Printer Friendly

Industrial jobs in danger when climate is to be saved.

The trade unions' solution for a greener world is new jobs with good working conditions. The critics argue that there's not enough time.

'We can either protect industrial jobs in the global north or save the climate,' said political scientist Tadzio Mller.

Politicians, businesses and unions all agree: There are no jobs on a dead planet. But the road to fewer emissions is full of opinions.

While the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is expected to reach record levels this year, the work toward a 'just transition' continues. The aim is to secure workers' interests when countries and employers convert to more climate-friendly ways of doing business.

'It is extremely urgent, and I'm worried. But if employers, governments and big financial interests had been more interested in the carbonization two decades ago, we would have been in a great position,' said Samantha Smith, the director of the Just Transition Centre, created three years ago by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC). The confederation gathers unions, organizations, businesses and countries in a social dialogue.

The term 'just transition' has origins from the 1980s but it took until 2013 for the United Nations' agency International Labor Organization to put its foot down and create guidelines for 'a just transition toward environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all.'

The Paris agreement from 2015 also includes mentions of just transition. Through the Paris agreement, governments commit to making sure that workers continue to have fair conditions during the climate adaption.

The UN climate change Conference of Parties 24 took place in December 2018 in Katowice, Poland, and just transition was high on the agenda. More than 50 states, including Sweden, signed the 'The Solidarity and Just Transition Silesia Declaration,' which states that the countries must consider workers' perspectives while shifting to climate-friendly policies.

In Sweden, issues on this matter are being discussed regularly at the Swedish Trade Union Confederation, commonly known as LO, and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, or Sida, among others. Sida recently donated pound 1.5 million to the organization Bankwatch, to support the transition toward a coal-free Eastern Europe.

Samantha Smith pointed out that every sector in every country will be affected in order to reach the 1.5-degree global-warming target.

'We wanted to start with rich countries because they have the wealth and capacity. In some poor countries you have a number of issues going on at the same time, one is recognizing basic labor rights, which is also human rights,' Smith said.

Tadzio Mller, political scientist and senior advisor on climate justice for the leftist foundation Rosa Luxembourg, agreed. He, on the other hand, is even more drastic.

'If Sweden, Germany and Great Britain want to do their bit to save the climate they have to shut down old industrial infrastructure within the next 10 years to 15 years so that the rest of the world can still emit some carbon emissions.'

Mller is critical of the trade union movement. The concept of 'just transition' was first used by union activists in the US in the 1980s.

'We have to be honest that it was, at least in part, the same industrial trade unions that called for a just transition that were fighting against ambitious climate politics and policies to save jobs,' he said. He mentions Germany's mining unions as an example.

Mller pointed out that he is in no way interested in limiting workers' interests.

'I am absolutely for giving workers every social protection that we can manage. I would even argue that a universal guaranteed income would be a great way to transition in heavy industrial regions, like western Germany or the north of France. I don't oppose just transition, but the fact that the function of just transition has been to slow down ambitious climate action.'

Smith at the Just Transition Centre said to her critics: 'What is your alternative? Especially in a democracy, like for example Germany. How are you going to shut down coal mines if the local government and all the people working in the mines don't agree to it?'

She pointed out that it's better to do something than nothing.

'And it's better to do something that will support social justice and strengthen the labor movement and democracy to get down emissions.'

Just transition countries and facts


The government has decided to phase out coal as a source of energy by 2030 while making investments in natural gas instead. This is a part of Canada's 'Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.

Catherine McKenna, minister of Environment and Climate Change, announced that a task force has been created, with representatives from unions, councils and businesses working together to make the transition from coal to natural gas as fair as possible for the workers in the sector.

The president of the Canadian Labour Congress has been put in charge of the project.


In 2016, the government launched a plan worth almost pound 2 billion to aid the closure of 26 coal mines. The mines were closed by the end of 2018, and approximately 2,000 workers were affected. The transition plan included early retirement for workers over 48 years of age and education in green industries for the rest.

The Spanish trade unions celebrated the agreement, but one group of 800 workers, employed by subcontractors of the mining industry, were not included in the transition. They formed the network 'Plataforma de Santa Barbara,' and gathered to protest that they had been abandoned by the unions and the political parties.


The transport system in Kenya's capital Nairobi is overly chaotic and spews out huge amounts of pollution each year. To tackle this, the government of Kenya has begun the transition toward a new system called 'Bus Rapid Transit,' with fewer but larger buses.

This means fewer jobs. So now the Kenyan unions are working together with the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), to ensure a fair transition that provides new 'green' jobs for the workers.


A massive transition is taking place in the state of New York, with pound 1.5-billion projects that include investments in renewable energy.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo started the initiative 'The Clean Climate Careers initiative' in 2017, with the goal of creating 40,000 new climate-friendly jobs by 2020.

The jobs will be in major renewable-energy projects, including wind and solar. Big money is being invested to redirect personnel to create a more climate-friendly work force.

Biggest carbon emitters

The 25 biggest carbon emitters in the world produced a fifth of the global carbon emissions, according to a review by Swedish newspaper Dagens Industry.

The companies are: Coal India, PJSC Gazprom, Exxon Mobil Corp., Cummins Inc., Thyssenkrupp AG, Rosneft OAO, Royal Dutch Shell, China Petroleum Chemical Corp., China Shenhua Energy, Rio Tinto, Petrochina Co. Ltd., BHP Billiton, Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Korea Electric Power Corp., British Petroleum, Total, Valero Energy Corp., Chevron Corp., Toyota Motor Corp., Wistron Corp., United Technologies Corp., Peabody Energy Corp., YTL Corp., Phillips 66 and Volkswagen AG.
COPYRIGHT 2019 Knowledge Bylanes
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Mirror (Makati City, Philippines)
Date:Mar 11, 2019
Previous Article:Church eyes pulling out funds from banks linked to dirty energy.
Next Article:'Unique species in the brink of extinction'.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters