Incidence and morphology of accessory head of Flexor pollicis longus muscle--an anatomical study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was carried out in the department of anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of medical sciences, Gangtok, India. Thirty (30) cadavers (20 male and 10 female) which were used for dissection by First year MBBS students were included in the study. Cadavers with congenital anomalies, scars of any origin, or other pathologies were excluded. The dissection was carried out by giving vertical incision from the middle of the ventral surface of the lower parts of the arm upto the tip of the middle finger. Skin was separated from the superficial fascia and the important subcutaneous structures were identified. Antebrachial fascia was incised along the same line. The superficial flexor group of muscles were examined and slowly separated from the deep flexors and looked for the presence of AHFPL and any other accessory muscle belly along with it. AHFPL once identified its relation with MN and AIN were observed. The accessory head was carefully traced above to see its origin and below up to its insertion. The shape of the muscle belly was recorded and with the help of a digital vernier caliper the length of muscular part, tendon length up to its insertion, the maximum width of muscle belly, and the maximum width of tendon were recorded in millimeter.
RESULTS: In the present study the AHFPL was seen in 43.33% of the total 30 cadavers dissected. Out of 60 upper limbs the AHFPL was seen in total 15 limbs (25%). Bilateral AHFPL was seen in 2 cadavers (10%). The remaining AHFPL was seen unilaterally 7(46.6%) on the right side and 4(26.66%) on the left side. The shape of the muscles were mainly fusiform in 84.61% and it was slender in 19.38%. It was observed that the origin of the AHFPL were variable. In most of the cases the AHFPL was arising with one or other muscles of the flexors or pronator of the forearm. In 53.33% the AHFPL was taking origin from coronoid process of ulna and in 33.33% cases the origin of the muscles was from the medial epicondyle of humerus. In all the above mentioned cases the fibres of AHFPL was arising with Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) (Fig.1). In 2 different cases the muscle was arising from tendon of brachialis (Fig.2) and deep head of pronator teres (Fig.3) partially blending with fibres of FDS. In addition to AHFPL, in one case an additional muscle belly was observed and identified as accessory head of flexor digitorum profundus and both were arising as common belly from the undersurface of FDS (Fig.4). In all the cases we observed that the AHFPL was inserted by its thin tendon in the region of upper middle part of the forearm by joining the medial side of the tendon of FPL. The length of the muscle belly of AHFPL was 93.48 [+ or -] 1.76 mm, its tendon length up to the insertion was 20 [+ or -] 8.09 mm. The width of the muscle belly was 7.03 [+ or -] 1.43 mm and the width of its tendon close to the insertion was 0.55 [+ or -] 0.23mm. The measurements are compared with the previous findings (Table-1). In the present study all the AHFPL was supplied by the branches from anterior interosseous nerve. The median nerve was related anterior and the AIN was running lateral to the AHFPL muscle belly in all the cases (Fig.1), however the branches for Flexor digitorum profundus were passing underneath the muscle belly.
DISCUSSION: The flexor muscles of the forearm develops from the flexor mass dividing into 2 layers superficial and deep and the occurrence of accessory muscles connecting the flexor muscles could be the reason of incomplete separation of the flexor mass during development. (7) Various authors have reported the incidence of AHFPL, and the incidence ranged from 66.6%, 45%, 55%, 52%, 66.7%, and 46.03%. (3, 5, 7, 9, 10) In the present study the AHFPL was seen in 43.33% cases. The presence of bilateral AHFPL found to be more than unilateral, (5,7-9) but in our study it was observed in only 2(10%) cases. The majority of the muscles (86.66%) were fusiform in shape and only 13.3% was slender and this corresponds to the finding of Gunal and Mahakkaunahah. (2,13) Many literatures have described the various source of origin of the muscles. (2,5,7,13,14) In the present study the muscles was mainly originating from the coronoid process with the fibres of FDS (53.33%), from the medial epicondyle with fibres of FDS (33.3%), and except in 2 different cases the muscle was arising from tendon of brachialis and deep head of pronator teres. It was somewhat in agreement with the finding of Jones and Abraham who found that the muscle arose from the coronoid process it was always involved either from the undersurface of FDS or medial epicondyle. (7) As quoted by Jones and Abraham (7) that Dykes and Anson 1944 and Mangini 1960 have describe the other minor attachments: brachialis muscle, oblique cord or pronator teres muscle (PT), intramuscular flexor fascia. Similar to this in our study we found in one case where the muscle was taking origin from deep head of PT and in another case it was arising from tendon of brachialis.
A very few authors have taken the measurement of AHFPL, (2,3,7,18) but in our knowledge none of these authors have taken the tendon width at its insertion (Table 1). This may be of importance as its tendon contributes to the volume of carpel tunnel while causing carpel tunnel syndrome.
AIN branches posterior from median nerve between 2 heads of PT and with anterior interosseous artery it descend anterior to interosseous membrane between and deep to FPL and Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and supply both and terminate posterior to pronator quadratus. (1) Paralysis of AIN due to compression in the forearm is called as the kilohnevin syndrome. (2,3,6,19) The causes for compression could be abnormal muscles and tendon, trauma, vascular arcade etc. (15) Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome (AINS) would be of complete type when the entire of AIN passes posterior underneath the AHFPL belly causing weakness of all the three muscles supplied by it and incomplete type of AINS is likely to occur when only the medial branches of AIN to the FDP which passes beneath the muscle belly is compressed. (2) In the study done by previous authors, the AIN was running posterior to the belly of AHFPL, (2,3,7) while in others the nerve passed anteriorly in front of muscle belly. (5,8) However, the present study showed the AIN was passing lateral to the belly of AHFPL in all the cases and only their tendon crossed the AIN towards its insertion. But the branches to the FDP were passing underneath the belly of the muscle.
CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of AHFPL is variable among the different races, (10) it can be one of the cause for AIN syndrome, pronator teres syndrome, carpel tunnel syndrome, or abnormal sensation in the lower part of the forearm. In the present study variable results were obtained as compared to the studies conducted by previous authors and this could be due to low sample size. Nevertheless the study would be useful for both physicians and surgeons to know the incidence and morphology of AHFPL as the cause in relation to anterior interosseous nerve syndrome and Pronator teres syndrome.
(1.) William PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dysons M, Dussek JE, et al. Gray's Anatomy. New York; Churchill Livingstone: 1995. p. 848.
(2.) Gunal SA, Siddiqui AU, Daimi SR, Farooqui MS, Wabale RN. A study on the Accessory Head Of The Flexor Pollicis Longus Muscle (Gantzer's Muscle). J Clin Diagn Res.2013;7:418-21.
(3.) Hemmady MV, Subramanya AV, Mehta IM. Occasional head of flexor pollicis longus muscle: a study of its morphology and clinical significance. J. Postgrad Med. 1993; 39:14-6.
(4.) Wood J. Variations in human mycology. Proceedings of Royal Society of London. 1868; 16:483-525.
(5.) Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Musculo aponeurotic variations along the course of the median nerve in the proximal forearm. J Hand Surg Br.1987; 12:359-63.
(6.) Potu BK, Gorantala VR, Pulakunta T, Rao MS, Mamatha T, Vollala VR et al. Accessory head of flexor pollicis longus muscle and its significance in anterior interosseous nerve syndrome: case report and review. International Journal of Morphology. 2007; 25:911-14.
(7.) Jones M, Abrahams PH, Sanudo JR, Campillo M. Incidence and morphology of accessory heads of flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus (Gantzer's muscles). J Anat. 1997; 191:451-55.
(8.) AI-Qattan MM. Gantzer's muscle. An anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle. J Hand Surg Br. 1996; 21:269-70.
(9.) Oh CS, Chung IH, Koh KS. Anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus and the anterior interosseous nerve in Asians. Clin Anat 2000; 13:434-8.
(10.) Pai MM, Nayak SR, Krishnamurthy A, Vadgaokar R, Prabhu LV, Ranade AV et al. The accessory heads of flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus: incidence and morphology. Clin Anat 2008; 21:252-8.
(11.) Spinner M. The anterior interosseous nerve syndrome with special attention to its variations. J. Bone Joint Surg.1970; 52: 84-94.
(12.) Mangini U. Flexor pollicis longus muscle: its morphology and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg. 1960; 42A:467-70.
(13.) Mahakkanukrauh P, Surin P, OngkanaN, Sethadavit M, Vaidhayakarn P. Prevalence of accessory head of flexor pollicis longus muscle and its relation to anterior interosseous nerve in Thai population. Clin Anat 2004;17:631-5.
(14.) Uyaroglu FG, Kayalioglu G, Erturk M. Incidence and morphology of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle (Gantzer's muscle) in a Turkish population. Neurosciences 2006; 11:171-4.
(15.) Degreef I, De Smet L. Anterior interosseous nerve paralysis due to Gantzer's muscle. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70:482-4.
(16.) Sembian U, Srimathi T, Muhil M, NalinaKumari SD, Subramanian T. A study of the accessory muscles in the flexor compartment of the forearm. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2012; 6:564-7.
(17.) Mani SS, Vishnumaya G, Madan Kumar SJ. Accessory head of flexor pollicis longus and its significance in anterior interosseous nerve neuropathies and precision handling. International Journal of Anatomical Variations 2010; 3:46-8.
(18.) Uyaroglu FG, KayaliogluG, Erturk M. Incidence and morphology of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle (Gantzer's muscle) in a Turkish population. Neurosciences 2006; 11:171-4.
(19.) Kiloh L, Nevin S. Isolated neuritis of the anterior interosseous nerve. Br Med J1952; 1:850-1.
[1.] Binod Kumar Tamang
[2.] Pranoti Sinha
[3.] Rohit Kumar Sarda
[4.] Poonam Shilal
[5.] B.V. Murlimanju
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
[1.] Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences.
[2.] Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences.
[3.] Tutor, Department of Anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences.
[4.] Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences.
[5.] Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, KMC, Mangalore.
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Binod Kumar Tamang, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, 5th mile, Tadong, East Sikkim.
Date of Submission: 21/08/2013.
Date of Peer Review: 23/08/2013.
Date of Acceptance: 29/08/2013.
Date of Publishing: 03/09/2013
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ORIGINAL ARTICLE|
|Author:||Tamang, Binod Kumar; Sinha, Pranoti; Sarda, Rohit Kumar; Shilal, Poonam; Murlimanju, B.V.|
|Publication:||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences|
|Date:||Sep 9, 2013|
|Previous Article:||A study of Caldwell-Luc approach in various etiologies.|
|Next Article:||Determination of transpedicular screw parameters with the help of pedicle morphometry of thoracic vertebrae for safe transpedicular screw fixation--a...|