Infection with Spodoptera litura NPV Reduces Food Consumption and Weight Gain of Spodoptera litura Larvae.
Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedroviruses, Food consumption, Weight gain, Spodoptera litura.
The Baculoviridae (King et al., 2012) are a large family of invertebrate viruses that are found ubiquitously in insects (notably members of the orders Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Diptera) in natural habitats. They are attractive biological control agents for lepidopteran insect pests due to their insecticidal properties, host specificity, safety to non-target animals and lack of toxic residues in the environment (Inceoglu et al., 2006; Szewczyk et al., 2006). However, baculoviruses have limitations, which are restricting their use for insect control in practice. Research is thus required to mitigate or eliminate these limitations.
A key limitation is a relatively slow speed of kill as compared to chemical insecticides (Moscardi et al., 2011; Beas-Catena et al., 2014; Knox et al., 2015). It may take several days to a few weeks before infected larvae die or stop feeding (Vasconcelos et al., 2005). Feeding may continue until the insects eventually die (Glass, 1958; Subrahmanyam and Ramakrishnan, 1981). Crop losses following the application of baculoviruses may therefore still be substantial (Bonning and Hammock, 1994; Bianchi et al., 2000a). To eliminate this drawback, fast-acting baculoviruses can be selected for or can be genetically modified to improve the speed of kill and reduce crop losses (Inceoglu et al., 2006; Szewczyk et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2009; Cai et al., 2010; Georgievska et al., 2010). However, these recombinant viruses have reduced within-host fitness compared to their parent wild-type virus (Cory, 2000; Zwart et al., 2009; Georgievska et al., 2010).
It is also difficult to produce recombinant viruses in vivo because the yield per cadaver is lower than for wild-type viruses (Sun et al., 2005). In addition, such recombinant viruses, being GMO, meets public resistance and is not compatible with organic production methods. So, selection for fast-acting baculovirus strains is an attractive option.
Feeding behaviour of infected larvae determines the extent to which baculoviruses can protect crops against feeding damage (Hoover et al., 1995). Baculoviruses delay the moult of larval hosts (reviewed by Clem and Passarelli, 2013). Normally, insect larvae cease feeding during larval-larval and larval-pupal moults during their life span (O'Reilly and Miller, 1989). However, infection with baculoviruses interferes with this feeding arrest, resulting in a prolonged feeding period after viral infection and increased weight gain by infected larvae to maximise virus yield (O'Reilly and Miller, 1991). For instance, Subrahmanyam and Ramakrishnan (1981) demonstrated that Spodoptera litura larvae that are exposed to and infected with Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus (SpltNPV) continue feeding until death and consumed more food than the unexposed larvae.
On the other hand, Vasconcelos et al. (2005) reported that baculovirus infected Mamestra brassicae larvae caused significantly less defoliation in cabbage plants than uninfected larvae.
There are thus contradictory observations in previous studies regarding food consumption and crop damage by baculovirus infected larvae as compared to healthy larvae. A detailed understanding of food consumption following infection by baculoviruses is needed to design effective use strategies for baculoviruses against insect pests. Therefore, a case-by-case approach is required to study this aspect, in the current case the leafworm S. litura and its baculovirus SpltNPV.
This study addresses three questions: (i) are food intake and weight gain of larvae reduced or not when they are infected with SpltNPV? (ii) if there is a reduction in food intake and weight gain, when does it set in following exposure to the baculovirus? (iii) is there any difference in food intake and weight gain between unexposed larvae and those that exposed to the virus but survived infection, i.e. are there sublethal effects on food intake and weight gain in those larvae that do not get lethally infected but have been exposed? These issues need to be addressed in order to design an optimal spraying regime to achieve minimal crop damage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Insect rearing and the SpltNPV-Pak-BNG isolate
A S. litura colony was maintained in the insectary of the National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Islamabad, Pakistan. Insects were reared at 26+-2AdegC, 50-60% relative humidity and 14h:10h day-night photoperiod on a semi-synthetic diet as described in Ali et al. (2018b). We used newly moulted 4th instar larvae of S. litura to evaluate the feeding and weight gain response by the infected and healthy larvae.
The SpltNPV-Pak-BNG isolate used in this experiment was collected from cotton in the Bahawalnagar district of Punjab, Pakistan, and was amplified in vivo in 3rd instar larvae of S. litura. Occlusion bodies (OBs) were purified from dead larvae according to Ali et al. (2018b). The viral concentrations were prepared by counting the OBs in the virus suspension using a haemocytometer (Neubauer) using phase contrast light microscopy. The SpltNPV-Pak-BNG isolate has a median lethal dose (LD50) of 1.88x104 OBs / larva and a median survival time (ST50) of 108 h post infection (hpi) in 4th instar larvae of S litura (Ali et al., 2018b).
Two viral stock concentrations, 3x106 and 3x107 OBs/ml, respectively, were prepared for conducting leaf disc bioassays to monitor feeding reduction and/or weight gain. In each assay, 45 newly moulted 4th instar larvae were individually placed in 24-well tissue culture plates (bottom diameter of 15.5 mm) to avoid cannibalism, and starved for 15 h. The larvae were then fed using leaf discs inoculated with OBs. Fresh tender leaves of young Ricinus communis plants were cut into 3 mm2 pieces and placed on a 1% plant agar-solidified solution in the 24-well tissue culture plates. The plant agar kept the tender leaves moist and prevented them from drying out. A 3.33 ul volume of viral suspension was placed on each leaf disc and allowed to air-dry. Fifteen leaves were inoculated with the 3x106 OBs/ml solution, while fifteen other leaves were inoculated with the 3x107 OBs/ml solution. The 15 remaining leaves were mock inoculated with distilled water.
The resulting viral doses (dose=D) on the leaf disks were D1=104, D2=105, and D0=0 OBs, respectively. The overnight-starved larvae were exposed to the leaf discs for 24 h and kept at 26+-2AdegC overnight in a climate chamber. Ten inoculated larvae that had eaten the whole leaf disc (randomly chosen) were weighed and transferred to 6-well tissue culture plates (bottom diameter of 35 mm) having a weighed amount of artificial diet plugs. The 6-wells plates were then covered with parafilm, tissue paper and by the original lid to prevent larval escape. Larvae were incubated at 26+-2 AdegC and a 14h:10h day-night photoperiod in a climate chamber.
Food consumed and weight gain by individual larvae were determined every 24 h during the first three days and subsequently every 12 h until death or pupation using a PW 214 Analytical Balance (USA) with a readability range of 0.1 mg to 210 g. The remaining diet plugs were weighed to assess the food consumed by the larvae. The larvae were also weighed to determine increase/loss in body weight. The remaining diet plugs and excrements were removed and replaced with fresh, weighed plugs of artificial diet. This process was continued for each larva until death or pupation. The experiment was conducted in three replicates.
Initially, food consumption and weight gain of individual replicates was analyzed for five groups of larvae: exposed infected larvae, exposed but not infected (exposed surviving) larvae for each of the two dose treatments and the unexposed larvae. No significant differences were detected in food consumption and weight gain among the replicates. The data from three replicates therefore were combined to determine food consumption and weight gain for all the three treatments, through comparing the mean and by using a univariate generalized linear model in SPSS (IBM Corp, 2012). Pairwise comparisons were conducted using t-tests in R to find differences between the treatments means at P a$? 0.05.
Fourth instar larvae of S. litura were infected with SpltNPV in a leaf disk bioassay. Two doses were applied with 104 and 105 OBs per larva, respectively (Table I). Mortality increased with viral dose. No mortality was observed in mock-infected larvae (unexposed). The number of larvae dying at the lower dose of 104 OBs per larva was 4, 3 and 3 in replicates 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The number of larvae dying at the higher dose of 105 OBs per larva was 7, 7 and 10 in replicates 1, 2 and 3, respectively (Table I). The overall mortality was 33% and 80%, respectively, for the lower and higher dose.
Exposed larvae that became infected and eventually died ate 59% (dose: 1x104 OBs/larva) or 58% (dose: 1x105 OBs/larva) less for than exposed insects that did not die following OB exposure. There was thus no viral dose dependency in food intake by exposed infected larvae, but the difference between exposed infected and unexposed (control) larvae was highly significant (P a$? 0.05; Table II).
Table I.- Mortality of 4th instar larvae of S. litura challenged with different viral doses (OBs/larva).
Replicates###Control###Low dose###High dose
###(104 OBs/larva)###(105 OBs/larva)
There was no significant difference between the virus doses. In addition, there was also no significant difference in food intake between larvae of the unexposed group and exposed surviving of OBs exposure. Differences in cumulative food consumption between exposed infected larvae and those that are either unexposed or that exposed surviving emerge between 72 and 96 hpi (Fig. 1). There was no viral dose-food intake dependency among the exposed infected larvae. The feeding of exposed infected larvae stopped completely at ~120 hpi, whereas feeding of noninfected or exposed surviving larvae stopped at ~140 hpi, prior to moulting.
Table II.- Food consumption by 4th instar larvae of S. litura till pupation or death upon challenge with different viral doses.
Replicates###Mean food consumed (g+-SE)
###Control###Low dose (104 OBs/larva)###High dose (105 OBs/larva)
Replicate 1###2.84+-0.16a (n = 10)###1.04+-0.26b (n = 4)###2.85+-0.2a (n = 6)###1.20+-0.19b (n = 7)###2.45+-0.30a (n = 3)
Replicate 2###2.66+-0.27a (n = 10)###1.18+-0.49b (n = 3)###2.82+-0.32a (n = 7)###1.09+-0.32b (n = 7)###3.01+-0.49a (n = 3)
Replicate 3###2.66+-0.22a (n = 10)###1.32+-0.39b (n = 3)###2.80+-0.26a (n = 7)###1.14+-0.22b (n = 10)###00+-00 (n = 0)
Pooled data###2.83+-0.12a (n = 30)###1.17+-0.21b (n = 10)###2.83+-0.15a (n = 20) 1.15+-0.14b (n = 24)###2.73+-0.27a (n = 6)
Table III.- Weight gain by 4th instar larvae of S. litura challenged with different viral doses.
Replicates###Mean weight gain (g+-SE)
###Control###Low dose (104 OBs/larva)###High dose (105 OBs/larva)
Replicate 1###0.91+-0.06a (n = 10)###0.21+-0.09b (n = 4)###0.85+-0.08a (n = 6)###0.24+-0.07b (n = 7)###0.67+-0.11a (n = 3)
Replicate 2###0.69+-0.07a (n = 10)###0.29+-0.13b (n = 3)###0.85+-0.08a (n = 7)###0.20+-0.08b (n = 7)###0.84+-0.13a (n = 3)
Replicate 3###0.78+-0.06a (n = 10###0.39+-0.10b (n = 3)###0.70+-0.07a (n = 7)###0.25+-0.06b (n = 10)###00+-00 (n= 0)
Pooled data###0.79+0.04a (n = 30)###0.29+0.06b (n = 10)###0.80+0.04a (n = 20)###0.23+0.04b (n = 24)###0.75+0.08a (n = 6)
The difference in weight gain between the virus exposed infected larvae that died and those that exposed surviving was highly significant (P a$? 0.05; Table III). There was no viral dose dependency in weight gain by the exposed infected larvae. There was also no significant difference in weight gain by larvae of the unexposed and exposed surviving that were exposed but did not get overt infection (polyhedrosis). Differences in cumulative weight gain between exposed infected larvae and those that are either unexposed or that exposed surviving emerged between 72 and 96 hpi (Fig. 2).
The most important parameter of successful control using insecticides is speed of action and the time at which exposed insects stop feeding. In the case of SpltNPV-Pak-BNG and S. litura, there was a highly significant difference in food intake and weight gain between unexposed and exposed infected larvae. Viral infection impaired food intake and reduced weight gain. There was no dose dependency in the effects of baculovirus infection on food consumption or weight gain and there was no difference in food consumption and weight gain between unexposed and exposed infected larvae during the first 48-72 h after OB ingestion. A significant difference between the exposed infected and unexposed larvae in food consumption and weight became apparent between 72 and 96 hpi. Exposed infected larvae consumed less food than the exposed larvae that did not become infected (exposed surviving). We found no significant difference in food intake between unexposed and exposed larvae surviving infection.
It is possible that in the latter a latent or persistent infection was established (viral presence), but then this did not affect the feeding behaviour of these exposed but surviving larvae. Such infection, if present, can contribute to long-term management of pest populations, as latent or persistent infections can turn into overt infections (polyhedrosis) through biological and environmental stress factors (Milks et al., 1998; Myers et al., 2000; Duan and Otvos, 2001).
The timing of divergence in food consumption and weight gain between exposed surviving and exposed infected larvae in our study agree with the data of Vasconcelos et al. (2005) for M. brassicae. One to two days after exposure is the time when the larval host tries to overcome the viral infections by shedding infected midgut epithelial cells (Keddie et al., 1989). The infected host deploys its resources in this elimination process that would otherwise be used for larval host growth and this may reduce food consumption (Keddie et al., 1989; Cory et al., 1997; Cory and Meyers, 2003).
Earlier studies demonstrated that a limitation of naturally occurring wild-type baculovirus is their low speed of kill, which allows the insect pests to significantly damage the crops before they are controlled (Bonning and Hammock, 1994; Bianchi et al., 2000a). This is due to expression of the egt gene in baculovirus, which blocks moulting and interferes with normal feeding arrest during larval-larval and larval-pupal moulting (O'Reilly, 1995). This interference results in prolonged feeding and hence greater food consumption in infected larvae within the instar (O'Reilly and Miller, 1991). Subrahmanyam and Ramakrishnan (1981) reported that SpltNPV-infected S. litura larvae consumed 66% more food than healthy larvae. It could be that the SpltNPV-Pak-BNG isolate we used resulted in a more reduced survival time (Ali et al., 2018b) and hence reduced food intake.
Differences in survival time have been noted among SpltNPV-Pak isolates (Ali et al., 2018a), but survival times could not be devised from Subrahmanyam and Ramakrishnan (1981) and hence not compared with the data presented here.
Paradoxically, our results reveal that, in spite of the relatively low speed of kill, the food intake and weight gain by viral infected larvae is quite low compared to healthy larvae, in agreement with the findings of Vasconcelos et al. (2005). The results demonstrate that the viral applications induce impaired feeding in infected larvae and can significantly lower the food consumption and weight gain in infected compared to healthy larvae, and thereby reduce crop damage. In a previous study (Ali et al., 2018a) four isolates of SpltNPV-Pak were found that were faster than SpltNPV-Pak-BNG, while having the same median lethal dose. It would be of interest now to determine whether these faster acting SpltNPVs further reduce the food uptake and hence further limit crop damage.
In conclusion this paper shows reduced food consumption and weight gain of baculovirus infected S. litura larvae, provided the larvae are infected leading to mortality (high enough dose). A field experiment should reveal whether this all results in reduced crop damage and to what extent.
We would like to thank Dr. Ehsan-ul-Haq for providing the insect rearing facility in the biological control laboratory of the National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad. We are also grateful to Ishaq Ahmed, Assistant Director Agriculture Extension AJK, for providing his support in establishing experiment and data collection.
Statement of conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
Ali, G., Abma-Henkens, M.H.C., Van der Werf, W., Hemerik, L. and Vlak, J.M., 2018a. Genotype assembly, biological activity and adaptation of spatially separated isolates of Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus. J. Inverteb. Pathol., 153: 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.01.009
Ali, G., Van der Werf, W. and Vlak, J.M., 2018b. Biological and genetic characterization of a Pakistani isolate of Spodoptera litura nucleopolyhedrovirus. Biocont. Sci. Tech., 28: 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1409339
Beas-Catena, A., Sanchez-Miron, F., Garcia-Camacho, A., Contreras-Gomez and Molina-Grima, E., 2014. Baculovirus biopesticide: An overview. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 24: 363-373.
Bianchi, F., Joosten, N.N., Vlak, J.M. and Van der Werf, W., 2000a. Green house evaluation of dose- and time-mortality relationships of two nucleopolyhedroviruses for the control of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, on chrysanthemum. Biol. Contr., 19: 252-258. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0869
Bianchi, F., Snoeijing, I., Van der Werf, W., Mans, R.M.W., Smits, P.H. and Vlak, J.M., 2000b. Biological activity of SeMNPV, AcMNPV, and three AcMNPV deletion mutants against Spodoptera exigua larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Inverteb. Pathol., 75: 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1999.4907
Bonning, B. and Hammock, B., 1994. Insect control by use of recombinant baculoviruses expressing juvenile hormone esterase. In: Natural and engineered pest management agents (eds. P.A. Hedin, J.J. Menn and R.M. Hollingworth). ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 368-383.
Cai, Y., Cheng, Z., Wang F., Li, G. and Pang, Y., 2010. Biological activity of recombinant Spodoptera exigua multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus against Spodoptera exigua larvae. Biol. Control 55: 178-185.
Clem, R.J. and Passarelli, A.L., 2013. Baculoviruses: Sophisticated pathogens of insects. PLoS Pathogens, 9: e1003729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003729
Cory, J.S., Hails, R.S. and Sait, S.M., 1997. Baculovirus ecology. In: The Baculovirus (ed. L.K. Miller). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 301-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1834-5_12
Cory, J.S., 2000. Assessing the risk of releasing genetically modified virus insecticide. Crop Protect., 19: 779-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00104-6
Cory, J.S. and Myers, J.H., 2003. The ecology and evolution of baculoviruses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 34: 239-272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132402
Duan, L. and Otvos, I.S., 2001. Influence of larval age and virus concentration on mortality and sublethal effects of a nucleopolyhedrovirus on the western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Torticidae). Environ. Ent., 30: 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.1.136
Georgievska, L., Velders, R., Dai, X., Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Van der Werf, W. and Vlak, J.M., 2010. Competition between wild-type and a marked recombinant baculovirus (Spodoptera exigua nucleopolyhedrovirus) with enhanced speed of action in insect larvae. J. Inverteb. Pathol., 105: 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2010.05.003
Glass, E.H., 1958. Laboratory and field tests with granulosis of the red-banded leafroller. J. Ecol. Ent., 51: 454-457. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/51.4.454
Hoover, K., Schultz, C.M., Bonning, B.C., Duffey, S.D., McCutchen, B.F. and Hammock, B. D., 1995. Reduction in damage to cotton plants by a recombinant baculovirus that knocks moribund larvae of Heliothis virescens off the plant. Biol. Contr., 5: 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1995.1050
IBM Corp., 2012. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.
Inceoglu, A.B., Kamita, S.G. and Hammock, B.D., 2006. Genetically modified baculoviruses: A historical overview and future outlook. Adv. Virol. Res., 68: 323-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(06)68009-3
Keddie B.A., Aponte G.W. and Volkman, L.E., 1989. The pathway of infection of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus in an insect host. Science, 243: 1728-1730. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2648574
King, A.M.Q., Lefkowitz, E., Adams, M.J. and Carstens, E.B., 2012. Virus taxonomy. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press, London, UK.
Knox, C., Moore, S.D., Luke, G.A. and Hill, M.P., 2015. Baculovirus-based strategies for the management of insect pests: a focus on development and application in South Africa. Biocont. Sci. Tech., 25: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2014.949222
Milks, M.L., Burnstyn, I. and Myers, J.H., 1998. Influence of larval age on the lethal and sublethal effects of nucleopolyhedrovirus of Trichoplusia ni in the cabbage looper. Biol. Contr., 12: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1998.0616
Myers, J.H., Malakar, R. and Cory, J.S., 2000. Sublethal nucleopolyhedrovirus infect effects on female pupal weight, egg mass size and vertical transmission in gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ. Ent., 29: 1268-1272. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.6.1268
Moscardi, F., de Souza, M.L., de Castro, M.E.B., Moscardi, M.L. and Szewczyk, B., 2011. Baculovirus pesticides: Present state and future perspectives. In: Microbes and microbial technology: Agricultural and environmental applications (eds. I. Ahmad, F. Ahmad and J. Pichtel). Springer Science, Dordrecht Heidelberg, London, pp. 415-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7931-5_16
O'Reilly, D.R. and Miller, L.K., 1989. A baculovirus blocks insect molting by producing ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyl transferase. Science, 245: 1110-1112. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2505387
O'Reilly, D.R. and Miller, L.K., 1991. Improvement of a baculovirus pesticide by deletion of the egt gene. Nat. Biotech., 9: 1086-1089. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1191-1086
O'Reilly, D.R., 1995. Baculovirus-encoded ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferases. Insect Biochem. mol. Biol., 25: 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-1748(94)00105-Q
R Core Team, 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Subrahmanyam, B. and Ramakrishnan, N., 1981. Influence of baculovirus infection on moulting and food consumption by Spodoptera litura. J. Inverteb. Pathol., 38: 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(81)90118-X
Sun, X.L., Sun, X.C., Bai, B.K., Van der Werf, W., Vlak, J.M. and Hu, Z.H., 2005. Production of polyhedral inclusion bodies from Helicoverpa armigera larvae infected with wild-type and recombinant HaSNPV. Biocontr. Sci. Technol., 15: 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150400016944
Sun, X.L., Wu, D., Sun, X.C., Jin, L., Ma, Y., Bonning, B.C., Peng, H.Y. and Hu, Z.H., 2009. Impact of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedroviruses expressing a cathepsin L-like protease on target and non-target insect species on cotton. Biol. Contr., 49: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.12.011
Szewczyk, B., Hoyos-Carvajal, L., Paluszek, M., Skrzecz, I. and Lobo de Souza, M., 2006. Baculoviruses - re-emerging biopesticides. Biotech. Adv., 24: 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.09.001
Vasconcelos, S.D., Hails, R.S., Speight, M.R. and Cory, J.S., 2005. Differential crop damage by healthy and nucleopolyhedovirus-infected Mamestra brassica L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae: A field examination. J. Inverteb. Pathol., 88: 177-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2005.01.002
Zwart, M.P., Van der Werf, W., van Oers, M.M., Hemerik, L., Van Lent, J.M., de Visser, J. A.G.M., Vlak, J.M. and Cory, J.S., 2009. Mixed infections and the competitive fitness of faster-acting genetically modified viruses. Evol. Appl., 2: 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00058.x
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Ali, Ghulam; der Werf, Wopke van; Vlak, Just M.|
|Publication:||Pakistan Journal of Zoology|
|Date:||Apr 30, 2019|
|Previous Article:||Molecular Characterization and Differential Expression of Two Prostaglandin E Synthase 2 Orthologs in Coilia nasus.|
|Next Article:||Growth Performance and Hair Mineral Status of Marecha (Camelus dromedarius) Calves Reared under Different Management Systems.|