Printer Friendly

Improving productivity through casting process modeling.

Casting engineers often design tooling based on their previous experiences. While this experience is invaluable, achieving the proper design using typical trial and error methods is time- and resource-consuming. Casting process modeling provides engineers a way to evaluate the effects of separate process variables on the quality of the resulting products in order to achieve the optimal process design.

In general, casting process modeling can be used by process engineers to develop new processes as well as optimize existing ones. This was the case for designing the mold and tooling for an automotive wheel made of A356 aluminum alloy. The wheel was cast via low pressure permanent mold with the tooling initially designed based on the past experiences of the engineers (Fig. 1). However, virtual inspection of the cast part revealed central shrinkage at the transition between the spokes and the well of the wheel casting (Fig. 2).

[FIGURE 1-2 OMITTED]

The part maker decided to redesign the cast tool using casting process modeling from Sutcast Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Solidification modeling of the initial design showed a macro shrinkage defect in the same location and size where it occurred in the actual casting.

In order to remove the macro shrinkage and decrease the solidification time, mold design was modified through:

* application of padding for improvement of directional solidification guaranteed by modeling;

* insertion of a water-cooled copper chill;

* adjustment of the temperature distribution of different tool parts;

* tool heat transfer control with the application of different coating thicknesses.

The proposed geometry of the new tooling design is shown in Fig. 3. Casting process modeling of the new design showed no sign of microshrinkage or porosity inside the wheel. However, at 0.42 seconds, the temperature of the fluid distribution in the new design fell below the solidus temperature, and the filling was stopped before completion.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

In the second step, initial conditions of the simulation were changed. Pouring temperature was set to 1,382F (750C), the mold initial temperature was increased to 572F (300C) and the contact surfaces with the metal were coated with various thicknesses. These changes resulted in increased temperature in the well of the wheel and, thus, complete mold fill.

Ultimately, process engineers were able to reduce lead time and avoid further casting process design by trial and error. Casting process modeling also allowed the cast wheel to be produced 2.5 times faster than the initial design.

Select No. 001 at www.moderncasting.com/info
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Foundry Society, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PRODUCT INNOVATIONS
Publication:Modern Casting
Date:May 1, 2006
Words:412
Previous Article:Chapter meetings.
Next Article:Tailor properties where needed using the CDC process.
Topics:


Related Articles
AFS research continues to focus on needs of U.S. foundry industry.
Castings will play major role in the future of transportation.
Simulation software in action: five users share their experiences.
In Pursuit of high tech: what foundries must consider to become State-of the-Art: three engineering firms detail their vision of what it takes to be...
Are you nuts?
Investing with rapid prototyping: with the ability to produce near-net shape engineered cast components in days, the combination of rapid prototyping...
AFS NW regional spotlights casting design, manufacturing.
Shopping for innovation: product innovations case studies show how metalcasting plants have saved money, increased productivity or improved quality...
GM Powertrain hosts Saginaw Valley Educational Seminars.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters