Printer Friendly

Implementation of a bowel care protocol within intensive care/Implementacion de un protocolo de cuidado intestinal en cuidado intensivo.

INTRODUCTION

Mater Adult Hospital ICU is an eleven-bed general intensive care unit (ICU) in South Brisbane with approximately 600 admissions per year. The unit is led by five intensivists who are rostered to lead the unit one week at a time.

In 2008, the unit did not have a formal bowel care protocol in place and bowel care was addressed using an unsystematic approach. Aperients were given in various forms and quantities and at different stages of the patient's admission.

A general observation was that constipation appeared to be a problem. The author approached the Nurse Unit Manager regarding whether there was a need to develop a protocol. It was agreed to carry out an audit to determine what action the unit was taking to prevent constipation and to identify any areas of improvement.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROTOCOL

A five-stage cycle was used as a guide for the audit process and a small audit was carried out on seven patients in June-July 2007. Each of these stages is summarised in the following section.

Stage 1--Preparation for audit

This was the general observation period in which it was idedntified that constipation was a problem.

Stage 2--Selection of audit criteria

The inclusion criteria were patients who were intubated and ventilated, receiving enteral feeding and had not had bowel surgery. Although constipation can be a problem for any patient It was decided to concentrate on this small group as it represented the typical ICU patient. Patients post bowel surgery were excluded as they were at high risk of developing an ileus.

Stage 3--Measuring current practice

This stage involved looking at how long after admission aperients were given, which aperients were given and how long after admission patients' were bowels opened.

Patients were commenced on aperients on day four of admission on average. All patients received prune juice twice daily and then variants of macrogol (Movicol[TM]), lactulose, enema (Microlax[TM]), and senna. On average, bowels were opened on day nine of admission.

The effect of constipation on patients within ICU was reviewed using the literature. It had been documented that constipation is a symptom that is often overlooked and does not receive attention until it is a problem (Ross 1998) and that continence assessment may be a low priority in a nurse's workload (Bayliss & Salter 2004). Causes of constipation are opioids, diuretics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants and loss of privacy (McKenna et at. 2001) and constipation can prolong both the time to wean from mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay (Van der Spoel et al. 2006). It was clear from the literature that ICU patients were at risk of developing constipation, and that constipation can have a serious detrimental effect.

The author approached the Nurse Unit Manager and the Clinical Nurse Consultant and a need for a bowel care protocol was identified.

A protocol was developed between June 2008 and February 2009. This involved searching the literature to determine best practice and looking at protocols already implemented within other ICUs. The multi-disciplinary team involved in the implementation of the protocol included the author, the clinical nurse consultant, intenslvists, a pharmacist, and a dietician (see Picture 1).

Stage 4--Implementation of change

Change was implemented from March 2009 onwards by carrying out in-service education sessions for staff. These sessions raised awareness of the effects and risks of constipation with ICU patients and provided education on using the protocol, which was implemented in July 2009.

Amendments in the early months included adding an area for a medical officer to prescribe the protocol. This was because there were examples of patients being placed on the protocol that should have been excluded.

Stage 5--Re-audit

A repeat audit was carried in June-July 2010 out on seven patients. The purpose of a re-audit is to ensure that the change implemented in stage four has been successful in Improving current practice.

Patients were commenced on the protocol on day 1.6 of admission on average. Bowels were opened on day 5.3 of admission on average. As shown in Figure 1, It was clear from the results of the audit that the implementation of a formal protocol has Improved bowel care and decreased constipation.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

THE PROTOCOL

The protocol (Figure 2) is for use with adult intensive care patients only. The following conditions are applied to its use:

* All patients commenced on enteral feeding to be commenced on bowel protocol unless contra-indicated.

* Protocol to be commenced on ICI medical officer's order.

* Certain patients are excluded from the protocol, for example, those with ileus or post-abdominal (gut) surgery.

* Night staff document on the patient's chart at midnight which day of the protocol the patient is on.

* All bowel activity/inactivity is documented every shift, stating quantity and description, for example, "large, semi-formed" or "small amount, loose, approximately 100 mL."

* Diarrhoea Is defined as three or more liquid/unformed stools per day or daily output exceeding 300 mL

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Diarrhoea management

If the patient has diarrhoea, the following actions are implemented:

* Stop aperients and document

* Do not automatically stop feeding

* Cause of diarrhoea to be considered and patient to be reviewed by medical officer, dietician, and pharmacist

* Stool specimen collected to check for Clostridium difficile

* Rectal examination performed to exclude overflow

* Night staff to assess daily at midnight; when patient has not had bowels open for 24 hours recommence on day 1 of protocol

REFERENCES

Bayliss V, Salter L (2004). Pathways for evidence based continence care. Nursing Standard 19 (9), 45-51.

McKenna S, Wallis M, Brannelly A, Cawood J (2001). The nursing management of diarrhoea and constipation before and after the implementation of a bowel management protocol. Australian Critical Care 14(1), 10-16.

Patel S (2010). Achieving quality assurance through clinical audit. Nursing Management-UK 17 (3), 28-35.

Ross H (1998). Constipation: cause and control in a hospital setting. British Journal of Nursing 7 (15), 907-913.

Van der Spoel Jl, Schulz MJ, van der Voort PJH (2006). Influence of severity of illness, medication and selective decontamination on defecation. Intensive Care Medicine 32 (6), 875-880.

Michelle Ring RN; DIPHE (Adult), BSc Critical Care, Clinical Nurse, ICU, Mater Adult Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia

E-mail: michetle.ring@mater.org.au
COPYRIGHT 2011 Connect Healthcare Publishing Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CLINICAL CONNECTIONS
Author:Ring, Michelle
Publication:Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing
Article Type:Report
Date:Mar 22, 2011
Words:1028
Previous Article:Walking with ventilated intensive care patients/Caminar con pacientes ventilados en cuidado intensivo.
Next Article:Assessing the safety and teamwork climate of intensive care staff/Valorando la seguridad y el clima de trabajo en equipo del plantel de cuidado...
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters