Printer Friendly

Influence of Disc Size on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cirrus Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.

1. Purpose

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a chronic disease characterized by a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells [1]. This cell loss leads to structural damage that includes a progressive regional or diffuse thinning of both the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and the neuroretinal rim within the optic nerve head (ONH), followed by functional loss, as shown by progressive visual field defects [2].

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive technology that has been extensively used to evaluate many retinal and optic nerve diseases. OCT can be used to analyze and measure not only the peripapillary RNFL thickness [3-5] but also topographic parameters of the ONH, including the disc area, neuroretinal rim area, and the cup-to-disc ratio [6]. Since 2002, time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) has been used for ONH analysis. The recently validated spectral-domain technology, such as the Cirrus HD-OCT (version 5) (Carl Zeiss Meditec), has been shown to provide a better approach for identifying the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the vicinity of the disc, thereby ensuring that the termination point of Bruch's membrane can be found [7, 8]. Moreover, software version 6.0 of the Cirrus HD-OCT system has led to a further significant improvement of the ONH segmentation quality.

The Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany) is the leading device for 3-dimensional quantitative studies and classification of the ONH shape [9, 10]. Subsequent studies have shown that the accuracy of the discrimination between normality and glaucoma is significantly influenced by both the ONH shape and size. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that larger optic discs are associated with lower specificities, while smaller discs are associated with lower sensitivities [11-14]. Therefore, these can potentially limit the role of quantitative ONH assessments during the clinical diagnostic process.

The purpose of the current study was to examine the influence of the ONH size on the diagnostic accuracy of the ONH quantitative assessment determined by the Cirrus HD-OCT.

2. Methods

A total of 71 glaucoma patients and 51 normal participants were enrolled in the study. All patients were examined at Kagawa University Hospital between August 2012 and November 2012. Among the patients, 27 had POAG while 44 had normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). After being provided with a detailed explanation of the study, all eligible participants signed an informed consent form in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of the Kagawa University Hospital approved this study. The normal control group consisted of participants attending outpatient clinics, spouses and friends of the recruited patients, and volunteers from our hospital staff.

All participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. Tests performed included visual acuity testing with refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, gonioscopy examination, and a dilated fundus examination with stereoscopic biomicroscopy of the optic nerve head conducted via slit lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopy. All participants were required to have a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, a spherical error within a range between +4.0 and -6.0 diopters, a cylinder within [+ or -] 2.0 diopters, and open angles (grade 3 and 4 according to Shaffer grading) in order to be included in the study. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of any kind of retinal pathology or neurologic disease or had previously undergone a retinal laser procedure or retinal surgery. One eye was randomly chosen for examination in each participant in the study. The enrolled normal controls were required to have a normal visual field with an IOP [less than or equal to] 21 mmHg and no history of retinal pathology. Eyes were defined as being glaucomatous if they exhibited structural glaucomatous changes that included a cup-to-disc ratio of [greater than or equal to] 0.6, vertical cup-disc asymmetry between fellow eyes of [greater than or equal to] 0.2, and narrowing of the neuroretinal rim, notches, localized pallor, or the presence of defects in the RNFL with glaucomatous VF loss in the corresponding hemifield. In order for the VF to be defined as glaucomatous, the glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) had to be outside of the normal limits, and after excluding the points on the edge of the field or those directly above and below the blind spot, it was necessary for at least three contiguous test points to be present within the same hemifield on the pattern deviation plot at P < 1%, with at least one at P < 0.5% [15]. The target condition under investigation was "definite glaucoma," and the reference standard in this study was VF defect definition and structural glaucomatous change.

The severity of the visual field damage was assessed using the VF index (VFI). Details of the VFI calculation have been described elsewhere [16]. In brief, the VFI represents the percentage of normal age-corrected visual function, with this value intended for use in calculating the progression rates and staging of glaucomatous functional damage. Use of VFI to evaluate the rate of functional loss in glaucomatous eyes has been suggested to be less susceptible than the mean deviation to the effects of cataract or diffuse media opacities [17]. VFI values can range from 100% (normal visual field) to 0% (perimetrically blind field).

3. Cirrus HD-OCT Imaging

All eyes were scanned by the Cirrus HD-OCT system, which used software version 6.0. The ONH was centered on the live image, after which the centering and enhancement were optimized. Subsequently, the laser scanned a 6 x 6 mm area, which captured a cube of data that consisted of 200 A-scans from 200 linear B-scans (40,000 points) over approximately 1.5 s (27,000 A-scans). After first determining the optic disc, the Cirrus HD-OCT algorithms automatically placed a calculation circle of 3.46 mm in diameter evenly around the disc. Software version 6.0 calculated the ONH parameter results via the use of a fully automatic algorithm that defined both the disc and cup margins within the three-dimensional data cube. The present study performed global measurements that included the disc area, rim area, cup-to-disc ratio, horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, and cup volume as previously described [18]. All the scans had a signal strength of at least 6. Both VF testing and OCT measurements were performed during the same visit.

4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were described by mean values [+ or -] standard deviation (SD) while categorical data were described by frequency analysis. Differences between the control and glaucoma groups were assessed by an independent Student's t-test, and the chi-square test for categorical parameters. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivities were compared between the parameters by choosing cutoff points that corresponded to a fixed 90% specificity. The influence of disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging devices under evaluation was assessed using the following method. The study population was first divided into 2 disc size groups based on the cutoff of the median value of the disc area [19]. Analyses were then performed in both groups, with the coefficient of variation (CoV) calculated for the sensitivity estimates using the following formula: CoV = [standard deviation of sensitivities across the disc size groups/mean of the sensitivities across the disc size groups] * 100. The influence of the optic disc size on the glaucoma diagnosis was subsequently assessed by each parameter of OCT and was assessed by likelihood ratio chi-square test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM, New York).

5. Results

Table 1 presents the basic characteristics of the diagnostic groups. Patients in the glaucoma group were significantly older than the participants in the normal group. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the disease severity, which was based on the VFI in the glaucomatous eyes. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the optic disc size in the entire cohort. The mean disc area was 1.91 [+ or -] 0.41 [mm.sup.2] (median, 1.84).

Thirty-four glaucoma patients and 25 normal participants were in small disc group and 37 glaucoma patients and 26 normal participants were in large disc group (Table 2). The rim area provided a sensitivity of 92% at a specificity of 90%, which corresponded to a cutoff of 0.96 [mm.sup.2]. The variability of the diagnosis sensitivity across the disc size ranged from 2.8% to 48.9%, with the rim area parameter found to produce the most stable values among the small and large discs (sensitivity of 88% and 92% in the small and large discs, respectively; CoV = 2.8%). Sensitivity at fixed specificity was recovered from the receiver operating characteristic curve plot.

Glaucoma diagnosis using the rim area was not affected (P = 0.17) by the disc size, although the other parameters were associated with diagnosis (P <0.05, Table 3).

There was no significant difference of disease severity between the large disc group (81.5 [+ or -] 21.1%) and the small disc group (75.7 [+ or -] 23.2%; P = 0.28).

6. Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that the optic disc size did not influence the accuracy of the Cirrus HD-OCT when determining the ONH rim area parameter. While the rim area was determined to be the most sensitive of the ONH parameters (sensitivity 92%), the cup volume, however, was found to be a poor diagnostic parameter. A previous study has shown that values above 80% for fixed specificities of 90% indicate very good discriminating capabilities between healthy and glaucomatous eyes [20].

Other previous studies [11-14] that used the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) have shown that the size of the optic disc can significantly influence the diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative ONH assessment, with larger discs associated with lower specificities and smaller discs associated with lower sensitivities. Coops et al. previously reported that optic disc size had a significant effect on the HRT3 classification, with an estimated 21% increase in the odds of a positive glaucoma probability score (GPS) classification and a 15% positive Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) classification for each 0.1 [mm.sup.2] increase in disc size [17]. The diagnostic accuracies for the HRT parameters, particularly the linear discriminant functions and the MRA, have been found to improve in conjunction with increasing disc sizes. It has been suggested that this may be due to difficulties in detecting the neuroretinal rim loss in a small disc as compared to a large disc [19].

In contrast to these previous findings, Medeiros et al. recently demonstrated that the sensitivities of the Cirrus HD-OCT RNFL parameters were not significantly influenced by the size of the optic disc [19]. Instead, they reported that larger discs were associated with higher sensitivities, and that these were responsible for significantly influencing the HRT diagnostic performance. It has also been reported that the disc size has no significant influence on the AUCs for any of the RTVue (Optovue, Fremont, CA) scanning protocols [21]. Additionally, the rim area has been shown to have very good sensitivities when above 80% for fixed specificities of 90% in both small and large discs. This demonstrates the excellent capabilities of this parameter for successfully discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. At the present time, it is unknown why HRT imaging is affected by disc size while OCT appears not to be affected. One possible explanation could be that there was a type II error associated with this study.

Since diagnostic accuracies are significantly influenced by disease severity [19, 21-23], it is important to adjust for the severity of diseases when comparing the effect of the disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging tests. In the current study, we found no significant differences for disease severity between the large and small disc groups.

One of the limitations of our current study was that the sample size in this study was modest, which could have led to relatively wide confidence limits for our estimates of the sensitivity. Also, we based the disc size in this study on the Cirrus HD-OCT disc area. By using the disc area from the same instrument, this could have potentially introduced bias for the other parameters that were being evaluated. Therefore, in order to determine more precise estimates of the diagnostic accuracy, larger studies will need to be undertaken in the future.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that Cirrus HD-OCT can be used to precisely determine the ONH rim area, with variations in the optic disc size having virtually no or only a minimal effect on the diagnostic accuracy.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5692404

Conflicts of Interest

We have no competing interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Forte Science Communications for proofreading this manuscript.

References

[1] H. A. Quigley, "Glaucoma," The Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9774, pp. 1367-1377, 2011.

[2] G. R. Douglas, S. M. Drance, and M. Schulzer, "A correlation of fields and discs in open angle glaucoma," Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 391-398, 1974.

[3] M. Takagishi, K. Hirooka, T. Baba, M. Mizote, and F. Shiraga, "Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual field sensitivity," Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 383-387, 2011.

[4] E. J. Lee, T. W. Kim, K. H. Park, M. Seong, H. Kim, and D. M. Kim, "Ability of Stratus OCT to detect progressive retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy in glaucoma," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 662-668, 2009.

[5] G. Savini, C. Bellusci, M. Carbonelli et al., "Detection and quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic disc edema using stratus OCT," Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 1111-1117, 2006.

[6] F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, C. Bowd, R. M. Vessani, R. Susanna Jr, and R. N. Weinreb, "Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography," American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 44-55, 2005.

[7] J. C. Mwanza, R. T. Chang, D. L. Budenz et al., "Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 5724-5730, 2010.

[8] G. Savini, P. Barboni, V. Parisi, and M. Carbonelli, "The influence of axial length on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic-disc size measurements by spectral-domain OCT," The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 57-61, 2012.

[9] A. Ferreras, A. B. Pajarin, V. Polo, J. M. Larrosa, L. E. Pablo, and F. M. Honrubia, "Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis," Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1981-1987.e1, 2007.

[10] Z. Burgansky-Eliash, G. Wollstein, R. A. Bilonick, H. Ishikawa, L. Kagemann, and J. S. Schuman, "Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3," Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 466-471, 2007.

[11] D. F. Garway-Heath and R. A. Hitchings, "Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology," British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 82, no. 9, p. 986, 1998.

[12] F. Oddone, M. Centofanti, L. Rossetti et al., "Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study," Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 1358-1365.e3, 2008.

[13] F. Oddone, M. Centofanti, M. Iester et al., "Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study," Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1106-1111.e3, 2009.

[14] V. Pueyo, V. Polo, J. M. Larrosa, A. Ferreras, L. E. Pablo, and F. M. Honrubia, "Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph, optical coherence tomograph, and scanning laser polarimeter in open-angle glaucoma," Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173-177, 2007.

[15] D. R. Anderson and V. M. Patella, Automated Static Perimetry, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2nd edition, 1999.

[16] B. Bengtsson and A. Heijl, "A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression," American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 343-353, 2008.

[17] A. Coops, D. B. Henson, A. J. Kwartz, and P. H. Artes, "Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5348-5355, 2006.

[18] S. Sato, K. Hirooka, T. Baba, and F. Shiraga, "Comparison of optic nerve head parameters using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography," Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 721-726, 2012.

[19] F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, C. Bowd, P. A. Sample, and R. N. Weinreb, "Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1008-1015, 2006.

[20] F. Oddone, M. Centofanti, L. Tanga et al., "Influence of disc size on optic nerve head versus retinal nerve fiber layer assessment for diagnosing glaucoma," Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1340-1347, 2011.

[21] H. L. Rao, M. T. Leite, R. N. Weinreb et al., "Effect of disease severity and optic disc size on diagnostic accuracy of RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in glaucoma," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1290-1296, 2011.

[22] F. A. Medeiros, C. Bowd, L. M. Zangwill, C. Patel, and R. N. Weinreb, "Detection of glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation," Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 3146-3153, 2007.

[23] L. M. Hoesl, C. Y. Mardin, F. K. Horn, A. G. M. Juenemann, and R. Laemmer, "Influence of glaucomatous damage and optic disc size on glaucoma detection by scanning laser tomography," Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 385-389, 2009.

Shino Sato, Kaori Ukegawa, Eri Nitta, and Kazuyuki Hirooka

Department of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Kazuyuki Hirooka; kazuyk@med.kagawa- u.ac.jp

Received 30 May 2017; Revised 15 February 2018; Accepted 28 February 2018; Published 11 April 2018

Academic Editor: Lisa Toto

Caption: Figure 1: Distribution of disease severity, as measured by the VFI in the glaucoma group.

Caption: Figure 2: Distribution of optic disc size in the entire cohort.
Table 1: Clinical characteristics in study participants.

                                 Normal               Glaucoma

N                                  51                    71
Age (y)                    61.0 [+ or -] 10.1    64.5 [+ or -] 11.7
Gender (M/F)                      24/27                 25/46
MD (dB)                                          -6.85 [+ or -] 7.66
VFI (%)                                          78.4 [+ or -] 22.1
Disc size ([mm.sup.2])     1.89 [+ or -] 0.36    1.92 [+ or -] 0.45
Spherical equivalent (D)   -1.26 [+ or -] 1.98   -1.00 [+ or -] 2.30

                           P value

N
Age (y)                     0.09
Gender (M/F)                0.19
MD (dB)
VFI (%)
Disc size ([mm.sup.2])      0.64
Spherical equivalent (D)    0.51

M: male; F: female; MD: mean deviation; VFI: visual field index.

Table 2: Sensitivity at fixed specificity of optic nerve head measured
by Cirrus HD-OCT in control and in glaucoma.

                           All discs

                Sensitivity at      Cutoff
               specificity > 90%

Rim area             0.92           0.96 *
Average C/D          0.68            0.74
Vertical C/D         0.83            0.71
Cup volume           0.37          0.45 (#)

                         Small discs

                Sensitivity at      Cutoff
               specificity > 90%

Rim area             0.88           0.88*
Average C/D          0.71            0.69
Vertical C/D         0.76            0.71
Cup volume            0.5          0.33 (#)

                         Large discs

                Sensitivity at      Cutoff    Sensitivity
               specificity > 90%                CoV (%)

Rim area             0.92           0.96 *        2.8
Average C/D          0.76            0.76         4.9
Vertical C/D         0.89            0.78        10.9
Cup volume           0.24          0.73 (#)      48.9

CoV: coefficient of variation of sensitivity across small and large
disc groups; *: [mm.sup.2]; (#): [mm.sup.3].

Table 3: Factors associated with the diagnostic accuracy of disc size.

               P value

Rim area       0.17
Average C/D    <0.01
Vertical C/D   0.02
Cup volume     <0.01
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Sato, Shino; Ukegawa, Kaori; Nitta, Eri; Hirooka, Kazuyuki
Publication:Journal of Ophthalmology
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:3311
Previous Article:Role of the Epipapillary Membrane in Maculopathy Associated with Cavitary Optic Disc Anomalies: Morphology, Surgical Outcomes, and Histopathology.
Next Article:Mutation Spectrum of the ABCA4 Gene in a Greek Cohort with Stargardt Disease: Identification of Novel Mutations and Evidence of Three Prevalent...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |