Printer Friendly

Importance of canopy position for growth of Celtis laevigata seedlings.

ABSTRACT. -- Seedlings of Celtis laevigata (Willd.), Texas sugarberry, were planted in the field to determine affects of canopy position, root competition, nutrient addition and herbivory on their growth. Growth was greatest under a mature Acacia smallii (Isley), huisache, canopy and least in open grassland between the mature Acacia trees. Mortality was highest in the open grassland compared to below the Acacia canopy. Other factors examined had no significant effect on C. laevigata seedling growth. Celtis laevigata is a mature community species that is shade tolerant and requires high levels of soil nitrogen. As such, growth should be limited in areas typical of early successional communities and promoted by conditions typical of mature communities. Key words: competition; herbivory; light levels; nutrients; shade; Texas sugarberry; trenching.

**********

Secondary succession in parts of southern Texas may begin with abandonment of farmland. If farming is stopped, colonization by various annual species occurs quickly, followed by establishment of woody plants like Acacia smallii (Isely), huisache, within five years (Van Auken and Bush, 1985). Acacia smallii dominates the savanna-woodland for the next 25 to 35 years, after which it declines. It is shade intolerant (Bush and Van Auken, 1986a) and grows poorly below its own canopy (Lohstroh and Van Auken, 1987). During this time period, Celtis laevigata (Willd.), Texas sugarberry, becomes established and then dominates the mature community (Bush and Van Auken, 1984). Celtis laevigata is shade tolerant as might be expected for mature community species (Bush and Van Auken, 1986a).

Although C. laevigata is tolerant of low light levels in the greenhouse, we have not identified any reports of its ability to grow in the field or its site requirements for establishment. Late successional species are usually tolerant of low levels of light (Grime, 1965; Loach, 1967, 1970), but may require higher levels of nutrients (Bormann, 1953; Tilman, 1982; Van Auken et al., 1985). Additional factors that could be important in determining plant establishment and dominance are herbivory and ability to compete for resources below ground (Weaver and Clements, 1966; Harper, 1977; Smith, 1980).

This study was designed to determine the importance of canopy position, nutrient addition, herbivory, and root competition on the growth of seedlings of C. laevigata in the field.

METHODS

Fruits of Celtis Iaevigata were collected in February 1985 from trees located along the San Antonio River, Bexar County, Texas. Seeds were soaked in giberellic acid for 3.5 hours to break dormancy (Kahn, 1968) and then rinsed thoroughly with distilled water. Three seeds were sown in each 15-centimeter diameter by 15-centimeter deep plastic pot containing 1400-gram sieved, Frio clay-loam soil (Taylor et al., 1966) from an early successional site. The soil was a Mollisol, classified as a fine, mixed, thermic, Cumulic Haplustoll, low in carbon (1.29 [+ or -] 0.45 percent, by weight), nitrogen (0.14 [+ or -] 0.03 percent), and phosphorous (8 [+ or -] 2 milligrams per kilogram). Calcium was high (2400 [+ or -] 800 milligrams per kilogram) and magnesium and potassium were at intermediate levels (30 [+ or -] 11 milligrams per kilogram, 11 [+ or -] 5 milligrams per kilogram, respectively) (Bush and Van Auken, 1986b). Rainfall data were taken from the NOAA local climatological data summary (NOAA, 1985).

Seven weeks after sowing, plants were sized according to height and vigor and thinned to one per pot. One-hundred-nineteen plants were used in the experiment. Seven randomly selected plants were kept in the greenhouse and the remaining plants were transplanted to a field site along the San Antonio River. Seven randomly selected plants were placed into each of the 16 treatments. All plants were given 300 milliliters of distilled water every third day for 10 days (equilibration) before initial measurements. Greenhouse plants were harvested for initial measurements by cutting at the cotyledon scars and drying (70[degrees]C) to a constant weight.

The experimental design was [2.sup.4] factorial with canopy position (under an Acacia smallii canopy or in the open), nutrients (added or not added), root competition (roots present or trenching, no woody plant roots), and herbivory (herbivores present or insecticide treatment, no herbivores) as factors. With all combinations, there were 16 treatments. The canopy position was beneath five mature A. smallii trees and the open area was adjacent. Mean light levels were 515 [+ or -] 153 [micro]M*[m.sup.-2]*[sec.sup.-1] under the canopy and 2173 [+ or -] 174 [micro]M*[m.sup.-2]*[sec.sup.-1] in the open. Light levels were measured with a Li-cor[R] LI-188 integrating quantum sensor. Nutrient treatment consisted of 250 milliliters of a complete nutrient solution (Van Auken and Kapley, 1979) once per week starting at zero time for 12 weeks. No nutrient-treatment plants were given 250 milliliters of distilled water at the same time intervals. Root competition was reduced (no competition treatment) by trenching a one square meter perimeter around the plants, to a depth of 20 centimeters. Root competition treatments were untrenched. No herbivory plants were sprayed with malathion (2.95 milliliters per liter) once each week for the duration of the experiment. A four-sided cardboard box prevented the insecticide from being blown onto other test plants. Herbivory treatment plants were sprayed with an equal amount of distilled water at the same time intervals.

The experiment was terminated 12 weeks after initial measurements were taken (1 November 1985). Plants were cut at the cotyledon scars and dry weights were measured. Data were statistically analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure and means were separated using the Least Significant Difference test. Mortality data was analyzed with a [X.sup.2] test (Steel and Torrie, 1980; SAS Institute, 1982).

RESULTS

Position was the only main factor tested that was significant (ANOVA, F = 64.03, P < 0.0001, Fig. 1). Herbivory, competition, or nutrient additions were not significant (ANOVA, F = 0.00-3.59, P > 0.05). Of the 10 two-way and three-way interactions, only the herbivory-nutrient interaction was significant (ANOVA, F = 4.37, P = 0.0397). Mean aboveground dry weight of Celtis laevigata seedlings grown in the open (grassland, full sunlight) was 0.25 [+ or -] 0.21 grams, whereas mean aboveground dry weight of plants grown below the Acacia canopy (shade) was 0.96 [+ or -] 0.45 grams. Mean aboveground dry weight of the plants harvested at the start of the experiment was 0.14 [+ or -] 0.08 grams. Thus, plants in the open (grassland) increased in dry weight 1.79 times, while those in the shade below the Acacia canopy increased 6.86 times.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Means of all treatments were separated using the least significant difference test (Table 1). The main differences were in canopy position. Mean values for all plants in treatments in the open were lower than means for plants in treatments below the Acacia canopy. Other differences are slight and should not be considered because other main effects were not significant when tested with ANOVA.

Overall seedling mortality in the field was 36 percent, and 98 percent of these mortalities occurred in the open (grassland, full sunlight), which was highly significant ([X.sup.2] = 36.1, P < 0.005). Rainfall during August 1985 was only 0.45", which was 83 percent below normal, and this was the time when almost all of the Celtis mortalities occurred (Fig. 2). Rainfall during September and October was 28 percent and 36 percent above normal, and only one mortality occurred during this time.

DISCUSSION

Many abiotic and biotic factors affect the establishment and growth of woody plants (Harper, 1977). However, the present field study identified C. laevigata seedling position relative to an Acacia smallii canopy as the major factor. Growth of C. laevigata seedlings below the Acacia canopy was 3.84 times higher than that of seedlings in open grassland. Reciprocially, mortality of C. laevigata seedlings in the open grassland was 39 times higher compared to those below the Acacia canopy.

Light intensity, an obvious variable influenced by the presence of a woody plant canopy, may be reduced by more than 90 percent by the A. smallii overstory (Bush and Van Auken, 1986a). But, low light levels should reduce, not stimulate, C. laevigata growth. Apparently, the stimulation of C. laevigata seedling growth is mediated by another factor associated with the A. smallii canopy. Soil temperature, soil nutrients, and soil water content all have been shown to change below the canopies of certain woody species (Tiedemann and Klemmedson, 1973a, 1973b, 1986; Bush and Van Auken, 1986b). Higher levels of soil nutrients may be a factor involved in stimulating the growth of C. laevigata. However, we did not find a nutrient stimulation in the present experiment. Soil nutrients, especially nitrogen, have been shown to increase during successional events (Gorham et al., 1979), and total soil nitrogen has been demonstrated to increase during secondary succession in this area (to 2.5 [+ or -] 0.7 g*[kg.sup.-1], Bush and Van Auken, 1986b). In addition, total soil nitrogen is almost twice as high under a 15-year-old Acacia smallii canopy compared to open grassland. Low light levels occur below the canopy, but higher soil nitrogen levels also are found. Added nitrogen, rather than other nutrients, has been shown to stimulate C. laevigata growth in the same Frio soil in greenhouse experiments (Van Auken et al., 1985). Thus, soil nitrogen seems to be a major candidate for causing the increased growth observed.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Other factors examined, including competition, nutrient supplements, and herbivory, did not cause significant changes in C. laevigata growth. Competition for soil-borne resources, mainly water and nutrients, can play a significant role in establishment and subsequent growth of woody species (Harper, 1977). Trenching effectively eliminates root competition (Ehrenfeld, 1980; Horn, 1985). But, we did not see a difference in C. laevigata growth between trenched and nontrenched plots and concluded that competition between adult and seedling plants was unimportant. Competition with woody plant roots may have been masked by competition with herbaceous plants that were not removed from the study plots (both canopy and open plots). Competition between woody plant seedlings and herbaceous plants can cause significant growth reduction in woody plants (Glendening and Paulsen, 1955; Van Auken and Bush, 1989).

Nutrient additions were expected to have stimulatory effects on the growth of C. laevigata as seen in previous studies (Van Auken et al., 1985). However, additional nitrogen in the canopy soil could have masked that effect. The lack of stimulation of growth of C. laevigata in the open when nutrients were added was probably the result of the early drought and later stimulation of associated herbaceous species by the removal of a nutrient limitation. With the growth limitation removed, the herbaceous species may have used up a nutrient required for C. laevigata growth.

Herbivores can have drastic effects on plant populations and change successional sequences (Harper, 1977; Gilbert, 1985), although not shown in the present study. This study was completed in the autumn and was of limited duration. A study completed over a longer time and including both the spring and autumn growing seasons might show significant growth reduction due to herbivory, if herbivores are present.

Celtis laevigata appears to be a late successional species, requiring high soil nitrogen and capable of growth in canopy shade. Although it can grow in disturbed areas or grasslands, it would do so at reduced rates, depending on the presence of competition and soil nitrogen levels. A more favored site would be in the reduced light and higher soil nitrogen environment below the canopy of A. smallii.
TABLE 1. Mean aboveground dry weight ([+ or -] SD) for Celtis laevigata
grown in 16 treatments and initial measurements. Mean values followed by
the same letter are not significantly different (ANOVA, LSD P > 0.05).

 Dry-weight
Treatments (grams)

Zero time 0.14 [+ or -] 0.08A
Open, herbivory, competition, nutrients 0.18 [+ or -] 0.31A
Open, herbivory, competition, no nutrients 0.08 [+ or -] 0.03A
Open, herbivory, no competition, nutrients 0.23 [+ or -] 0.28AB
Open, herbivory, no competition, no nutrients 0.35 [+ or -] 0.36ABC
Open, no herbivory, competition, nutrients 0.23 [+ or -] 0.42AB
Open, no herbivory, competition, no nutrients 0.17 [+ or -] 0.19A
Open, no herbivory, no competition, nutrients 0.40 [+ or -] 0.35ABC
Open, no herbivory, no competition, no nutrients 0.28 [+ or -] 0.45AB
Under canopy, herbivory, competition, nutrients 1.00 [+ or -] 0.55DE
Under canopy, herbivory, competition, no
 nutrients 0.91 [+ or -] 0.29CDE
Under canopy, herbivory, no competition,
 nutrients 0.85 [+ or -] 0.36CDE
Under canopy, herbivory, no competition, no
 nutrients 0.93 [+ or -] 0.19CDE
Under canopy, no herbivory, competition,
 nutrients 0.88 [+ or -] 0.49CDE
Under canopy, no herbivory, competition, no
 nutrients 0.79 [+ or -] 0.41BCD
Under canopy, no herbivory, no competition,
 nutrients 1.41 [+ or -] 0.93E
Under canopy, no herbivory, no competition, no
 nutrients 0.90 [+ or -] 0.42CDE


LITERATURE CITED

Bormann, F. H. 1953. Factors determining the role of loblolly pine and sweetgum in early oldfield succession in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr., 23:339-358.

Bush, J. K., and O. W. Van Auken. 1984. Woody species composition of the upper San Antonio River gallery forest. Texas J. Sci., 36:139-145.

______. 1986a. Light requirements of Acacia smallii and Celtis laevigata in relation to secondary succession on floodplains of South Texas. Amer. Midland Nat., 115:118-122.

______. 1986b. Changes in nitrogen, carbon, and other surface soil properties during secondary succession. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 50:1597-1601.

Ehrenfeld, J. G. 1980. Understory response to canopy gaps of varying size in a mature oak forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 107:29-41.

Gilbert, L. E. 1985. Ecological factors which influence migratory behavior in two butterflies of the semi-arid shrublands of south Texas. Pp. 724-747, in Migration: mechanisms and adaptive significance (M. A. Rankin, ed.), Contrib. Marine Sci., 27 (suppl.): 1-868.

Glendening, G. E., and H. A. Paulsen, Jr. 1955. Reproduction and establishment of velvet mesquite as related to invasion of semidesert grasslands. USDA Tech. Bull., 1127:1-50.

Gorham, E., P. M. Vitousek, and W. A. Reiners. 1979. The regulation of chemical budgets over the course of terrestrial ecosystem succession. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 10:53-84.

Grime, J. P. 1965. Shade tolerance in flowering plants. Nature, 208:161-163.

Harper, J. L. 1977. The population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, 892 pp.

Horn, J. C. 1985. Responses of understory tree seedlings to trenching. Amer. Midland Nat., 114:252-258.

Kahn, A. A. 1968. Inhibition of gibberellic acid-induced germination by abscisic acid and reversed by cytokinins. Plant Physiol., 43:1463-1465.

Loach, K. 1967. Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. I. Leaf photosynthesis and respiration in plants raised under artificial shade. New Phytol., 66:607-621.

______. 1970. Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. II. Growth analysis of plants raised under artifical shade. New Phytol., 69:273-286.

Lohstroh, R. J., and O. W. Van Auken. 1987. Comparison of canopy position and other factors on seedling growth in Acacia smallii. Texas J. Sci., 39:233-239.

NOAA. 1985. Local climatological data, annual summary with comparative data, San Antonio, Texas. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina, 8 pp.

SAS Institute. 1982. SAS user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 584 pp.

Smith, R. L. 1980. Ecology and field biology. Harper and Row, New York, 835 pp.

Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometric approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, 633 pp.

Taylor, F. B., R. B. Hailey, and D. L. Richmond. 1966. Soil Survey of Bexar County, Texas. USDA Soil Conserv. Serv., Washington, D.C., 126 pp.

Tiedemann, A. R., and J. O. Klemmedson. 1973a. Nutrient availability in direct grassland soil under mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) trees and adjacent open areas. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 37:107-111.

______. 1973b. Effects of mesquite on physical and chemical properties of the soil. J. Range Manag., 26:27-29.

______. 1986. Long-term effects of mesquite removal on soil characteristics: I. Nutrients and bulk density. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 50:472-475.

Tilman, D. 1982. Resources, competition and community structure. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, New Jersey, 296 pp.

Van Auken, O. W., and R. Kapley. 1979. Principles of ecology: laboratory manual. Burgess Publ. Co., Minneapolis, 175 pp.

Van Auken, O. W., E. M. Gese, and K. Connors. 1985. Fertilization response of early and late successional species: Acacia smallii and Celtis laevigata. Bot. Gaz., 146:564-569.

Van Auken, O. W., and J. K. Bush. 1985. Secondary succession on terraces of the San Antonio River in south Texas. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club., 112:158-166.

______. 1989. Prosopis glandulosa growth: influence of nutrients and simulated grazing of Bouteloua curtipendula. Ecology, 70:512-516.

Weaver, J. E., and F. E. Clements. 1966. Plant ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 601 pp.

O. W. VAN AUKEN AND R. J. LOHSTROH

Division of Life Sciences, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78285
COPYRIGHT 1990 Texas Academy of Science
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Van Auken, O.W.; Lohstroh, R.J.
Publication:The Texas Journal of Science
Geographic Code:1U7TX
Date:Feb 1, 1990
Words:2775
Previous Article:Phyllodont (Paralbulinae) fish toothplates from the Lower Cretaceous Glen Rose Formation of central Texas.
Next Article:Solar pond feasibility for low cost energy and water production.
Topics:


Related Articles
Romantic display gets tree planted.
Logs give seedlings a leg-up.
Competitive interactions in chenier communities of Southwest Louisiana.
Woody vegetation survey of beall woods nature preserve, Wabash County, Illinois.
Effects of temperature and light on Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) and Texas sugarberry (Celtis laevigata) seed germination.
Evaluation of facilitated succession at Las Palomas Wildlife Management Area in South Texas.
A phytosociological description of a remnant bottomland hardwood forest in Denton County, Texas.
Effects of temperature and light on Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) and Texas sugarberry (Celtis laevigata) seed germination.
Seedling survival, growth and mortality of Juniperus ashei (Cupressacae) in the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |