Incorporating anthropometrics data in designing driver's seat for Malaysian made compact cars.
Comfort is one of the widely mentioned terms to consumers in product marketing. This includes from everyday use product, equipment, facilities and vehicles. Information on comfort area is crucial and important especially in vehicle study scope and the current available knowledge is quite limited (Faiet al., 2007; Vink & Hallbeck 2012). Consumers nowadays are looking for a car that can offer them comfort and safety features, thus every car manufacturer has to consider these criteria closely in order to be ahead in the automotive industry (Franz et al., 2011; Schmidt et al., 2013; Zenk et al., 2012). As mentioned by Kolich and Taboun (2004), "comfortable seating nowadays is no longer considered a luxury but it is a requirement".
Ergonomic factors are one of the criteria that need to be incorporated in car design to ensure the comfort of the users (Darses& Wolf, 2006). Therefore, this study focuses on the drivers' car seat design because drivers' comfort needs to be considered closely and effectively because the controlling and maneuverability of the car depend on the driver (Mohamad et al., 2010). The two categories in ergonomic criteria assessment studies are the physiological and anthropometric factors. Examples of physiological factors are: objective measurement using pressure distribution(Andreoni et al., 2002; Porter et al., 2003), vibration analysis (Morioka & Griffin, 2010; Okunribido et al., 2007; Rahmatalla & DeShaw, 2011; Wang & Rahmatalla, 2013; Xu et al., 2011), surface electromyography (Alizadehkhaiyat et al., 2011; Hashemi et al., 2013; Roman-Liu & Bartuzi, 2013) and temperature at seat (Diebschlag et al., 1988). As for anthropometric factors, they are mainly involved in human body measurement. Several past researches that focused on anthropometric factors in comfort design are studies done by Parkinson and Reed(2007), Reed et al., (2005), Reed et al. (2000) and Seitz et al., (2000).
Anthropometry is a study of human body measurements such as stature, reach, body length, circumference and many others. An appropriate use of anthropometric data in designing equipment, workstations, and vehicle design may improve human well-being, health, comfort and safety (Pheasant, 1998). There are many researchers who incorporated anthropometric data in their design stages such as Gragg et al., (2012), Singh et al., (2012), Yang and Cho (2012) and Reed et al.(2005). Anthropometry is important in classifying dimension needed for certain population, for instance the development of car seat design as mentioned by Linder et al.(2013), because females and males have different anthropometry and mass distribution, which may influence the interaction of the upper body with seatback and head restraint, and consequently injury risks.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
I. Subjective Rating:
The number of participants involved in this study was 45 Malaysian citizens, comprising of 19 females and 26 males. The participants' age ranged from 20 to 30 years old. Minimum driving experience required is one year to ensure the drivers have adequate experience in driving. As a token, the participants were given some incentives for their participation. The objective and procedures of the study were explained in detail to each participant and they are required to fillin their personal information in a form given to them. Having done that, participants will be required to sit on the driver's seat in their comfortable driving postures. Participants were then required to fill in the Likert scale form given to them in assessing the comfort of the driver's seat. The same procedure was repeated for the other two different cars chosen in this study.
The maximum and minimum values of seat adjustment horizontal sliding distance (SLD) were taken with the absence of participant on the seat. The sliding distance was measured from the Accelerator Heel Point (AHP) to the front of the drivers' car seat as illustrated in Figure 1. The measurement tools used consist of the basic L-shape ruler and a tape measurement. Data were recorded manually into the form provided. The seat adjustment measurements were taken from three different cars, PeroduaMyVi, Proton Saga BLM, and Toyota Vios. The cars chosen are from compact and entry midsize segment cars. These cars represent the highest, average and the lowest ranks of cars used in Malaysia according to the survey by Powers (2008).The selected cars shared equal features on the driver's seat such as manual adjustment of the seat track and the seat back, no armrest and standard fabric cover. It is important to ensure they shared similar features to minimize the aesthetic effects on the participants' subjective responses (Kyung & Nussbaum, 2008).
II. Anthropometry measurement:
For anthropometry data collection, 62 body dimensions were measured from 1216 Malaysian respondents. However for the purposes of this paper, only the popliteal height parameter was used. The participants' ages varied between 15-65 years old. The range of participants for collecting the anthropometric data came from all ages to fit the 95th percentile of Malaysian citizens. The participants involved were gathered from all the Malaysian 14 states. All anthropometric data collected were based on MS ISO 7250 standard (2003). The equipment used in this study comprised of the anthropometric measuring tools such as the Human Body Measuring Kit and Anthropometer. The anthropometric data were measured and recorded in the data form before being transferred into the computerized anthropometric database.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The results found from the study are presented and discussed in this section. There are two parts of data analyses: first, from the subjective rating of 45 participants and second, the comparisons of car dimensions with anthropometry data of the 1216 participants.
I. Subjective Rating:
A descriptive statistical analysis was used to depict the percentage value of subjective rating gathered from each participant involved. Descriptive analysis was done on the participants comfort survey (subjective rating). The responses of the questionnaire were based on a five-point Likert scale with rating from 1 to 5. A percentage analysis of the questionnaire was done in order to enhance the interpretation of significant findings from the study. The percentages of comfort rating for all three cars involved in this study are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 shows that the driver's seat conditions for Toyota Vios scored the highest with 17.8% of participants voted as the seat as very comfortable compared to PeroduaMyVi and Proton Saga BLM, which scored only 2.2% at very comfortable level. This result correlates positively with the study done by Mohamed and Yusuff (2007) that showed the participants preference towards the Toyota Vios in term of car seat adjustability.
As for the foot comfortable evaluation, Proton Saga BLM achieved the highest very comfortable percentage of 11.1%, followed by PeroduaMyVi and Toyota Viosat 8.9%. The preference towards the Proton cars is maybe due to their larger legroom as compared to the Toyota Vios (Mohamed & Yusuff, 2007).
II. Anthropometric Comparisons:
As for anthropometric data comparison, the parameter of popliteal height was chosen to be compared with the maximum and minimum horizontal allowable seat adjustments in each car. Table 2 shows the anthropometric data measurement of popliteal height of 1007 participants.
The car seat horizontal adjustments (sliding distance) for all three cars involved are depicted in Table 3.
From the data in Table 2, the minimum value of popliteal height taken from the 5th percentile female is 369.95 mm. While for the maximum value of popliteal height of 95th percentile male is 503.88 mm. Both of these values lie within the minimum and maximum allowable range of horizontal car seat adjustment for all the three cars as shown in Table 3. This means that the horizontal design of car seat adjustability for all three cars involved are able to satisfy a majority of 90% of Malaysian population.
However, 10% of the Malaysian maximum and minimum range population that lie outside of this may experience some difficulties in terms of car seat horizontal comfort adjustability. For a shorter individual, he may face more difficulties to sit comfortably in a Proton Saga BLM as the minimum value is on the high side compared to PeroduaMyVi and Toyota Vios. This means that, he may have to sit slightly farther in his car seat in order to able to control the steering wheel.
On the other hand, for a taller individual, the Toyota Vios may restrict its horizontal car seat comfort because the value for the maximum adjustment is quite low compared to PeroduaMyVi and Proton Saga BLM. In this case, a driver may possibly need to raise his knees a bit in order to be able to sit properly in his car seat without obstructing his foot placement on the pedal.
This study has investigated and found the comfort subjective ratings and preference in three different driver's car seats. It has made comparisons of anthropometric data with the car seat horizontal adjustability. The subjective rating results showed that the Toyota Vios was found to be the most comfortable car in terms of seat adjustment while Proton Saga BLM was better in terms of spacious legroom for feet comfort. All the three cars studied showed that their car seat horizontal adjustments are able to accommodate 90 % of car drivers from the Malaysian population. However, the extreme population i.e. 5th percentile and 95th percentile outside the majority may experience some difficulties in achieving comfort. It is recommended that a more in depth investigation needs to be done in the future in order to clearly identify the possible explanation from the results found in this study. However these data must be interpreted with caution because the results are based on individual comfort perception and the sample size was small. As a suggestion, more researches on this topic need to be undertaken before the relationship between the car seat design and drivers comfort can be clearly understood.
Received 25 January 2014
Received in revised form 12
Accepted 14 April 2014
Available online 25 June 2014
Alizadehkhaiyat, O., A.C. Fisher, G.J. Kemp, K. Vishwanathan, S.P. Frostick, 2011. Shoulder muscle activation and fatigue during a controlled forceful hand grip task. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2'(3): 478-82. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.03.002
Andreoni, G., G.C. Santambrogio, M. Rabuffetti, A. Pedotti, 2002. Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. Applied ergonomics, 33(6): 511-22. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12507335
Antony, N.T., P.J. Keir, 2010. Effects of posture, movement and hand load on shoulder muscle activity. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 20(2): 191-8. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.04.010
Darses, F., M. Wolff, 2006. How do designers represent to themselves the users' needs? Applied Ergonomics, 37: 757-764.
Diebschlag, W., F. Heidinger, B. Kuurz, R. Heiberger, 1988. Recommendation for ergonomic and climatic physiological vehicle seat design. Technical Paper No.880055, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, USA.
Fai, T.C., F. Delbressine, M. Rauterberg, 2007. Vehicle seat design: State of the Art and Recent Development. Proceedings World Engineering Congress, 51-61.
Franz, M., R. Zenk, P. Vink, S. Hallbeck, 2011. The effect of a lightweight massage system in a car seat on comfort and electromyogram. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 34(2): 107-13. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.12.002
Gragg, J., Yang, J. (James), B. Howard, 2012. Hybrid method for driver accommodation using optimization-based digital human models. Computer-Aided Design, 44(1): 29-39. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2010.11.009
Hashemi, O.A., M.G. Paulin, A.B. Carman, 2013. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 23(1): 216-22. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.011
Power, J.D., 2008. J.D Power Asia Pacific Malaysia Initial Quality Study SM (IQS). On web http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008201 (9 September 2009).
Kyung, G., M.A. Nussbaum, 2008. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38: 526-538.
Linder, A., S. Schick, W. Hell, M. Svensson, A. Carlsson, P. Lemmen, K.U. Schmitt, et al., 2013. ADSEAT--Adaptive seat to reduce neck injuries for female and male occupants. Accident; analysis and prevention. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.043
Malaysian Standard, 2003. MS ISO 7250:2003 Basic human body measurements for technological design (ISO 7250: 1996, IDT). Department of Standards Malaysia.
Mohamad, D., B.M. Deros, D.A. Wahab, D.D.I. Daruis, A.R. Ismail, 2010. Integration of Comfort into a Driver's Car Seat Design Using Image Analysis. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(7): 924-929.
Mohamed, Z., R.M. Yusuff, 2007. Automotive Ergonomics: Passenger Cars Interior Dimension Parameters and Comfort, Proceedings of ICE 2007 International Conference On Ergonomics 3-6.
Morioka, M., M.J. Griffin, 2010. Magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration at the foot for seated persons. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329(14): 2939-2952. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.01.026
Okunribido, O.O., S.J. Shimbles, M. Magnusson, M. Pope, 2007. City bus driving and low back pain: A study of the exposures to posture demands, manual materials handling and whole- body vibration. Applied Ergonomics, 38: 29-38. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.01.006
Parkinson, M.B., M.P. Reed, 2007. Standing Reach Envelopes Incorporating Anthropometric Variance and Postural Cost, SAE Technical papers, (724).
Pheasant, S., 1998. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. Second edition. Taylor & Francis, London.
Porter, J.M., D.E. Gyi, H.A. Tait, 2003. Interface pressure data and the prediction of driver discomfort in road trials. Applied ergonomics, 34(3): 207-14. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00009- 7
Rahmatalla, S., J. DeShaw, 2011. Effective seat-to-head transmissibility in whole-body vibration: Effects of posture and arm position. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(25): 6277-6286. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2011.07.034
Reed, M.P., M.A. Manary, C.A. Flannagan, L.W. Schneider, 2000. Effects of vehicle interior geometry and anthropometric variables on automobile driving posture. Human factors, 42(4): 541-52. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11324849
Reed, M.P., S.M. Ebert-hamilton, M.A. Manary, K.D. Klinich, L.W. Schneider, 2005. A New Database of Child Anthropometry and Seated Posture for Automotive Safety Applications, SAE Techical papers, (724).
Roman-Liu, D., P. Bartuzi, 2013. The influence of wrist posture on the time and frequency EMG signal measures of forearm muscles. Gait & posture, 37(3): 340-4. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.027
Schmidt, S., M. Amereller, M. Franz, R. Kaiser, A. Schwirtz, 2013. A literature review on optimum and preferred joint angles in automotive sitting posture. Applied ergonomics. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.009
Seitz, T., J. Balzulat, H. Bubb, 2000. Anthropometry and measurement of posture and motion. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(4): 447-453. doi:10.1016/S0169- 8141(99)00028-1
Singh, S.P., S. Singh, P. Singh, 2012. Ergonomics in developing hand operated maize dehusker-sheller for farm women. Applied ergonomics, 43(4): 792-8. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.014
Vink, P., S. Hallbeck, 2012. Editorial: comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Applied ergonomics, 43(2): 271-6. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.001
Wang, Y., S. Rahmatalla, 2013. Human head-neck models in whole-body vibration: Effect of posture. Journal of biomechanics, 46(4): 702-10. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.037
Xu, X.S., D.E. Welcome, T.W. McDowell, J.Z. Wu, B. Wimer, C. Warren, R.G. Dong, 2011. The vibration transmissibility and driving-point biodynamic response of the hand exposed to vibration normal to the palm. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(5): 418-427. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.05.007
Yang, J.F., C.Y. Cho, 2012. Comparison of posture and muscle control pattern between male and female computer users with musculoskeletal symptoms. Applied ergonomics, 43(4): 785-91. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.013
Zenk, R., M. Franz, H. Bubb, P. Vink, 2012. Technical note: spine loading in automotive seating. Applied ergonomics, 43(2): 290-5. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.004
(1) Baba Md Deros, (1) Darliana Mohamad, (2) Dian Darina Indah Daruis, (1) Ahmad Rithaudden Yusoff, (1) Jaharah A. Ghani and (3) Chairul Saleh
(1) Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKMBangi, Selangor, Malaysia
(2) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sg Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
(3) Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia, UII Main Campus Kaliurang Street Km '4.5, Besi, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia
Corresponding Author: Baba MdDeros, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1: Comfort Rating Percentage (n = 45). PeroduaMyVi NC (%) LC (%) MC (%) C (%) VC (%) Driver's Seat Condition 0 0 26.7 71.1 2.2 Foot Comfort 0 6.7 22.2 62.2 8.9 Proton Saga BLM Driver's Seat Condition 0 0 46.7 51.1 2.2 Foot Comfort 0 2.2 33.3 53.3 11.1 Toyota Vios Driver's Seat Condition 0 0 20 62.2 17.8 Foot Comfort 0 2.2 24.4 64.4 8.9 * NC = Not Comfortable, LC = Less Comfortable, MC = Medium Comfortable, C = Comfortable, VC = Very Comfortable Table 2: Anthropometric data Measurement (n=1007). Male Mean SD 5%tile 95%tile Popliteal 436.88 40.61 369.88 503.88 Height Female Mean SD 5%tile 95%tile Popliteal 436.82 40.53 369.95 503.69 Height * all data in mm Table 3: Value of car seat horizontal adjustability. Cars Minimum Maximum PeroduaMyVi 360 570 Proton Saga BLM 370 580 Toyota Vios 320 530 * all data in mm
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Deros, Baba Md; Mohamad, Darliana; Daruis, Dian Darina Indah; Yusoff, Ahmad Rithaudden; Ghani, Jahar|
|Publication:||Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Hakim Rokn-Al-Din Masih Kashani and his poetic innovations.|
|Next Article:||Application of on load tap changer for voltage control.|