Printer Friendly

Improvement of Physicomechanical Properties of Pineapple Leaf Fiber Reinforced Composite.

1. Introduction

Use of natural fibers in composite fabrication drew great interest from the researchers due to its biodegradability and acceptable mechanical strength. As a matrix material, polypropylene has been extensively used with natural fiber in composite preparation [1, 2]. After banana and citrus fruit, pineapple (Ananas comosus) is one of the most essential tropical fruits in the world [3]. Hence leaves of pineapple can be used for producing natural fibers, which necessarily are considered as waste materials. Pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) are composed of holocellulose (70-82%), lignin (5-12%), and ash (1.1%), with tremendous mechanical properties [4]. Composites, the wonder lightweight material with high strength-toweight ratio and stiffness properties, have come a long way in replacing conventional materials like metals, woods, etc. [5].

Researchers are having great interest in finding out new sources of raw materials that possess comparable physical and mechanical properties to synthetic fibers. Various other parameters to be considered while selecting raw materials are being cheap, being ecofriendly [6], absence of health hazards, high degree of flexibility [7], lower plant's age, easy collection, and regional availability which directly influence the suitability of natural fibers [8]. Above all the natural fibers are renewable resource, thus providing a better solution of sustainable supply; for example, it has low cost, low density, least processing expenditure, no health hazards, and better mechanical and physical properties [9].

Thermoplastic matrix materials are the most important part of a composite. Polypropylene (PP) is an amorphous thermoplastic polymer and is widely used as an engineering thermoplastic, as it possesses useful properties such as transparency, dimensional stability, flame resistance, high heat distortion temperature, and high impact strength. PP is also very suitable for filling, reinforcing, and blending. PP with fibrous natural polymers of biomass origin is one of the most promising routes to create natural-synthetic polymer composites [10].

However, the major limitation of natural fibers/polymers composites is the incompatibility between the hydrophobic thermoplastic matrices and the hydrophilic natural fibers [11]. Therefore it is highly important to modify the natural fiber surface to increase the fiber and matrix interaction. Chemical treatments, graft copolymerization, and use of coupling agents on natural fibers have already been explored by a number of researchers with a view to improve the fiber/matrix interaction [12]. However, mercerization of natural fibers by alkali is the most popular method nowadays to improve fiber/matrix interactions by reducing the hydrophilicity of the natural fiber. In this study, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is used for the surface modification of the PALF.

PALF has been explored by a number of researchers in the fiber reinforced composites, and they have various alkali treatment with a view to improve the mechanical properties of the composite. However, the effect of the alkali concentration has not been explored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to manufacture the PALF/PP composite having better mechanical strength. The effects of fiber loading on the mechanical properties of PALF/PP composites are analyzed. Finally, the effects of the concentration of the alkali treatments on the mechanical properties of the composite are evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials. Granules of PP were purchased from the Cosmoplene Polyolefin Company Ltd. (401, Ayer Merbau Road, Singapore). Raw pineapple fibers were collected from Tangail, Bangladesh.

2.2. Alkali Treatment. Pineapple fibers were washed multiple times to remove the dirt and impurities attached on the fiber surface. After drying, the fibers were cut into small pieces. NaOH solutions were prepared with three different concentrations as 3, 5, and 7 (w/v) %. Then the fibers were emerged on NaOH solution and treated for 1 hour at room temperature, maintaining the fiber to solution weight ratio at 1:20 (w/v). Treatment with NaOH helps to remove the hydrogen bonding in the network structure of the fibers cellulose, thereby increasing fibers surface roughness [13]. Certain amount of wax and oils covering the external surface of the fibers cell wall, as well as lignin, will be removed in this process. Besides, this process will expose the short length crystallites and depolymerise the native cellulose structure [14].

After 1 hour samples were washed thoroughly until the neutral pH is achieved. Then the fibers were dried by oven at 80[degrees] C for 20 hours and stored in the plastic container.

2.3. Fabrication of Composite. PP sheet was prepared from its granules (10 g) by heat press. The press was operated at 360[degrees] F. Steel plates were pressed for 5 min under a pressure of 2 tons. The plates were then cooled for 5 min in a cold press under the same pressure at room temperature. The resulting PP sheet was cut into desired size for composite fabrication. Composites were prepared by sandwiching pineapple fibers between two sheets of PP. The fiber content in the pineapple composites were 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, and 45% by weight. The prepared composites were then packaged in polyethylene bags prior to testing.

2.4. Sample Identification. Thickness of the samples was recorded by digital slide calipers. Average results of three readings from different place along the sample have been taken for measuring each thickness. Different samples are marked as mentioned in Table 1.

2.5. Water Uptake Test. Water uptake test was carried out according to ASTM D-570. Composite samples were immersed in a beaker containing 100 ml of deionized water at room temperature (25[degrees]C) for 1 hour. Initially weight of the samples was determined, after certain time interval; samples were taken out of the beaker and wiped using tissue papers. Their weight was taken again. In this case, it shows no uptake after 50 minutes; that is why we carried out the test up to 1 hour [19]. Water uptake test was carried out on three samples of different weight of each composite. Water uptake percentage was determined by using the following equation:

Water up-take (%) = ([W.sub.f] - [W.sub.i]/[W.sub.f]) x 100% (1)

where [W.sub.i] is initial weight (oven dry weight) and [W.sub.f] is final weight (weight after immerse in water).

2.6. Mechanical Test. The tensile strength (TS), Young's modulus (YM), and elongation at break (EB%) of the composites were measured according to the European standard (ISO/DIS 527-1:2010) by a universal tensile testing machine (H50 KS0404) with an initial clamp separation of 20mm and a cross-head speed of 10 mm/min speed. The samples sizes were 60mmx10mmx1.6mm. The samples were conditioned at 25[degrees]C and 50% relative humidity for two days before testing and all the tests were performed under the same conditions. The samples were conditioned at 25[degrees]C and 50% relative humidity for two days before testing and all the tests were performed under the same conditions (ISO 291:2012) for consistent result.

Equations (2), (3), and (4) were used for measuring the tensile strength, elongation at break percentage, and Young's modulus, respectively.

Tensile strength, [sigma] = Force/Area = [F.sub.max]/A (2)

where [F.sub.max] is maximum load applied to the sample and A is cross-sectional area of the sample.

Percentage of elongation at break was obtained by the following relation:

Elongation at Break, EB (%) = ([DELTA][L.sub.b]/[L.sub.0]) x 100 (3)

where [DELTA][L.sub.b] is extension at breakpoint and [L.sub.0] is original length of the sample.

Young's Modulus, Y = d[sigma]/d[epsilon] (4)

where d[sigma] is stress at yield point and de is strain at yield point.

Bending test was carried out for determining bending strength (BS) and bending modulus (BM) using the same universal tensile testing machine according to ISO standard (ISO 14125).

Bending test was carried out for determining bending strength (BS) and bending modulus (BM) using the same universal tensile testing machine.

Bending strength and modulus were calculated by (5) and (6), respectively.

Bending Strength, [sigma] = 3FL/2b[d.sup.2] (5)

where F is the load (force) at the fracture point (N), L is the length of the support span, b is width, and d is thickness.

Bending Modulus, [E.sub.bend] = [L.sup.3]F/4w[h.sup.3]d (6)

where w and h are the width and height of the sample, L is the distance between the two outer supports, and d is the deflection due to the load F applied at the middle of the sample.

Dynamic impact test was conducted to evaluate impact strength (IS) on unnotched mode composite specimens according to ASTM D 6110-97 standard using an Impact Tester (HT-8041B IZOD, Pendulum type, Taiwan). Mechanical property measurement for each composite was repeated for four times for accuracy, and three duplicate samples having the same dimensions were tested.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Water Uptake. Water uptake determines the water-swelling behavior of the composites. Water uptake test was carried out on three samples of each composite and their average values were calculated. The results of water uptake are shown in Figure 1. It can be observed from Figure 1 that the water absorption percentages were increased with the increasing soaking time.

The maximum water absorption was found when the soaking time was about 50 minutes for almost all the composites and, in most of the cases, water absorption was very fast (almost 50% of maximum water uptake) in the first 10 minutes of soaking time; then it became slower gradually. It is also found that alkali-treated composite takes more water than untreated composites; for example, sample PP725 took 29% more water than sample PP025 at maximum level.

Alkali treatment removes all the noncellulosic impurities, so microgaps may be increased due to the removal of interfibrillar matrix material, such as lignin and pectin. Then the small water molecules may penetrate fiber surface easily due to having more space, resulting in more water absorption by the alkali-treated composite [19].

Besides, with the increase of fiber content (wt%) the water uptake percentage was increased; for example, sample PP045 took 94.73% more water compared to sample PP025 at maximum level. The highest water uptake percentage (1.93%) was recorded for sample PP745 at 50 minutes of soaking time. With the increased fiber loading in the composite, more absorbent sites are available, and more empty spaces resulting from the removal of the lignin and pectin are present, which leads to the higher water uptake [19].

3.2. Effect of Fiber Loading on Mechanical Properties. Tensile strength (TS), tensile modulus (TM), elongation at break (Eb%), bending strength (BS), bending modulus (BM), and impact strength (IS) of the prepared composites were studied and the data are given in Figure 2. The TS, TM, and Eb% of PP matrix were found to be 28 MPa, 338 MPa, and 75%, respectively, for sample PP025 (25 wt% fiber). Composite with 40 wt% fibers content (sample PP040) showed an increase of 192% TS and 268% TM. In all cases of fiber addition to composite, Eb% was lowered compared to PP. This was because PALF in general have low elongation percentage compared to PP [20]. So, the elasticity of polypropylene decreases with the addition of pineapple fiber and, therefore, the elongation at break also decreases which shows that composite became brittle after the increase in volume. It was noticed that composite with 45 wt% fiber content (PP045) brought out higher BS and BM values. The results revealed that, due to 45 wt% reinforcement by PALF (PP045), an increase of 155% BS and 265% BM was observed. The IS values of PP045 were obtained 7.182 kJ/[m.sup.2]. It was noticed that 140% IS was increased for PP045 compared to PP025. From Figure 1, it is clear indication that PP000 < PP025 < PP030 < PP035 < PP040 < PP045 for all the properties except elongation at break. That means that, with the increasing of fiber content, all the mechanical properties increase. PALF composites gained huge mechanical properties over the matrix material and thus indicated good fiber matrix adhesion.

The superiority of mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fiber is related to high content of alpha-cellulose content with low microfibrillar angle (14[degrees]). As reinforcing agent PALF has both qualities, that is, high content of alpha-cellulose content with low microfibrillar angle (14[degrees]), the result of PALF based polymer composites shows excellent stiffness and strength compared to other cellulose based composite materials.

3.3. Effect of Alkali Concentration on Mechanical Properties. Figure 3 depicts the TS, EB, TM, BS, BM, and IS of alkali-treated and alkali-untreated PALF/PP composites.

Before PALF was treated with 3, 5, and 7 (w/v) % of NaOH, in all the cases fiber content was 35 wt%. Then all the mechanical properties of all the samples were measured. The samples were found as PP035 < PP335 < PP535 < PP735 for all the properties. For example, TS, EB, and TM were increased 25.35%, 31.4%, and 43.45%, respectively, for sample PP735 compared to sample PP035. It is observed that the bending strength and modulus were also increased by 15.78% and 52%, respectively, but the impact strength was decreased 23.11% for sample PP735 compared to sample PP035.

From the figure it is clear that alkali treatment improves the mechanical properties of the PALF reinforced polypropylene composites. It is also evident that the percentage of NaOH is directly related to all the mechanical properties and composite, treated with 7 (w/v) % NaOH showing better mechanical properties. The increasing of tensile strength and modulus value of alkali-treated composites is due to the fact that the alkali treatment improved the adhesive characteristics of fiber surface by removing natural and artificial impurities.

Moreover, alkali treatment leads to fiber fibrillation, that is, breaking down of the fiber bundles into smaller fibers and results in the increasing of interface between matrix and fiber [21, 22]. This also increases in the number of reactive sites and changes in chemical compositions of the fibers [23]. The improvement of the mechanical properties may also be achieved by removing hemicellulose and lignin contents from the fiber [24]. However, when the composite was treated with 10% NaOH, it reduces the tensile strength of the composite to 81 MPa. The reason for this may be that the higher alkali concentration weakens the fiber by excess delignification [25].

4. Comparison of the Tensile Strength of PALF/PP Composite with Other Composites

It can be seen from Table 2 that PALF/PP fiber exhibits superior tensile strength than other natural fiber reinforced composites. Therefore PALF/PP fiber can be a potential natural fiber reinforced composite for various applications.

5. Conclusions

Pineapple leaf fiber is very common in tropical regions and it is very simple to extract fibers from its leaves. The utilization of pineapple leaf fiber in composite material is a new source of materials which can be economic, ecofriendly, and recyclable. It was found that PALF/PP composite shows better tensile strength than other natural fiber reinforced composites. Besides, better mechanical properties of composite were observed with the increase of fiber loading and alkali treatment. Moreover, water uptake percentage increased with alkali treatment. Thus, PALF may be used in fabrication of ecofriendly composite products for diversified applications and, thus, synthetic fibers can easily be replaced with PALF.

Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


[1] L. P. Wu, "Structures and properties of low-shrinkage polypropylene composites," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, p. 134, 2017.

[2] P. Uawongsuwan, Y. Yang, and H. Hamada, "Long jute fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite: Effects of jute fiber bundle and glass fiber hybridization," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 132, no. 15, 2015.

[3] R. M. N. Arib, S. M. Sapuan, M. A. M. M. Hamdan, M. T. Paridah, and H. M. D. K. Zaman, "A literature review of pineapple fibre reinforced polymer composites," Polymers and Polymer Composites, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 341-348, 2004.

[4] S. Mishra, M. Misra, S. S. Tripathy, S. K. Nayak, and A. K. Mohanty, "Potentiality of pineapple leaf fibre as reinforcement in PALF-polyester composite: Surface modification and mechanical performance," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 321-334, 2001.

[5] S. Nangia and S. Biswas, "Jute composite: technology & business opportunities," in Proceedings of the international conference on advances in composites, IISc & HAL, Bangalore, India, 2000.

[6] M.S. Sreekala, M. G. Kumaran, and S. Thomas, "Oil palm fibers: morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 821-835, 1997.

[7] P. J. Herrera-Franco and A. Valadez-Gonzalez, "A study of the mechanical properties of short natural-fiber reinforced composites," Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 597-608, 2005.

[8] M. Abdelmouleh, S. Boufi, M. N. Belgacem, and A. Dufresne, "Short natural-fibre reinforced polyethylene and natural rubber composites: effect of silane coupling agents and fibres loading," Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 7-8, pp. 1627-1639, 2007.

[9] L. Yan, N. Chouw, and X. Yuan, "Improving the mechanical properties of natural fibre fabric reinforced epoxy composites by alkali treatment," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 425-437, 2012.

[10] R. A. Khan, M. A. Khan, S. Sultana, M. Nuruzzaman Khan, Q. T. H. Shubhra, and F. G. Noor, "Mechanical, degradation, and interfacial properties of synthetic degradable fiber reinforced polypropylene composites," Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 466-476, 2010.

[11] M. M. Haque, M. Hasan, M. S. Islam, and M. E. Ali, "Physicomechanical properties of chemically treated palm and coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites," Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 20, pp. 4903-4906, 2009.

[12] H. Ku, H. Wang, N. Pattarachaiyakoop, and M. Trada, "A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites," Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 856-873, 2011.

[13] B.-H. Lee, H.-J. Kim, and W.-R. Yu, "Fabrication of long and discontinuous natural fiber reinforced polypropylene biocomposites and their mechanical properties," Fibers and Polymers, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83-90, 2009.

[14] X. Li, S. Panigrahi, and L. G. Tabil, "A study on flax fiberreinforced polyethylene biocomposites," Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 525-531, 2009.

[15] S. Siddika, F. Mansura, M. Hasan, and A. Hassan, "Effect of reinforcement and chemical treatment of fiber on the properties of jute-coir fiber reinforced hybrid polypropylene composites," Fibers and Polymers, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1023-1028, 2014.

[16] M. R. Rahman, M. M. Huque, M. N. Islam, and M. Hasan, "Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of jute fiber reinforced polypropylene composites by post-treatment," Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1739-1747, 2008.

[17] M. A. Maleque, F. Y. Belal, and S. M. Sapuan, "Mechanical properties study of pseudo-stem banana fiber reinforced epoxy composite," Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 359-364, 2007.

[18] M. Boopalan, M. Niranjanaa, and M. J. Umapathy, "Study on the mechanical properties and thermal properties of jute and banana fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites," Composites PartB: Engineering, vol. 51, pp. 54-57, 2013.

[19] J. Zhu, H. Abhyankar, and J. Njuguna, "Effect of fibre treatment on water absorption and tensile properties of flax/tannin composites," in Proceedings of the ICMR, 2013.

[20] R. M. N. Arib, S. M. Sapuan, M. M. H. M. Ahmad, M. T. Paridah, and H. M. D. K. Zaman, "Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites," Materials and Corrosion, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 391-396, 2006.

[21] J. P. Siregar, S. M. Sapuan, M. Z. A. Rahman, and H. M. D. K. Zaman, "The effect of alkali treatment on the mechanical properties of short pineapple leaf fibre (PALF) reinforced high impact polystyrene (HIPS) composites," Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment (JFAE), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1103-1108, 2010.

[22] Y. Li, Y.-W. Mai, and L. Ye, "Sisal fibre and its composites: A review of recent developments," Composites Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2037-2055, 2000.

[23] H. Obasi et al., "Influence of alkali treatment and fibre content on the properties of oil palm press fibre reinforced epoxy biocomposites," American Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 117-123, 2014.

[24] J. Jayaramudu, B. R. Guduri, and A. V. Rajulu, "Characterization of natural fabric sterculia urens," International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 115-125, 2009.

[25] X. Li, L. G. Tabil, and S. Panigrahi, "Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review," Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 25-33, 2007.

K. Z. M. Abdul Motaleb, (1) Md Shariful Islam, (1) and Mohammad B. Hoque (2)

(1) Department of Textile Engineering, BGMEA University of Fashion and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

(2) Department of Textile Engineering World University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Correspondence should be addressed to K. Z. M. Abdul Motaleb;

Received 28 December 2017; Revised 7 May 2018; Accepted 15 May 2018; Published 12 June 2018

Academic Editor: Vijaya Kumar Rangari

Caption: Figure 1: Water uptake percentage of PALF/PP composites.
Table 1: Sample Identification.

Sl. No.           Samples            Thickness(mm)

01               PP Matrix                0.8
02        25 wt% PALF/PP composite        1.5
03        30 wt% PALF/PP composite       1.66
04        35 wt% PALF/PP composite       1.73
05        40 wt% PALF/PP composite       1.85
06        45 wt% PALF/PP composite       1.97

Sl. No.   Identification Code

          0% NaOH   3% NaOH   5% NaOH   7% NaOH

01         PM000      --        --        --
02         PP025     PP325     PP525     PP725
03         PP030     PP330     PP530     PP730
04         PP035     PP335     PP535     PP735
05         PP040     PP340     PP540     PP740
06         PP045     PP345     PP545     PP745

Table 2: Comparison of mechanical properties.

Sl.     Name of the composite        Tensile       References
                                  strength (MPa)

1              PALF/PP                  89         This study
2     Jute-Coir hybrid fibre/PP         27            [15]
3           Jute fibre/PP               55            [16]
4     Banana fibre/Epoxy resin        45.57           [17]
5        Jute-Banana hybrid           18.96           [18]
          fibre/Epoxy resin
6     Palm-Coir hybrid fiber/PP         30            [11]

Figure 2: Effect of fiber content on the mechanical
properties of PALF/PP composites.


Fiber Content (%)   Tensile Strength (MPa)

PP000                         28
PP025                         56
PP030                         61
PP035                         71
PP040                         82
PP045                         87


Fiber Content (%)   Elogation at Break (%)

PP000                         75
PP025                       15.55
PP030                       14.05
PP035                       13.15
PP040                        11.8
PP045                       11.05


Fiber Content (%)   Tensile Modulus (MPa)

PP000                        338
PP025                        1026
PP030                        1096
PP035                        1139
PP040                        1246
PP045                        1731


Fiber Content (%)   Bending Strength (MPa)

PP000                         20
PP025                         27
PP030                         31
PP035                         38
PP040                         45
PP045                         51


Fiber Content (%)   Bending Modulus (MPa)

PP000                        230
PP025                        330
PP030                        420
PP035                        496
PP040                        560
PP045                        840


Fiber Content (%)   Impact Strength

PP000                   2.989
PP025                   3.788
PP030                   4.607
PP035                   4.607
PP040                   5.446
PP045                   7.182

Note: Table made from bar graph.

Figure 3: Effect of alkali treatment on the
mechanical properties of PALF/PP composites.


NaOH (%)     Tensile Strength (MPa)

PP035 (0%)             71
PP335 (3%)             77
PP535 (5%)             84
PP735 (7%)             89


NaOH (%)     Elongation (%)

PP035 (0%)      13.15
PP335 (3%)      15.21
PP535 (5%)      16.82
PP735 (7%)      17.28


NaOH (%)     Tensile Modulus (MPa)

PP035 (0%)            1139
PP335 (3%)            1364
PP535 (5%)            1476
PP735 (7%)            1634


NaOH (%)     Bending Strength (MPa)

PP035 (0%)             38
PP335 (3%)             41
PP535 (5%)             42
PP735 (7%)             44


NaOH (%)     Bending Modulus (MPa)

PP035 (0%)            496
PP335 (3%)            528
PP535 (5%)            588
PP735 (7%)            754


NaOH (%)     Impact Strength

PP035 (0%)       4.607
PP335 (3%)       4.251
PP535 (5%)       3.877
PP735 (7%)       3.542

Note: Table made from bar graph.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Motaleb, K.Z.M. Abdul; Islam, Shariful; Hoque, Mohammad B.
Publication:International Journal of Biomaterials
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Early Biofilm Formation on UV Light Activated Nanoporous Ti[O.sub.2] Surfaces In Vivo.
Next Article:In Vitro Culture of Single Bovine Embryos with Microwell Plates Made of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Cured under Low Pressure.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters