Printer Friendly

Individual variation is the key to the development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus: a comparative study between mice lineages.

Introduction

Bacterial infections occur worldwide and are an important public health problem. Among pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus is the main causative agent of bacterial diseases, accounting for millions of deaths every year, mainly for virulence mechanisms and enhanced antimicrobial resistance. S. aureus isolates that exhibit resistance to methicillin are referred to as MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) (1,2).

Little is known about the mechanisms of a protective immunity against an infection by S. aureus. Some authors believe that the activation of Tand B cells by immunization is sufficient to generate a full protection. The inflammatory response is a complex event, with variations that depend on the intrinsic and extrinsic conditions of each individual and of the infectious agent. The variation among humans may be caused by differences among individual characteristics, such as hormonal levels, associated comorbidities, among others. S. aureus colonization and invasive disease are not associated with the development of protective immune responses, which is attributable to a large spectrum of immune evasion factors (3,4).

Studies evaluating the protective immunity against S. aureus infection are extremely controversial; therefore, new approaches must be undertaken to clarify the mechanisms involved. Animal models of different lineages may simulate infections and treatment approaches that occur in humans, although murine models have characteristics that differentiate them from the human responses to an infection. Nevertheless, the use of different models can raise awareness of the decisive factors in infection control (5).

Mice have several lineages with different immune response profiles. Among them, the C57BL/6 lineage presents a Th1 response profile and the A/j lineage presents a Th2 profile (6). A comparison of the inflammatory response between these 2 models could contribute to the understanding of immune responses against S. aureus. Few studies have compared the inflammatory response of two models after a challenge (7,8).

Mice are of great importance due to their great genetic diversity and easy monitoring and manipulation. Several types of studies may be developed with these animals, including a route of infection similar to humans. The intradermal route is described as one of the best ways for the induction of adaptive immunity against pathogens. This route does not lead to tolerance induction and resembles infection in humans (9).

A common route of infection for S. aureus is intradermal. In a model of skin immunization with S. aureus, a reduction of lesion size and the presence of heavy neutrophilic infiltration was demonstrated. The magnitude of infiltration was correlated with increased production of cytokines, such as IL-17, and chemokines associated with the chemotaxis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (10,11). Specific antigens for Th17 cells can improve neutrophil performance with the generation of antibodies for opsonization of staphylococcal strains. Th17 cells are currently being studied in generation of forward protection to infections, particularly with the production of interleukin 17 by [CD4.sup.+] T cells in murine models. However, the requirements for the properties and the differentiation of human Th17 cells and cells in animal models induced by pathogens remain poorly understood (12).

Along with Th17 cells, IgG antibodies are critical in defending against this pathogen. Different studies have shown that protective immunity against extracellular gram positive microorganisms is influenced by opsonization. Phagocytosis has the participation of specific antibodies for polysaccharides present in the capsule and is helpful for protection after infection challenge (12,13).

The difficulty of understanding how the immune response generates protection against S. aureus infection is perhaps the biggest obstacle to the development of a vaccination Thus, our study aimed to evaluate and compare the immune response in C57BL/6 and A/j mice immunized with a MRSA sample inactivated by heat and subsequently challenged with the same sample of viable MRSA.

Material and Methods

MRSA strains

The MRSA ATCC 43300 strain was obtained from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB) at the Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP). The samples were stored in a freezer at -80[degrees]C. At the time of culture, samples were thawed at room temperature, plated on brain heart infusion (BHI, pH 7.4, HIMEDIA, France), and stored in an incubator for 24 h at 37[degrees]C.

Determination of bacterial inoculum and inactivation by heat

The quantification of bacterial load inoculated in animals was determined by spectrophotometry to obtain the amount of 108 colony forming units (CFU) of MRSA. After quantification, a serial dilution was carried out to obtain 106 CFU, which was inoculated into animals to be immunized. The strains were inactivated by heat ("Heat killed", 60[degrees]C for 30 min) before immunizations.

A sample of the inoculum was cultured for confirmation of inactivation.

Animals

A/j and C57BL/6 mice, aged 6 to 8 weeks, were obtained from the Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saude, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anisio Teixeira facilities. The animals were maintained under controlled conditions of temperature with free access to water and food. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) IMSCAT UFBA.

Intradermal immunization with inactivated strains of MRSA

The methodology used was based on the literature, with adaptations (14). The experiment was similar and independent in the different lineages of mice. The animals were divided into two groups: control and immunized, with 36 animals in each group. The mice were anesthetized with 50 mg/kg of ketamine and 10 mg/kg of xylazine to perform the intradermal immunizations in the left ear. Each group was immunized three times. The interval between immunizations was 14 days. The animals received [10.sup.6] CFU of MRSA inactivated by heat in a volume of 10 [micro]L. Control animals received the same volume of sterile saline.

Challenge with viable MRSA

Challenge was performed using the air pouch model 14 days after the last immunization. At this time, each group was subdivided into two new groups: mice challenged with live strains of MRSA (n=18) and mice challenged with saline (n=18).

Air pouch model

The preparation of the air pouch was performed as described in the literature, with adaptations (15). Initially, the animals were anesthetized with 50 mg/kg of ketamine and 10 mg/kg of xylazine. The animals were injected with 3 mL of sterile air in the dorsal subcutaneous space. Mice challenged with MRSA received [10.sup.7] CFU of inoculum suspended in 100 [micro]L of saline. The corresponding controls received the same volume of sterile saline. Subsequently, the animals were euthanized at 6, 12, and 24 h post infection (n=6 per group per time). Thus, after treatment in C57BL/6 and A/j mice, the following groups were formed: immunized with inactivated strain and challenged with live strain (Heat killed/MRSA), immunized with inactivated strain and challenged with saline (Heat killed/ Saline), saline injected and challenged with live strain (Saline/MRSA), and saline injected and challenged with saline in the air pouch (Saline/Saline).

Euthanasia was performed by deep anesthesia with administration of ketamine and xylazine at doses of 400 and 40 mg/kg, respectively, intraperitoneally. After euthanasia, blood samples were collected for differential quantification of neutrophil and the serum for quantification of IgG antibodies.

Inflammatory cell influx

Lavage of the air pouches was carried out with 5 mL of sterile saline and stored at 4[degrees]C. Subsequently, the collected material was centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min at 4[degrees]C. Total cell count was performed in a Neubauer chamber (LojaLab, Brazil). The differential cell counts were performed by citospin in Panotic stained slides and analyzed by light microscopy. The remaining fluid was stored at -80[degrees]C for later quantification of cytokines and IgG antibodies.

Bacterial load

Five microliters of lavage were seeded in BHI plates (pH 7.4, HIMEDIA) and incubated for 24 h at 37[degrees]C. The technique used was the pour plate, thus facilitating the quantitation of colonies formed after culture. The CFU quantification was performed with the aid of a colony counter (CP-600 Plus, Phoenix, Brazil).

Quantification of inflammatory cytokines in the air pouch lavage

The supernatant from the air pouch lavages was used to determine TNF-[alpha], IL-1[beta] or IL-17A cytokines by sandwich ELISA using the ELISA Ready- SET-GO[R] kit (Bioscience, USA). A standard curve was obtained and cytokines were calculated according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Quantification of the IgG1 and IgG2a against S. aureus

Whole bacteria were used to coat ELISA plates in sodium bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6 for 18 h. Plates were blocked for 1h with assay diluent 1x (Assay Diluent, BD Biosciences). The lavage fluid or diluted serum (1:50 in assay diluent 1x) was added to the plates (100 mL/well). After 2 h of incubation at room temperature, the plates were washed thoroughly (5 times) with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) plus 0.1% Tween 20 (Synth). Anti-IgG1 and Anti-IgG2a conjugate diluted 1:100 in assay diluent 1x (Assay Diluent, BD Biosciences) was added (100 [micro]L/well) and incubated for 1 h. After washing as described earlier, a solution of tetramethylbenzidine (BD Biosciences) was added to the wells and the color change pattern was observed. The stop solution was added (50 [micro]L/well) and the color intensity was measured on a plate reader (Thermoplate, Brazil) at 450 nM.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test of GraphPadPrism software (version 5.0, GraphPad Program Inc., USA) and Dunn's post-test. We used the Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups. Statistical differences were considered significant at P<0.05.

Results

Immunized C57BL/6 mice showed higher bacterial clearance in the air pouch

Figure 1 demonstrates bacterial growth of both strains after 24 h of cultivation. Previously immunized C57BL/6 mice had a lower number of CFU at the different times analyzed. This result was not observed in A/j mice.

Immunization enhanced IgG2a antibodies production against S. aureus in the serum of C57BL/6 mice

In order to assess whether bacterial clearance was related to the production of antibodies, IgG antibodies in serum and from lavage were quantified by ELISA. Figure 2 shows that immunization promoted an enhancement in the titers of IgG2a antibodies in the serum of C57BL/6 animals. Immunized C57BL/6 mice exhibited significantly higher titers of IgG2a antibodies than immunized A/j mice.

Immunized C57BL/6 mice consumed IgG1 antibodies in the inflammatory environment

To analyze the concentration of antibodies in the infection site, the air pouch lavages were assessed. No difference between the two lineages was observed for IgG1 antibodies. However, there was a decrease in the local concentration of these antibodies 24 h after the challenge only in C57BL/6 mice (Figure 3). There was no significant amount of IgG2a in the analyzed groups.

C57BL/6 mice showed higher inflammation in the air pouch than A/j mice

As seen in Figure 4, data demonstrated that infected animals and their respective controls showed no leukocytosis after the challenge at analyzed time points. However, C57BL/6 immunized and MRSA challenged mice had a higher number of leukocytes than A/j mice.

Interestingly, previously immunized C57BL/6 mice had an early recruitment of inflammatory cells and this number was maintained along the follow-up time. Similarly, unimmunized animals showed a later quantitative elevation of recruited cells. Immunized A/j mice and their controls did not differ in cellular recruitment profile in inflammatory environment, and was quantitatively lower when compared with C57BL/6 animals.

The quantification of neutrophils in the peripheral blood and inflammatory environment at all times examined (6, 12, and 24 h) after the challenge in both mouse lineages is shown in Figure 5.

The A/j lineage showed no differences in neutrophil recruitment in the evaluated groups; however, these animals showed lower cell recruitment to the infection site at the analyzed times than C57BL/6 mice.

Immunized C57BL/6 mice produced IL-17A in the inflammatory site after the challenge

Quantification of cytokines in bone marrow and spleen was performed, and no difference was found in these sites (data not shown). However, it was observed that after 24 h of challenge, immunized C57BL/6 animals showed significant elevations of IL-17A compared to non-immunized challenged C57BL/6 (Figure 6). The analysis of IL-1[beta] pro-inflammatory cytokines and TNF-[alpha] by the same technique showed no difference between groups and between the lineages in the analyzed times.

Discussion

In the infectious process, the generation of an adequate protective response is the main aspect that will determine whether the host will progress to healing or develop disease. The present study showed a correlation between production of IgG antibodies and reduced bacterial load in a murine model of intradermal immunization. In addition, these data were correlated with the increased local production of IL-17. This correlation is important because different studies describe failures after attempting to develop immunizations against S. aureus. A reason for this is that this bacterium is present in human microbiota (16). Furthermore, there are significant differences among strains of S. aureus, which directly influences the type of inflammatory response against this pathogen and hinders the understanding of the inflammatory process against these bacteria (17).

This is a barrier to a standard understanding of the immune response mediated by antibodies toward this microorganism. Moreover, the pathogenicity and the production of virulence factors are widely described in strains resistant to antibiotics. We analyzed an antibiotic resistant strain, and the air pouch model proved to be effective in assessing inflammation (18). We collected material from the inflammatory environment after evaluation of bacterial load, antibody dosage, cytokines dosage, and local cellular quantification. In addition, it was possible to visualize polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) in the air pouch. This is important because neutrophils are the main cells in the control of S. aureus infections (19).

The lower bacterial load in immunized mice correlated also with lower inflammation in the air pouch. There was a lower amount of neutrophils in the lavage fluid of the immunized C57BL/6 mice in the analyzed time points; however, as mentioned before, even with a smaller amount of PMNs these animals had higher bacterial clearance. This is relevant because the higher the inflammation, the greater the tissue damage that it can cause to the host (19,20). Therefore, the recruitment of cells to the infection site and their activation could be critical for the control of bacterial load. Additionally, intradermal immunization was able to confer systemic immunity, once the challenge occurred at a different body site from the immunization, being an important immunization route for the activation of dendritic cells and consequently a stimulus for the production of antibodies (21).

The higher production of antibodies of the IgG class in immunized C57BL/6 animals is another relevant result because IgG receptors make an important connection between the humoral and cellular immune responses (22). These receptors mediate various biological responses such as phagocytosis, endocytosis, capture and clearance of immunocomplexes, cytotoxicity, and release of inflammatory mediators. These receptors belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily, which has several isoforms. These molecules differ in affinity and specificity for IgG isotypes, cell distribution, intracellular signaling, and molecular weights (23).

In this context, it was observed that previously immunized C57BL/6 animals produced more than one IgG antibody subtype. In this way, it is worth mentioning that within the air pouch, the consumption of IgG1 subtype occurred over the analyzed time (Figure 3A and B). In addition, genetic polymorphism is responsible for variations between individuals, which may explain the fact that A/j animals did not significantly increase antibodies as C57BL/6 animals did at the analyzed time point. The structural and functional diversity of FcgR makes these molecules important targets for immunotherapy (24,25).

In animal studies, protective immunity against extra-cellular microorganisms, such as gram-positive bacteria, is influenced mainly by opsonization and phagocytosis, with participation of specific antibodies for polysaccharides present in the capsule. This mechanism is an efficient protection after infection challenge (13). Antibodies of the IgG2a class are fundamental in response against S. aureus. Different authors have described the participation of IgG2a in immunity against this pathogen (26). The fact that immunized C57BL/6 mice showed protection and decreased bacterial loads in the inflammatory environment could be related to antibodies provided by immunizations. The non-immunized C57BL/6 mice presented higher bacterial loads in their air pouch (Figure 1).

Higher titers of IgG2a are important elements against bacterial structures, such as capsular polysaccharides, teichoic acid, and lipoteichoic acid (13,27). The differences between mouse lineages in the production of antibodies and protection could be related to the interaction between IgG antibodies with proteins of the complement system. For example, IgG1 can bind to C1q and activate the classical complement pathway opsonization, leading to phagocytosis of the S. aureus mediated by PMN cells (28).

Studies with other pathogens indicate the importance of the interaction of IgG antibodies with the complement system components such as C5. Such interaction causes improved opsonization and a better targeting of inflammatory processes. It is well known that the A/j mice have a deficiency in complement C5 (29,30). In addition, complement-antibody interaction is deficient in these animals. These data are in accordance with the higher susceptibility of A/j mice to MRSA infection. However, different authors have reported that the complement alone without direct participation of antibodies is not sufficient to cause bacterial clearance of gram positive bacteria by neutrophils and macrophages. Thus, the protection observed in the immunized C57BL/6 mice may be due to a mutual action of complement and antibody of the IgG class (30). Corroborating this fact, non-immunized C57BL/6 mice have the complement system and yet there was no protection in these mice. Other authors report that the deficiency of these components in the A/j model leads to a deregulated response in cytokine production (31).

Another result of this work is the evaluation of IL-17 participation against S. aureus infection. There are few reports that address the importance of IL-17A profile after infection by MRSA. Antibodies can enhance the neutrophil response; however, other factors have a strong impact on PMNs activation, such as Th17 cells (11). Among the sites that are colonized by S. aureus, the nasal passages are the most common. It has been shown that IL-17 knockout mice are unable to effectively eliminate S. aureus (32). Thus, immune responses associated with Th17 could be a strategic method to eliminate persistent infections in humans. Many studies have described that this cytokine is produced by T lymphocytes, but this component is mostly secreted by cells of the innate immunity in inflammatory processes The release of IL-17A by neutrophils has been described by different authors. Mice deficient in IL-17A or IL-17F have proved prone to skin infections caused by gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus (12,33,34).

In one study, administration of neutralizing antibodies to IL-17A was correlated with decreased formation of intra-abdominal abscesses, decreased defense, and exacerbated systemic bacterial infections (11). Corroborating these data, our results showed an enhancement in the local production of IL-17 by immunized C57BL/6 mice 24 h after the challenge. Thus, the inflammatory response promoted by immunization was important for protection in these animals. Different authors have reported that previous exposure to S. aureus led to protection inducing IL-17 production. There are few reports that address the importance of IL-17A profile after infectious processes by MRSA (35).

The use of animal models in research is fundamental for the advancement of science since, due to ethical limitations, it is not always possible to conduct studies in humans. Therefore, animal studies have generated findings of enormous impact on the living conditions and longevity of the human being (36). Rodents, especially mice, are the most used animals in research, serving as tools to answer specific questions about human diseases. Thus, we used two strains of mice to evaluate differences between them after being immunized and challenged with S. aureus. Altogether, these data can shed light on the understanding of different immune responses among individuals from the same species but with diverse genetic backgrounds (37).

After analyzing the data of this work, it was possible to perceive that even among animal species of the same group, the effectiveness of a vaccine against S. aureus will depend on the individual variations. In C57BL/6 animals, different components were produced compared to A/j mice, even though they were from the same species, the same model of infection was used, with equal bacterial load and analyzed in equal time points (7,8).

Mouse strains are divided into lineages that result from mating between siblings (inbred) called isogenic, while colonies from random mating (outbred) are said to be heterogenetic. Each inbred line has a unique gene set, since the consanguineous mating decreases the frequency of heterozygous genotypes, generating a homoallelic state, that is, where there is only one allelic variant present that leads to the fixation of the alleles of that group.

Regarding the other cytokines analyzed, no differences were found between groups. This may be related to the time after the challenge that samples were evaluated. IL-[beta] and TNF-[alpha] cytokines were elevated in the air pouch sample from the immunized animals, but had no significant difference compared to groups that did not receive immunization. In S. aureus immunization models, cytokines such as IFN-g had no significant elevation; however, these data are controversial, requiring further studies to elucidate the role of this cytokine after immunization (38).

A/j animals did not show protection after the challenge with live strain and no increase in IgG antibody and IL-17A were observed. On the other hand, the presence of these features was associated with lower bacterial load in immunized C57BL/6 mice. C57BL/6 and A/j mice are widely studied, especially to investigate the genetic control of host immunity to infectious pathogens. In addition, in sepsis experimental models, A/j mice showed increased susceptibility to infections compared to C57BL/6 mice, especially during the acute phase of infection. However, further work must be done for full clarification of Th17 cell activity and humoral response in the control of MRSA infection.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20186773

Received July 19, 2017 | Accepted January 11, 2018

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES). We also thank the financial contribution from the Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saude, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anisio Teixeira.

References

(1.) Alvarez C, Labarca J, Salles M, Grupo Latinoamericano de Trabajo sobre Resistencia en G-P. [Prevention strategies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus 'aureus (MRSA) infections in Latin America]. Rev Chilena Infectol 2010; 27 (Suppl 2): S81-S93.

(2.) Turner RB, Valcarlos E, Won R, Chang E, Schwartz J. Impact of Infectious Diseases consultation on clinical outcomes of patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Community Health System. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60: 5682-5687, doi: 10.1128/AAC.00439-16.

(3.) Missiakas D, Schneewind O. Staphylococcus aureus vaccines: Deviating from the carol. J Exp Med 2016; 213: 1645-1653, doi: 10.1084/jem.20160569.

(4.) Chapman SJ, Hill AV. Human genetic susceptibility to infectious disease. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 175-188, doi: 10.1038/nrg3114.

(5.) Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, Mindrinos MN, Baker HV, Xu W, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 3507-3512, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222878110.

(6.) Jovicic N, Jeftic I, Jovanovic I, Radosavljevic G, Arsenijevic N, Lukic ML, et al. Differential immunometabolic phenotype in th1 and th2 dominant mouse strains in response to high-fat feeding. PloS One 2015; 10: e0134089, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0134089.

(7.) Bavia L, de Castro IA, Isaac L. C57BL/6 and A/J Mice have different inflammatory response and liver lipid profile in experimental alcoholic liver disease. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015: 491641, doi: 10.1155/2015/491641.

(8.) Morrison WI, Murray M. The role of humoral immune responses in determining susceptibility of A/J and C57BL/6 mice to infection with Trypanosoma congolense. Parasite immunol 1985; 7: 63-79, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985. tb00479.x.

(9.) Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat immunol 2015; 16: 343-353, doi: 10.1038/ni.3123.

(10.) Tkaczyk C, Hamilton MM, Datta V, Yang XP, Hilliard JJ, Stephens GL, et al. Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin suppresses effective innate and adaptive immune responses in a murine dermonecrosis model. PloS One 2013; 8: e75103, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075103.

(11.) Tesmer LA, Lundy SK, Sarkar S, Fox DA. Th17 cells in human disease. Immunol Rev 2008; 223: 87-113, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00628.x.

(12.) van de Veerdonk FL, Gresnigt MS, Kullberg BJ, van der Meer JW, Joosten LA, Netea MG. Th17 responses and host defense against microorganisms: an overview. BMB Rep 2009; 42: 776-787, doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2009.42.12.776.

(13.) Jung DJ, An JH, Kurokawa K, Jung YC, Kim MJ, Aoyagi Y, et al. Specific serum Ig recognizing staphylococcal wall teichoic acid induces complement-mediated opsonophagocytosis against Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol 2012; 189: 4951-4959, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201294.

(14.) Selle M, Hertlein T, Oesterreich B, Klemm T, Kloppot P, Muller E, et al. Global antibody response to Staphylococcus aureus live-cell vaccination. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 24754, doi: 10.1038/srep24754.

(15.) Edwards JC, Sedgwick AD, Willoughby DA. The formation of a structure with the features of synovial lining by subcutaneous injection of air: an in vivo tissue culture system. J Pathol 1981; 134: 147-156, doi: 10.1002/path.1711340205.

(16.) Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9: 244-253, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2537.

(17.) Rivas AL, Schwager SJ, Gonzalez RN, Quimby FW, Anderson KL. Multifactorial relationships between intramammary invasion by Staphylococcus aureus and bovine leukocyte markers. Can J Vet Res 2007; 71: 135-144.

(18.) Inoue S, Moriyama T, Horinouchi Y, Tachibana T, Okada F, Maruo K, et al. Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains. Springerplus 2013; 2: 283, doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-283.

(19.) Rigby KM, DeLeo FR. Neutrophils in innate host defense against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Semin immunopathol 2012; 34: 237-259, doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0295-3.

(20.) Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Am J Pathol 2015; 185: 1518-1527, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.030.

(21.) Wallach D, Kang TB, Kovalenko A. Concepts of tissue injury and cell death in inflammation: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Immunol 2014; 14: 51-59, doi: 10.1038/nri3561.

(22.) Pellegrino M, Rodriguez N, Vivas A, Giraudo J, Bogni C. Staphylococcus aureus avirulent mutant vaccine induces humoral and cellular immune responses on pregnant heifers. Vaccine 2016; 34: 3356-3362, doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.014.

(23.) Hammarstrom L, Granstrom M, Oxelius V, Persson MA, Smith CI. IgG subclass distribution of antibodies against Staphylococcus aureus teichoic acid and alpha-toxin in normal and immunodeficient donors. Clin Exp Immunol 1984; 55: 593-601.

(24.) Torre A, Bacconi M, Sammicheli C, Galletti B, Laera D, Fontana MR, et al. Four-component Staphylococcus aureus vaccine 4C-staph enhances Fcgamma receptor expression in neutrophils and monocytes and mitigates Staphylococcus aureus infection in neutropenic mice. Infecimmun 2015; 83: 3157-3163, doi: 10.1128/IAI.00258-15.

(25.) Zheng L, Nibbering PH, van Furth R. Stimulation of the intracellular killing of Staphylococcus aureus by human monocytes mediated by Fc gamma receptors I and II. Eur J Immunol 1993; 23: 2826-2833, doi: 10.1002/eji.1830231116.

(26.) Garcia-Romo GS, Gonzalez-Ibarra M, Donis-Hernandez FR, Zendejas-Buitron VM, Pedroza-Gonzalez A. Immunization with heat-inactivated Staphylococcus aureus induced an antibody response mediated by IgG1 and IgG2 in patients with recurrent tonsillitis. Microbiol Immunol 2015; 59: 193-201, doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12241.

(27.) Sasaki S, Tagawa Y, Iwakura Y, Nakane A. The role of gamma interferon in acquired host resistance against Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006; 46: 367-374, doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2005.00037.x.

(28.) Farrell C, Sogaard H, Svehag SE. Detection of IgG aggregates or immune complexes using solid-phase C1q and protein A-rich Staphylococcus aureus as an indicator system. Scand J Immunol 1975; 4: 673-680, doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-3083.1975.tb02675.x.

(29.) Wetsel RA, Fleischer DT, Haviland DL. Deficiency of the murine fifth complement component (C5). A 2-base pair gene deletion in a 5'-exon. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 2435-2440.

(30.) Mullick A, Leon Z, Min-Oo G, Berghout J, Lo R, Daniels E, et al. Cardiac failure in C5-deficient A/J mice after Candida albicans infection. Infect Immun 2006; 74: 4439-4451, doi: 10.1128/IAI.00159-06.

(31.) Jagannath C, Hoffmann H, Sepulveda E, Actor JK, Wetsel RA, Hunter RL. Hypersusceptibility of A/J mice to tuberculosis is in part due to a deficiency of the fifth complement component (C5). Scand J Immunol 2000; 52: 369-379, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2000.00770.x.

(32.) Montgomery CP, Daniels M, Zhao F, Alegre ML, Chong AS, Daum RS. Protective immunity against recurrent Staphylococcus aureus skin infection requires antibody and interleukin-17A. Infect Immun 2014; 82: 2125-2134, doi: 10.1128/IAI.01491-14.

(33.) Archer NK, Harro JM, Shirtliff ME. Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is Tcell dependent and mediated through interleukin-17A expression and neutrophil influx. Infect Immun 2013; 81: 2070-2075, doi: 10.1128/IAI.00084-13.

(34.) Cypowyj S, Picard C, Marodi L, Casanova JL, Puel A. Immunity to infection in IL-17-deficient mice and humans. Eur J Immunol 2012; 42: 2246-2254, doi: 10.1002/eji.201242605.

(35.) Joshi A, Pancari G, Cope L, Bowman EP, Cua D, Proctor RA, et al. Immunization with Staphylococcus aureus iron regulated surface determinant B (IsdB) confers protection via Th17/IL17 pathway in a murine sepsis model. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2012; 8: 336-346, doi: 10.4161/hv.18946.

(36.) Saputra S, Jordan D, Worthing KA, Norris JM, Wong HS, Abraham R, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-positive staphylococci isolated from companion animals in Australia: A one year study. PloS One 2017; 12: e0176379, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176379.

(37.) Hua G, Kolesnick R. Using ASMase knockout mice to model human diseases. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2013; (216): 29-54, doi: 10.1007/978- 3-7091-1511-4.

(38.) Murphy AG, O'Keeffe KM, Lalor SJ, Maher BM, Mills KH, McLoughlin RM. Staphylococcus aureus infection of mice expands a population of memory gammadelta T cells that are protective against subsequent infection. J Immunol 2014; 192: 3697-3708, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303420.

D.P. dos Santos, I.P.R. Muniz, A.F. Queiroz, I.S. Pereira, M.P.A. Souza, L.J. Lima, L.R.O. Sousa, I.S. Ribeiro, M.P.L. Galantini, L.M. Marques, T.B. Figueiredo and R.A.A. da Silva

Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saude, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitoria da Conquista, BA, Brasil

Correspondence: D.P. dos Santos: <farmapalmito@gmail.com>

Caption: Figure 1. Bacterial load of Staphylococcus aureus in the air pouch in C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat and challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) live MRSA. A, bacterial growth in both animal lineages. B, representation of growth in BHI medium for C57BL/6 mice (24 h). C, comparison of CFU in the two lineages. Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD (n=6). BHI: brain heart infusion; Hk: Heat killed; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (A, Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test; C, Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups).

Caption: Figure 2. C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat were challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) of live MRSA. A, Concentration of serum IgG1 antibodies. B, concentration of serum IgG2a antibodies. C, comparison of antibody concentrations in the two lineages. Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD (n=6). MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Hk: Heat killed. *P<0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test (A and B) and Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups (C).

Caption: Figure 3. C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat were challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) live MRSA. A, Concentration of IgG1 in air pouch sample from both lineages. B, Comparison of antibody concentrations in the two lineages. Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD (n=6). MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Hk: Heat killed. *P<0.05 (A, Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test; B, Mann-Whitney test).

Caption: Figure 4. C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat were challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) of live MRSA. A, Number of leukocytes in peripheral blood. B, Number of leukocytes present in the air pouch lavage sample. C, Comparison between the two mouse lineages of the amount of leukocytes present in peripheral blood and in the air pouch lavage. D, Representation of the inflammatory infiltrate in the air pouch C57BL/6 controls and infected mice (12 h). Bar=25 [micro]M. Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD. MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Hk: Heat killed. *P<0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test; Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups).

Caption: Figure 5. C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat and challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) live MRSA. A, Total number of neutrophils in the peripheral blood. B, Total number of neutrophils present in the air pouch. C, Comparison the total number of neutrophils present in peripheral blood and air pouch. Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD. MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Hk: Heat Killed. *P<0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test; Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between groups).

Caption: Figure 6. C57BL/6 and A/j mice previously immunized with [10.sup.6] strains of MRSA inactivated by heat and challenged in the air pouch with [10.sup.7] colony forming units (CFU) live MRSA. Lavages were collected and evaluated by ELISA for levels of IL-17A, IL-1[beta] and TNF-[alpha] (n=6). Data are reported as means [+ or -] SD. MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Hk: Heat killed. *P<0.05 (Kruskal- Wallis test and Dunn's post-test; Mann- Whitney test for comparisons between groups).
COPYRIGHT 2018 Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica (ABDC)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Santos, D.P. dos; Muniz, I.P.R.; Queiroz, A.F.; Pereira, I.S.; Souza, M.P.A.; Lima, L.J.; Sousa, L.R
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Article Type:Report
Date:May 1, 2018
Words:5700
Previous Article:Human dental pulp stem cell adhesion and detachment in polycaprolactone electrospun scaffolds under direct perfusion.
Next Article:2-Methyl 2-butanol suppresses human retinoblastoma cells through cell cycle arrest and autophagy.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters