Printer Friendly

Importance of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Byline: Bahattin Isik, Muhittin Serkan Yilmaz, Cihat Yel, Cemil Kavalci, Gorkem Alper Solakoglu, Metin Ozdemir, Murat Ongar and Burak Demirci


Objective: To explore the effect of red blood cell distribution width levels on the diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, and comprised record of patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. Factors analysed were age, gender, red blood cell distribution width level, admission haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, endoscopy findings classified according to the Forrest system, comorbid diseases, use of medications, unhealthy habits like alcohol usage and smoking, and mortality rate.

Results: Of the 147 patients, 93(64%) were men. The overall median age of the sample was 60 years. Besides, 117(79.6%) patients had comorbid diseases, of which hypertension 56(38.4%) was the most common. A total of 24(16.8%) patients were using antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, while 30(20.5%) were on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Peptic ulcer in 128(87.1%) patients was the most common cause of haemorrhage. The median red blood cell distribution width level of the study population was 15.25% which was significantly higher compared to the reference values (pless than 0.05).. In contrast, haemoglobin 9.55% (3.7) and haematocrit 28.75% (10.8)were significantly lower (pless than 0.05). Mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with higher red blood cell distribution width values (pless than 0.05).

Conclusion: Red blood cell distribution width levels were higher during the acute phase of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, Red blood cell distribution width, Emergency.


Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH) is an important cause of emergency admissions.1 Peptic ulcer is the most common cause of UGIH with a prevalence of 52-170/100000 in different studies.2 About 70-80% of UGIH is self-limited, but overall mortality is 7-10%, which makes UGIH a significant emergency condition.3,4

Older age, comorbid diseases, medications and unhealthy habits like alcohol usage and smoking are common risk factors for UGIH.5,6

In Turkey, endoscopy is usually difficult to reach in emergency units. Moreover, medical history and physical examination may sometimes not be useful to make the diagnosis and decide management approach, especially in debilitated patients due to the nature of the condition and because of the overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs). These conditions together complicate the treatment of haemorrhagic patients and prolong hospitalisation time. For these reasons, there is a need for novel parameters to help clinicians diagnose UGIH in acute settings.1

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a marker that increases in emergency situations as cute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute cerebrovascular events.7-9 As far as we know no study has yet investigated the relationship between UGIH and RDW. RDW, an anaemia parameter, is reportedly an independent risk factor for haemorrhage after AMI.10,11

The current study was planned to determine the role of RDW levels in the diagnosis of UGIH.

Materials and Method

The retrospective study was conducted at Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, and comprised record of patients diagnosed with UGIH from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. After getting approval from the institutional ethics committee, patients records were retrieved from the via hospital database. Age, gender, RDW level, admission haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct) levels, endoscopy findings classified according to Forrest system, comorbid diseases, medication use (antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), unhealthy habits (alcohol usage and smoking), and mortality rate were investigated.

Data was analysed using SPSS 17. Descriptive statistics included frequency (n), percentage (%), median, and interquartile range (IQR). Normality of the study variables was tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskall-Wallis test. RDW level of the patients and the upper limit of the normal for RDW were compared, as were the Hb and Hct levels of the patients and the lower limit of normal for Hb and Hct. Results were interpreted at a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Pless than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Of the 147 patients, 94(64%) were men. The overall median age of the sample was 60 years. Besides, 117(79.6%) patients had comorbid diseases, of which hypertension 56(38.4%) was the most common. A total of 24(16.8%) patients were using antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, while 30(20.5%) were on NSAIDs. Six (4.1%) patients were regularly consuming alcohol (Table-1).

Peptic ulcer in 128(87.1%) patients was the most common cause of haemorrhage (Table-2).

The median RDW level of the study population was 15.25%, which was significantly higher compared to the reference values (pless than 0.05). In contrast, Hb 9.55% (3.7) and Hct 28.75% were significantly lower (pless than 0.05) (Table-3).

Overall, 83(56.8) patients were at Forrest stage 3. No statistically significant correlation existed between RDW levels and Forrest classification. (p>0.05) (Table-4).

Table-1: Demographic data.




Comorbid Disease###Hypertension###56###38.4

###Coronary artery disease###27###18.5

###Diabetes Mellitus###22###15.1


###Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)###15###10.3


###Chronic Liver Disease###7###4.9




Unhealthy Habits###Smoker###28###19.0

###Alcohol user###6###4.1

Table-2: Endoscopic evaluation.

Endoscopy findings###n###%

Peptic Ulcer###128###87.1

Oesophagus Varices###13###8.8

Malignant Ulcer###5###3.4

Table-3: RDW, Hb and Hct levels.





Table-4: Relation between Forrest Classification and RDW levels.

Stage###n (%)###RDW (Median-IQR)###P

Stage 1a###12 (8.2)###17.45 (6.2)###0.34

Stage 1b###16 (11)###15.45 (4.8)

Stage 2a###12 (8.2)###14.80 (3.1)

Stage 2b###10 (6.8)###15.10 (3.2)

Stage 2c###13 (8.9)###15.60 (4.1)

Stage 3###83 (56.8)###15.20 (3.2)

Table-5: Correlation between RDW and patient outcomes.

###N###RDW Median (IQR)###p



In our study 8(5.4%) patients died due to haemorrhage (Table-5). Mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with higher RDW values (pless than 0.05) ( Table-5). Forrest stage and higher age were significantly associated with higher mortality rates (pless than 0.05 each). Gender, comorbid diseases, unhealthy habits and medication use did not affect mortality rate (p>0.05).


Management of UGIH has recently considerably improved parallel to the developments in general healthcare. Despite these progresses, mortality rates have yet to get lowered significantly.12 Older patients usually require intensive care unit (ICU) admissions due to medications and comorbid diseases.13

Literature suggests that most of the patients diagnosed with UGIH are 60 to 65 years old males, and our study demonstrated similar results with males constituting 63% of the sample, and the mean age was 63 years.1,6,14-16

The prevalence of vascular pathologies and comorbid diseases increase with age. In addition, men consume more alcohol and smoke more than women. Unhealthy eating habits of male patients may also contribute UGIH aetiology. These facts can be the cause of higher prevalence of UGIH in older male group.

A study reported that 17% subjects with UGIH were using NSAIDs, 7% anticoagulants, 8.5% salicylate, and 1% clopidogrel. It also reported a high prevalence of alcohol consumption (38%).16 A study from Turkey indicated a rate of 31% for smoking and 6% for alcohol consumption. NSAIDs and anticoagulant use has been reported as high as 69% and 7%, respectively in Turkish population.14

Another domestic study reported NSAIDs, anticoagulant use, smoking, and alcohol consumption rates of 36%, 2%, 17% and 4%, respectively.12 Unlike previous data, the prevalence of alcohol consumption is lower in Turkey (4%). We conclude that cultural influences on smoking and alcohol usage, especially aspirin, NSAID, anticoagulant and anti-platelet medications, affect the ratio of UGIH in different patient populations.

In addition to primary liver and kidney diseases, other comorbidities also increase the risk for UGIH.5,6 A study reported a rate of 4% for chronic kidney disease and 10% for liver disease,12 while another study reported rates of 3.4% and 21%, respectively.14 The latter study also reported a malignancy rate of 8.4%. In our study the most common comorbid disease was hypertension; rates of malignancy, chronic liver and kidney disease were similar to those reported in literature.12,14

Previous studies have reported that the most common cause of UGIH is peptic ulcer disease.14,17,18 A Turkish study indicated that mostly duodenal (52%) and gastric ulcers (29%) were encountered.19 Widespread NSAIDs use due to a high prevalence of coronary artery disease and rheumatological diseases in Turkey may be the basis of peptic ulcers as an aetiological factor.

One study reported that the rate of Forrest stage 3 ranged between 63-70%. We found similar results for re-haemorrhage risk to other studies from our country.1

As far as we know, no study has yet compared the effect of RDW levels on UGIH. Several studies have identified RDW as an indicator of morbidity and mortality in acute coronary syndrome. Haemorrhagic processes stimulate erythropoietin (EPO) production. Higher EPO levels lead to a cascade that provokes anisocytosis. Inflammatory cytokines like tumour necrosis factor-alpha ( TNF-a), Interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 affect bone marrow, desensitising erythrocyte progenitors,20 which inhibit erythrocyte maturation and further add to anisocytosis.20

Increased stress leads to neurohormonal activity and affects RDW levels.21 In our study we found that RDW levels are increased in UGIH patients. Stress, inflammatory process, and an acute drop in haemoglobin due to haemorrhage stimulate bone marrow to produce massive amounts of immature and deformed red blood cells (RBCs), increasing RDW levels. Our study found that Hb and Hct levels were as low as expected (pless than 0.005). We encountered no study in literature that correlated RDW levels and Forrest stage. We found no significant correlation between them. As Forrest classification is used as a risk stratification tool for secondary haemorrhage but RDW levels increase in the acute phase, we conclude that this statistical insignificance was an expected finding.

Mortality rates reported in literature are 9.5%, 10.7%, 15% and 11% respectively.14,22-24 Our study found a relatively lower mortality rate, which may be explained by early medical interventions before an endoscopist takes over a patient. As most of the patients were diagnosed to be at Forrest stage 3 during endoscopy, we conclude that rapid and accurate medical interventions had positive effect on prognostic outcome.

Age is an independent risk factor for mortality in UGIH patients.14,21,25,26 A study reported age as the only risk factor for mortality among gender, smoking, NSAID, and anticoagulant usage.27 We conclude that altered physiological functions by age and intolerance to hypovolaemia may be the cause of higher mortality in older population.

No studies have been conducted yet to explain the association between mortality caused by UGIH and RDW though such an association exists in different clinical circumstances such as AMI and pneumonia.28-30 We conclude that hypovolaemia due to massive haemorrhage before death leads to the secretion of a higher amount of EPO and stress factors. These factors in turn stimulate bone marrow to produce young RBCs. This cascade may be the cause of higher RDW levels in patients with higher mortality.


As far as we know, this is the first study in the literature examining RDW levels during UGIH management. RDW can be used as a predictor for prognosis of UGIH patients. More studies are needed to show the role of higher RDW levels in association with the UGIH management. RDW levels were higher in UGIH, especially during the acute phase.


1. Cander B, Ertekin B, Kara H, Gul M, Dundar D, Kocak S, et al. Factors Affecting The Length of Hospitalization at The Patients Admit to Emergency Department With Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Firat Tip Derg 2011;16: 51-4.

2. Wierzchowski P, Dabrowiecki S, Szczesny W, Szmytkowski J. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding - risk factors and the valueof emergencyendoscopy. Arch Med Sci. 2013; 9:843-8.

3. Yavorski RT, Wong RK, Maydonovitch C, Battin LS, Furnia A, Amundson DE.Analysis of 3, 294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities. AmJ Gastroenterol. 1995; 90:568-73.

4. Di Fiore F, Lecleire S, Merle V, Herve S, Duhamel C, Dupas JL, et al. Changes in characteristics and outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a comparison of epidemiology and practices between 1996 and 2000 in a multicentre French study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 17:641-7.

5. Arlt GD, Leyh M.Incidence and pathophysiology of peptic ulcer bleeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001; 386:75-81.

6. Boonpongmanee S, Fleischer DE, Pezzullo JC, Collier K, Mayoral W, Al-Kawas F, et al. The frequency of peptic ulcer as a cause of upper- GI bleeding is exaggerated. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59:788-94.

7. Karakas MF, Buyukkaya E, Kurt M, BuyukkayaS, Karakas E, Akcay AB, et al. Association between red cell distribution width(RDW) and hs-CRP in patients with Cardiac Syndrome X. Abant Med J. 2013;2:17-22.

8. Isik T, Uyarel H, Tanboga IH, Kurt M, Ekinci M, Kaya A, et al. Relation of red cell distribution width with the presence, severity, and complexity of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. 2012; 23:51-6

9. Ani C, Ovbiagele B. Relation of baseline presence and severity of renal diseaseto long-term mortality in persons with known stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2010; 288:123-8.

10. Fatemi O, Torguson R, Chen F, Ahmad S, Badr S, Satler LF, et al. Red cell distribution width as a bleeding predictor after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2013; 166:104-9.

11. Goncalves S, Ferreira Santos J, Amador P, Rassi L, Rodrigues AR, Seixo F, et al. Impact of red blood cell distributor width on risk for bleeding events in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013; 32:27-33.

12. Gunay N, Yildirim C, Zengin S, Kose B, Cavdar M, Hocagil H, et al. Acilservisebasvuranust gastrointestinal kanamalihastalaricinbazi zaman degerlerininprospektifolarakdegerlendirilmesi. Akademikacil tip derg. 2006; 5:17-20.

13. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK, NonvaricealUpper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group.Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:843-57.

14. Turedi S, Gunduz A, Yandi M. An etiological and prognostic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from Karadeniz Technical University Department of Emergency Medicine.Turk J Emerg Med. 2010; 10: 20-5.

15. Paucar S H, Cossio V E, Lizarraga R J.Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Cuzco: two years experience. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1996; 16:203-7.

16. Botianu A, Matei D, Tantau M, Acalovschi M.Mortality and need of surgical treatment in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a one year study in a tertiary center with a 24 hours / day-7 days / week endoscopy call. Has anything changed? Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108:312-8.

17. Thomopoulos KC, Mimidis KP, Theocharis GJ, Gatopoulou AG, Kartalis GN, Nikolopoulou VN. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy: endoscopic findings, clinical management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:1365-8.

18. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC.Influencing the practice and outcome in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Steering Committee of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Gut. 1997; 41:606-11.

19. Koruk ?, Cam H, Aydinli M, Yilmaz N, Dag MS, Demir U, et al. Endoscopically active bleeding in patients referred for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Active bleeding rates in patients with symptoms). Endoscopy Gastrointestinal 2013;21:11-4.

20. Montagnana M, Cervellin G, Meschi T, Lippi G. The role of red blood cell distribution width in cardiovas-cular and thrombotic disorders. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 50:635-41.

21. Fukuta H, Ohte N, Mukai S, Saeki T, Asada K, Wakami K, et al. Elevated plasma levels of B-type natriuretic Peptide but not C- reactive protein are associated with higher red cell distribution width in patients with coronary artery disease. Int Heart J. 2009; 50:301-12.

22. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. BMJ. 1995; 311:222-6.

23. Amouretti M, Czernichow P, Kerjean A, Hochain P, Nousbaum JB, Rudelli A, et al. Management of upper digestive hemorrhage occurring in the community: patterns of patient care in 4 French administrative areas. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000; 24:1003-11.

24. Sereda S, Lamont I, Hunt P. The experience of a hematemesis and melaena unit: a review of the first 513 consecutive admissions. Med J Aust. 1977; 1:362-6.

25. Greenwald DA. Aging, the gastrointestinal tract, and risk of acid-related disease. Am J Med. 2004; 117:8S-13S. Review.

26. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet. 2000; 356:1318-21.

27. Ates F, Karincaoglu M, Aladag M. Evaluation of 524 Cases With Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal System Bleeding. ?nonuUnivers Tip FakDerg. 2008;15:93-8.

28. Bekler A, Gazi E, Tenekecioglu E, Karaagac K, Altun B, Temiz A, et al. Assessment of the relationship between red cell distribution width and fragmented QRS in patients with non-ST elevated acute coronary syndrome.Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:413-9.

29. Braun E, Kheir J, Mashiach T, Naffaa M, Azzam ZS. Is elevated Red cell distribution width a prognostic predictor in adult patients with community acquired Pneumonia?BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:129.

30. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ni H, Deng H. Red cell distribution width is associated with hospital mortality in unselected critically ill patients. J Thorac Dis. 2013; 5:730-6.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Pakistan Medical Association
Date:Feb 29, 2016
Previous Article:Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling on implant stability - an experimental study in sheep.
Next Article:Squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue in young patients - A 10 years tertiary care experience.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters