differ between the creeks. Unlike in enclosure experiments in which mummichogs were denied access to the marsh (4, 5), all fish in our study could access the marsh, though the extent of this access differed among creeks. Thus, because the lower marsh is accessible at every high tide, differences in regularly flooded accessible marsh area may not be great enough to cause a large difference in mummichog growth.
This work was funded by NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates through the Boston University Marine Program and the Plum Island Sound Long-term Ecological Research Program. We thank Simon Panall, Nate Tsao, Marc McDonnell, Susan Oleszko, Joao Salgado, Jaimie Champagne, and Jeff Hughes for their help with the project.
1. Butner, A., and B. H. Brattstrom. 1960. Copeia 1960: 139-141.
2. Weisberg, S. B., R. Whalen, and V. A. Lotrich. 1981. Mar. Biol. 61: 243-246.
3. Kneib, R. T., and A. E. Stiven. 1978. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31: 121-140.
4. Weisberg, S. B., and V. A. Lotrich. 1982. Mar. Biol. 66: 307-310.
5. Javonillo, R., L. Deegan, K. Chiaravalle, and J. Hughes. 1997. Biol. Bull. 193: 288-289.
6. Harding, J.P. 1949. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 28: 141-153.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Komarow, Sharon; Young, Talia; Deegan, Linda; Garritt, Robert|
|Publication:||The Biological Bulletin|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Oct 1, 1999|
|Previous Article:||Population Size and Summer Home Range of the Green Crab, Carcinus maenas, in Salt Marsh Tidal Creeks.|
|Next Article:||Decline of a Horseshoe Crab Population on Cape Cod.|