Printer Friendly

In Vitro Evaluation of the Toxicity of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles in Kidney Cell/Kobalt Ferrit Nanopartikullerinin Bobrek Hucresi Uzerine Guvenliginin In Vitro Degerlendirmesi.


Today nanoparticles are important issue of concern with their widely application in industrial and medical sectors because of their special properties, which cause dramatic increases in intentional and inadvertent oral, dermal and inhalational human exposure. Also, nanoparticles can found as contaminant in water, air, and bulky materials as a result of the natural incident such as volcanic eruptions. (1,2) Research database provides that nanoparticles could cause DNA damage, cell death, oxidative stress and change cell function and morphology in vitro, damages and changes in liver, kidney, gastrointestinal and neuronal systems in vivo. (3,4)

The exceptional features of cobalt based nanoparticles motivate their uses in different technologies like sensors, catalysts, pigments, and magnetism and energy storage devices. (5,6) Because of the high physicochemical stability of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs), researchers also focus on using as drug carriers, anticancer treatment, and as magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement. (7-9) However, some researchers have shown that Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs could cause oxidative damage, cell death and inflammatory responses in exposed mice, guinea pigs, zebrafish and human cell lines. (10-14) Therewith, both in vitro and in vivo studies should be gradually carried out to get comprehensive toxicity profiles of nanoparticles to predict their effects on human. There is no study evaluating the effects of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs or any other cobalt based nanoparticle on kidney. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the toxic effects of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs on kidney (NRK-52E) cells by in vitro assays.


Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs (CAT. No: 773352), neutral red dye and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM F-12), fetal bovine serum (FBS), phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and antibiotic solutions from Multicell Wisent (Quebec, Canada); Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit with propidium iodide (PI) from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA); the other chemicals from Merck (NJ, USA) were purchased.

To particle size and distribution characterization, Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs were suspended in Milli-Q water and cell culture medium with 10% FBS, and measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Jem-2100 HR, JEOL, USA). (15-17) The average hydrodynamic size of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs in cell culture medium was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (ZetaSizer Nano-ZS, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). One mg Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs was dispersed in cell culture medium, and then the suspension was sonicated at room temperature for 15 min at 40 W. Ten [micro]L of the suspension were diluted with cell culture medium to reach final concentration 10 [micro]g/mL, and sonicated for further 5 min. Then, DLS experiments performed.

NRK-52E rat kidney proximal tubular epithelial cells (CRL-1571) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The cells were incubated in DMEM-12 medium supplemented with FBS (%10) and 100 U/mL antibiotic solution at 5% C[O.sub.2], 90% humidity and 37[degrees]C for 24 h. The cell densities were from 1X[10.sup.4] to 1X[10.sup.6] cells/mL. Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs were freshly suspended at 1 mg/mL concentration in cell culture medium with 10% FBS and sonicated at room temperature for 15 min to avoid the aggregation/agglomeration of the nanoparticles before exposure. (15,16) The exposure times to the particle suspensions were 24 h.

The cellular uptake of nanoparticle was evaluated with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Thermo Elemental X series 2, USA). After exposure to 200 [micro]g/mL of nanoparticles, the cells were washed several times with equal volumes of PBS and counted by Luna cell counter (Virginia, USA). (15,16) The acid-digested samples were assayed for Co amount with ICP-MS. Also, Co content of the untreated cells for every cell line was measured.

The cytotoxic potentials of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs were determined by MTT and neutral red uptake (NRU) assay based on different cellular mechanisms. (15,16,18,19) The cell exposed final concentrations of 0-1000 [micro]g/mL. Optical density was read at 590 and 540 nm for MTT and NRU, respectively, using a microplate spectrophotometer system (Epoch, Germany). In every assay, the untreated cells were evaluated as negative control. It was calculated the inhibition of enzyme activity observed in cells compared with untreated (negative control) cells. Results were expressed as ratio of negative control.

The genotoxic potentials of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs were determined by comet assay. (15,16,20,21) The cell exposed final concentrations of 0.1-100 [micro]g/mL. Hydrogen peroxide ([H.sub.2][O.sub.2]) (100 [micro]M) and PBS were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Briefly, the cells were layered on microscope slides coated with agarose gel. The slides were incubated for 1 h at 4[degrees]C in lysis solution (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, and 10 mM tris-HCl, pH 10), added with 10% DMSO and 1% triton X-100. Then, DNA was unwinded for 20 min in cold-fresh electrophoresis buffer (0.3 M NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH 13) at 4[degrees]C and electrophoresis was performed at 4[degrees]C for 20 min (20 V / 300 mA). After electrophoresis, slides were neutralized with 0.4 M tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) 3 times for 5 min. The number of DNA breaks were scored under a fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 400 magnification using an automated image analysis system (Comet Assay IV, Perceptive Instruments, Suffolk, UK). DNA damage to individual cells was expressed as a percentage of DNA in the comet tail (tail intensity %).

Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit with PI was used to evaluate the cellular apoptosis or necrosis. (15,16) In every assay, negative controls and blank were evaluated. The cell exposed final concentrations of 0.1-100 [micro]g/mL. The apoptotic or necrotic cells, distributed on the slides, were immediately counted at 400 magnification under a phase-contrast fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Results were expressed as percent of the total cell amount.

All experiments were done in triplicates and each assay as repeated four times. Data (n=12) was expressed as mean [+ or -] standard deviation. The significance of differences between the untreated and treated cells with the nanoparticles was calculated by one-way ANOVA Dunnett t-test using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). p values of less than 0.05 were selected as the levels of significance.


The aim of this study is to evaluate the toxicity profiles of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs in NRK-52E kidney cells that could simulate specific target organ or system affected by occupational and environmental exposure to nanoparticles.

According to TEM images, the average size of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs was 39[+ or -]17 nm with narrow size distribution after dispersing in water (Figure 1). The nanoparticles slightly agglomerated and/or aggregated after dispersing in the culture medium, and their average sizes (range) increased to 101.5 nm (32.6 to 157.1 nm). The average hydrodynamic size of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs was evaluated by DLS technique. The nanoparticle size was 183.6 nm (ranging from 5.6-342.1 nm), and 52% of the particles had a size lower than 33.6 nm. In addition, the cellular uptake of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs was evaluated using ICP-MS. Results confirmed that nanoparticles were taken into the cells. Cobalt concentration was 8.3 [micro]g/mL/[10.sup.5] cell compared to the negative control.

In the evaluation of their cytotoxic potential, it was shown that Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs did not decrease the cell viability at concentration [less than or equal to]1000 [micro]g/mL (Figure 2). Annexin V-FTIC apoptosis detection assay with PI was used to assess the cell death pathway. The maximum levels of apoptotic and necrotic induction were 4.02 and 2.25 fold, respectively. The induction level was statistically significant at 100 [micro]g/mL. Our results showed that apoptosis could be the main cell death pathway in kidney NRK-52E cells exposed to Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs (Figure 3).

As to Comet assay results, Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs could be genotoxic because it was observed an increase in tail intensity, and induced DNA damage. The increase in DNA damage was significant in the range of 10-100 [micro]g/mL, and occurred in a concentration-dependent manner ([rho]<0.05). At the highest concentration of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs (100 [micro]g/mL), the tail intensity was approximately 1.7-fold of the negative control. In the positive controls (100 [micro]M [H.sub.2][O.sub.2]), the tail intensity was 16.9 (Figure 4).


Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs toxicity still controversial since the previous studies have contrary estimations. Horev-Azaria et al. (13) investigated the in vitro toxicological effects of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs on lung (A549 and NCIH441), liver (HepG2), kidney (MDCK), intestine (Caco-2 TC7), and lymphoblast (TK6) cells in the concentration range of 11.7-281.5 mg/mL. They reported that Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs produced no toxic effects in all cell types at s46.9 mg/mL. In that study, a significant decrease in viability was observed in NCIH441, HepG2, MDCK, and Caco-2 TC7 cells after 72 h, while there was no cytotoxic effect on A549 and TK6 cells even after 24 h of exposure.

Marmorato et al. (22) reported Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4] caused interference with lipid metabolism in Balb/3T3 cells depending on concentration. In another study, Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs were observed to have a weakly embryotoxic effect with an I[C.sub.50] value of 243.91 and 20.05 mg/mL in mouse 3T3 fibroblast and D3 embryonic stem cell lines, respectively. (8) Human glioblastoma-astrocytoma (U87MG) cells were observed to have peculiar features including a white corona around the nucleus and other morphological changes after exposure to Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs at 58 and 235 mg/mL for 24 h. They suggested Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs caused cellular stress, and indicated the vesicles appeared to be lipid droplet organelles. (11)

The genotoxicity of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs was evaluated by studying the interaction with Salmon sperm DNA. (23) It was reported the interaction between Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs and nucleic acid occurred, and the linkage was based on a coordination interaction of the phosphate groups and the oxygen atoms on the heterocyclic bases of DNA with metal ions on the particle surface. (24) Also, Ahmad et al. (10) pointed out the genotoxicity of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs. Similarly, Colognato et al. (25) reported the induction of genotoxicity in human peripheral lymphocytes exposed those Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs.


In conclusion; Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs did not show cytotoxic potentials on the kidney cells, whereas only their highest concentration induced DNA damage. The intensity of toxicological effects of nanoparticles could be varied among different cell lines. In light of the results and previous researches, low but effective concentrations of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs could be evaluated to be used safely in biomedicine, electronic, magneto-optic, sensor, data storage, catalysis and microwave applications. However, in vivo studies should be carried out to fully understand the mechanism of Co[Fe.sub.2][O.sub.4]-NPs toxicity.


This work was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University (Project No: 40441).

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.


(1.) Dhawan A, Sharma V. Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:589-605.

(2.) Kim YJ, Yu M, Park HO, Yang SI. Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by silica nanomaterials in human neuronal cell line. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2010;6:337-344.

(3.) Arora S, Raj'wade JM, Paknikar KM. Nanotoxicology and in vitro studies: the need of the hour. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;258:151-165.

(4.) Brooking J, Davis SS, Illum L. Transport of nanoparticles across the rat nasal mucosa. J Drug Target. 2011;9:267-279.

(5.) Alarifi S, Ali D, Verma A, Alakhtani S, Ali BA. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in human skin keratinocytes cells. Int J Toxicol. 2013;32:296-307.

(6.) Alinovi R, Goldoni M, Pinelli S, Campanini M, Aliatis I, Bersani D, Lottici PP, Iavicoli S, Petyx M, Mozzoni P, Mutti A. Oxidative and proinflammatory effects of cobalt and titanium oxide nanoparticles on aortic and venous endothelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2015;29:426-437.

(7.) Maaz K, Mumtaz A, Hasanain SK, Ceylan A. Synthesis and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route. J Magn Magn Mater. 2007;308:289-295.

(8.) Di Guglielmo C, Lopez DR, De Lapuente J, Mallafre JM, Suarez MB. Embryotoxicity of cobalt ferrite and gold nanoparticles: a first in vitro approach. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;30:271-276.

(9.) Amiri S, Shokrollahi H. The role of cobalt ferrite magnetic nanoparticles in medical science. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:1-8.

(10.) Ahmad F, Yao H, Zhou Y, Liu X. Toxicity of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanobeads in Chlorella vulgaris: interaction, adaptation and oxidative stress. Chemosphere. 2015;139:479-485.

(11.) Gianoncelli A, Marmorato P, Ponti J, Pascolo L, Kaulich B, Uboldi C, Rossi F, Makovec D, Kiskinova M, Ceccone G. Interaction of magnetic nanoparticles with U87MG cells studied by synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence techniques. X-Ray Spectrom. 2013;42:316-320.

(12.) Matsuda S, Nakanishi T, Kaneko K, Osaka T. Synthesis of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles using spermine and their effect on death in human breast cancer cells under an alternating magnetic field. Electrochim Acta. 2015;183:153-159.

(13.) Horev-Azaria L, Baldi G, Beno D, Bonacchi D, Golla-Schindler U, Kirkpatrick JC, Kolle S, Landsiedel R, Maimon O, Marche PN, Ponti J, Romano R, Rossi F, Sommer D, Uboldi C, Unger RE, Villiers C, Korenstein R. Predictive toxicology of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles: comparative in vitro study of different cellular models using methods of knowledge discovery from data. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2013;10:32.

(14.) Hwang DW, Lee DS, Kim S. Gene expression profiles for genotoxic effects of silica-free and silica-coated cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:106-112.

(15.) Abudayyak M, Altincekic T, Ozhan G. In vitro toxicological assessment of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles in several mammalian cell types. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;175:458-465.

(16.) Uzar NK, Abudayyak M, Akcay N, Algun G, Ozhan G. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induced cyto- and genotoxicity in kidney epithelial cells. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2015;25:334-339.

(17.) Chattopadhyay S, Dash SK, Tripathy S, Das B, Mandal D, Pramanik P, Roy S. Toxicity of cobalt oxide nanoparticles to normal cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Chem Biol Interact. 2015;226:58-71.

(18.) Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1125-1131.

(19.) Van Meerloo J, Kaspers GJ, Cloos J. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;731:237-245.

(20.) Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26:249-261.

(21.) Speit G, Hartmann A. The comet assay (single-cell gel test): a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage and repair. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;113:203-212.

(22.) Marmorato P, Ceccone G, Gianoncelli A, Pascolo L, Ponti J, Rossi F, Salome M, Kaulich B, Kiskinova M. Cellular distribution and degradation of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles in Balb/3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Toxicol Lett. 2011;207:128-136.

(23.) Mariani V, Ponti J, Giudetti G, Broggi F, Marmorato P, Gioria S, Franchini F, Rauscher H, Rossi F. Online monitoring of cell metabolism to assess the toxicity of nanoparticles: the case of cobalt ferrite. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6:272-287.

(24.) Pershina AG, Sazonov AE, Novikov DV, Knyazev AS, Izaak TI, Itin VI, Naiden EP, Magaeva AA, Terechova OG. Study of DNA interaction with cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012;11:2673-2677.

(25.) Colognato R, Bonelli A, Bonacchi D, Baldi G, Migliore L. Analysis of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles induced genotoxicity on human peripheral lymphocytes: comparison of size and organic grafting-dependent effects. Nanotoxicology. 2009;1:301-308.


(1) Istanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Istanbul, Turkey

(2) Istanbul University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.4274/tjps.99609

(*) Correspondence: E-mail:, Phone: +90 532 206 28 27


Received: 25.11.2016, Accepted: 15.12.2016
COPYRIGHT 2017 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Abudayyak, Mahmoud; Gurkaynak, Tuba AltincekIc; Ozhan, Gul
Publication:Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Aug 1, 2017
Previous Article:Activation of Two Different Drugs Used in Alzheimer's Disease Treatment on Human Carbonic Anhydrase Isozymes I and II Activity: an In Vitro...
Next Article:Synthesis and Antioxidant Properties of New Oxazole-5(4H)-one Derivatives/Yeni Oksazol-5(4H)-one Turevlerinin Sentez ve Antioksidan Ozellikleri.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |